Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Explorer / August 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Replace all tires for a flat one?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Ocean - 02 Dec 2004 22:08 GMT
My tire (rear/passenger side) got flat and the dealer told me it can't
be fixed for a safty reason. That's ok.  However, he asked me to
replace all tires in order to tune ABS and so forth cause it is 4WD(I
know only a little about car). BTW, the car is a 2003 XLT. I bought
this car last year and it is only less than 15K miles so far.  Is that
a reasonable solution? I appreciate your suggestions!
Searcher - 02 Dec 2004 22:30 GMT
He is just trying to sell you tires! The ABS system is not going to be
affected by the mere 1/4 of tread gain on one tire. YOu have 4 ABS sensors
each one working independently of the other. I don't know what tires you
have now or the condition of such. But on my Explorer I have BF G's All
terrain TA's the ones in the front right now, have 13/32 of tread the back
have 15/32 tread yes they are only about 6 months old. So, is your dealer
going to tell me that my ABS is out of tune because of 2/32 o tread
difference. If he did I would get it in writing then take them to the better
business. If your tires are down to less than 3/32 of tread depth then you
should replace all of them. He may have said that it can't be fixed for
saftey reasons because as a general rule most tire facilities will not
repair a tire that is less than 3/32 of tread depth or the hole is within
3/4 of a sidewall.
I hope this helps, But please don't beleive the ABS crap, thats a sales
tactic meant to worry you into new tires. Much like telling a woman (my
wife) that her brakes are wearing down. I looked at the brake pads to find
over half of the of pad left, they were fine. But it was said in order to
"SELL THE SAFTEY" issue.

Searcher1

> My tire (rear/passenger side) got flat and the dealer told me it can't
> be fixed for a safty reason. That's ok.  However, he asked me to
> replace all tires in order to tune ABS and so forth cause it is 4WD(I
> know only a little about car). BTW, the car is a 2003 XLT. I bought
> this car last year and it is only less than 15K miles so far.  Is that
> a reasonable solution? I appreciate your suggestions!
Dr. Rastis Fafoofnik - 03 Dec 2004 16:43 GMT
> My tire (rear/passenger side) got flat and the dealer told me it can't
> be fixed for a safty reason. That's ok.  However, he asked me to
> replace all tires in order to tune ABS and so forth cause it is 4WD(I
> know only a little about car). BTW, the car is a 2003 XLT. I bought
> this car last year and it is only less than 15K miles so far.  Is that
> a reasonable solution? I appreciate your suggestions!

Your dealer is an "a.shole" Find a good/honest tire store and talk with
them. Most of them will tell you what can/can't be safely repaired.
I only go back to the dealer for factory recalls or defects.
Janet - 04 Dec 2004 21:51 GMT
> > My tire (rear/passenger side) got flat and the dealer told me it can't
> > be fixed for a safty reason. That's ok.  However, he asked me to
> > replace all tires in order to tune ABS and so forth cause it is 4WD(I
> > know only a little about car). BTW, the car is a 2003 XLT. I bought
> > this car last year and it is only less than 15K miles so far.  Is that
> > a reasonable solution? I appreciate your suggestions!

What I would do is buy a new tire to match, take the spare which should
be new and put that on. This way you have two new tires on the same
axle. Then I use the other that had 15k on it for the spare.

Janet
Capt Retardo and the Skidmarks - 05 Dec 2004 19:13 GMT
Previously in rec.autos.makers.ford.explorer, Janet
<maliu@ilhawaii.net>  proclaimed :

>> > My tire (rear/passenger side) got flat and the dealer told me it can't
>> > be fixed for a safty reason. That's ok.  However, he asked me to
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>Janet

unfortunately, the dealer is correct.  In a 4wd system, *all* tires
must be replaced.  The uneven tread depth that a new tire would
can really mess up your 4x4 drive train.

If you never put the vehicle in 4x4 then it isn't an issue.

__________________________________________________________________________

People are more violently opposed to fur than leather because it's
safer to harass rich women than motorcycle gangs.
-Unknown
__________________________________________________________________________
Remove "die spammers" to email
Big Bill - 06 Dec 2004 05:38 GMT
>Previously in rec.autos.makers.ford.explorer, Janet
><maliu@ilhawaii.net>  proclaimed :
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
>If you never put the vehicle in 4x4 then it isn't an issue.

Nope.
The differential will take up any such minor differences in tire
circunference.
And since 4x4 should only be used when the tires can slip anyway,
that's *really* not true.

