Car Forum / Ford / Ford Focus / October 2004
Different Cars
|
|
Thread rating:  |
GM - 22 Aug 2004 18:18 GMT The Focus cars made in the EU are better quality and more reliable than the ones made in America, Canada and Mexico.Why would that be?
Andy Lee - 22 Aug 2004 21:27 GMT >The Focus cars made in the EU are better quality and more reliable than the >ones made in America, Canada and Mexico.Why would that be? Better quality workforce, better quality parts.More expensive parts. Europeans care more about the quality of their small cars than Americans do, To Americans the Focus is generally a 2nd or 3rd car usually driven by the other half and the expectations are not as high.
Regards
Andy Lee
 Signature It matters not whether you win or lose; what matters is whether I win or lose.
Michael Heiming - 22 Aug 2004 21:44 GMT -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
In alt.autos.ford.focus Andy Lee <arl@nospamblueyonder.co.uk> suggested:
>>The Focus cars made in the EU are better quality and more reliable than the >>ones made in America, Canada and Mexico.Why would that be?
> Better quality workforce, better quality parts.More expensive parts. > Europeans care more about the quality of their small cars than > Americans do, To Americans the Focus is generally a 2nd or 3rd car > usually driven by the other half and the expectations are not as high. Sounds reasonable, in addition the Focus isn't a small car in Europe, it's considered IIRC somehow "lower-middle-class", the majority of cars driven over here is this size/class.
 Signature Michael Heiming (GPG-Key ID: 0xEDD27B94) mail: echo zvpunry@urvzvat.qr | perl -pe 'y/a-z/n-za-m/'
Zweef? - 22 Aug 2004 22:42 GMT > >The Focus cars made in the EU are better quality and more reliable than the > >ones made in America, Canada and Mexico.Why would that be? [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Americans do, To Americans the Focus is generally a 2nd or 3rd car > usually driven by the other half and the expectations are not as high. I sincerely hope this to be nonsense.....
 Signature Bezit en wijsheid zijn illusies
Tim \(Remove NOSPAM. - 23 Aug 2004 00:57 GMT > >The Focus cars made in the EU are better quality and more reliable than the > >ones made in America, Canada and Mexico.Why would that be? For the UK market (probably others in the EU too) Foci are built both in Spain and Germany. As a general rule the German cars are better built. (fit and finish, lack of rattles etc)
Tim..
Chris Game - 23 Aug 2004 09:18 GMT Tim (Remove NOSPAM. wrote:
> For the UK market (probably others in the EU too) Foci are built > both in Spain and Germany. As a general rule the German cars are > better built. (fit and finish, lack of rattles etc) What's the quickest way of telling which country it was made in?
Useful if you're looking at some second hand examples.
 Signature Chris Game
"The most incomprehensible thing about the world is that it is comprehensible." -- Albert Einstein
Michael Heiming - 23 Aug 2004 11:10 GMT -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
In alt.autos.ford.focus Chris Game <chrisgame@example.net> suggested:
> Tim (Remove NOSPAM. wrote:
>> For the UK market (probably others in the EU too) Foci are built >> both in Spain and Germany. As a general rule the German cars are >> better built. (fit and finish, lack of rattles etc)
> What's the quickest way of telling which country it was made in?
> Useful if you're looking at some second hand examples. You need to encrypt the VIN Number:
http://www.coolcats.net/tech/reference/vincode.html
(There's somewhere an online calculator, don't have the URL handy)
My Focus was according to its VIN built in Saarlouis (Germany).
 Signature Michael Heiming (GPG-Key ID: 0xEDD27B94) mail: echo zvpunry@urvzvat.qr | perl -pe 'y/a-z/n-za-m/'
Josef Erbs - 23 Aug 2004 22:21 GMT > My Focus was according to its VIN built in Saarlouis (Germany). Hi thats less than twenty kilometers from my home. Mine is from there also. bye Jupp
Freddie the Crook Finder - 23 Aug 2004 03:04 GMT >Europeans care more about the quality of their small cars than >Americans do. Bullshit
> To Americans the Focus is generally a 2nd or 3rd car >usually driven by the other half and the expectations are not as high. Premium, grade A bullshit
You need to get out of the house away from watching American TV shows.
