
Signature
============================================================================
==================
Due to an excessive amount of spam, if you want to send me an e-mail put
eniplA in the subject if you want me to see it.
============================================================================
==================
no, but the reference to the hatched area on the dipstick is a reference to
"correct level"
I am just amazed that in all the references and messages on this topic,
nobody mentioned the "vent line" before... most previous statements were
to the effect that overfilling could cause foaming and tranny failure...
Not to mention the nastiness of overflowing in such a way as to coat the
underside of the vehicle! More bad design... why not an overflow
reservoir to prevent that? Radiators do a nice job of overflow and then
later fluid recovery... why can't a tranny be designed that way? Sure
beats trying to guess what a dipstick reading is...
> Considering the fact that the title of this thread is "Possible tranny
> problem after service?" and the only two questions the OP asked were: "Has
> it blown a seal? What should I check for?", there is no indication that the
> OP was asking "how to determine the correct tranny fluid level.. sheesh..."
============================================================================
> ==================
> Due to an excessive amount of spam, if you want to send me an e-mail put
> eniplA in the subject if you want me to see it.
============================================================================
> ==================
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> > by
> > > the big puddle under your vehicle.
============================================================================
> > > ==================
> > > Due to an excessive amount of spam, if you want to send me an e-mail put
> > > eniplA in the subject if you want me to see it.
============================================================================
> > > ==================
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> > > >
> > > > Jack
Bill Funk - 27 May 2004 00:03 GMT
>no, but the reference to the hatched area on the dipstick is a reference to
>"correct level"
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>later fluid recovery... why can't a tranny be designed that way? Sure
>beats trying to guess what a dipstick reading is...
The reason a tranny won't have an overflow bottle like the cooling
system does is because the tranny is an open-to-the-air system, while
the cooling system is a closed system.
Any overflow from a tranny would stay in the overflow bottle, and
never be sucked back into the tranny.
In theory, the vent line is just that; not an overflow. If it
overflows, there's something fairly wrong, and a bottle would hide
that.

Signature
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
Fred W. - 27 May 2004 20:21 GMT
> no, but the reference to the hatched area on the dipstick is a reference to
> "correct level"
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> underside of the vehicle! More bad design... why not an overflow
> reservoir to prevent that?
Bad design? Not really. Why not just put the right amount of fluid in it
and then it won't overflow? Otherwise, we'd want to put an overflow tank on
the engine crankcase too? And how about that windshield washer bottle or
brake fluid reservoir?
> Radiators do a nice job of overflow and then
> later fluid recovery... why can't a tranny be designed that way? Sure
> beats trying to guess what a dipstick reading is...
Reading a dipstick is not exactly rocket science... Even high school
drop-outs seem quite capable of performing this amazing feat at the local
gas station. ;-)
A radiator is made with overflow because there is expected fluid expansion
in an entirely fluid filled enclosure. The fluid needs somewhere to go. An
auto transmission (or engine crankcase for that matter) is nowhere near full
and has plenty of headspace to takeup the expansion when the fluid gets
warm.
-Fred W
Bill Jeffrey - 28 May 2004 14:27 GMT
Of course the 5R55W transmission on the 02 Explorer doesn't even HAVE a
dipstick. Is that "bad design"? I dunno, but I can't say I'm too
enthusiastic. I'd like to check the level occasionally, and I'd like to
look at the color of the fluid, too, without sliding my body under the
vehicle.
Bill Jeffrey
=======================
> Bad design? Not really. Why not just put the right amount of fluid in it
> and then it won't overflow? Otherwise, we'd want to put an overflow tank on
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> -Fred W