Signature

Bill Funk
Change "g" to "a"

Capt Retardo and the Skidmarks - 07 Dec 2004 00:19 GMT
Previously in rec.autos.makers.ford.explorer, Big Bill
<bill@pipping.com>  proclaimed :

>>Previously in rec.autos.makers.ford.explorer, Janet
>><maliu@ilhawaii.net>  proclaimed :
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>And since 4x4 should only be used when the tires can slip anyway,
>that's *really* not true.

this took all of 2 minutes to find.  There's dozens of resources out
there that say the same thing:

http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tiretech/general/matchingtires.jsp

__________________________________________________________________________

People are more violently opposed to fur than leather because it's
safer to harass rich women than motorcycle gangs.
-Unknown
__________________________________________________________________________
Remove "die spammers" to email
Fred W - 07 Dec 2004 18:20 GMT
> this took all of 2 minutes to find.  There's dozens of resources out
> there that say the same thing:
>
> http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tiretech/general/matchingtires.jsp

That's an interesting article but I fail to understand the actual theory
behind their claim:

"As an example of different tire diameters resulting from tires worn to
different tread depths,..."
"While the difference of 1/8" in overall diameter doesn't seem
excessive, the resulting 4 revolutions per mile difference can place a
continuous strain on the tires and vehicle's driveline. Obviously, the
greater the difference in the tires' circumferences, the greater the
resulting strain"

In the above example, the difference in rotation at 60mph would amount
to 4 rpm.  If you have 4WD then the the front axle is disconnected from
the driveline on the roadway anyway.  If you have AWD then the transfer
case is viscous coupled, which allows slippage between the front and
rear axles. So difference in wear between front and rear axles is
insignificant.

If you have open diffs then the amount of difference in rotational speed
between wheels on teh ame axle is also of no consequence.  Even if you
have limited slip diffs, slippage between two wheels on the same axle at
4 rpm is hardly anything compared to the amount of slippage that occurs
normally when steering.   I cannot see where this would put undue
"strain" on anything.

Obviously if you put a different sized tire on, or a different
manufacturer the differences in circumference wiould be magnified and at
some point *could* be significant.

It sounds to me like this theory is in the best interest of tire
merchants or services that perform "shaving" to match the diameters.

I'd be interested in some hard evidence that shows a cause and effect
relationship of worn driveline parts and slightly mismatched tires such
as what one would expect from wear.

-Fred W
Big Shoe - 07 Dec 2004 20:06 GMT
Thanks for posting this link, very interesting article.  Also explains
why Ford recommends rotating tires so often.

>> this took all of 2 minutes to find.  There's dozens of resources out
>> there that say the same thing:
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>
>-Fred W
Capt Retardo and the Skidmarks - 08 Dec 2004 03:50 GMT
Previously in rec.autos.makers.ford.explorer, Fred W
<Fred.Wills@SPAMmyrealbox.com>  proclaimed :

>> this took all of 2 minutes to find.  There's dozens of resources out
>> there that say the same thing:
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>That's an interesting article but I fail to understand the actual theory
>behind their claim:

<snip good comments>

>It sounds to me like this theory is in the best interest of tire
>merchants or services that perform "shaving" to match the diameters.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>-Fred W

It shouldn't  take much time to do some searching on the net to
substantiate the link I posted.  I *do* know that I've been told by
more than one reputable technician (one of which is Pat Goss, who
hosts Goss' Garage radio show and has a segment on Motor Week),
that he *most definitely* would NOT recommend a new tire replacement
on a 4x4 unless the other three tires are almost new.  He has
absolutely no interest in selling tires btw.

__________________________________________________________________________

People are more violently opposed to fur than leather because it's
safer to harass rich women than motorcycle gangs.
-Unknown
__________________________________________________________________________
Remove "die spammers" to email
DriveSpy - 08 Dec 2004 04:17 GMT
So 4 RPM on one tire results in 2 RPM increase on the driveshaft for that end
of the car.  Is Control Trac so sensitive that it would trigger on a 2 rpm
difference?  Especially a difference that was present for a sustained amount of
time.  It would seem Ford would have to allow for long term differences in RPM
from front to back.  Engine computer does something similar with long term fuel
trim doesn't it?
Big Bill - 09 Dec 2004 03:47 GMT
>Previously in rec.autos.makers.ford.explorer, Big Bill
><bill@pipping.com>  proclaimed :
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
>http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tiretech/general/matchingtires.jsp

Hmmm...
I wonder what those differentials are there for?
Tirerack, in case eyou missed it, sells tires. You don't think thety
may have an ulterior motive, do you? Nah, couldn't be.