Freddie
per - 23 Aug 2004 06:18 GMT > >Europeans care more about the quality of their small cars than > >Americans do. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Freddie I sure heard that Americans have a lot of those Ford, Dodge and Chevrolet pick up trucks, so much that these are their most sold models, and all sorts of SUV's and Mini Vans too, am I deceived here. /per
GM - 23 Aug 2004 06:24 GMT Very rude person, you responded to this persons post and demeaned them. I see that you are in Texans I always thought Texans were polite and friendly people?
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 20:27:58 GMT, Andy Lee <arl@NOSPAMblueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>Europeans care more about the quality of their small cars than >Americans do. Bullshit
> To Americans the Focus is generally a 2nd or 3rd car >usually driven by the other half and the expectations are not as high. Premium, grade A bullshit
You need to get out of the house away from watching American TV shows.
Freddie
HbgpodLW - 23 Aug 2004 08:10 GMT >Very rude person, you responded to this persons post and demeaned them. I >see that you are in Texans I always thought Texans were polite and friendly >people? forget the stereotypes...He said what I was thinking when I read the persons original post...I'd have answered a little more politely but I don't think our expectations are lower because it's a Focus...I'm a female and I want a smaller car that is fun to drive and new so I don't have to worry too much about it. Fords tend to be less expensive to buy and fix and insure than other cars - from my first Maverick in 1973 to my current 2003 Focus. I've had pick-up trucks in there 4 wheel drive and a diesel too but I prefer my smaller cars. The arrogance of this...
>> To Americans the Focus is generally a 2nd or 3rd car >>usually driven by the other half and the expectations are not as high. Since women make decisions on what car or truck is bought 74% of the time in the US I don't think ANYONE intelligent in this business would dare to think that way and survive too long. I've been in dealerships where guys try to treat me like that I take my business elsewhere...to a smarter salesperson - male or female. And I do report the offending dealerships to the automakers. Linda
Chris Game - 23 Aug 2004 09:22 GMT HbgpodLW wrote:
> Since women make decisions on what car or truck is bought 74% of > the time in the US... If this is true I'm sure that's one point of difference between UK (if not Europe) and the US. Do women pay attention to quality issues, read up on them in Which? or other consumer mags, or are they swayed by a good paint job?
 Signature Chris Game
"Drawing on my fine command of language, I said nothing." -- Mark Twain
Stephen F. - 23 Aug 2004 12:18 GMT > > Since women make decisions on what car or truck is bought 74% of > > the time in the US... [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > issues, read up on them in Which? or other consumer mags, or are > they swayed by a good paint job? Another clueless response. Most women are better informed about the financially relevant aspects of car ownership when it comes time to make a purchasing decision. They place an emphasis on quality ratings, fuel economy, service costs. It's usually the men who are acting on impulse...
Andy Lee - 24 Aug 2004 10:08 GMT >>Very rude person, you responded to this persons post and demeaned them. I >>see that you are in Texans I always thought Texans were polite and friendly >>people? > > forget the stereotypes...He said what I was thinking when I read the persons >original post...I'd have answered a little more politely Well at least you posted more than 1 line of insult. We often think like Freddie but most of us usually pause and take stock and respond in a more reasoned way, but hey ho we can't all be polite and even tempered maybe he just had a bad day at the office.
>but I don't think our >expectations are lower because it's a Focus...I'm a female and I want a smaller [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > >> To Americans the Focus is generally a 2nd or 3rd car >>>usually driven by the other half and the expectations are not as high. What's arrogant of making the observation that Foci are 2nd or 3rd choice of car and when you pay a lot less for it than mainstream cars why would you expect mainstream quality. In no way was I implying that because you were female that your specific expectations were not as high but be honest if your husband brought the car for you he probably couldn't give a damn what the quality was like unless it impinged on his own life too much
> Since women make decisions on what car or truck is bought 74% of the time in >the US I don't think ANYONE intelligent in this business would dare to think >that way and survive too long. Please cite evidence that this is the case, remember here in the Uk a large percentage (>50%)of cars are company cars and choice is not always an option and even if it was most peole who chose them have another car at home
> I've been in dealerships where guys try to treat >me like that I take my business elsewhere...to a smarter salesperson - male or >female. And I do report the offending dealerships to the automakers. > Linda Good for you Linda I bet that makes you feel a whole lot better :-) This doesn't matter in the UK most dealers treat you like sh*t weather you are male or female.
