> More than worthless, I'd say.
>
> Not that my Focus has given me much trouble, but on the few occassions when
> something I thought might be covered required attention, the extended
> warranty was of no use. I would not buy another warranty from Ford, and
> wouldn't recommend it to anyone else.
> it depends on your point of view.
> As long as the main things are included, like the engine, gearbox, air
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> But the big expensive things in your car that would cost you thousands of
> Dollars or EUR to change or fix are the reason for an extended warranty.
======================
Perhaps...
When forming your point of view, though, keep in mind the cost of the
warranty can be about equal to the cost of a major repair. If you have the
good fortune of never needing the warranty, you've still shelled-out a large
chunk of change.
I stand by my advice to skip extended warranty coverage. I believe most
major consumer protection groups give the same advice.
Rob
Dave Gower - 12 Feb 2005 15:32 GMT
> I stand by my advice to skip extended warranty coverage. I believe most
> major consumer protection groups give the same advice.
Agree completely. This is a form of insurance, but one should only take out
insurance on things that are too expensive to pay for out of pocket (like,
for example, liability). For normal things like car repairs, you're just
paying someone else's overhead. There's a reason why salesmen push these
plans, and it ain't because they feel warm and fuzzy about our welfare.
"There is no such thing as a free lunch".
Alan - 12 Feb 2005 15:41 GMT
>> it depends on your point of view.
>> As long as the main things are included, like the engine, gearbox, air
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>I stand by my advice to skip extended warranty coverage. I believe most
>major consumer protection groups give the same advice.
Watch out for warrantees that only cover just the parts or just the
labour. Often when you have to pay for one of these items the price of
the bit you pay for becomes inflated and you effectively pay for both
labour and parts - plus paying for the warrantee.
I once made the mistake of taking up the (Citroen) dealer's "free"
service where I had to only pay for the parts. I know it said Gold in
the name of the oil they used but I didn't realise that it actually
contained a lot of real gold - with a price to match :(

Signature
Alan
mailto:news2me_a_2003@amacleod.clara.co.uk
Josef Erbs - 13 Feb 2005 17:51 GMT
> When forming your point of view, though, keep in mind the cost of the
> warranty can be about equal to the cost of a major repair. If you have the
> good fortune of never needing the warranty, you've still shelled-out a large
> chunk of change.
Hi
of course do you need to compare the cost of the warranty with the
dangers it covers. If the warranty costs you a thousand Dollars I would
agree not to buy it.
It depends on the price. And how many money you can bear to pay if
something expensive has got to be fixed. And, also important, if you
need your car substantly for your normal living, as for going to work.
> I stand by my advice to skip extended warranty coverage. I believe most
> major consumer protection groups give the same advice.
Maybe in USA, I live in Germany, so I don´t know what yours are telling.
But here in Germany you can buy an extended warranty by other insurance
companies then the manufacturer´s ones also. So here I can choose what
kind of warranty I want and how many EUR to pay for.
bye
Jupp