I understand what you are saying...... and can even almost agree with it. I
would, however, like to see the comparative temperature readings rather than
assuming anything.
Engine rpm also needs to be taken into consideration since any torque
multiplication will increase the heat build up.
>I understand what you are saying...... and can even almost agree with it. I
>would, however, like to see the comparative temperature readings rather than
>assuming anything.
>
>Engine rpm also needs to be taken into consideration since any torque
>multiplication will increase the heat build up.
The drivetrain doesn't change RPMs because the wheels are blocked by a
curb, as opposed to the wheels being blocked by the brakes. It neither
knows or cares *why* the load is present, it just knows the load is
there.
If you're stopped at an idle (as at a red light), the drivetrain
doesn't care if the load is presented by the brakes or a hill, or a
curb, or a dog, or your kid's tricycle. It simply has no mechanism to
know or care, or adjust the RPMs.

Signature
Bill Funk
Change "g" to "a"
Jim Warman - 12 Feb 2005 04:29 GMT
I wont be drawn into a pissing contest... you can have it whichever way you
like it. I will neither suggest nor recommend doing it "this way". It has
been many years since transmissions were "overbuilt" and late model
automatics can re-adjust our spending habits if they require repair. There
is little to be gained in performing a simple task in a "unique" manner...
especially given the human subconcious reaction of pedalling the car to
maintain that grasp on remaining stationary.
You may treat your car however you feel, but I feel I must caution against
recommending these same practices to those with less experience or
knowledge. Any condition that will have a chance of increasing the operating
temp of the transmission should be avoided if possible. When the converter
is slipping, it is generating heat. It is just as easy to burn a
transmission up at 0 mph as it is at 70 mph.
> >I understand what you are saying...... and can even almost agree with it. I
> >would, however, like to see the comparative temperature readings rather than
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> curb, or a dog, or your kid's tricycle. It simply has no mechanism to
> know or care, or adjust the RPMs.