Chris Game - 24 Aug 2004 18:08 GMT Andy Lee wrote:
> What's arrogant of making the observation that Foci are 2nd or 3rd > choice of car and when you pay a lot less for it than mainstream > cars why would you expect mainstream quality. You seem to equate performance and features with 'quality'; if Japanese manufacturers have taught us anything it is that volume products have to be reliable and dependable to sell, and to reduce warranty costs. Thus small cars - driven by the Japanese competition - generally have high 'quality', where quality means fitness for purpose (or similar).
 Signature Chris Game
'Calm down -- it's only ones and zeros.'
Michael Heiming - 24 Aug 2004 18:57 GMT -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
In alt.autos.ford.focus Chris Game <chrisgame@example.net> suggested:
> Andy Lee wrote:
>> What's arrogant of making the observation that Foci are 2nd or 3rd >> choice of car and when you pay a lot less for it than mainstream >> cars why would you expect mainstream quality.
> You seem to equate performance and features with 'quality'; if > Japanese manufacturers have taught us anything it is that volume > products have to be reliable and dependable to sell, and to reduce > warranty costs. Thus small cars - driven by the Japanese > competition - generally have high 'quality', where quality means > fitness for purpose (or similar). Until you need to get some spare parts, motor-bike/car doesn't matter, Japanese manufacturer rip you off over here (Germany).
So, let's have a look if reality backs up Andy's statement:
http://www.bellaonline.com/articles/art6844.asp
Top Selling Vehicles in US in 2002
This list was gathered by www.autonews.com
1: Ford F-350 2: Chevrolet Silverado 1500 3: Toyota Camry Solera 4: Ford Explorer 5: Honda Accord 6: Dodge Ram Van 1500 7: Ford Taurus 8: Honda Civic 9: Chevrolet Trailblazer 10: Dodge Caravan
Lot's of SUV among them, couldn't find any stats for the UK, perhaps someone has an URL?
 Signature Michael Heiming (GPG-Key ID: 0xEDD27B94) mail: echo zvpunry@urvzvat.qr | perl -pe 'y/a-z/n-za-m/'
Freddie the Crook Finder - 24 Aug 2004 20:18 GMT >1: Ford F-350 >2: Chevrolet Silverado 1500 [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > >Lot's of SUV among them, Care to define "lots"? Maybe you can name the lots of SUVs on your list; it won't take long ;-)
Freddie
Michael Heiming - 24 Aug 2004 20:59 GMT -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
In alt.autos.ford.focus Freddie the Crook Finder <saynothankyoutoSPAM@ourhouse.com> suggested:
>>1: Ford F-350 >>2: Chevrolet Silverado 1500 [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >> >>Lot's of SUV among them,
> Care to define "lots"? Maybe you can name the lots of SUVs on your Sure you will tell us?
 Signature Michael Heiming (GPG-Key ID: 0xEDD27B94) mail: echo zvpunry@urvzvat.qr | perl -pe 'y/a-z/n-za-m/'
Freddie the Crook Finder - 25 Aug 2004 03:39 GMT >>>1: Ford F-350 >>>2: Chevrolet Silverado 1500 [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > >Sure you will tell us? Oh heck, your no fun at all. Just in case, number 4, Ford Explorer and number 9, Chevrolet Trailblazer are the only SUVs, but you already knew that. It's the reasoning that concludes that 2 out of 10 constitutes, "Lots of SUV among them", that I was hoping to see.
I'm not a big fan of statistics anyway; I always think of the line, "Lies, dam lies and statistics". The Ford F 350, for those who may not know, is enough truck to pull down a house, two houses if you spring for the 6.8 L V10. This was the best selling vehicle in the U.S. in '02? I don't think so.
