Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Focus / June 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Price of gas = more Foci on the road?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Roarmeister - 26 May 2004 03:30 GMT
Price of gas in Regina, Sask. is CDN 92.5/litre for regular.  That
equates to about $2.56 US/US gal. (according to today's exchange
rate).

How much are <you> paying?  According to CNN, the average price in the
USA is around $2.15/gal.  An article I read mentioned that people will
not seriously consider downsizing their vehicle (OR buying a SULEV
type of vehicle) until the price reaches $2.50/gal, however people may
be considering slightly fewer options are their vehicles now.  Ie.
smaller engines, 2 wheel drive instead of 4 wheel drive, smaller SUVs
or vans/trucks instead of the monsters we see on the road today.  Will
we "ever" see people forget their big vehicles in favour of smaller
sedans/coupes?

Ford with its newer Focus engines (2.3 litre PZEV) is less polluting
than even some hybrid cars and slightly more fuel efficient than the
2.0 litre.  Then Ford will come out with the Escape hybrid shortly and
it should be considerably more fuel efficient than the standard V-6
Escape.  (This is not the same as equating low emission vehicles as
highly fuel efficient vehicles but the two ideas are generally going
in the same direction).

Will N.A. be turning to smaller vehicles in the near future -- is the
age of bigger engines/displacement going to take a turn like it did in
the '70s?  If you convert energy costs of the '70s to today's inflated
dollar we still are not paying the same cost as we did then.
Neill Massello - 26 May 2004 04:42 GMT
> Will N.A. be turning to smaller vehicles in the near future -- is the
> age of bigger engines/displacement going to take a turn like it did in
> the '70s?  If you convert energy costs of the '70s to today's inflated
> dollar we still are not paying the same cost as we did then.

Many oil industry analysts are saying that higher prices will be with us
for some time. We may hope that this will knock some sense into the
maroons who bought gigantic pickup trucks and SUVs to use as commuter
vehicles, and there is some indication already of a drop in sales of the
monster vehicles.

At the moment, there isn't too much screaming about the oil companies;
but then prices probably haven't peaked yet, which they probably will
about the time the politicians announce their usual fruitless
investigations and hearings. (You might have noticed that it's political
season down south.)
Dave Gower - 26 May 2004 15:38 GMT
> Many oil industry analysts are saying that higher prices will be with us
> for some time.

Forever, probably, although there may be some ups and downs with various
events. For example, Iraq should be capable of 6 or more million barrels a
day if they get their act together, and undoubtedly will want to sell as
much as they can to rebuild their country. But with China, India etc buying
streadily more oil, and few major new low-cost fields being found, the
long-term trend can only be up.

That doesn't mean we'll suddenly have a Mad Max end-of-oil event. Things
will gradually get tighter over several decades. But with prices at 40-50
dollars a barrel it is economical to tap into really huge higher-cost
sources i.e. tar sands, undersea methane. That should stretch it out to the
lifetime of today's adults.

>We may hope that this will knock some sense into the
> maroons who bought gigantic pickup trucks and SUVs to use as commuter
> vehicles

Amen to that. When I see whiners trying to organize boycotts on the local
newsgroups, I can't help but rub it in. "Get a bicycle (or a Focus),
losers."

(retired economist with an interest in technology).
Roarmeister - 28 May 2004 00:30 GMT
> >We may hope that this will knock some sense into the
> > maroons who bought gigantic pickup trucks and SUVs to use as commuter
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> newsgroups, I can't help but rub it in. "Get a bicycle (or a Focus),
> losers."

I may not be the type to rub it in, but I guarrentee you these people
get no sympathy from me.

Everyday I drive to work in my little car getting 30+ mpg while
somebody drives past me in their 50-60k 3-ton SUV who gets 15mpg on a
good day.
Somebody who can afford to lay out that kind of cash (usually for the
second or third vehicle of the family) and then starts to complain
about the cost of gas is declaring himself King Jerk.
Matter - 26 May 2004 17:07 GMT
I have a new 04 Wagon.  The dealer did not have the cargo cover for the
back, and says his shop is backordered on the covers.

Is it possible to buy something from an autoparts supplier like Pep Boys
etc., or is this something where I'd be better off just waiting for the
dealer to get it in.

Likewise with the crossbars for roofrack.  The Yakima crossbars weren't
in stock, so I'll have to wait.  Is it easy (and inexpensive) to buy off
the shelf crossbars, or do I need to go back to the dealer?

(Side question -- why does Ford sell a roof rack without crossbars?)
Hoot!!! - 26 May 2004 18:58 GMT
Think yourselves lucky in UK the price is about $6.00 a gallon
Basic Wedge - 27 May 2004 02:06 GMT
> (Side question -- why does Ford sell a roof rack without crossbars?)

