Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Explorer / October 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Could someone please explain how tire size destroyed my transfer case?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Michael Horowitz - 13 Oct 2006 22:12 GMT
97 Explorer.
Diagnosed as needing a new transfer case.
Guy took a caliper and measured the diameter of each tire and found
the right front to be about 1/2" smaller than others and declared that
to be the problem that caused the failure. It was worn and needed
replacement.

How did the diameter of one tire cause this problem?

One of the reasons I"m confused is because there have been many times
during the life of this car when the mechanic has warned me that a
tire or two has too much wear and the 'case hasn't failed.
Is the the results of differing tire sizes (due to wear) over a 9 year
period?

He wants to replace all 4 tires, although the other three appear to me
to be in good shape - Mike
Passerby - 20 Oct 2006 01:23 GMT
Mike,

 I had a similar problem in 1998 with my 98 Eddie Bauer.  The spare
was of a smaller circumference than the other three tires.  After about
50 miles of driving, smoke was pouring from the transfer case as was a
good deal of fluid.  After a tow to the Ford dealer and a 30 day
repair, I got my Explorer back.  Since then, I've been much more fussy
about the age and sizes of the tires. The problem has never returned.
 It doesn't take but a little math to realize that when the
circumference of the tires on the same axle differs by even a little
that the cumulative effect that the transfer case sees over distance
traveled adds up fast and may lead to trouble.
 By the way, last month I replaced my Michelin LTX M/S with 84000
miles on them with a whole new set of Michelin LTX M/S.
SWEET!

 Best of luck to you!
carbide@egine.com - 20 Oct 2006 06:52 GMT
> 97 Explorer.
> Diagnosed as needing a new transfer case.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> How did the diameter of one tire cause this problem?

I recently posted this info on how your transfer case works in the
thread about the 1995 Explorer update. Note that you can't select true
2 wheel drive.  If the computer thinks a wheel is slipping, it engages
the transfer case. There is a "brown wire mod" that allows you to stop
the transfer case from engaging in this case. Here's the info:

97-'01 (switch says, 4auto, 4high, 4low)

The '97-'01 model years lack a true 2 wheel drive option. With a live
front axle, there are no significant mileage gains to be had by driving
the rear wheels alone. That being said, some of us simply prefer to
determine when the front wheels should drive and when they shouldn't,
instead of relying on a computer to make that decision for us.

In 4 auto, the GEM monitors the wheel speeds. When it determines that
there is wheel slippage, it sends the signal to the Torque On Demand
relay to actuate the Transfer Case Clutch Coil via the brown wire.
******************

So the computer interpreted the smaller wheel as slippage and engaged
your transfer case on pavement.  The "brown wire mod" would allow you
to defeat that.
-Paul
Bill - 30 Oct 2006 05:02 GMT
Couldn't find your reference to the mod, please provide more info on where
it is posted

Bill

>> 97 Explorer.
>> Diagnosed as needing a new transfer case.
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> to defeat that.
> -Paul
Captain Coleman - 30 Oct 2006 15:30 GMT
>>How did the diameter of one tire cause this problem?

Read the article:
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tiretech/techpage.jsp?techid=18

That should help answer your question.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

carbide@egine.com - 30 Oct 2006 19:03 GMT
> Couldn't find your reference to the mod, please provide more info on where
> it is posted

Here's info  on the "brown wire mod" with pictures for the 1995-1996
Explorers:
http://tinyurl.com/y5hzu9

Here's the "comprehensive brown wire mod" info, covering '95-'96 and
'97-'01 model years:
http://tinyurl.com/ycyp54

Note: not for AWD vehicles.

Why do this mod:

Some of us simply prefer to determine when the front wheels should
drive and when they shouldn't, instead of relying on a computer to make
that decision for us.

Background on the "brown wire mod":
There were three slightly different systems included in the
second-generation Explorers. The All Wheel Drive is a full-time system
and cannot be modified to be full-time four-wheel drive or two-wheel
drive. The second and third systems used in the '95-'96 and '97-'01
model years were both called 'Control Trac 4 Wheel Drive' Both systems
used the (insert model here) transfer case. The '95-'96 used a front
axle equipped with a Center-Axle Disconnect, which was done away with
on the '97 model year in favor of a live axle (and fewer parts to fail
when needed most)

Depending on the operator selection, the transfer cases in both systems
were actuated by one of two GEM-controlled sources: The Torque On
Demand Relay and the Transfer Case Shift Relay. The transfer case
contains a Transfer Case Clutch Coil, which is what locks the front and
rear driveshafts together. Power for the TCCC is fed via a brown wire,
hence the familiar name.

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.