Freddie
>Michael Heiming (GPG-Key ID: 0xEDD27B94) >mail: echo zvpunry@urvzvat.qr | perl -pe 'y/a-z/n-za-m/' [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >=cvnI >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Michael Heiming - 25 Aug 2004 06:51 GMT -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
In alt.autos.ford.focus Freddie the Crook Finder <saynothankyoutoSPAM@ourhouse.com> suggested:
>>>>1: Ford F-350 >>>>2: Chevrolet Silverado 1500 [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] >> >>Sure you will tell us?
> Oh heck, your no fun at all. Just in case, number 4, Ford Explorer and > number 9, Chevrolet Trailblazer are the only SUVs, but you already > knew that. It's the reasoning that concludes that 2 out of 10 > constitutes, "Lots of SUV among them", that I was hoping to see.
> I'm not a big fan of statistics anyway; I always think of the line, > "Lies, dam lies and statistics". The Ford F 350, for those who may > not know, is enough truck to pull down a house, two houses if you > spring for the 6.8 L V10. This was the best selling vehicle in the > U.S. in '02? I don't think so. Ah well, thought the Ford F 350 would be an SUV in addition, might have confused it with Ford F-150, don't know the Ford US models that well. You only see them over here once a year if you are lucky, looking at the fuel consumption, only idiots drive them here (Germany). So, there are after all 2 SUV among them. Don't like any stats I haven't faked myself too. Thought the discussion could benefit from some "facts", only insulting each other is rather cheap and doesn't help anyone.;)
 Signature Michael Heiming (GPG-Key ID: 0xEDD27B94) mail: echo zvpunry@urvzvat.qr | perl -pe 'y/a-z/n-za-m/'
Tim C - 25 Aug 2004 14:34 GMT > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] >>> >>>Sure you will tell us? ...
>> I'm not a big fan of statistics anyway; I always think of the line, >> "Lies, dam lies and statistics". The Ford F 350, for those who may >> not know, is enough truck to pull down a house, two houses if you >> spring for the 6.8 L V10. This was the best selling vehicle in the >> U.S. in '02? I don't think so. You have a good eye...
His list came from a site whose claim to fame is that everything is hand-entered. (!) It was way up on Google, for some reason.
Anyway, I caught it because they painfully misspelled "Solara," which happens to be marginally different than the base Camry. I started to post earlier and thought better of feeding this thread, but nonethelees, for the real list (same idea, but a bit more comprehensive): http://www.edmunds.com/reviews/list/top10/99278/article.html
It also has numbers.
You'll see that the groupings are a bit painful (#1 was _every_ Ford F-series truck, for example). Roughly 680K units of SUV sold versus 1.9M trucks, 1.4M cars, and 250K vans in the top 10.
> Ah well, thought the Ford F 350 would be an SUV in addition, > might have confused it with Ford F-150, don't know the Ford US [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > discussion could benefit from some "facts", only insulting each > other is rather cheap and doesn't help anyone.;) The Ford F series is all truck. All of them. The F-150 is a light truck, the F-350 is a heavy truck. From my German friends I'm inclined to agree it would take a nut to drive a truck _or_ full-sized SUV there; you'd never be able to park! :) My friend with the van had enough trouble.
I know you didn't mess up your duplication of the list; that site did a painfully poor job of typing it in. Fortunately for the discussion Edmunds had it (as well as the lists for 2000, 2001, and 2003) for easy access.
I will say for my part, the Focus is our primary car (US, 2002), my wife drives it, and I drive the early-90s clunkers that are our secondaries. I suspect I'm average for Focus owners here (central North Carolina), based on the others I've seen around. I'm not sure why someone would give his wife the _bad_ car for driving around town... I'd rather have my car break on the way to/from work and have her take me the rest of the way than have to drop everything and go rescue her and children from the grocery.
Back to your reguarly scheduled bickering, -TC
 Signature swap triangle and cannedmeat to reply
Me - 25 Aug 2004 16:42 GMT >>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>Hash: SHA1 [quoted text clipped - 75 lines] > Back to your reguarly scheduled bickering, > -TC Right, my wife is driveing the '03 Sable, (which incidently gets as good or better milage as mine)I got the '00 ZX3.
Michael Heiming - 25 Aug 2004 17:53 GMT -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
In alt.autos.ford.focus Tim C <cannedmeat@crone.us> suggested:
>> In alt.autos.ford.focus Freddie the Crook Finder <saynothankyoutoSPAM@ourhouse.com> suggested: >>> On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 19:59:04 -0000, Michael Heiming [..]
