Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Explorer / August 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

6 Cyl Economy as bad as 8!

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Daniel David Palmer - 22 Jan 2008 13:21 GMT
I am thinking about buying a new Mountaineer to replace my 2003
Mountaineer. I currently have the V8 that gets...surprise
surprise....13MPG around town and 19 on the road, exactly what the new
"real world" sticker rating estimates on new Mountaineers. I noticed
that the 6 cylinder doesn't get any better mileage. Why is that? Why buy
one? Why does Ford even MAKE one if it can't offer better fuel economy
with the reduced power?
C. E. White - 22 Jan 2008 14:04 GMT
>I am thinking about buying a new Mountaineer to replace my 2003
>Mountaineer. I currently have the V8 that gets...surprise
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>that? Why buy one? Why does Ford even MAKE one if it can't offer
>better fuel economy with the reduced power?

Because they can sell the V6 version for less. There is very little
difference is weight between the V6 and the V8. The driving cycle used
by the EPA has tightly defined acceleration rates and speeds. There is
not much difference in engine efficiency, so there really should not
be much difference in fuel economy. I would expect the V8 to have
better acceleration, and if you take advantage of that, you will get
worse fuel economy.

Ed
trailer - 22 Jan 2008 15:11 GMT
When I purchased my 2000 Explorer new, I opted for the V8.  The economy has
been pretty good, about 13-15 around town and 18-23 on highway.

I guess they discontinued that V8 (5.0), but if I get another new one I
wouldn't hesitate to get the v8.

I am thinking about buying a new Mountaineer to replace my 2003
Mountaineer. I currently have the V8 that gets...surprise
surprise....13MPG around town and 19 on the road, exactly what the new
"real world" sticker rating estimates on new Mountaineers. I noticed
that the 6 cylinder doesn't get any better mileage. Why is that? Why buy
one? Why does Ford even MAKE one if it can't offer better fuel economy
with the reduced power?
taz - 18 Aug 2008 21:08 GMT
Is 2000 a good yr for the Explorer?I would buy newer(used) but what I have
read doesnt sound encouraging.I would also like a v-8..
> When I purchased my 2000 Explorer new, I opted for the V8.  The economy
> has
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> one? Why does Ford even MAKE one if it can't offer better fuel economy
> with the reduced power?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.