> The recommended pressures. In the UK it is an offence to drive with
> incorrect tyre pressures. This is generally taken as within 10% of the
> makers stated pressures.
>> The recommended pressures. In the UK it is an offence to drive with
>> incorrect tyre pressures. This is generally taken as within 10% of the
>> makers stated pressures.
>
> Where do you get your information from?
Here:
s41A(b) Road Traffic Act 1988, Road Vehicles (Construction and Use)
Regulations 1986, reg 27, as amended
> The MOT test does not go into tyre pressures and I have never ever seen
> any legal issues regarding this.
Where do you get *your* information from? :-)
Tyre underinflation is considered as part of the MOT test, although not in
itself a reason for rejection. See here:
http://www.motuk.co.uk/manual_410.htm
BTW, I never mentioned MOT testing in my reply to the OP.
> Too soft maybe or at an extreme "too hard" may be a judgement made by the
> law but not "within 10%"
My value of +/- 10% was obtained from a friendly police traffic patrol
driver. Although not established in law, he tells me it is the generally
accepted level outside of which you may be prosecuted.
<snip OT speeding information>
HTH
Chris

Signature
Remove prejudice to reply
sid - 30 Jul 2005 12:51 GMT
>s41A(b) Road Traffic Act 1988, Road Vehicles (Construction and Use)
>Regulations 1986, reg 27, as amended
It would be of interest what the reg actually states. Is there a web site
with these details?
> The MOT test does not go into tyre pressures and I have never ever seen
> > any legal issues regarding this.
>
> Where do you get *your* information from? :-)
I get my information from the mot manual. It does not test for correct PSI
The MOT test does concern itself with vehicle regs and tyres are a vital
part of the MOT test.
> http://www.motuk.co.uk/manual_410.htm
>
> BTW, I never mentioned MOT testing in my reply to the OP.
Yes - I accept that you did not mention, when questioned, something that you
may etc. :-)
> My value of +/- 10% was obtained from a friendly police traffic patrol
> driver. Although not established in law, he tells me it is the generally
> accepted level outside of which you may be prosecuted.
Hmm - how does he establish tyre pressure requirements. I have an estate
car and the pressure requirements for a full or heavy load differ at the
rear by 6PSI.(err - thats more than 10% of the normal recommended pressure)
Does he carry a list of vehicles tyre pressures? Does he weigh the vehicle
to establish what load is carried and at what axle? How does he calibrate
his tyre pressure device?
All sorts of problems in law with what he states. Maybe the vehicle reg
stated by you gives a full breakdown?
Don't doubt that they can push something like that, and check all the points
mentioned, but I "guess" that it would be part of a list of faults that
directly resulted in a bad car accident and they wanted to ensure that a
proper conviction was obtained.
Chris Whelan - 30 Jul 2005 14:23 GMT
>>s41A(b) Road Traffic Act 1988, Road Vehicles (Construction and Use)
>>Regulations 1986, reg 27, as amended
>
> It would be of interest what the reg actually states. Is there a web site
> with these details?
Probably. Google is your friend...
Incidentally, on conviction the penalty is the same as for other tyre
defects. (Fine up to 2500UKP, 3 points, Disqualification).
>> The MOT test does not go into tyre pressures and I have never ever seen
>> > any legal issues regarding this.
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> the vehicle to establish what load is carried and at what axle? How does
> he calibrate his tyre pressure device?
"He" doesn't do any of these things, a VOSA examiner does, and would have
all the information needed. In many police authority areas VOSA examiners
now have the same right as the police to instruct a driver to stop in order
for his vehicle to be examined. This avoids the cost of having a police
officer available before roadside checks can be done.
> All sorts of problems in law with what he states. Maybe the vehicle reg
> stated by you gives a full breakdown?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> directly resulted in a bad car accident and they wanted to ensure that a
> proper conviction was obtained.
Out of interest, I've just checked the Highway Code. Annex 1 states "Tyres
*MUST* be correctly inflated..."etc.
Chris

Signature
Remove prejudice to reply
sid - 13 Aug 2005 21:44 GMT
"> s41A(b) Road Traffic Act 1988, Road Vehicles (Construction and Use)
> Regulations 1986, reg 27, as amended
> My value of +/- 10% was obtained from a friendly police traffic patrol
> driver. Although not established in law, he tells me it is the generally
> accepted level outside of which you may be prosecuted.
Its interesting that you are unable to quote other than from a " friendly
police traffic patrol
driver"
A search on google produced no more than a summary of faults that could
potentially result in prosectution. No % figures etc.for tyre inflation.
Perhaps you have a reference for any kind of figure?
Police officers certainly have a general overview of the law and are more
expert than a lay person, but they certainly do not have extensive knowledge
of every aspect.
That's why we now have a CPS who review evidence.