> Anyway, I caught it because they painfully misspelled "Solara," which > happens to be marginally different than the base Camry. I started to > post earlier and thought better of feeding this thread, but nonethelees, > for the real list (same idea, but a bit more comprehensive): > http://www.edmunds.com/reviews/list/top10/99278/article.html Yup, looks better and has some numbers in addition.
[..]
> You'll see that the groupings are a bit painful (#1 was _every_ Ford > F-series truck, for example). Roughly 680K units of SUV sold versus > 1.9M trucks, 1.4M cars, and 250K vans in the top 10. Ah see, thought trucks and SUV would belong to one category, you don't see much of those over here owned privately, perhaps some Ford Ranger and there are some older VW Caddy. Don't know why, perhaps it's just raining to much? Was looking into getting a Ford Ranger times I got my Focus, but it wasn't easy getting one cheap (at all) used, wasn't sure which one to get, top speed seemed a bit low, IIRC not even 100 mph, which is often not enough to drive comfortable on the left lane of a German high-way, so I got a Focus. It does pretty well, despite the few minor glitches any Ford I owned had.
[..]
> The Ford F series is all truck. All of them. The F-150 is a light > truck, the F-350 is a heavy truck. From my German friends I'm > inclined to agree it would take a nut to drive a truck _or_ full-sized > SUV there; you'd never be able to park! :) My friend with the van had > enough trouble. You see a bunch of those SUV recently, mostly Mercedes M class, BMW X ?, VW Tuareg and others. But those are probably not that large as the ones driven in the US. They are pretty expensive, so one can assume most of the owners have one or more other cars.
[..]
> why someone would give his wife the _bad_ car for driving around > town... I'd rather have my car break on the way to/from work and have > her take me the rest of the way than have to drop everything and go > rescue her and children from the grocery. Full ack!
 Signature Michael Heiming (GPG-Key ID: 0xEDD27B94) mail: echo zvpunry@urvzvat.qr | perl -pe 'y/a-z/n-za-m/'
Andy Lee - 25 Aug 2004 11:00 GMT >Andy Lee wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >competition - generally have high 'quality', where quality means >fitness for purpose (or similar). Fair point Chris but when you look closely at Japanese small cars the real price is not apparent until you try to do things to repair them. Spares prices are stupidly high compared with say Ford or GM parts (at least this is the case here in the UK) Also Japanese small cars also tend to be more expensive than say the Ford equivelent (again here in the UK) not by a huge amount but when you consider the difference in cost to say use higher quality plastics in the cabin is not that much at the production stage you have to wonder if Fords penny pinching is doing them any favours in the quality stakes.
HbgpodLW - 25 Aug 2004 02:44 GMT >What's arrogant of making the observation that Foci are 2nd or 3rd >choice of car and when you pay a lot less for it than mainstream cars [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >couldn't give a damn what the quality was like unless it impinged on >his own life too much It's not the 2nd or 3rd choice of car - he meant the second or third car in the family...And yes I do expect decent quality for the money I pay for my cars...Ford doesn't mean cheap - it means reasonable. And I also don't "let" my husband pick my cars so that's not an option...I don't pick his either but he did pick a Ford...
>> Since women make decisions on what car or truck is bought 74% of the time >in >>the US I don't think ANYONE intelligent in this business would dare to think >>that way and survive too long. I'm talking about personal cars - not something a company would give you. I do know my percent is correct. Most carmakers realize that and ask women for input for their preferences.
>Please cite evidence that this is the case, remember here in the Uk a >large percentage (>50%)of cars are company cars and choice is not [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >This doesn't matter in the UK most dealers treat you like sh*t weather >you are male or female. Before I wouldn't have done that - at least now I have an option...and choose to use it. Kind of like answering back to you..and others. Linda
Freddie the Crook Finder - 23 Aug 2004 21:39 GMT >Very rude person, you responded to this persons post and demeaned them. I >see that you are in Texans I always thought Texans were polite and friendly >people? Pardon me, lady. At least I think your female; whatever you are your either too lazy or just plain too rude to sign some kind of name so we at least know what gender we're addressing.
