>>>>>Interesting. My 03 USA ZTW requires one press of the lock button to
>>>>>get doors locked and lights to flash. Double-lock the car?
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> If the flash means "secured", then why doesn't it flash when you "secure"
> the vehicle by just pressing the button once?

Signature
Blinky RLU 297263
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
Coming Soon: Filtering rules specific to various real news clients
>>>>>>Interesting. My 03 USA ZTW requires one press of the lock button to
>>>>>>get doors locked and lights to flash. Double-lock the car?
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> It does.
I'm afraid it definitely doesn't, I have the handbook here in front of me
and it states categorically that it only flashes the lights after the second
press of the button within a 3 second interval!
In other words, it only flashes when you put it in deadlock mode!
>> Most other vehicles I've owned, flash on "secure" as well as "Unsecure"!
>
> Then that message doesn't actually carry much content, if it can mean
> that your car is either locked or unlocked. I'd rather have a message
> that didn't have conflicting meaning.
You seem to be having difficulties here, let me explain, to make it simple,
lets say the lights flash once for secure and twice for insecure. How can
you see that as a conflicting meaning?
Sadlybrokeboy - 09 Jun 2006 23:37 GMT
> >>>>>>Interesting. My 03 USA ZTW requires one press of the lock button to
> >>>>>>get doors locked and lights to flash. Double-lock the car?
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
> lets say the lights flash once for secure and twice for insecure. How can
> you see that as a conflicting meaning?
Blinkey,
So I'm right in thinking that is SHOULD?
Thanks,
Matt
Michael Heiming - 10 Jun 2006 01:31 GMT
In alt.autos.ford.focus o00o <o00o@gone.com>:
>>>>>>>Interesting. My 03 USA ZTW requires one press of the lock button to
>>>>>>>get doors locked and lights to flash. Double-lock the car?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>>>>>> being opened from the inside. A safety warning is included about not
>>>>>> operating this feature with people still inside the car.
Unsure why someone would want that feature at all?
[..]
>>> If the flash means "secured", then why doesn't it flash when you "secure"
>>> the vehicle by just pressing the button once?
>>
>> It does.
> I'm afraid it definitely doesn't, I have the handbook here in front of me
> and it states categorically that it only flashes the lights after the second
> press of the button within a 3 second interval!
> In other words, it only flashes when you put it in deadlock mode!
AFAIK the behavior can be configured, with newer Focus with the
key. Try groups.google.com search within this group, has been
explained a few times howto do this. Doesn't work for any Focus,
perhaps dependable on when/where it was built and which options
it has?
From my experience you'll have a hard time finding two Fords from
the same series that are exactly the same. ;-)
On the first press mine does just lock doors, on the second it
does switch on alarm and (with a little delay) interior
monitoring alarm sensors and flashes hazard warning lights once.
If you keep the button pressed, it will close any open window and
perhaps sunroof if yours is electrical. Can't tell mine is a
mechanical version.
>>> Most other vehicles I've owned, flash on "secure" as well as "Unsecure"!
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> lets say the lights flash once for secure and twice for insecure. How can
> you see that as a conflicting meaning?
Yep, twice for unlocking would be nice. Though at least my Focus
turns on driver and rear passenger interior lights if unlocking
doors remote which might or not be mentionable more or less
easily.

Signature
Michael Heiming (X-PGP-Sig > GPG-Key ID: EDD27B94)
mail: echo zvpunry@urvzvat.qr | perl -pe 'y/a-z/n-za-m/'
Blinky the Shark - 10 Jun 2006 02:27 GMT
>>>>>>>Interesting. My 03 USA ZTW requires one press of the lock button to
>>>>>>>get doors locked and lights to flash. Double-lock the car?
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> press of the button within a 3 second interval!
> In other words, it only flashes when you put it in deadlock mode!
I'm afraid you're not reading a "handbook" that applies to my 2003 US
Focus. I know how my car works. One click = flash.
>>> Most other vehicles I've owned, flash on "secure" as well as "Unsecure"!
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>>
> You seem to be having difficulties here, let me explain, to make it simple,
No, I'm not.
> lets say the lights flash once for secure and twice for insecure. How can
> you see that as a conflicting meaning?
That's not what happens with my car.

