>>I couldn't find an FAQ to see whether it was ok to post this, but it's
>> sort of on topic, I guess. I don't think this one fits the SVT, just
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>lingerie for cars - whatever next :)
Personally I like the bra-less look better.
:-P
later,
tom @ www.CarFleaMarket.com
bbarkow@hotmail.com - 02 Mar 2005 21:30 GMT
My wife does too....that's why I'm selling it.
Michael Heiming - 02 Mar 2005 21:50 GMT
In alt.autos.ford.focus The Real Tom <Tom @ www.workathomeplans.com>:
>>>I couldn't find an FAQ to see whether it was ok to post this, but it's
>>> sort of on topic, I guess. I don't think this one fits the SVT, just
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>>
>>why would anyone want one of these??
;)
>>lingerie for cars - whatever next :)
> Personally I like the bra-less look better.
Found the "spoiler", likely to add some extra fuel consumption in
addition to perhaps even reduced Vmax most amazing.;)
Are there really people out using something like this? With lots
of unpaved roads/etc it would make at least some sense.

Signature
Michael Heiming (X-PGP-Sig > GPG-Key ID: EDD27B94)
mail: echo zvpunry@urvzvat.qr | perl -pe 'y/a-z/n-za-m/'
#bofh excuse 167: excessive collisions & not enough packet
ambulances
bbarkow@hotmail.com - 02 Mar 2005 22:57 GMT
Out here in the sticks they help to reduce rock chips and bug juice.