Differentials are there for just such a purpose.
We hardly ever drrive in a straight line, even on straight stretches
of road. Check your own steereing wheel as you drive; it's constantly
moving, making small adjustments, which makes the car turn. This makes
the tires take different tracks, making them turn at different rates.
That's why the differentials are there.

4X4 should not be used when the tires can't slip.
Even lockers (which, BTW, lock not when power is applied, but when
there's slippage betweent the tires on the same end).
Signature

Bill Funk
Change "g" to "a"

Frank Berger - 23 Apr 2006 17:36 GMT
>> > My tire (rear/passenger side) got flat and the dealer told me it can't
>> > be fixed for a safty reason. That's ok.  However, he asked me to
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Janet
Sam - 24 Apr 2006 02:23 GMT
You are being lied to and taken advantage of.  There is another
solution to your problem.

The ONLY reason I could see what the "dealer" is saying is if the
other tires were worn and needed to be replaced anyway..but that is
because it would make since to buy 4 new tires instead of buying one
new and having 3 badly worn others.

Is this the ford dealership or a tire dealer?  What town are you in?
If you have the spare still on shop around Monday..find a friend you
trust to help you make your decision.

Thanks,

Sam in Raleigh.

>>> > My tire (rear/passenger side) got flat and the dealer told me it can't
>>> > be fixed for a safty reason. That's ok.  However, he asked me to
>>> > replace all tires in order to tune ABS and so forth cause it is 4WD(I
>>> > know only a little about car). BTW, the car is a 2003 XLT. I bought
>>> > this car last year and it is only less than 15K miles so far.  Is that
>>> > a reasonable solution? I appreciate your suggestions!
Big Shoe - 24 Apr 2006 14:27 GMT
Check the owner's manual for information about this.  Some of the
newer vehicles require that the tires all be the same diameter in
order for the traction and stability control systems to work properly.
My understanding is that a different size tire can be interpreted as
wheel spin, causing 4WD to partially engage all the time.

>You are being lied to and taken advantage of.  There is another
>solution to your problem.
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>>>> > this car last year and it is only less than 15K miles so far.  Is that
>>>> > a reasonable solution? I appreciate your suggestions!
The Model Hobbit - 25 Apr 2006 05:08 GMT
All vehicles with computer controlled AWD must have all tires replaced at
the same time. As discussed before, the newer tire will have a greater
diameter and circumference and will in turn spin at a lesser rate than the
other three tires. Greater diameter means less revs per mile. This will be
interpreted as wheel spin by the computer and will engage the differentials.
This will burn out the clutches in the diffs.

There have been  a lot of vehicles coming in for service that requires the
replacement of the differentials. This is due to the computer keeping them
engaged all the time and burning them out. This is why they are telling you
to replace all four tires. He will note this in your maintenance log in the
computer. If the vehicle comes in at a later date with burned out clutches
in the diffs then they can and will deny you warranty coverage because it
was not caused by normal wear and tear. You were advised and then failed to
take the advice of the service technician.

I have read all these horror stories on the Audi and VW forums. The Quattro
AWD system has a service note in the manual informing the owner of this.
Jake B. - 28 Jul 2006 01:45 GMT
The Quattro system isn't computer controlled. I've been working for VW/Audi
and owned various Quattros throughout the past 20 years and still do. I have
never heard of any differential clutch damage in a Quattro. In fact it would
be a remarkable incident, since the Quattro differentials don't have a
clutch. A clutch is only used in non full time 4WD's. The VW Syncro system
works with a visco-clutch, a system that can't be compared to control trac
anyway. There are way too many Volkswagens around here, which have different
wheel dimensions on the front and rear axle that this damage theory could
hold.

Beside, I spent much time in German Quattro forums and never read one single
"horror story" like this...

> All vehicles with computer controlled AWD must have all tires replaced at
> the same time. As discussed before, the newer tire will have a greater
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Quattro AWD system has a service note in the manual informing the owner of
> this.
Captain Coleman - 02 Aug 2006 21:13 GMT
If you look at tirerack.com they actually offer a "tire shaving service."
Check out:
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tiretech/techpage.jsp?techid=18

> All vehicles with computer controlled AWD must have all tires replaced at
> the same time. As discussed before, the newer tire will have a greater
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Quattro AWD system has a service note in the manual informing the owner of
> this.
Big Shoe - 02 Aug 2006 22:50 GMT
Interesting article, makes sense to me.

>If you look at tirerack.com they actually offer a "tire shaving service."
>Check out:
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>> Quattro AWD system has a service note in the manual informing the owner of
>> this.
Hairy - 05 Dec 2004 20:15 GMT
> My tire (rear/passenger side) got flat and the dealer told me it can't
> be fixed for a safty reason. That's ok.  However, he asked me to
> replace all tires in order to tune ABS and so forth cause it is 4WD(I
> know only a little about car). BTW, the car is a 2003 XLT. I bought
> this car last year and it is only less than 15K miles so far.  Is that
> a reasonable solution? I appreciate your suggestions!

