Speaking of timing (cam) belts and chains, does anyone know which,
if any, of the Focus engines are interference and which are
non-interference?
In an interference engine, the pistons and valves share some of the same
space, hopefully kept apart by the timing belt. In a non-interference engine,
the pistons and valves do not share space, so a timing belt or chain failure
can't result in a destroyed engine. Thus timely belt replacement is more
crucial with an interference engine.
http://www.aa1car.com/library/timing_belts_interference_engines.htm
--
Don
Chris Whelan - 03 Mar 2009 08:19 GMT
> Speaking of timing (cam) belts and chains, does anyone know which, if
> any, of the Focus engines are interference and which are
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> http://www.aa1car.com/library/timing_belts_interference_engines.htm
AFAIK, all UK/European Focus engines are interference.
I don't think there are many modern cars of any make that are still non-
interference. Piston /valve tolerances have to be tight to meet
performance requirements, especially with a four valve per cylinder
configuration.
Chris

Signature
Remove prejudice to reply.
Michael Pardee - 03 Mar 2009 12:44 GMT
> Speaking of timing (cam) belts and chains, does anyone know which,
> if any, of the Focus engines are interference and which are
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> --
> Don
You can try the "locator" at
http://www.gates.com/part_locator/index.cfm?location_id=3598&go=Interference
but I don't entirely trust it. It shows the 1985 Volvo 760T I once had as
interference, but it was definitely non-interference - as were all the Volvo
"red block" engine in all variants in all markets.
As Chris says, most modern engines are interference because it is considered
a small price for performance and efficiency.
You put it very well. Timing belt replacement is important even in
non-interference engines if only because the driver is trying to get
somewhere when the belt fails, but is *crucial* in interference engines.
Mike