I didn't know they did! My wagon came with crossbars. If they were, at all,
easy to remove, I'd take them off.

Rob
Timothy J. Lee - 28 May 2004 21:46 GMT
>Likewise with the crossbars for roofrack.  The Yakima crossbars weren't
>in stock, so I'll have to wait.  Is it easy (and inexpensive) to buy off
>the shelf crossbars, or do I need to go back to the dealer?

Try other Yakima dealers (like shops that sell bicycles, kayaks, canoes,
and other sporting / outdoor recreation goods).  Thule may also offer
racks for your car.  Try http://www.yakima.com and http://www.thuleracks.com .

Signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Timothy J. Lee
Unsolicited bulk or commercial email is not welcome.
No warranty of any kind is provided with this message.

Corrie Davis - 02 Jun 2004 21:29 GMT
I have an 01 wagon.

I chucked the factory cross bars (simple to remove with screw driver.
Rails remain in place.  I bought thule "Crossroad 450" foot pack to
attach to the rails and thule load bars.  much better in terms of
versatility.

I carry two white water and one sea kayak on the top of the car with
ease now.

> >Likewise with the crossbars for roofrack.  The Yakima crossbars weren't
> >in stock, so I'll have to wait.  Is it easy (and inexpensive) to buy off
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> and other sporting / outdoor recreation goods).  Thule may also offer
> racks for your car.  Try http://www.yakima.com and http://www.thuleracks.com .
Roarmeister - 28 May 2004 01:02 GMT
> > Will N.A. be turning to smaller vehicles in the near future -- is the
> > age of bigger engines/displacement going to take a turn like it did in
> > the '70s?  If you convert energy costs of the '70s to today's inflated
> > dollar we still are not paying the same cost as we did then.

> At the moment, there isn't too much screaming about the oil companies;
> but then prices probably haven't peaked yet, which they probably will
> about the time the politicians announce their usual fruitless
> investigations and hearings. (You might have noticed that it's political
> season down south.)

 http://www.cbc.ca/stories/2004/05/27/business/neb040527
 Oilsands production to more than double by 2015, NEB says:

CALGARY - Despite huge cost overruns in new oilsands projects, a
federal agency says the future of the industry is bright.  In a report
released Thursday, the National Energy Board (NEB) said the costs of
production are expected to decline and demand will continue to grow,
although the industry may have to do some marketing.
Expanded production will require new or larger pipelines to carry the
oil to markets, which could eventually include California and the Far
East, the board said.
Basic Wedge - 27 May 2004 01:57 GMT
Both our family's cars are fuel efficient compacts. I can't say we really
ever downsized from a gas guzzler - we never owned one. Our Focus wagon was
purchased to replace a reasonably fuel efficient Taurus wagon. That was a
time when gas first hit $.70 CDN per litre, and the slight fuel savings were
appreciated, none the less.
Basic Wedge - 27 May 2004 02:02 GMT
Gas prices in Manitoba are about the same as what you're paying in
Saskatchewan. I can add that gas was $1.92 a gallon in North Dakota a couple
of weeks ago.

If I was in the market for a new vehicle today, I would not be considering
an SUV :)

Rob
Neill Massello - 27 May 2004 10:37 GMT
> Gas prices in Manitoba are about the same as what you're paying in
> Saskatchewan. I can add that gas was $1.92 a gallon in North Dakota a couple
> of weeks ago.
>
> If I was in the market for a new vehicle today, I would not be considering
> an SUV :)

I figured that the SUV fad was peaking when Porsche got into the act.
Perhaps all those TV news shots of flipped SUVs finally started to have
an effect.
Dublevay - 27 May 2004 23:58 GMT
> Gas prices in Manitoba are about the same as what you're paying in
> Saskatchewan. I can add that gas was $1.92 a gallon in North Dakota a couple
> of weeks ago.

My heart bleeds ... no, really!! ;o)

Try living in the UK. It's now approx 80 - 85p per L. At 81p per litre,
that's ?3.72 or about $6.70 per Imperial gallon!!

JW
Psyonicdreams - 28 May 2004 09:17 GMT
> > Gas prices in Manitoba are about the same as what you're paying in
> > Saskatchewan. I can add that gas was $1.92 a gallon in North Dakota a
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Try living in the UK. It's now approx 80 - 85p per L. At 81p per litre,
> that's ?3.72 or about $6.70 per Imperial gallon!!

Did you see that one on GMTV a couple of weeks back, one
place in London was charging 96.9p per litre (thats $8 a gallon!).
The place I went yesterday was 79.9p (thats $6.60 a gallon!),
but thats the cheapest in my area.

