 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / Ford / Ford Explorer / November 20044.0 SOHC Tranny oil change 50KKm or 250Kkm?
Ford's "Scheduled Maintenance Service Guide" indicates that for 1996 to 2004 the explorer 4.0 only needs "transmission service" every 250Kkm! That's about 155,000 miles! It goes on to list a nunmer if transmissions and vehicles which do require fluid change at 50Kkm. Guess what wasn't there. No indication of the explorer 4.0! So my question.....Where is it written that I should have this service done every 50Kkm? I'm all for maintenance but I don't change my motor oil every 1000 Kkm which is the same 1/5 the schedule as 50K is to 250K. My Ford dealer said that this was a misprint. Ford, misprint? What gives? Is the dealer trying to pull one over on me? I don't know about those before, but the 2002's and later are rated 150,000 miles on the auto transmission fluid change interval for non-severe service. My dealer tried to sell me a trans flush at 30,000 miles for the 2002. I think thats overkill for the way I drive. I'll reconsider at a later date. It may be surprising as to what may or may not be considered "severe service". While I currently have reservations about 'flushing', when it comes to a fluid exchange with a filter change..... sooner is much better than too late - (oops, I think I meant later). Yes, I will try and sell service operations..... if I didn't believe that they would reduce your overall cost per mile, I wouldn't bother. There are only so many customers to be had... giving them good service for dollar spent keeps them coming back. Sad to say, some of my biggest problem customers are the ones that try to guide the diagnostic and maintenance procedures. Early and/or repeat failures in the name of economy aren't economical. Personally, I treat each customers vehicle as my own.... "What would I do if this were mine???". Bear in mind that I turn my family loose in my vehicles and do not think that breakdown calls are fun. Of course, I can understand your reticence at some points since you Yanks are ever so busy trying to bend each other over the desk....... riveSpy" <drivespy@aol.com> wrote in message news:20041116230037.11419.00000776@mb-m29.aol.com... >I don't know about those before, but the 2002's and later are rated 150,000 > miles on the auto transmission fluid change interval for non-severe > service. > My dealer tried to sell me a trans flush at 30,000 miles for the 2002. I > think > thats overkill for the way I drive. I'll reconsider at a later date. Which brings me to a couple of questions for you, Jim. My '92 EB has suddenly taken to having the "Check Engine" light come on. This vehicle has also taken to vibrating a little on acceleration, then smoothing out about 35 - 40 mph. Since I have already changed the oil, filter ( air and oil ), the antifreeze, lubed 1000 miles ago, transmission replaced 11 months ago, what is causing my frustration? -- John | It may be surprising as to what may or may not be considered "severe | service". While I currently have reservations about 'flushing', when it [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] | > think | > thats overkill for the way I drive. I'll reconsider at a later date. Honestly, without knowing what the CEL is trying to tell us, we are just shooting into the dark. We need to know the codes and the exact circumstances to decide if the CEL and the vibration are connected or exclusive to each other. The modern automobile has become so complicated that it is difficult to decide which rout to follow in our diagnosis. Certainly, there are "pattern" failures that are extremely predictable.... in symptom and in codes retrieved. In other cases we have to decide f the code is the cause of the problem or a symptom of the problem. At this time I can only suggest having the codes read, making a note of them and clearing them. When the problem recurs, have the codes read ASAP to see which came back first. The computer on your desk is nowhere near as complicated as the computer you drive to work each day.... > Which brings me to a couple of questions for you, Jim. > [quoted text clipped - 47 lines] > | > think > | > thats overkill for the way I drive. I'll reconsider at a later date. Actually, auto computers aren't all that bad to work on, but it would sure help to read the codes. I was hoping you could tell me because my Chilton and Haynes manuals tell me nothing except what the codes mean....and I don't have a OBD I readers. I don't even know where to get one or how much it will run me. The fun part is that the light is an intermittent thing, so no pattern I can see to it. The vibration is only when rapidly accelerating. If I ease into it it doesn't happen. | Honestly, without knowing what the CEL is trying to tell us, we are just | shooting into the dark. We need to know the codes and the exact [quoted text clipped - 63 lines] | > | > think | > | > thats overkill for the way I drive. I'll reconsider at a later date. JC Whitney or most auto parts places can sell you the appropriate reader. Paul > Actually, auto computers aren't all that bad to work on, but it would > sure help to read the codes. I was hoping you could tell me because my [quoted text clipped - 91 lines] > | > | > thats overkill for the way I drive. I'll reconsider at a later > date. I'm not sure if the 2002 is any different than my 2001 Sport SOHC, but why the two storys directly from Ford, and which one is correct? Is it because it is not quite as cut and dry as numbers on a page? Does the concern Ford mechanic know something which the corporation doesn't want to admit? Or it is that being up to your elbows in engine and transmissions for years you soon relize what works regardless of what is reccomended. As for "severe service", well, if driving in Canadain summers/winters, 20 miles Hw/day, tow my 2500# boat 60 miles twice a year, then I can't emagine what light duty would be. Am I wrong? Jim, with your experience, would you agree that I should get this service done? you know, second opinions and all... > It may be surprising as to what may or may not be considered "severe > service". While I currently have reservations about 'flushing', when it [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > Of course, I can understand your reticence at some points since you Yanks > are ever so busy trying to bend each other over the desk....... I would go with the service sans chemicals..... expect anywhere up to near 20 litres of Mercon V for a good job (inclding filter change). The mere mention of towing puts you into the realm of "severe service". Add in our cold climate and we are pushing the envelope. One reason for regular service (likely the main reason) is the sheer cost of repairing or replacing. Back in the day of the old PowerGlide, C4, FMX and so on, transmission replacement was injurious to the pocketbook.... but certainly not on the scale of their modern counterparts. Technology s exacting a high price on our wallets. Unlike older units which were generally "overbuilt", the bean counters and engineers have goten together and are designing the cheapest, lightest design to handle expected loads and still perform the functions required. > I'm not sure if the 2002 is any different than my 2001 Sport SOHC, but > why the two storys directly from Ford, and which one is correct? Is it [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > with your experience, would you agree that I should get this service > done? you know, second opinions and all... |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.