After 24 years of rattling away the PCV valve started to lose some of its
sealing when the engine (351c) was idling.
PCV valves are supposed to admit only a small amount of crankcase gases
(mostly air if the engine is in good condition) when manifold vacuum is
greatest ( idle and over-run). Once revs rise under acceleration the vac
drops and the valve is pushed by its spring off its seat and allows much
more crankcase ventilation to occur which is normal.
This original equipment valve was letting too much air in at idle and would
vary causing the engine to intermittantly:: miss at idle on LPG (LPG is
airleak sensitive), cause the brake-booster to not top up vacuum
sufficiently at idle causing lossof assistance in slow moving traffic once
the resevoir had been depleted, introduced a partial miss on cylinders 4 and
8 at idle (this was a prime indication that the PCV valve was faullty), and
make the car hard to start when cold.
One tell-tale sign (apart from all the others) is the engine idling high
especially on petrol and removing the PCV line from the engine while idling
caused little change in idling speed/quality.
A $16 replacement fixed ALL this! $%@#!
Jason
Jason James - 03 Sep 2003 01:11 GMT
Errata:
Last paragraph should read: once the PCV valve is removed from the
rockercover and is sealed off with a rag, the idle would drop revs and
smooth-out. The new valve caused little change in idle speed/quality when
removed.
Jason
> After 24 years of rattling away the PCV valve started to lose some of its
> sealing when the engine (351c) was idling.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Jason
Dave - 03 Sep 2003 01:16 GMT
gotta love those cheap little fixes that make a world of difference
> Errata:
>
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> >
> > Jason
Toby Ponsenby - 03 Sep 2003 01:19 GMT
> After 24 years of rattling away the PCV valve started to lose some of its
> sealing when the engine (351c) was idling.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Jason
Heh, a lesson there. Simple stuff first - but which simple thing is it
causing the trouble:-)
I wonder of the PCV Valve problem you experienced is the 'real' reason for
horrible repeated crank-splutter-stall noises all over Aus on winter
mornings.
Add in the fact that the PCV Valve(s) spring(s) is(are) subject to an
'interesting' life, and shouldn't be expected to last indefinitely.
So the matter of keeping them clean as well as replacing them at reasonable
intervals should assist.
Sort of like thermostats. Some will go the life of the engine, but we'd be
nuts to operate on that premise.

Signature
Toby
quidquid latine dictum
sit, altum viditur
Dave Horsfall - 03 Sep 2003 01:33 GMT
[...]
> A $16 replacement fixed ALL this! $%@#!
Yep; that can be a bastard to diagnose.
(Dave thinks back to his old 1600 TC Cortina, where he almost stripped
down the engine, looking for his idling problem.)
-- Dave
Jason James - 03 Sep 2003 01:47 GMT
> [...]
> > A $16 replacement fixed ALL this! $%@#!
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> -- Dave
I spent untold hours over a couple of years on and off stuffing around, with
this intermittancy...
The mechy who did the reco changeover also put this valve back, so I felt a
little better about it then.
In the end I replaced it on a payer!!
Jason
Dan-- - 03 Sep 2003 01:35 GMT
> A $16 replacement fixed ALL this! $%@#!
Thats the royal of all PITA's is the smallest thing biggest grief.
:-)
Dan-- - 03 Sep 2003 01:38 GMT
> Thats the royal of all PITA's is the smallest thing biggest grief.
> :-)
Crap! Should be been the smallest thing causing the biggest grief.
Ben Thomas - 03 Sep 2003 01:49 GMT
> After 24 years of rattling away the PCV valve started to lose some of its
> sealing when the engine (351c) was idling.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Jason
They should have used OO when designing that engine... :)

Signature
Ben Thomas - Melbourne - Australia
Current car: silver manual Holden Astra SRi
Dream car: black Lamborghini Diablo
Respect for the man in the ice-cream van.
Jason James - 03 Sep 2003 22:00 GMT
> > After 24 years of rattling away the PCV valve started to lose some of its
> > sealing when the engine (351c) was idling.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> They should have used OO when designing that engine... :)
You mean 00 buckshot?
Jason