We had a similar situation on our Sport Trac at about 20000 miles. The
dealer suggested putting the new spare on in place of the cut tire. (Tire
was cut, but not clear through).
That's what we did and have had no problems with ABS or 4wd.
I think your dealer just wants to sell tires.
H
yahoo@yahoo.com - 05 Dec 2004 21:23 GMT
Absolute claptrap. Get yourself a new and HONEST dealer. It doesnot
work that way....
351CJ - 05 Dec 2004 23:28 GMT
> My tire (rear/passenger side) got flat and the dealer told me it can't
> be fixed for a safty reason. That's ok.  However, he asked me to
> replace all tires in order to tune ABS and so forth cause it is 4WD(I
> know only a little about car). BTW, the car is a 2003 XLT. I bought
> this car last year and it is only less than 15K miles so far.  Is that
> a reasonable solution? I appreciate your suggestions!

If you have a locking rear end, you should have the same sized and brand of
tires with similar tread wear on both sides.  Because, different sized tires
will greatly increase the wear and tear on your locking assembly (clutches)
because the tires are unable to spin at the same rate.

If you have a 4x4 It is great practice to keep the same sized and brand of
tires with similar tread wear on all 4 corners.  I always do, But unless it
is full time 4x4, or you are in the habit of running around in four wheel
drive on dry pavement, it really is not that critical as long as the new
tire is the same sized and brand as the other 3.  If you have the locking
rear end, make sure you have two "matching" on the rear axel.

I have owned and driven 4x4 Ford trucks and Bronco's for 25 years.  I always
replace my tires in sets of 4, (the newest truck will be sets of 6 :-0) the
only time I have lost a tire to a catastrophic failure and have not had all
4 tires last the life of the set, was when I punched 2 separate sidewalls on
two consecutive weekends on a fairly new set of tires.  These tires were
purchased from Les Schwab tires, a regional North West dealer who has
offered full on and off road, unlimited warranty which covers sidewall
punctures since I have been driving, they replaced both for free.

If you are not running around on dry pavement in four wheel drive, have the
single new tire of the same brand and size put on the front and you will be
fine.

Good Luck
Big Bill - 06 Dec 2004 05:44 GMT
>> My tire (rear/passenger side) got flat and the dealer told me it can't
>> be fixed for a safty reason. That's ok.  However, he asked me to
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>will greatly increase the wear and tear on your locking assembly (clutches)
>because the tires are unable to spin at the same rate.

A locking rear end should not be locked unless traction is poor enough
to allow the tires to slip. This means that even with the diff locked,
a minor difference in tire circumference won't matter.

>If you have a 4x4 It is great practice to keep the same sized and brand of
>tires with similar tread wear on all 4 corners.  I always do, But unless it
>is full time 4x4, or you are in the habit of running around in four wheel
>drive on dry pavement, it really is not that critical as long as the new
>tire is the same sized and brand as the other 3.  If you have the locking
>rear end, make sure you have two "matching" on the rear axel.

Yes, same brand and size. But tire size is nominal; small differences
occur within the same model.
Ever see race teams measure their tires with an eye to placing the
different sizes on different corners to improve handling? And these
are racing tires; hand made, to be as uniform as possible. Tires
bought 'off the rack', so to speak, are not identical.
See above for the locking rear end thing.

>I have owned and driven 4x4 Ford trucks and Bronco's for 25 years.  I always
>replace my tires in sets of 4, (the newest truck will be sets of 6 :-0) the
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>single new tire of the same brand and size put on the front and you will be
>fine.

Why would anyone run around in four wheel drive on dry pavement?
25 years?
Not to sound like I'm making fun of you, but your post does not
reflect the experience of four-wheeling for 25 years.

>Good Luck

Signature

Bill Funk
Change "g" to "a"

351CJ - 06 Dec 2004 06:52 GMT
> >> My tire (rear/passenger side) got flat and the dealer told me it can't
> >> be fixed for a safty reason. That's ok.  However, he asked me to
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> to allow the tires to slip. This means that even with the diff locked,
> a minor difference in tire circumference won't matter.

BULLSHIT!
Obviously you have Zero experience with locking rearends. They lock
according to the TORQUE being applied to them. They have ZERO input as to
the condition of the traction!!! You stomp the gas both axels are locked and
driven, regardless of traction conditions. DUH!

