Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Focus / January 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Performance question

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Aquila - 17 Jan 2005 17:00 GMT
Can anyone tell me what the performance is of an RS Focus, 2ltr 235bhp,
53plate?
Thanks in advance.
Mark Allen - 17 Jan 2005 19:20 GMT
> Can anyone tell me what the performance is of an RS Focus, 2ltr 235bhp,
> 53plate?
> Thanks in advance.

Standard power output is 212bhp (215ps) and performance is adequate, 0-60mph
in around 6.something depending which test you read and max of around
145mph.

One chipped to 235bhp probably wouldn't get to sixty that much quicker due
to traction issues, and might top 150ish??

It is a relatively light car (1280kg) compared to some of the "competition"
you might meet on a given day - for example an Impreza WRX Sti Type UK
(1475kg, 261bhp) has only slightly better power to weight ratio
(~10bhp/1000kg) or a Mazda RX8 (228bhp, 1350kg) is about 2bhp/1000kg better
off. As you would imagine, rolling straight line performance for both is
pretty similar to the RS. Both will launch better.

HTH

Mark
Stephen F. - 18 Jan 2005 07:35 GMT
>> Can anyone tell me what the performance is of an RS Focus, 2ltr 235bhp,
>> 53plate?
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> off. As you would imagine, rolling straight line performance for both is
> pretty similar to the RS. Both will launch better.

The Focus RS is brilliant on good roads and tracks, but can be quite darty
on bumpy roads due to its differential.
per - 18 Jan 2005 19:41 GMT
> The Focus RS is brilliant on good roads and tracks, but can be quite darty
> on bumpy roads due to its differential.

What do you mean, "due to it's differential". Of course it has a
differential, all cars have them.
Do you mean "due to its bad differential" or do you mean to say: "Due to
lack of four wheel drive with a limited slip rear differential"?
/per
Stephen F. - 19 Jan 2005 07:38 GMT
>> The Focus RS is brilliant on good roads and tracks, but can be quite
>> darty on bumpy roads due to its differential.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> lack of four wheel drive with a limited slip rear differential"?
> /per

Sorry, I was in a hurry.  Due to its quirky LSD.  It bobs and weaves like a
lightweight boxer on rough roads.
Andy Lee - 19 Jan 2005 08:22 GMT
>>> The Focus RS is brilliant on good roads and tracks, but can be quite
>>> darty on bumpy roads due to its differential.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>Sorry, I was in a hurry.  Due to its quirky LSD.  It bobs and weaves like a
>lightweight boxer on rough roads.

Have you experienced this directly Stephen? I have only once been in
an RS and I can't say that this was what happened to me, mind you I
guess it depends a lot of the roads but this was a right mixture of
main and back roads and I never really had a problem with it.
Stephen F. - 19 Jan 2005 10:35 GMT
>>>> The Focus RS is brilliant on good roads and tracks, but can be quite
>>>> darty on bumpy roads due to its differential.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> guess it depends a lot of the roads but this was a right mixture of
> main and back roads and I never really had a problem with it.

I have, and the severity depends a lot on the technique or style of the
driver.  I've done some back to back driving up and down various alpine
passes here with an Impreza WRX and the Focus RS.  The WRX (not a full blown
STi) was quite benign, but rather dull.  The Focus was really alive and on
the whole a much more fun car to drive.  I have a lot of experience with
powerful front wheel drive cars, so I know how to avoid or deal with torque
steer, how not to boil the inside tire exiting a corner etc.  However, on
many sections of road the RS threw me a few head fakes which I wasn't
expecting.  The Impreza was boring but predictable.  If it were my only car,
I would tend with the Impreza for all-weather performance.  If I were
looking for the ultimate hot hatch, I would choose the RS for its agressive
nature, generally excellent grip and handling, and live with the jiggles.
Shame about the ugly steering wheel, but maybe I'm a bit older than the
target buyer (I'm 37).  When it comes to putting my own money down, I've
tended to have a practical car and a second toy and try not to compromise,
so my practical car is my Focus TDCi wagon, and I am currently shopping
around for a dirt-cheap Opel Speedster (Vauxhall VX220) for my toy, as this
is in a whole different world of performance and they are going out the door
for substantially less than a same-aged RS.
Mark Allen - 19 Jan 2005 18:36 GMT
> >>>> The Focus RS is brilliant on good roads and tracks, but can be quite
> >>>> darty on bumpy roads due to its differential.
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> is in a whole different world of performance and they are going out the door
> for substantially less than a same-aged RS.