Signature
Blinky RLU 297263
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
Coming Soon: Filtering rules specific to various real news clients
o00o - 10 Jun 2006 06:15 GMT
>>>>>>>>Interesting. My 03 USA ZTW requires one press of the lock button to
>>>>>>>>get doors locked and lights to flash. Double-lock the car?
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
> I'm afraid you're not reading a "handbook" that applies to my 2003 US
> Focus. I know how my car works. One click = flash.
I didn't realise we were talking about "YOUR 2003 US FOCUS"
I thought we were talking about a "2005 UK FOCUS LX" owned by Sadlybrokeboy!
>>>> Most other vehicles I've owned, flash on "secure" as well as
>>>> "Unsecure"!
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> No, I'm not.
Oh I'm sure you are!
>> lets say the lights flash once for secure and twice for insecure. How can
>> you see that as a conflicting meaning?
>
> That's not what happens with my car.
I didn't realise we were talking about "YOUR 2003 US FOCUS"
I thought we were talking about a "2005 UK FOCUS LX" owned by Sadlybrokeboy!
Blinky the Shark - 10 Jun 2006 07:28 GMT
>>>>>>>>>Interesting. My 03 USA ZTW requires one press of the lock
>>>>>>>>>button to get doors locked and lights to flash. Double-lock
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
> I didn't realise we were talking about "YOUR 2003 US FOCUS" I thought
> we were talking about a "2005 UK FOCUS LX" owned by Sadlybrokeboy!
I said *I* wouldn't like a setup that flashed the lights for either a
lock or an unlock, because then I could accidentally do the wrong thing
with a wrong button press and not realize it from the light signal.
That would be applicable to any car -- I'd not want any car to signal me
the same for both unlock and lock. That would be like a green light
that could mean either GO or STOP. :)
>>>>> Most other vehicles I've owned, flash on "secure" as well as
>>>>> "Unsecure"!
That's what I'd dislike. As it is, this Focus is the only car I've ever
had with *any* such features; I've never had anything with a remote,
before. And this one flashes when I press the lock button once, and
does nothing but unlock on when I press the unlock button.
>>>> Then that message doesn't actually carry much content, if it can
>>>> mean that your car is either locked or unlocked. I'd rather have a
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Oh I'm sure you are!
No, I'm not.
>>> lets say the lights flash once for secure and twice for insecure.
>>> How can you see that as a conflicting meaning?
>>
>> That's not what happens with my car.
AND that's not what I was talking about. I was talking about a
hypothetical car (on any side of the Atlantic) that flashed lights for
lock and also flashed lights for unlock. See, then an accidental press
on the wrong key wouldn't be noticed.
> I didn't realise we were talking about "YOUR 2003 US FOCUS" I thought
> we were talking about a "2005 UK FOCUS LX" owned by Sadlybrokeboy!
So you also missed Okiver's reference to his '03? See, sometimes a
discussion involves more than one datapoint; sometimes even statements
about the general case and not the specific case.
Here's mine about the general case, again: I'd not want *any* car to
give me the same signal for two conflicting conditions...like, say, Lock
and Unlock. That would be like a turn signal indicator that flashed on
the dashboard whether or not your turn inficator was reall on. :)

Signature
Blinky RLU 297263
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
Coming Soon: Filtering rules specific to various real news clients
bumblebee - 14 Jun 2006 11:21 GMT
> >>>>>>Interesting. My 03 USA ZTW requires one press of the lock button to
> >>>>>>get doors locked and lights to flash. Double-lock the car?
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
> lets say the lights flash once for secure and twice for insecure. How can
> you see that as a conflicting meaning?
On my wagon ('01 1.6 liter), the lights flash once when locking and twice when unlocking.. I like
it..
ahmet
turkey