>> I am considering a pre-emptive intake manifold replacement on my
>> wife's 1997 G.M. 54,000 miles, looks and runs like new.
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>
> .
Hmm, I didn't fare so well with my 1996 Thunderbird and its 4.6. My
intake manifold blew 5 miles from home while I was passing someone and
it seemed like I overheated very quickly. I made it home, but from
there it had to be towed. This happened in October 1999 with just over
60,000 miles on the car that I had from day 1. Sadly, it was NOT the
same after the intake manifold blew so I traded it on a 2000 F150 in
December of 1999.
Oddly, about 2 years ago, I saw my old car at a junkyard on a display
rack. At least, I thought it was mine because it had the same
aftermarket rims and a real true dual exhaust, which were both
modifications that I made to the car.
RD Jones - 12 Feb 2008 00:32 GMT
> > "George Adams" <george9...@aol-dot-com.no-spam.invalid> wrote in message
> >> I am considering a pre-emptive intake manifold replacement on my
> >> wife's 1997 G.M. 54,000 miles, looks and runs like new.
Has the manifold been replaced yet under the recall ?
Determine for certain that the intake has a plastic front water
passage
crossover. If it's a plastic crossover your pre-emptive service is not
a bad idea.
> >> I checked Advance Auto Parts website and found two choices, the
> >> Motormite at $265, and the Dorman at $199. The show a picture of the
> >> Dorman, and it appears to be all plastic like the original. No picture
> >> of the Motormite, but it carries a lifetime warranty. Anyone have any
> >> info on these two items?
I would not replace the intake with any all plastic part.
Get the correct upgraded part with the metal coolant crossover.
The intake design changed several times, the model year range for your
design is 1996-1998.
> Hmm, I didn't fare so well with my 1996 Thunderbird and its 4.6.
Same here.
The first replacement under the early recall was a similar all plastic
part.
The second time they put in the upgraded intake with the metal
passage.
rd
>>I am considering a pre-emptive intake manifold replacement on my
>> wife's 1997 G.M. 54,000 miles, looks and runs like new.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> the engine has "fail safe cooling." You would be able to continue driving
> the vehicle (at reduced speed) to reach a repair location.
Uh, didn't the poster ask about a GM intake manifold? If so, I agree that
it might be a good idea to replace this intake manifold before it fails.
Around 60,000 to 65,000 miles. Mine did, and I know others with the 3.8L V6
that have done so. Pure GM plastic junk!
Kruse - 12 Feb 2008 00:26 GMT
Pure GM plastic junk!
Uh....the subject here is Grand Marquis here isn't it? You weren't
referring to General Motors
which also has intake manifold problems, were you? Either way, the
junky plastic factory manifolds
have been redesigned by the aftermarket to eliminate some of the
problems that the originals had.
Since I brought up the subject of General Motors, the problem they had
was the EGR passages
burning a hole in the intake and failing.
FYI, check the replacement manifolds. They are probably made in China.