What kind of tire wear are you getting with your Explorer? I just
replaced the OEM P235/70-16 Michelin Cross Terrains on my 2002 Explorer
and I got 42k miles out of them. They were just approaching the wear
indicators. Amazingly, the tires never had to be re-balanced for the
entire 42k miles and ran true and vibration-free at any speed. All I
did was make sure the tire pressures were correct and rotate them once
in a while. I had no problem buying the same exact tire again.
4.0L
HerkyJerky - 14 Feb 2006 19:17 GMT
I got about 53K on our original set before being replaced with more
Cross Terrains. Sounds like I had the same maintenance and experience
as you. Probably could have been driven another few thousand before
hitting the wear indicators.
D.D. Pallmer - 14 Feb 2006 21:25 GMT
My experience has been that Goodyears were garbage and lasted less than 20K
Pittsburgh miles but Michelins on the same vehicle went over 50K.
Interestingly, the Firestones that got recalled were like new at 25K when
they got recalled. The Goodrich tires on my 2003 Mountaineer (the other
tires were on a '99 Explorer) only last 25000 miles. I am approaching 50K
(on my second set) and will get Michelins this time, even though they are
much more expensive.
> What kind of tire wear are you getting with your Explorer? I just
> replaced the OEM P235/70-16 Michelin Cross Terrains on my 2002 Explorer
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> 4.0L
Searcher - 14 Feb 2006 22:38 GMT
I have 22K on BFgoodrich AtKO's starting tread depth 16 tread depth now 13
Says alot for BFG's , Whenever I buy a vehicle part of the bargin is getting
rid of the Goodyears in exchange for BFG ATKO
Searcher
D.D. Pallmer - 21 Feb 2006 21:23 GMT
On second thought, new BF Goodrich tires are $78 per tire (Tire Rack) or
about $425 "full monty" (four tires) with shipping and nusance fees
including installation. New Michelins are almost $800. Will they last TWICE
as long as the Goodrichs? Probably 35000-40000 miles here in Pittsburgh
(versus 25,000 for Goodrich)...so dollar per mile the Goodrichs seem to be a
better deal after all.
> My experience has been that Goodyears were garbage and lasted less than
> 20K Pittsburgh miles but Michelins on the same vehicle went over 50K.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>>
>> 4.0L
wth - 15 Feb 2006 12:18 GMT
So far, I got 41K on the factory goodyears, with 6-8K still to go on our '02
EB. Also they have never needed to be rebalanced either, just about 3
rotations.
wth
> What kind of tire wear are you getting with your Explorer? I just
> replaced the OEM P235/70-16 Michelin Cross Terrains on my 2002 Explorer
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> 4.0L
D.D. Pallmer - 15 Feb 2006 13:43 GMT
Are you sure you have GOODYEAR and not GOODRICH? I don't think Ford used
Goodyears on the '02s or since. And if you have 41K on Goodrich, wow, you're
doing great. You probably live in a mild climate with not too many hills.
Tires here (Pittsburgh) get torn up all the time.
> So far, I got 41K on the factory goodyears, with 6-8K still to go on our
> '02 EB. Also they have never needed to be rebalanced either, just about 3
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>>
>> 4.0L
Big Shoe - 15 Feb 2006 14:02 GMT
I have 23K on my '05 and the BFG tires are doing well. Don't have a
tread depth gauge, but they look less than half worn. I've gotten
excellent performance from Michelin LTX M/S in the past, over 60K. By
the way, Goodrich is a division of Michelin and I know Michelin has a
lot to say about their operation.
>Are you sure you have GOODYEAR and not GOODRICH? I don't think Ford used
>Goodyears on the '02s or since. And if you have 41K on Goodrich, wow, you're
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>>>
>>> 4.0L
wth - 17 Feb 2006 12:35 GMT
Goodyear Wrangler AP. Vehicle was built in 8/02, on of the last 02's
wth
> Are you sure you have GOODYEAR and not GOODRICH? I don't think Ford used
> Goodyears on the '02s or since. And if you have 41K on Goodrich, wow,
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>>>
>>> 4.0L
Frank Berger - 15 Feb 2006 19:15 GMT
> What kind of tire wear are you getting with your Explorer? I just
> replaced the OEM P235/70-16 Michelin Cross Terrains on my 2002 Explorer
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> 4.0L
My Michelin LTX's look like they will go well over 50K.
stevie - 15 Feb 2006 19:59 GMT
my LTXs went over 65K and still had tread left when I got new ones.
The tires were 'cupping'. Not sure what the cause was. It drove OK, but
had road noise due to cupping.
I replaced shocks (still had originals) and had alignment.
Fortunately, Sears gave me a pretty good credit, so I purchased the same new
LTXtires.
2000 Limited 5.0 2WD
73K miles
most power options
> What kind of tire wear are you getting with your Explorer? I just
> replaced the OEM P235/70-16 Michelin Cross Terrains on my 2002 Explorer
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> 4.0L
My Michelin LTX's look like they will go well over 50K.
Passerby - 24 Feb 2006 23:10 GMT
I replaced my OEM Firestones, with their 75K miles, during the Ford
recall, with Michelin 235/16 LTX M/S. I now have 84K just on this set
of Michelins and they look great. They are rotated every 5K. I will
likely purchase new Michelins next time for my '98 Explorer EB.
Passerby - 24 Feb 2006 23:12 GMT
I replaced my OEM Firestones, with their 75K miles, during the Ford
recall, with Michelin 235/16 LTX M/S. I now have 84K just on this set
of Michelins and they look great. They are rotated every 5K. I will
likely purchase new Michelins next time for my '98 Explorer EB.