Maybe I'll have to fool around with the psi's a bit. Other than that, they
do handle well (wet & dry), and coupled with the independant suspension,
which my Exped. didn't have, makes for a nice ride.
Ken
on that note, whats a good overall psi for a 2002 fe when you have
snow on the ground 24/7..usually packed hard. less air, right?
>Maybe I'll have to fool around with the psi's a bit. Other than that, they
>do handle well (wet & dry), and coupled with the independant suspension,
>which my Exped. didn't have, makes for a nice ride.
>
>Ken
Cheers,
-sd
http://www.zoom.sh
Hairy - 15 Dec 2004 02:00 GMT
> on that note, whats a good overall psi for a 2002 fe when you have
> snow on the ground 24/7..usually packed hard. less air, right?
I'd go with Ford's recommendation. Suv's don't do well with underinflated
tires.
H
Big Shoe - 15 Dec 2004 14:14 GMT
One guess here is that your new tires are rated for greater load than
the original tires. On my '05, the load rating is 105, I know some of
the Michelins are rated 109. One change to get the higher rating is
that the sidewalls are stiffer, making for a harder ride. I learned
this when I put LTX M/S tires on my '99 and found out it rode harder.
>> on that note, whats a good overall psi for a 2002 fe when you have
>> snow on the ground 24/7..usually packed hard. less air, right?
>
>I'd go with Ford's recommendation. Suv's don't do well with underinflated
>tires.
>H
Some Dude - 17 Dec 2004 17:54 GMT
figured that much..thanks