I second everything Stephen says there - in my opinion, although four wheel
drive has its uses, it provides an overkill level of grip/predictability to
the extent of being boring 99% of the time on public roads unless you really
want to drive in a total hooligan manner at idiotic speeds (something I am
just about growing out of after 18 years driving!).

I did choose an RS as a daily driver, at 36 I'm closer to the target
demographic (!) and yes I still think the wheel is pig-ugly...

I like that it is an easy car to live with as a daily driver, yet can
provide bad-boy thrills at more "sensible" speeds than a performance 4x4
when the remaining hooligan in me takes over!

As for my weekend toy, I elected for something that probably couldn't be
more different to a VX220 if it tried (although I follow Stephen's logic
totally)...

http://www.hj60.btinternet.co.uk/focustang.jpg

Mark
Stephen F. - 20 Jan 2005 08:03 GMT
> As for my weekend toy, I elected for something that probably couldn't be
> more different to a VX220 if it tried (although I follow Stephen's logic
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Mark

Believe me, if I could find a decent '65-'67 Fastback at a price I could
afford, I'd snap it up in a second.  The early Mustang has always been one
of my favourites.  Letting my thoughts wander a bit, I could also see
keeping the Focus estate for my daily driver, and building up a "Focus RS8"
for my weekend toy.  In America you can buy a kit to drop a Cammer V8 and
RWD drivetrain into the 3 dr Focus.  Sounds fun, and what an oddball pair of
automotive siblings that would be! Outrageous power at less than the cost of
the RS, but questionable handling, I imagine.

http://www.rsportscars.com/eng/cars/focus_rs8.asp

Or, the best of both worlds... a 1st Gen Mustang with a brand new Cammer V8.
Sweet!

http://www.machinedesign.com/ASP/viewSelectedArticle.asp?strArticleId=56611&strS
ite=MDSite&catId=0


Still, there's something elemental about the Elise/VX220/Speedster, and
paradoxically, it sips petrol when not being hammered along.

Stephen
Andy Lee - 20 Jan 2005 08:44 GMT
>I have, and the severity depends a lot on the technique or style of the
>driver.  I've done some back to back driving up and down various alpine
>passes here with an Impreza WRX and the Focus RS.

I bet that was a lot of fun I've only done Switzerland to Austria via
the mountains once and that was in a Dicovery so performance was not
high on the list, mind you with those views going fast was the last
thing on my mind.

> The WRX (not a full blown
>STi) was quite benign, but rather dull.  The Focus was really alive and on
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>nature, generally excellent grip and handling, and live with the jiggles.
>Shame about the ugly steering wheel

Must be an age thing I'm 42 and all that blue and aluminium is not to
my taste either looks like an explosion in the Halfords parts shop!

> but maybe I'm a bit older than the
>target buyer (I'm 37).  When it comes to putting my own money down, I've
>tended to have a practical car and a second toy and try not to compromise,
>so my practical car is my Focus TDCi wagon, and I am currently shopping
>around for a dirt-cheap Opel Speedster (Vauxhall VX220) for my toy,

Loads of fun to be had in one of those just far to low to the ground
for  a big fat guy like me  I need a winch to get out of the thing.

> as this
>is in a whole different world of performance and they are going out the door
>for substantially less than a same-aged RS.

Must be that Vauxhall/Opel badge if you stuck a Lotus one on it I 'm
sure they would double in price.
Stephen F. - 20 Jan 2005 10:28 GMT
>> as this
>>is in a whole different world of performance and they [VX220] are going
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Must be that Vauxhall/Opel badge if you stuck a Lotus one on it I 'm
> sure they would double in price.

Exactly.  I say a big thank-you to badge snobs when it comes to buying fast,
cheap cars.  The infatuation with the VW GTI also reaps dividends on the
used car lot for buyers seeking competent cars like the Focus SVT/ST170.

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.