I currently have Four 4x4's and 3 cars that have locking rearends. I have
rebuilt and set up more rearends then you have owned in your lifetime. I
have worn out, twisted 31 spine axels, stripped the axel splines off and
even grenaded a couple Ford 9 inch rearends. I have a thorough understanding
of the design and function from the inside out.

If you are going to correct someone you really ought to understand what the
hell you are talking about...

> >If you have a 4x4 It is great practice to keep the same sized and brand of
> >tires with similar tread wear on all 4 corners.  I always do, But unless it
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> Why would anyone run around in four wheel drive on dry pavement?
> 25 years?

Duh!  I don't, know, maybe they are driving a FULL-TIME 4x4, or who knows,
but my point was, since the vast majority of 4x4's never drive around in
four wheel drive on dry pavement, there would be no issues...  Do you just
generally have trouble with reading comprehension?

> Not to sound like I'm making fun of you, but your post does not
> reflect the experience of four-wheeling for 25 years.

Your comments reflect embarrassing mechanical & reading comprehension...  No
number of years is likely to correct that...

> >Good Luck
>
> --
> Bill Funk
> Change "g" to "a"
Searcher - 06 Dec 2004 12:30 GMT
>> >> My tire (rear/passenger side) got flat and the dealer told me it can't
>> >> be fixed for a safty reason. That's ok.  However, he asked me to
[quoted text clipped - 92 lines]
>> Bill Funk
>> Change "g" to "a"
Searcher - 06 Dec 2004 12:30 GMT
>> >> My tire (rear/passenger side) got flat and the dealer told me it can't
>> >> be fixed for a safty reason. That's ok.  However, he asked me to
[quoted text clipped - 92 lines]
>> Bill Funk
>> Change "g" to "a"
Searcher - 06 Dec 2004 12:35 GMT
No experience with lockers, well I do. And you are wrong sir, the difference
in tread depth is not going to effect the persons OR your lockers to the
point of a problem. Tread depth is 15/32 (NEW BFGAT) after 15000 miles even
these tires are not going to drop to any less than 10/32, So now if you are
telling me that 5/32 of tire difference is going to effect your lockers then
you need to go out and buy you a set of ARB's. THe only  things that should
be of concern are speed rating, tire size, not even brand really makes a hoo
haa.
Searcher1

>> >> My tire (rear/passenger side) got flat and the dealer told me it can't
>> >> be fixed for a safty reason. That's ok.  However, he asked me to
[quoted text clipped - 92 lines]
>> Bill Funk
>> Change "g" to "a"
Big Bill - 06 Dec 2004 16:53 GMT
>> >> My tire (rear/passenger side) got flat and the dealer told me it can't
>> >> be fixed for a safty reason. That's ok.  However, he asked me to
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>the condition of the traction!!! You stomp the gas both axels are locked and
>driven, regardless of traction conditions. DUH!

And, pray tell, on pavement, how much time does your locker spend
locked?
Use a little common sense.

>I currently have Four 4x4's and 3 cars that have locking rearends. I have
>rebuilt and set up more rearends then you have owned in your lifetime. I
[quoted text clipped - 60 lines]
>> Bill Funk
>> Change "g" to "a"

Signature

Bill Funk
Change "g" to "a"

351CJ - 06 Dec 2004 18:19 GMT
> >> >> My tire (rear/passenger side) got flat and the dealer told me it can't
> >> >> be fixed for a safty reason. That's ok.  However, he asked me to
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> locked?
> Use a little common sense.

Generally every time you take off with more then 1/4 throttle...
That for many drivers is every time the start from a stand still.

If you are going to correct someone you really ought to understand what the
hell you are talking about...

> >I currently have Four 4x4's and 3 cars that have locking rearends. I have
> >rebuilt and set up more rearends then you have owned in your lifetime. I
[quoted text clipped - 65 lines]
> Bill Funk
> Change "g" to "a"
Big Bill - 09 Dec 2004 03:49 GMT
>> >> >> My tire (rear/passenger side) got flat and the dealer told me it
>can't
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>Generally every time you take off with more then 1/4 throttle...
>That for many drivers is every time the start from a stand still.

Your tires slip with 1/4 throttle?

>If you are going to correct someone you really ought to understand what the
>hell you are talking about...

Why would the diff need to lock at such low power? Do you oil your
tires?

Signature

Bill Funk
Change "g" to "a"

351CJ - 09 Dec 2004 05:47 GMT
> >> >> >> My tire (rear/passenger side) got flat and the dealer told me it
> >can't
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
> Why would the diff need to lock at such low power? Do you oil your
> tires?