Having said that, we are very friendly people, but like people everywhere, we object to being patronized and stereotyped which is exactly what the man I was resopnding to did with his remarks about Americans and their automobiles. As for the use of the word, bullshit, that's simply one of our more polite, genteel colloquialisms.
I fail to see how being honest demeans anyone.
Freddie
HbgpodLW - 24 Aug 2004 01:50 GMT >>Very rude person, you responded to this persons post and demeaned them. I >>see that you are in Texans I always thought Texans were polite and friendly [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > >Freddie The person you were addressing "Very rude person..." had the name of Gary...if you had read the whole message you'd have seen it I think. I have AOL so I don't know if it shows up differently on yours...I always sign mine with my name...Linda
Freddie the Crook Finder - 24 Aug 2004 02:26 GMT > The person you were addressing "Very rude person..." had the name of Gary...if >you had read the whole message you'd have seen it I think. I have AOL so I >don't know if it shows up differently on yours...I always sign mine with my >name...Linda I always read the whole message. How could I be an effective Crook Finder and fail to do so. All I saw on the "Very rude person" message, including in the complete header was: From "GM" ginnaam@ nospamhotmail.com. That's a genderless soul if there ever was one. Either a lazy one or simply one who could care less. In any event, there never is a problem when people like you and I take the extra 2 seconds to sign our messages.
Freddie
Richard Ray - 25 Aug 2004 22:00 GMT Sounds like "Freddie" surely is a product of Texas. But not one of their hospitable and friendly persons. But does bovine and equine scat best describe his posts, and by extension, brand him the same?
> Very rude person, you responded to this persons post and demeaned them. I > see that you are in Texans I always thought Texans were polite and friendly [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Freddie
> Very rude person, you responded to this persons post and demeaned them. I > see that you are in Texans I always thought Texans were polite and friendly [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Freddie Freddie the Crook Finder - 26 Aug 2004 03:30 GMT >Sounds like "Freddie" surely is a product of Texas. But not one of their >hospitable and friendly persons. But does bovine and equine scat best >describe his posts, and by extension, brand him the same? Congratulations Richard for jumping right in the middle of a thread that, to a lot of folks delight, had finally ended for some 24 hours.
Did you have to use both brain cells trying to think of something clever to say?
Freddie
GM - 26 Aug 2004 06:04 GMT As I said in my previous message "Freddie" is a Very rude person, he responded to Richards post and demeaned him. Talking about brain cells he is the one to talk. Maybe he is related to George whets his name he comes from Texas. Gina.
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 16:00:06 -0500, Richard Ray <richardray@cox.net> wrote:
>Sounds like "Freddie" surely is a product of Texas. But not one of their >hospitable and friendly persons. But does bovine and equine scat best >describe his posts, and by extension, brand him the same? Congratulations Richard for jumping right in the middle of a thread that, to a lot of folks delight, had finally ended for some 24 hours.
Did you have to use both brain cells trying to think of something clever to say?
Freddie
Freddie the Crook Finder - 26 Aug 2004 18:23 GMT >As I said in my previous message "Freddie" is a Very rude person, he >responded to Richards post and demeaned him. Talking about brain cells he is >the one to talk. Maybe he is related to George whets his name he comes from >Texas. >Gina. I thought this thread was over, then along came Richard to stir the pot, and now your wanting to turn the whole thing into a political debate. Shame.
Freddie
Gary Pigott - 23 Aug 2004 11:31 GMT >>Europeans care more about the quality of their small cars than >>Americans do. > > Bullshit Agreed
>> To Americans the Focus is generally a 2nd or 3rd car >>usually driven by the other half and the expectations are not as high. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Freddie Strongly disagree. Here's some news for you: Because European cars tend to be smaller than US ones, people who'd buy a Focus over here (I'm Irish by the way, but I travel to the US a few times a year) are the same ones who'd buy a Taurus over there. A European Focus costs about $23K (Which *will* buy a Taurus in the US), compared to $14K in the US, (which will get you a Hyundai Getz here <shudder>. See http://www.carzone.ie/newcars/index.cfm?fuseaction=Details&uid=677). The Euro-Focus is marketed and priced as a mid-range family car. The Ameri-Focus is marketed as a car for young drivers or as a 2nd or even 3rd car in a household.
