Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Explorer / November 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

99 explorer euro spec, O2 sensor

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
spr - 07 Nov 2005 10:46 GMT
Hi,
My explorer runs like crap when starting in cold weather( i have to apply
'gas' to increase idle speed to keep it running), after it warms up its
fine. when its raining it runs better(almost normal) right from the start.
it's the 4.0L v6 SOHC, 4X4 approx 80k miles.  I had a tune up done by the
local ford dealer; oil change, new plug wires, new plugs. I get a yellow
warning light after driving about 5 min(anytime after driving a few min, I
can idle for 20 min and not get the light). The "dealership" as they call
themselves, can't read the codes, just clear them, so I'm kinda stuck with
guessing. (I'm in Germany, not so many explorers here). I was recommened by
a friend/mechanic as the next low cost item to try is the O2 sensor. Sound
like a good choice? any other ideas? is this a generic part for all
explorers or do I need my vin # to get the right one for my vehicle's
computer?
ross - 08 Nov 2005 00:34 GMT
I would suggest searching the internet and finding a cheap code reader - they
are as low as 28.95 U.S. for a very simple reader - make sure its for Ford.
Then read your codes.  This should help pinpoint your issue - you may just
have a vacuum leak.  It's euro, but I believe it is still obdii.

O2 sensors fail, but its not really that common compared to other issues, so
rather than just parts swapping,  I'd spend a small amopunt of money and try
and diagnose it.  And, you will have the code reader available the next time
your check engine lite goes on.

Many sites have explanations for codes or you can get help here once you know
them.
Happy Traveler - 08 Nov 2005 17:17 GMT
At least in the US, any vehicle from 96 on will require an OBDII code
reader. If you buy anything, make sure that it's for OBDII. I am mentioning
this, because the $28.95 will, to the best of my knowledge, only buy you the
older EECIV 'readers' (consisting of an LED and a pushbutton switch in a
matchbox) - those will not work with OBDII. Prepare to pay at least $80 for
the simplest OBDII reader. Also make sure that it will work with Ford -
there are at least 3 different OBDII protocols.

> I would suggest searching the internet and finding a cheap code reader - they
> are as low as 28.95 U.S. for a very simple reader - make sure its for Ford.
> Then read your codes.  This should help pinpoint your issue - you may just
> have a vacuum leak.  It's euro, but I believe it is still obdii.
Jim Warman - 08 Nov 2005 01:16 GMT
Your concerns sounds very much like the intake gasket pattern failure...
IIRC, it is rare for this concern to illuminate the CEL (if your yellow
light is shaped something like an engine might look or shows "service engine
soon"). There is the chance that the light is responding to a different
problem.  If the shop has a "smoke machine", the intake manifold can be
smoked when it is cold to help check for vacuum leaks.

At any rate, it is vital that the codes be read.... In addition to Ross'
comments, you or your mechanic might look here
http://www.troublecodes.net/technical/scaninfo.shtml this is a pretty
inclusive list. Before making a buying decision, one would need to closely
compare features.

> Hi,
> My explorer runs like crap when starting in cold weather( i have to apply
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> explorers or do I need my vin # to get the right one for my vehicle's
> computer?
Jim Warman - 08 Nov 2005 01:18 GMT
Oops.... forgot the usual "I don't work BatAuto..." speel.... I was even
banned from their technicians forum for being..... ummmmmm, outspoken, I
guess.
spr - 08 Nov 2005 15:51 GMT
> Oops.... forgot the usual "I don't work BatAuto..." speel.... I was even
> banned from their technicians forum for being..... ummmmmm, outspoken, I
> guess.

thanks for the replys, any websites off hand that sell a code reader and
ship US postal service?
ross - 11 Nov 2005 08:53 GMT
>> Oops.... forgot the usual "I don't work BatAuto..." speel.... I was even
>> banned from their technicians forum for being..... ummmmmm, outspoken, I
>> guess.
>
>thanks for the replys, any websites off hand that sell a code reader and
>ship US postal service?

Not sure - you might try ebay to get some ideas - lots of scanners on there,
just make sure its a Ford scanner.

Also, doesn't ebay have a european website?.  That would minimize shipping.
with a little luck.
carbide@egine.com - 08 Nov 2005 17:09 GMT
> If the shop has a "smoke machine", the intake manifold can be
> smoked when it is cold to help check for vacuum leaks.

That's an interesting technique- do you blow smoke into the intake, and
see where it comes out?

Anyone know where the intake manifold tends to leak?  Might help him
find it quicker. I should think you could fix it by applying some RTV
over it while the engine idles. That would pull the RTV into the leaky
area.

-Paul
Jim Warman - 09 Nov 2005 05:22 GMT
Yes... the heart of the machine is a simple smoke generator... Hooked up to
a vaccum port on the manifold, I like to hold the throttle open to expell
all the clear air quickly. When smoke starts coming from the throttle, I let
it close and continue to let the smoke build - this is not harmful to the
motor. Use a halogen spot light to watch for tattletales.

You're kidding about the RTV idea, right????

> > If the shop has a "smoke machine", the intake manifold can be
> > smoked when it is cold to help check for vacuum leaks.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> -Paul
carbide@egine.com - 09 Nov 2005 05:43 GMT
> Yes... the heart of the machine is a simple smoke generator... Hooked up to
> a vaccum port on the manifold, I like to hold the throttle open to expell
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> You're kidding about the RTV idea, right????

No- I fixed a coolant leak once by removing the radiator cap and
holding a vacuum cleaner nozzle against the opening to suck some epoxy
into the area of the leak. It worked.

I would think manifold vacuum would pull some RTV into the place that
leaked. Then shut 'er off and let it cure. Are you thinking it would
pull a lot of RTV in? Since he says it idles OK after it warms up, it
must be a pretty small leak.

Removing the lower intake manifold is no small task. If I could fix it
in a couple of minutes with a little RTV, I'd do it.  
-Paul
Jim Warman - 11 Nov 2005 23:41 GMT
While these sorts of "jerry rig" repairs may seem like an option, they
usually have ramifications. First and foremost is the possibility that
something can "let go" at the most unopportune moment... another being that
subsequent repairs to these areas can be made more expensive than
necessary... let alone that subsequent repairs wouldn't have to be made in
the first place.

If you feel you deserve substandard repairs, more power to you... I would be
hard pressed to recommend anything I didn't trust as a permanent fix. At the
same time, you may want to consider the personality of RTV sealants.... they
tend to "lose their grip" over time if not in an area subject to direct
mechanical pressure.... even then, there have been concerns.

Again... quality is in the eye of the beholder.... for me... I think I
deserve the best I can get and I'm not afraid to adjust the budget to get
it.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.