Don't be a blockhead, they do not LOCK from slippage, they lock from
Torque....   Duh!

Stop by I'll demonstrate it to you...

Here I'll repost this since you seam incapable of following the thread.

The most common limited slip differentials found in performance
cars and trucks are of the cone or clutch type.  Many cone or clutch type
differentials use preload springs to help keep some tension on the unit at
all times.  There is torque applied to both axels, not just when there is
slippage.

Limited Slips:
(LSD's) come in a variety of designs. Most use friction plates, cones and/or
gears to reduce slippage between each of the tires. these units have a dual
power path from the differential case to the axle shafts. some power is
transmitted through the spider gears to the side gears in the conventional
manner. The remainder is transmitted by friction between the differential
case and the clutch plates and the side gears. A certain amount of "clutch
preload" is built into the unit in a static condition. Then, as load is
applied to the differential, the separation forces between the spider gears
and the side gears increases this clutch loading. This increase in friction
provides for a good positive power flow from the case directly to the side
gears. When traction is available to both wheels, the power going to the
differential causes the plates to bind tightly together, giving even power
to both wheels. However, in a situation where there is little or no traction
available to either one wheel or the other, the amount of power that can be
transmitted to the other wheel which has traction is dependent on the
friction or "preload" in the clutch plates. High levels of "clutch preload"
will result in good torque transfer but some chattering of the clutches
during cornering may occur. Lower levels of preload results in minimal
chatter but reduced levels of torque transfer to the wheel with traction.
Because LSD's restrict true differential action, tire wear is accelerated.
Changes in vehicle handling may also occur, particularly in short wheelbase
vehicles. Wear rates on limited slip differentials are generally higher than
on other types due to the reliance on friction to reduce wheel slippage.
Also, special lubricants may be required to minimize rough and noisy
operation.

http://www.therangerstation.com/tech_library/LockerComparo.html

I realize your being stuck in this funk may be genetic, pun intended, but
please do try to follow along.

> --
> Bill Funk
> Change "g" to "a"
Big Bill - 09 Dec 2004 15:35 GMT
>> >> >> >> My tire (rear/passenger side) got flat and the dealer told me it
>> >can't
[quoted text clipped - 92 lines]
>I realize your being stuck in this funk may be genetic, pun intended, but
>please do try to follow along.

OK, put on your thinking cap here...
If the diff is locked, how does the diff allow differential speeds
betweent he wheels on turns under power?
Answer: they aren't locked.
So then, how do these things actually work? Answer: they sense the
slippage beyond a preset amount,and then lock. This doesn't happen
under normal accelleration.
Signature

Bill Funk
Change "g" to "a"

AZGuy - 10 Dec 2004 04:27 GMT
>> >> >> My tire (rear/passenger side) got flat and the dealer told me it
>can't
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>Generally every time you take off with more then 1/4 throttle...
>That for many drivers is every time the start from a stand still.

Please explain the mechanism that would cause this.  On pavement, 1/4
throttle won't cause any difference in tire slip between the two
tires.  No differential (between sides) slip =  no lockup in any
"Locking axle" I've driven.  So how do you figure they lock up??

>If you are going to correct someone you really ought to understand what the
>hell you are talking about...
[quoted text clipped - 83 lines]
>> Bill Funk
>> Change "g" to "a"

--
Elbridge Gerry, of Massachusetts:

"What, sir, is the use of militia?  It is to prevent the
establishment of a standing army, the bane of liberty.  . .
Whenever Government means to invade the rights and liberties of
the people, they always attempt to destroy the militia, in order
to raise a standing army upon its ruins."  -- Debate, U.S.  House
of Representatives, August 17, 1789  
351CJ - 07 Dec 2004 07:26 GMT
> >> >> >> My tire (rear/passenger side) got flat and the dealer told me it
> >can't
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
> tires.  No differential (between sides) slip =  no lockup in any
> "Locking axle" I've driven.  So how do you figure they lock up??

Do you have any clue how the clutch pack in a factory ford "locking" rear
end works, or even a conventional mechanical Detroit locker?  Cause you
question doesn't indicate that you do...

Ford sells a Trac-Lok clutch-plate limited slip differential as a locking
differential, although it is not a true locker.  They do not offer a true
locker, you would have to install or have that installed yourself.  So if
you order you truck from Ford with a "locking differential", you really have
a Trac-Lok clutch-plate limited slip differential.

A conventional open differential sends equal amounts of torque to both axle
shafts. If one wheel spins because of lost traction, it is sustaining zero
engine torque, so zero engine torque is also going to the wheel with
traction.  The most common limited slip differentials found in performance
cars and trucks are of the cone or clutch type.  Many cone or clutch type
differentials use preload springs to help keep some tension on the unit at
all times.  There is torque applied to both axels, not just when there is
slippage.

