Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Falcon / September 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

using your automatic as a brake

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
ken kerrison - 31 Aug 2004 09:41 GMT
There are many situations where dropping to a lower auto ratio will
reduce the need to apply brakes - this is so whether or not you have a
sequential shift. But I have seen no discussion of the relative
economics. For all I know the wear and tear on the auto transmission
may prove more costly than burning up brake pads.
Yet I have a feeling that auto transmissions can take whatever
punishment is involved. The management systems in current models will
reject downshifts outside acceptable parameters.
I suppose it comes down to the relative life of pads as against bands.
Jason James - 02 Sep 2004 16:17 GMT
> There are many situations where dropping to a lower auto ratio will
> reduce the need to apply brakes - this is so whether or not you have a
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> reject downshifts outside acceptable parameters.
> I suppose it comes down to the relative life of pads as against bands.

The wear only occurs during the actual change-down.  The best way is to
back-off the juice as you approach the downwards commencement.,..pull it
back a gear (to 2nd) while its coasting so as to minimise wear,..

With older autos which donot change quickly, I always back off the throttle
to persuade the trans to go into 3rd (top-gear) sooner than it normally
would and to save wear.

I've an old 351 with an FMX inoriginal condition, and while it has some
change quality problems under full power and it takes forever to go into
reverse when its hot (worn oil-pump), its still going fine after 6 more
years and 35,000 ks.

Jason
ken kerrison - 03 Sep 2004 07:27 GMT
My experience over about six vehicles is that automatics are
trouble-free. One Ford needed a re-build (reverse failed) but that was
after 140,000km. And a Peugeot needed one too but that was after
190,000km. My F150 (close to 200,000 km) has only had a modulator
replaced.
So maybe I will make increased use of dynamic braking - at least with
my RTV.
Thanks.

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.