I've been down this highway a few times. The bottom line is that Ford KNOWS
they are going to take a loss on the vehicle with a residual that is 3grand
higher than planned. (I think they even know that when they WRITE the leases
but have no choice to keep the metal moving). That being said, they would
rather take back the vehicle and sell it to one of their dealers at auction
than sell it to you at a discount. Your dealer might buy it at auction or
another might. It's very difficult for you, the consumer, to control how to
get that vehicle back, and you very well might spend close to $3000 more
than market (what you'd pay anyway) to buy it from a dealer who knows you
are "hot" for "that" vehicle. In the end I just turned them in and moved on.
Unfortunately leasing doesn't really make sense unless you plan to continue
leasing every time a lease is up.
On the other hand, if you had paid cash or financed the vehicle, you would
have spent that $3000 upfront and it still would only be worth the paultry
amounts that 13MPG SUVs are now worth (I have an '03 so misery loves
company). So consider yourself 3 grand ahead of the game. I guess I'd say to
buy someone else's used vehicle, because availability and price will be
better than trying to chase your old bug smasher. As one last resort you
MIGHT just tell the dealer you want THAT vehicle and they should buy at
auction for you (and you'll pay a markup). Unfortunately many dealers will
lie about what they bid and, again, you'll be close to the extra 3 grand you
are trying to save.
>I know we have some Ford technicians here that are very helpful, do we have
>any sales members here? My question involves lease end options. I'm not
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>the idea of finding me a similar used one and pushing another lease makes
>me at least wonder. Any thoughts would be appreciated.
Big Shoe - 31 Jan 2007 13:28 GMT
Several years ago I tried to buy a used Explorer that I really liked.
The dealer said it was a lease vehicle that had been turned in and he
had to return it to Ford. He could not sell it to me. Don't know why
Ford does it that way, but that's the way it is.
>I've been down this highway a few times. The bottom line is that Ford KNOWS
>they are going to take a loss on the vehicle with a residual that is 3grand
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>>the idea of finding me a similar used one and pushing another lease makes
>>me at least wonder. Any thoughts would be appreciated.
D.D. Palmer - 31 Jan 2007 20:55 GMT
For what it's worth, GM is the same way. My father wanted to buy a Park
Avenue off lease that was worth 3-4 grand less than the residual. Again,
they told him they'd rather give that price advantage to one of their
dealers because it helps the dealer and many customers will end up leasing a
new GM vehicle. I am sure they have run the numbers and know that they're
ahead of the game by NOT letting the consumer get the benefit of buying a
vehicle at market price (less than a planned residual).
> Several years ago I tried to buy a used Explorer that I really liked.
> The dealer said it was a lease vehicle that had been turned in and he
[quoted text clipped - 56 lines]
>>>the idea of finding me a similar used one and pushing another lease makes
>>>me at least wonder. Any thoughts would be appreciated.
Bob - 31 Jan 2007 23:29 GMT
> I've been down this highway a few times. The bottom line is that Ford KNOWS
> they are going to take a loss on the vehicle with a residual that is 3grand
[quoted text clipped - 79 lines]
>
> You are very knowledgeable regarding leases, I 've always wondered what
the advantage is to a lease vs. a purchase. They are so complicated to
me I can't tell what a good deal is. I only drive about 5000 miles a
year would a lease be good for me? I'd like to drive a new car every 2-3
years.
D.D. Palmer - 01 Feb 2007 00:49 GMT
You could probably get a low mileage lease. It's not that complicated,
really. Just shop the dealers against each other for the lowest cost for 3
years you want the vehicle for. Another approach is to buy a Honda or Toyota
and just trade it in. They retain their value the best. Truthfully, 5000
miles a year is so miniscule that a new car every 3 is VERY costly when you
figure the cost per mile. I get bored with cars too but unless you are
rollin' in the dough I'd recommend keeping the car at least twice as long.
>> I've been down this highway a few times. The bottom line is that Ford
>> KNOWS they are going to take a loss on the vehicle with a residual that
[quoted text clipped - 86 lines]
> I can't tell what a good deal is. I only drive about 5000 miles a year
> would a lease be good for me? I'd like to drive a new car every 2-3 years.
Bob - 01 Feb 2007 22:58 GMT
> You could probably get a low mileage lease. It's not that complicated,
> really. Just shop the dealers against each other for the lowest cost for 3
[quoted text clipped - 195 lines]
>>I can't tell what a good deal is. I only drive about 5000 miles a year
>>would a lease be good for me? I'd like to drive a new car every 2-3 years.
Thanks for the info. I like your idea of buying a Honda or Toyota. It
sure is a big loss to trade in an Explorer every 3 years with only 15000
miles on it.