Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Explorer / January 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Trouble Code P0420

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Mr. Whatever - 14 Jan 2005 07:12 GMT
My scanner says "System efficiency below threshold"
my Chiltons book says "catalyst efficiency monitor and/or exhaust system
fault" for that code.

Could it be the Oxygen Sensor? I have 70K on this one :(

TIA
Mr. Whatever - 14 Jan 2005 17:22 GMT
> My scanner says "System efficiency below threshold"
> my Chiltons book says "catalyst efficiency monitor and/or exhaust system
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> TIA
Doh... found an archive post that suggests it's probably oxygen sensor.
I forgot to mention I have 96 Explorer 4.0 4WD AT. I see in manual that
there are 4 sensors. Should I replace all 4 if one is bad? TIAA
Mr. Whatever - 28 Jan 2005 15:47 GMT
>> My scanner says "System efficiency below threshold"
>> my Chiltons book says "catalyst efficiency monitor and/or exhaust
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> I forgot to mention I have 96 Explorer 4.0 4WD AT. I see in manual that
> there are 4 sensors. Should I replace all 4 if one is bad? TIAA

Double Doh. Found another post that suggested having the PCM re
calibrated or reset first. Something about the trouble code being stored
in memory. It cost $90 but the trouble code hasnt come back after 200
miles. Seems like an inherent flaw like that should have been paid for
by the factory. Oh well, Kragen said they would take the 02 sensors back.
Paul Scrutton - 28 Jan 2005 23:13 GMT
How many miles did you have on when you did this?

This code came up on mine also. I did do the cat replacement, as my mileage
was high, and I haven't had the
code come on again. I haven't had my PCM recalibrated. Anyone know what
that's all about? Is this a dealer only type thing requiring special
equipment?

Paul

>>> My scanner says "System efficiency below threshold"
>>> my Chiltons book says "catalyst efficiency monitor and/or exhaust system
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> like an inherent flaw like that should have been paid for by the factory.
> Oh well, Kragen said they would take the 02 sensors back.
Mr. Whatever - 30 Jan 2005 21:18 GMT
> How many miles did you have on when you did this?
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Paul

I had 67K+ on it when the trouble code came up. As far as I know only
the dealer can flash/recalibrate/reset the PCM but I'm not certain. I
found the post about the PCM at http://www.ford-trucks.com/forums
Jim Warman - 31 Jan 2005 01:23 GMT
Haven't seen the post on your link. If it is referring to power programmers
and chips, all these do is modify the spark and fuel curves as well as the
rpm limits. They do nothing to the operating strategy that decides when to
set the MIL and send a DTC to memory. In the past, Ford (along with most
other marques) have approached the EPA for permission to alter the fault
determination strategies to reduce the incidence of "nuisance" MILs.

Dealers are the only ones with this sort of programming data. The original
poster would have to go to the dealership and have his car connected to the
WDS to determine if a later flash is available for the car.

> > How many miles did you have on when you did this?
> >
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> the dealer can flash/recalibrate/reset the PCM but I'm not certain. I
> found the post about the PCM at http://www.ford-trucks.com/forums
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.