Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Falcon / June 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Tyre wear

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
gb - 05 Jun 2006 07:14 GMT
Wow! I got a shock the other day when I went to get my wheels rotated (front
to rear etc) on removing the tyres I found that on the inside edge of the
front tyres one of the tyres had worn through to the steel belt, of course I
then had to replace both as the other one had also worn heavily on the
inside edge. Tyres are 17" Kumho on Ford rims I'd done about 25k the ones on
the rear will be good for about another 10k by the looks. I thought I was
pretty diligent with watching my tyres but this caught me out, I'd had my
front end done at my dealer about 6k ago and he had noted tyres had some
wear on the front, suggested I should rotate them to the rear. Guess I
should have done so then. I'm trying Firenzo's now so I'll see how they
wear.

GB
Peter - 05 Jun 2006 10:02 GMT
Also sounds liek you need a good wheel alignment too there mate bad wheel
alignment can and will wear the shoulders of any tyres down very quickly,
tho you can have wear on the inside of 1 tyre and the outside of another.
Hitting gutters will cause your wheel alignment to be out of whack, pot
holes, hitting other things are all events that will put your wheel
ailignment out. Best thing is to also have your wheel alignment checked on a
yearly basis, or when you have hit ant solid object. Tie rod ends govern
your alignment. Good luck

Peter

Australia ( Bridgestone employee)

> Wow! I got a shock the other day when I went to get my wheels rotated
> (front to rear etc) on removing the tyres I found that on the inside edge
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> GB
Jason - 06 Jun 2006 10:53 GMT
I'd also suggest he has his shocks checked as well.  Worn shocks caused my
EL to demolish two front tyres in a similar fashion to what he has
described.

> Also sounds liek you need a good wheel alignment too there mate bad wheel
> alignment can and will wear the shoulders of any tyres down very quickly,
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>>
>> GB
gb - 11 Jun 2006 05:48 GMT
I know that tyre pressures can create a lot of argument, my Ford dealer
reckons that 26psi is fine, my tyre dealer reckons 38psi, I've been running
32psi. Any suggested optimum pressures for 235/45/17's on a Falcon.

gb
Simon - 11 Jun 2006 21:20 GMT
> I know that tyre pressures can create a lot of argument, my Ford
> dealer reckons that 26psi is fine, my tyre dealer reckons 38psi, I've
> been running 32psi. Any suggested optimum pressures for 235/45/17's
> on a Falcon.
> gb

Example..... http://www.autoworld.co.za/autonews/viewart.asp?id=503
Tyre Make: Dunlop SP Sport 7000D
Tyre Size: 235/45 17”
Tyre Pressure:
Front: 3 Bars
Back: 3 Bars

and this....

Originally posted by Rod:
<STRONG>
Eric, I was wondering why you use a higher psi than the recommended one?
What benefits/drawbacks are there to this? I believe the higher tire
pressure helps extend the life of the tread, but what disadvantages are
there to this? Wouldn't this also increase the cars braking distance and
reduce grip a bit? :confused:</STRONG>

I started out with the high pressure (from the tire dealer). I dropped the
pressure and the car didn't handle quite as well.

So, I am running "racing" pressures -- and the tire will take 50/51 MAX PSI.

I've been checking the tread, and it is wearing even. I would NOT run the
tires at this pressure if I though I was going to rub the center off the
tire.

I checked with Toyo, and they said I could run 32 PSI minimum, but most of
the people I talked to have moved their pressures up -- but not as much as I
have.

As far as the braking distance, etc being increased, I have not found this
to be true. When I tried braking I got a "better" stop on a patch of street
that I use for an occasional medium-speed antilock test. Sorry, I didn't put
cones in the street, so I can't testify that the stopping distance is XX
feet less. :)
scott - 12 Jun 2006 05:54 GMT
i wood realy run 40psi i am a tyer fitter So
not enuf pressher will result in the tyer wering on the out side edges
get sumone to chek the camber of your front wheels MAY BE move the front
wheels forward a bit AE FORD BOYS

i do and allways have dun this run a high pressher in my tyers wher the
midle of the tyer out a bit then drop the pressures
and start wering out the edges

>> I know that tyre pressures can create a lot of argument, my Ford
>> dealer reckons that 26psi is fine, my tyre dealer reckons 38psi, I've
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> didn't put cones in the street, so I can't testify that the stopping
> distance is XX feet less. :)
gb - 13 Jun 2006 09:34 GMT
>i wood realy run 40psi i am a tyer fitter So

Thanks Scott and all those who offered a viewpoint.
Since the 2 new tyres have been on I've played around with various
pressures, on all 4, going as high as 3 bar all round and have now settled
on 2.5 bar all round, the car was a boneshaker at 3. I'm trying to get the
car "feeling" as good as it did with the 4 Kumho's on.
I also discovered that, despite being adjusted at the tyre dealers the tyre
pressures were all over the place (ie: 26psi, 29psi, 32psi & 34psi) after
being fitted and telling me that the tyres were going to be set at 34psi.
I'm not saying that my gauge is correct but at least my tyres are now all at
the same reading.

gb
David Hales - 29 Jun 2006 13:05 GMT
G
I've had the same problem. I've had the front wheels aligned many times,
I've had new shocks fitted and played around with tyre presures and nothing
works. I suspect there is a major camber problem - if I look at current
falcons with the wheels turned, the inside wheel shows a significantly
greater positive (I think) camber than on my EF.

Several people have suggested a camber kit is required so maybe that's the
answer. I just don't know why I should have to cough up for this significant
suspension design defect.

D

> Wow! I got a shock the other day when I went to get my wheels rotated (front
> to rear etc) on removing the tyres I found that on the inside edge of the
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> GB
gb - 30 Jun 2006 07:05 GMT
D

Here's a post I sent in January this year, 5-6k later my tyres were stuffed,
I had thought that I might get 30k out of the tyres;

********************************
Last service, at 70,000 K's, my Ford dealer noted that he had to shim the
front end to get correct readings on his front-end machine I told him that I
had fitted a kit to my previous EB and was it the same problem, he told me
that
there is generally enough adjustment with shims on AU's and they don't
usually need a kit unless there's been damage.

GB
ps: Mines a 2000 AU with sports suspension & 17" rims, I got 50k out of my
original 16" tyres, I've yet to see how the 17's wear but with 20k on them I
think maybe 30k max will be it.
********************************

GB

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Hales" <djelt.hales@telstra.com>
Newsgroups: alt.ford.falcon
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 10:05 PM
Subject: Re: Tyre wear

> G
> I've had the same problem. I've had the front wheels aligned many times,
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> D

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.