Because European Focus owners are paying Taurus money, the fit and finish is higher than the US car (that $9K isn't just extra profit for FMC). The engines and transmissions are all different. Most of the interior trim is different. Our ignitions don't break (we have those hexagonal key things), and our brake discs last as long as other manufacturer's cars.
Gary
 Signature Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, because you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup. http://garypigott.net
Andy Lee - 24 Aug 2004 09:53 GMT >>Europeans care more about the quality of their small cars than >>Americans do. > >Bullshit If you are going to counter my suggestions at least have the ability to back it up with something other than 1 line of abuse otherwise all you do is reinforce the steerotype of Americans being lowbrow grunts or maybe that is what you are after all.
>> To Americans the Focus is generally a 2nd or 3rd car >>usually driven by the other half and the expectations are not as high. > >Premium, grade A bullshit so all Americans make the Focus their number one choice of car and all those SUV's etc that are the top selling cars in America are a figment of my imagination then
>You need to get out of the house away from watching American TV shows. > >Freddie Don't flatter yourself American TV is not worth the effort of watching, unless I'm having trouble getting to sleep.
Freddie the Crook Finder - 24 Aug 2004 15:09 GMT >so all Americans make the Focus their number one choice of car and all >those SUV's etc that are the top selling cars in America are a figment >of my imagination then You argue just like my late mother in law. Name any subject in the world and she was the worlds greatest expert on that subject. How very boorish. The simple fact is that you made a statement about Americans and their cars that was totaly off the wall and based on nothing but your own presumed expertise. It was not only opinionated, but steriotyping, rude and just plain ignorant. I caught it, Linda did, and I'm sure others did as well. By the way are your remarks to Linda typical of British gentlemen?
You've been holding court here for a long time, my mother in law would have loved you although the two of you eventually would have devoured one another with your egos. You got caught with your foot in your mouth and couldn't handle the consequences. Is that wordy enough for you? I still think bullshit says it a lot better.
>Don't flatter yourself American TV is not worth the effort of >watching, unless I'm having trouble getting to sleep. There you go. That's the Andy we all know and love and have grown to tolerate, however there are limits.
Freddie
P.S. In case it has not hit you yet, your done. I have better things to do so you just continue making an a.s of yourself.
Andy Lee - 25 Aug 2004 11:09 GMT >>so all Americans make the Focus their number one choice of car and all >>those SUV's etc that are the top selling cars in America are a figment >>of my imagination then > >You argue just like my late mother in law. Name any subject in the >world and she was the worlds greatest expert on that subject. I have never claimed to be an expert on the Ford Focus and if you look at my posts you will see that most of them are based on my personal experience with driving Focii for the last 5 years.
So where did you pop up from Freddie if you think I've been holding court in here such a long time then. Care to point out how many posts I have made in here over say the past 4 years. To save you the trouble it's around 170 not a lot. Whereas you have posted What 21 times in less time than it takes you to decide which shoes goes on which foot in the morning
>How very >boorish. The simple fact is that you made a statement about Americans >and their cars that was totaly off the wall and based on nothing but >your own presumed expertise. It was not only opinionated, well surprise surprise it was opinionated of me to hold an opinion. What was rude about it please point it out. I responded to the original question with a set of possible answers as to why the American Focus was apparantly not as well built as its European counterpart. No where did I state that any of them were fact but lets look at each of them in turn.
1 Better workforce It is common knowledge that a lot of quality problems with the early NA focus were because they were built in Mexico where the workforce was very inexperienced compared to the say the Workforce in Germany who have been building cars for longer that I have been alive. This is not disimilar to the case where the cars made in Spain are also not as good because again the workforce was new.
2 Better Parts. As has been stated by other posters in this thread the American Focus has had supplier quality issues from before the first day of production this is not to say that this does not happen else where but it certainly did contribute to the problems with the early Focus models.
3 This is obviously related to 2 in that the list price for a European Focus is a lot higher than the NA Focus hence the percieved quality has to be higher to maintain customer satisfaction.