Limited Slips:
(LSD's) come in a variety of designs. Most use friction plates, cones and/or
gears to reduce slippage between each of the tires. these units have a dual
power path from the differential case to the axle shafts. some power is
transmitted through the spider gears to the side gears in the conventional
manner. The remainder is transmitted by friction between the differential
case and the clutch plates and the side gears. A certain amount of "clutch
preload" is built into the unit in a static condition. Then, as load is
applied to the differential, the separation forces between the spider gears
and the side gears increases this clutch loading. This increase in friction
provides for a good positive power flow from the case directly to the side
gears. When traction is available to both wheels, the power going to the
differential causes the plates to bind tightly together, giving even power
to both wheels. However, in a situation where there is little or no traction
available to either one wheel or the other, the amount of power that can be
transmitted to the other wheel which has traction is dependent on the
friction or "preload" in the clutch plates. High levels of "clutch preload"
will result in good torque transfer but some chattering of the clutches
during cornering may occur. Lower levels of preload results in minimal
chatter but reduced levels of torque transfer to the wheel with traction.
Because LSD's restrict true differential action, tire wear is accelerated.
Changes in vehicle handling may also occur, particularly in short wheelbase
vehicles. Wear rates on limited slip differentials are generally higher than
on other types due to the reliance on friction to reduce wheel slippage.
Also, special lubricants may be required to minimize rough and noisy
operation.

http://www.therangerstation.com/tech_library/LockerComparo.html

> >If you are going to correct someone you really ought to understand what the
> >hell you are talking about...
[quoted text clipped - 93 lines]
> to raise a standing army upon its ruins."  -- Debate, U.S.  House
> of Representatives, August 17, 1789
Big Bill - 09 Dec 2004 06:19 GMT
>> >> >> >> My tire (rear/passenger side) got flat and the dealer told me it
>> >can't
[quoted text clipped - 91 lines]
>
>http://www.therangerstation.com/tech_library/LockerComparo.html

But you didn't answer the question.
Why would a 1/4 throttle accelleration cause your tires to slip?
I know I understand how diffs work; I'm just not sure why *your* diffs
lock under 1/4 throttle accelleration on pavement.

Signature

Bill Funk
Change "g" to "a"

351CJ - 09 Dec 2004 06:27 GMT
> >> >> >> >> My tire (rear/passenger side) got flat and the dealer told me it
> >> >can't
[quoted text clipped - 96 lines]
> I know I understand how diffs work; I'm just not sure why *your* diffs
> lock under 1/4 throttle accelleration on pavement.

Just because you have a reading comprehension problem DOES Not mean I don't
know what I am talking about or how to explain it...

Generally every time you take off with more than 1/4 throttle...
That for many drivers is every time the start from a stand still.

The key here is "more than 1/4 throttle".  Duh...

> --
> Bill Funk
> Change "g" to "a"
AZGuy - 09 Dec 2004 06:57 GMT
>> >> >> >> >> My tire (rear/passenger side) got flat and the dealer told me
>it
[quoted text clipped - 129 lines]
>
>The key here is "more than 1/4 throttle".  Duh...

I understand exactly how the different types of differentials work.
You have not explained in anyway why a locking diff would "lock" under
conditions that do not cause one of the wheels to slip relative to the
other. If you can't answer that just say so.  Your saying "..it
locks.." is not an explanation of why you think it locks.  There is
zero reason for it to lock (or for the clutch pack in a LSD to
"engage") under the conditions being discussed, whether at 1/5
throttle or 2/3rds throttle) so I'd like to know what makes you think
it would lock.  I've taken off many times in Chevy's with Eaton
lockers on pavement at full throttle without the diff locking.
Conversely, the same truck on loose gravel might lock at less then
quarter throttle if started on loose gravel while turning.
--
Elbridge Gerry, of Massachusetts:

"What, sir, is the use of militia?  It is to prevent the
establishment of a standing army, the bane of liberty.  . .
Whenever Government means to invade the rights and liberties of
the people, they always attempt to destroy the militia, in order
to raise a standing army upon its ruins."  -- Debate, U.S.  House
of Representatives, August 17, 1789  
351CJ - 09 Dec 2004 08:45 GMT
> >> >> >> >> >> My tire (rear/passenger side) got flat and the dealer told me
> >it
[quoted text clipped - 151 lines]
> to raise a standing army upon its ruins."  -- Debate, U.S.  House
> of Representatives, August 17, 1789

What the hell makes you think it is not locked???
Unless you are spinning one tire on pavement and not the other, at full
throttle without the differential locking, in which case you are describing
that your limited slip differential is not functioning properly.
Just because you are not losing traction (spinning your tire(s)) ABSOLUTELY
DOES NOT INDICATE THAT THE LOCKING MECHANISM IS NOT LOCKED or that you are
not applying power to both axels!!!  On the other hand it may simply be that
you don't have enough power to spin either of your tires on dry pavement,
let alone both of them...