Dean
Dublevay - 28 May 2004 19:48 GMT
> Did you see that one on GMTV a couple of weeks back, one
> place in London was charging 96.9p per litre (thats $8 a gallon!).
> The place I went yesterday was 79.9p (thats $6.60 a gallon!),
> but thats the cheapest in my area.

It's a nightmare, isn't it. I did see one place on the local news that had a
forecourt attendant. They were charging ?1.09/l. But that is just absolutely
ridiculous. Quite why anyone would go to a place like that (that must have
been 99p/l before the recent price hikes), is beyond me. Maybe that was just
for the cameras?

JW
Roarmeister - 28 May 2004 00:48 GMT
> Price of gas in Regina, Sask. is CDN 92.5/litre for regular.  That
> equates to about $2.56 US/US gal. (according to today's exchange
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> the '70s?  If you convert energy costs of the '70s to today's inflated
> dollar we still are not paying the same cost as we did then.

http://autonet.ca/AutonetStories/Stories.cfm?StoryID=12018

Bear Stearns analyst Domenic Martilotti said higher oil and gas prices
could be causing some people to delay vehicle purchases, but "we don't
believe it's causing a drastic shift from big SUVs to mid-size cars."

"We see gas prices having to move past $3 (a gallon) to have a more
significant impact on consumer tastes," Martilotti said.

Still, sales of fuel-efficient gas-electric hybrids continue to rise.
Toyota's U.S. arm reported its eighth consecutive best-ever April
sales tally last month, helped in part by strong demand for its hybrid
Prius sedan. Honda, the only other automaker currently selling a
hybrid vehicle on the U.S. retail market, said its Civic hybrid posted
a second consecutive month of record sales in April.

Many dealers have waiting lists for the Prius and Civic hybrids.
Hoot!!! - 28 May 2004 19:14 GMT
We should all sell our cars and buy a donkey :)

only 2 carrots per mile!!
Michael Heiming - 28 May 2004 21:32 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message

In alt.autos.ford.focus Roarmeister <roarmeister2@netscape.net> suggested:
> Price of gas in Regina, Sask. is CDN 92.5/litre for regular.  That
> equates to about $2.56 US/US gal. (according to today's exchange
> rate).

> How much are <you> paying?  According to CNN, the average price in the
> USA is around $2.15/gal.  An article I read mentioned that people will
> not seriously consider downsizing their vehicle (OR buying a SULEV
> type of vehicle) until the price reaches $2.50/gal, however people may

After looking it up 3.785l == 1 US gal, 1l == 0.56 $US, now I'd
love to pay that price, recently 1l "super" 1.199 EUR over here,
which translates to about:

1 US gal == 4.538 EUR (about 5.56 $US according to this
converter: http://www.oanda.com/convert/classic )

Signature

Michael Heiming (GPG-Key ID: 0xEDD27B94)
mail: echo zvpunry@urvzvat.qr | perl -pe 'y/a-z/n-za-m/'

Benjamin Robinson - 29 May 2004 07:30 GMT
In alt.autos.ford.focus, on the "Price of gas = more Foci on the road?"

>How much are <you> paying?  According to CNN, the average price in the
>USA is around $2.15/gal.

About $1.97/US gal in the Tampa Bay area.  This is for regular.
Incidentally, when I bought my car, one other vehicle I was considering was
the VW Golf 1.8T.  This car requires premium fuel; perhaps it's just as well
that I didn't buy it.

>  An article I read mentioned that people will
>not seriously consider downsizing their vehicle (OR buying a SULEV
>type of vehicle) until the price reaches $2.50/gal [...]

Neill Massello has already mentioned that large SUV sales are softening.  GM
is either offering incentives on its big Hummer SUVs, or is considering it.
The hot vehicles right now are hybrids -- Toyota's Prius and the Honda
Civic.  I haven't heard about the sales of small conventionally-powered cars
like the Focus.

I did read an article that some hybrid owners were disappointed in their
mileage.  The real-world mileage of the Civic hybrid, for example, was 36
m.p.g.  Pretty good, but not up to the 44+ the EPA rated it for.  Meanwhile,
I get an honest 30m.p.g. out of the Focus -- not to far off the pace of the
Honda hybrid.

>Will N.A. be turning to smaller vehicles in the near future -- is the
>age of bigger engines/displacement going to take a turn like it did in
>the '70s?

If it does, cars won't be as dreary as they were 30 years ago.  Automotive
engineers have gotten a lot better at extracting more power from small
engines -- just ask any "tuner."
Signature

Benjamin Robinson                                     bjr7@freenet.tlh.fl.us
This message may or may not contain sarcastic content; your burden to decide
         "I'm naked, clueless, and f-e-e-e-ling good!" -- Ratbert

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.