4 This is the one that got up your nose I suppose. I tried to say that to the Average American the Focus is just a little fun can that doesn't cost a whole lot compared with your mainstream choice of cars so why should Ford raise expectation of mainstream percieved quality? after all I wouldn't expect the same levels of build quality in my Focus as what I would expect from say a Mercedes C class costing more that twice as much. As to the comments that the car is driven by the other half and the expectations are not as high, well all I can go by is my own experiences here in the UK where most couples who have 2 cars the wife generally drives a little runabout to do things like the shopping etc etc this is not normally a new car and is regarded as just a usefull little tool to make life easier. Ok in better off classes this may not be entirely the case but it's fair to say that in general this second card does not have particularly high expectations of quality surrounding it. If this came accross as offensive why not just say so instead of using abuse. I'm prepared to apologise as much as the next guy but not to somebody who's line in reasoned argument seems to consist of insulting someone they don't agree with.
3
>but >steriotyping, rude and just plain ignorant. I caught it, Linda did, >and I'm sure others did as well. By the way are your remarks to Linda >typical of British gentlemen? Which remarks are you on about. The only comment I have made recently to Linda in this thread were complementing her on at least arguing her case. You on the other hand.....
>You've been holding court here for a long time, my mother in law would >have loved you although the two of you eventually would have devoured >one another with your egos. You got caught with your foot in your >mouth and couldn't handle the consequences. Is that wordy enough for >you? I still think bullshit says it a lot better. Hey I'm entitled to post to this group at least as much as you are bud if you don't like what I post fine I don't have a problem with that but if your only argument is a series of 1 line insults then don't expect me to enter into reasoned debate with you.
>>Don't flatter yourself American TV is not worth the effort of >>watching, unless I'm having trouble getting to sleep. > >There you go. That's the Andy we all know and love and have grown to >tolerate, however there are limits. So in the short time you have been here makes you an expert on all things Andy now does it? So I don't like American TV. So what I don't much like English TV either, most TV is mindless crap designed to passify the masses.
>Freddie > >P.S. In case it has not hit you yet, your done. I have better things >to do so you just continue making an a.s of yourself. Feel free to do what you please, but don't expect your little outburst do anything other that reinforce my negative image of you either.
Dave Gower - 24 Aug 2004 00:56 GMT > The Focus cars made in the EU are better quality and more reliable than the > ones made in America, Canada and Mexico.Why would that be? This was only true in 2000 and 2001. Since then, quality of North American Foci has been as good as anyone in the market segment.
But as to the explanation for the first two years, I dealt with that in a recent post, but to repeat here:
"...Ford North America invited the local suppliers to participate in product development, hoping this would improve quality. Bad move. More than one supplier apparently used this opportunity to boost their profits rather than make a better car.
Another thing is timing. I understand that the North American operations were forced to rush their cars into production in the late summer of 1999, when they were still trying to incorporate the lessons of the first year of European production, which had revealed some problems. They would have preferred to wait until later in the year."
Raider Rick - 28 Aug 2004 06:57 GMT Headline: Troll snares a netfull.
 Signature Rapid Rick "Just drive, baby" "And you snatch your rattling last breaths, with deep sea diver sounds, and the flowers bloom like madness in the spring."
> The Focus cars made in the EU are better quality and more reliable than the > ones made in America, Canada and Mexico.Why would that be? John R Cambron - 05 Sep 2004 07:53 GMT > The Focus cars made in the EU are better quality and more reliable than the > ones made in America, Canada and Mexico.Why would that be? As one who has a Mexican built 2004 ZX3 that I got in April of 2003. I have had reliable service for over 132,000 miles. The only major work that was done was replacing the front brake rotors and pads at 122,000 miles. The only car that I have owned that ever come as close to this level or reliability was my 1997 5 Speed manual Ford Escort wagon that I totaled in a wreck with 200,000 plus miles on the clock.
 Signature John in the sand box of Marylands eastern shore.
Johnny BlazE - 10 Oct 2004 03:50 GMT >>The Focus cars made in the EU are better quality and more reliable than the >>ones made in America, Canada and Mexico.Why would that be? [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Escort wagon that I totaled in a wreck with 200,000 plus miles on > the clock. We've had our Focus for 5 years with no problems here in the UK. Bought it from new...
-JBlazE, Newbie to Newsgroup here
|
|
|