Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Explorer / May 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Problems with leftovers

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jim Tiberio - 10 May 2007 22:26 GMT
Are there any problems that may be typical with a fairly old left over
vehicle?  I've found a dealer who has two 2005 Mountaineers, both with <100
miles.  They are loaded models and are both priced around $29K.  They are
about $12K less than new and still $3K more than what KBB thinks a true used
one with the same miles is worth.  I'll work on the price but if I do this
what kinds of things should I look for in a vehicle that has been sitting
that long?   Both mechanically and regarding future value?  I should note
that they do in fact come with a new warrantee.  Thanks in advance.
Art McClinton - 11 May 2007 02:36 GMT
Which part of New Orleans did this vehicle come from.

I personally do not have sufficient knowledge to attempt to judge the value
of such a vehicle.  I know that is possible to get a good one, but it also
can be one that is salvaged from a dealers lot that went under water.  I
just remember seeing a local dealer park is over flow next to the creek
which flooded. I am certain all were sold in sales later on.

> Are there any problems that may be typical with a fairly old left over
> vehicle?  I've found a dealer who has two 2005 Mountaineers, both with
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> should note that they do in fact come with a new warrantee.  Thanks in
> advance.
Jim Tiberio - 11 May 2007 04:11 GMT
> Which part of New Orleans did this vehicle come from.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> water.  I just remember seeing a local dealer park is over flow next to
> the creek which flooded. I am certain all were sold in sales later on.

Thanks, that's a damn good point I hadn't considered.  If the insurance
company wasn't involved there is no resaon for this to show up on Carfax.

>> Are there any problems that may be typical with a fairly old left over
>> vehicle?  I've found a dealer who has two 2005 Mountaineers, both with
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>> I should note that they do in fact come with a new warrantee.  Thanks in
>> advance.
Ashton Crusher - 11 May 2007 06:26 GMT
>> Which part of New Orleans did this vehicle come from.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>Thanks, that's a damn good point I hadn't considered.  If the insurance
>company wasn't involved there is no resaon for this to show up on Carfax.

I think it's a federal offense t sell a car that's been in a flood.
And I would think the dealer would have insurance that would cover
such damage but could be wrong.  Plus it seems unlikely the car
manufacturer would not just take back a flooded vehicle rather then
risk a dealer selling it.  OTOH, if it has a new car warranty any
problems from the flood, if there even was one, should certainly show
up during the warranty period.

>>> Are there any problems that may be typical with a fairly old left over
>>> vehicle?  I've found a dealer who has two 2005 Mountaineers, both with
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>>> I should note that they do in fact come with a new warrantee.  Thanks in
>>> advance.
Bill Jeffrey - 11 May 2007 13:58 GMT
> OTOH, if it has a new car warranty any problems from the flood, if
> there even was one, should certainly show up during the warranty
> period.

Would the warranty cover flood damage? I thought they provided coverage
against manufacturer's defects.

Bill
Ashton Crusher - 14 May 2007 03:13 GMT
>> OTOH, if it has a new car warranty any problems from the flood, if
>> there even was one, should certainly show up during the warranty
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>Bill

If they try to deny your warranty claim on the basis of flood damage
don't you think that's the same as them admitting that they broke the
law selling the car to  you in the first place?  If the car has been
sitting with flood damage, which will largely screw up the electrical
stuff, for the past two years, it's unlikely it would run at all at
this point.  If it starts and runs fine it seem really unlikely to me
there is a flood damage issue.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.