> There are many situations where dropping to a lower auto ratio will
> reduce the need to apply brakes - this is so whether or not you have a
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> reject downshifts outside acceptable parameters.
> I suppose it comes down to the relative life of pads as against bands.
The wear only occurs during the actual change-down. The best way is to
back-off the juice as you approach the downwards commencement.,..pull it
back a gear (to 2nd) while its coasting so as to minimise wear,..
With older autos which donot change quickly, I always back off the throttle
to persuade the trans to go into 3rd (top-gear) sooner than it normally
would and to save wear.
I've an old 351 with an FMX inoriginal condition, and while it has some
change quality problems under full power and it takes forever to go into
reverse when its hot (worn oil-pump), its still going fine after 6 more
years and 35,000 ks.
Jason
ken kerrison - 03 Sep 2004 07:27 GMT
My experience over about six vehicles is that automatics are
trouble-free. One Ford needed a re-build (reverse failed) but that was
after 140,000km. And a Peugeot needed one too but that was after
190,000km. My F150 (close to 200,000 km) has only had a modulator
replaced.
So maybe I will make increased use of dynamic braking - at least with
my RTV.
Thanks.