The whole idea is for the locking differential to drive both axels and avoid
one or the other of them from having to slip...

The limited slip information I posted in my other posts was not what I said
it was on a web page I have nothing to do with...
http://www.therangerstation.com/tech_library/LockerComparo.html
in the Limited Slip section, I included the link so you can read it
yourself...

It is real easy for you to check yourself provided you have access to a
working limited slip differential.  If you jack both wheels off the ground
and spin one axel one way the other axel will spin that way too!  As matter
of fact, if you ask a friend to hold one axel while you spin the other they
will not move separately.  this is the no-load no-slippage PRELOAD that is
always being applied.  This connection between the two axels never gets any
less than in that neutral state, unless enough torque is applied to break
the grip of the clutch.  When torque is applied the clutch grips harder yet.

FYI:
If you don't know it, a standard OPEN differential if jacked up and one axel
is spun, the other axel will spin the opposite direction.

If you still can't understand it take a class.
Big Bill - 09 Dec 2004 15:40 GMT
>What the hell makes you think it is not locked???
>Unless you are spinning one tire on pavement and not the other, at full
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
>If you still can't understand it take a class.

I think I see the problem here.
You're assuming the the diff is locked becasue you don't experience
tire spin.
Not true. That's not the way they work. They lock when they sense the
different rates of spin on the different axle shafts. Otherwise, the
diff would remain locked even around turns, which is not a good thing.

Signature

Bill Funk
Change "g" to "a"

AZGuy - 10 Dec 2004 07:28 GMT
>> >> >> >> >> On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 23:28:24 GMT, "351CJ" <351CJ@MSN.com>
>wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 188 lines]
>
>What the hell makes you think it is not locked???

Because I know how they work.  They don't lock when there is no
differential wheel rotation because there is no need to lock.  

>Unless you are spinning one tire on pavement and not the other, at full
>throttle without the differential locking, in which case you are describing
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
>If you still can't understand it take a class.

--
Elbridge Gerry, of Massachusetts:

"What, sir, is the use of militia?  It is to prevent the
establishment of a standing army, the bane of liberty.  . .
Whenever Government means to invade the rights and liberties of
the people, they always attempt to destroy the militia, in order
to raise a standing army upon its ruins."  -- Debate, U.S.  House
of Representatives, August 17, 1789  
Big Bill - 09 Dec 2004 15:37 GMT
>> But you didn't answer the question.
>> Why would a 1/4 throttle accelleration cause your tires to slip?
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>The key here is "more than 1/4 throttle".  Duh...

I have to admit that what you're saying defys my knowledge of how
diffs work, and the nortmal physics of vehicle accelleration.
Why does accelleration of *more than* 1/4 throttle lock the diff?
What's slipping?
Do your vehicles all spin tires at 1/2 throttle accelleration?

Signature

Bill Funk
Change "g" to "a"

351CJ - 10 Dec 2004 00:47 GMT
> >> But you didn't answer the question.
> >> Why would a 1/4 throttle accelleration cause your tires to slip?
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> Bill Funk
> Change "g" to "a"

Yes, my slouchiest is a 3/4 ton 4x4 with a 460 5 speed, and it spins the
tires at far under 1/2 throttle.  All of my Ford cars with Traction Loc's
can spin the tires in all gears, and easily in 1st at well under 1/2
throttle.  Even the wife's Toyota Camry 3.0L 5 speed spins its tires if you
don't try not to...
Big Bill - 10 Dec 2004 03:47 GMT
>> >> But you didn't answer the question.
>> >> Why would a 1/4 throttle accelleration cause your tires to slip?
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>throttle.  Even the wife's Toyota Camry 3.0L 5 speed spins its tires if you
>don't try not to...

That's rather amazing.
I think I now undertstand where you're coming from.
I always tried to keep decent tires on my vehicles so that didn't
happen.
I do think tho that you might want to reconside your thoughts on diff
locks; they lock on a speed differential between the wheels, not on
power. The fact that *your* vehicles spin their tires so easily is not
characteristic of other vehicles.

Signature

Bill Funk
Change "g" to "a"

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.