Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Focus / January 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ford focus gloat

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Fuddzy - 04 Jan 2005 18:06 GMT
I bought a new  2003 zx5 approx 1.5 yrs ago.

works great

for example, drove it to San Francisco and back to Regina, Sask

Many variations in topography, road conditons and  climate.

Maintained an average highway speed of 112 Km/hr (where possible)

total trip   3567 miles
total fuel consumption  100 Imp Gal
average fuel cost was nine cents (Cdn) per mile.

Happy motoring

Fud
Basic Wedge - 04 Jan 2005 23:13 GMT
Fud. That's just an absolutely bizarre mix of metric and imperial
measurements - with an obscure currency reference thrown in for good measure
: )

What would you say your average fuel economy was in terms we can all
understand? (litres per 100 kms, for example).

Rob

----------------------------

>I bought a new  2003 zx5 approx 1.5 yrs ago.
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> total fuel consumption  100 Imp Gal
> average fuel cost was nine cents (Cdn) per mile.
Fuddzie - 05 Jan 2005 02:14 GMT
> Fud. That's just an absolutely bizarre mix of metric and imperial
> measurements - with an obscure currency reference thrown in for good measure
> : )

Yep.......... but that is what happens if you live next to the USA.  !!!
In Canada we buy fuel in litres using Canadian dollars (aprox 1.20 Cdn
for each US $) and measure distance in KM BUT express fuel efficeincy in
miles per gallon.

While in the US, one purchases fuel in US Gallons which are .833 of an
Imperial gallon but in US $.

Thus I converted everything to IMP gallons, Miles and Canadian $

> What would you say your average fuel economy was in terms we can all
> understand? (litres per 100 kms, for example).

> Rob

sure enough can try .........

 the trip was 5779 km and consumed 454.8 litres

thus 7.869L per 100 KM

hope this helps

Fud
> ----------------------------
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>>total fuel consumption  100 Imp Gal
>>average fuel cost was nine cents (Cdn) per mile.

Signature

ooo........Elmer   ..........ooo..........

"Man is the only animal that blushes. Or needs to." Mark Twain

Basic Wedge - 05 Jan 2005 18:11 GMT
Thanks Fud. That seems like pretty good fuel economy. My SPI powered wagon
occasionally comes close to that level, but only in ideal weather and road
conditions. At this time of the year, with our cold prairie weather, I'm
lucky to be under 10 Litres/100Km.

I, by the way, also live in Canada, and only an hour's drive from the U.S.
border. In my neck of the woods, though, I don't think many people know how
to express fuel economy in the old miles per gallon terms. When will those
Americans ever switch to metric like the rest of us? : )  I'll be embarking
on a quick trip to the U.S. at the end of the month, so I'll put your
conversion formula to the test!

Cheers,

Rob

-------------------------------------

> Yep.......... but that is what happens if you live next to the USA.  !!!

> In Canada we buy fuel in litres using Canadian dollars (aprox 1.20 Cdn for
> each US $) and measure distance in KM BUT express fuel efficeincy in miles
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> thus 7.869L per 100 KM
Fuddzy - 05 Jan 2005 21:56 GMT
> Thanks Fud. That seems like pretty good fuel economy. My SPI powered wagon
> occasionally comes close to that level, but only in ideal weather and road
> conditions. At this time of the year, with our cold prairie weather, I'm
> lucky to be under 10 Litres/100Km.

 In my neck of the woods, though, I don't think many people know how
> to express fuel economy in the old miles per gallon terms.
 If memory serves:  Canada  in Paris, in 1965, agreed with many other
countries to begin metrification (except the USA) Then slowly introduced
it to the nation  starting with the temp scale and then the metric tonne
(for exporting) and then weights (Kg... which is really a 'mass' unit)
in grocery stores etc etc. Meanwhile the school system(s) each under
provincial jurisdiction each decided to introduce it in the math and
science programs and their own speeds. So it was a slow process. Since
us old guys had obtained our university degrees prior to all that
.............. we had to learn on our own.
Of course the science courses always did measure the properties of
physical objects in metric. Thus it was easy for me. By the way the
official metric unit for temp is the Kelvin  (i.e. 0 deg C = 273 deg
K)........ guess the politicians would never understand that at 250 K it
could still be cold.........

So more to your point............ most the people born in 1940 or
earlier still think in MPG

 When will those
> Americans ever switch to metric like the rest of us? : )

The only concession the US did was to 'invent' the "Long Ton" which is
2200 lbs and which is roughly equal to a metric tonne (1000 Kg)
 I'll be embarking
> on a quick trip to the U.S. at the end of the month, so I'll put your
> conversion formula to the test!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Rob

Fuel is much cheaper in the US (except in CA)

Stay warm and happy

Fud

> -------------------------------------
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>>
>>thus 7.869L per 100 KM
Michael Heiming - 05 Jan 2005 18:42 GMT
In alt.autos.ford.focus Fuddzie <end@accesscomm.ca>:

>> What would you say your average fuel economy was in terms we can all
>> understand? (litres per 100 kms, for example).

>  the trip was 5779 km and consumed 454.8 litres

> thus 7.869L per 100 KM

There are dozens others, this one isn't bad and offers various
units.

http://www.volker-quaschning.de/datserv/us-rechner/index.html

"Treibstoffverbrauch (milage)"

What kind of engine is this? Never got that out of my Focus, 8.3
l/100km or 28.3 mpg was lowest. Usually about 9-9.5 l/100km
(24.7-26.1 mpg). Sure creeping with 112 Km/h, I'd expect even better
millage.;)

Signature

Michael Heiming (X-PGP-Sig > GPG-Key ID: EDD27B94)
mail: echo zvpunry@urvzvat.qr | perl -pe 'y/a-z/n-za-m/'
#bofh excuse 364: Sand fleas eating the Internet cables

Roarmeister - 06 Jan 2005 00:53 GMT
>I bought a new  2003 zx5 approx 1.5 yrs ago.
>for example, drove it to San Francisco and back to Regina, Sask

Yo, Fuddzy..  what's your tag #?  I'm also a proud 2004-ZX5 owner in
Regina.  
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.