Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Mustang / July 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

69 coupe spoiler advice

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jack Napier - 19 Jul 2004 16:27 GMT
I would like to reduce the lift on my 69 coupe (at high speed) and
also for looks. But im old school when it comes to form and function,
if something is designed for a purpose but slapped on an application
where it doesnt work and is for looks only, im against it. I think we
all know what im talking about. Specifically, will a repro mach 1
spoiler actually mount properly and achieve desired effect on a coupe?
I assume that a front spoiler will help but not sure about the rear.

also, if anyone has had bad experiences with the aftermarket spoilers
available from the paddockparts for example, ABS plastic OK or is
fiberglass a better option? What were the stock ones made of??

Thanks,

PS thanks for the pics in response to previous post.
Stuart&Janet - 19 Jul 2004 23:22 GMT
The rear spoiler will push the rear down thus pushing the front up. A properly adjusted
rear spoilers will work at about 100 mph. (Ask me how I know!) The front spoiler is the
one that keeps the the front down by spoiling the airflow under the car that causes the
entire car to act like a wing. A stock mach 1 front spoiler will make a difference on your
car. StuK

> I would like to reduce the lift on my 69 coupe (at high speed) and
> also for looks. But im old school when it comes to form and function,
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> PS thanks for the pics in response to previous post.
WraithCobra - 20 Jul 2004 00:10 GMT
A wing causes the air to move faster over one side of  it than the other,
like a car body. The air moving faster over the top of the wing, or car
body, lowers the pressure above it creating lift beacuse the presssure below
the wing does not change. It's the normal pressure below the wing, or car
body, that allows it to be lifted by the lower pressure created above it. A
rear spoiler is there to 'spoil' the lift, or low pressure area created by
the airflow over the body, it does not create down force. The splitter on
the front lowers the amount of air going under the front of the car which
lowers the pressure under the car. Less pressure under the car means less
lift when the pressure is lowered above the car.
Signature

Mike
Silver 10th Anniversary Cobra Coupe
---

> The rear spoiler will push the rear down thus pushing the front up. A
> properly adjusted rear spoilers will work at about 100 mph. (Ask me
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>>
>> PS thanks for the pics in response to previous post.
66 6F HCS - 20 Jul 2004 00:33 GMT
> rear spoiler is there to 'spoil' the lift, or low pressure area created by
> the airflow over the body, it does not create down force.

You better tell all the top fuel guys and the vintage SR-2 racers then.
Depending on the angle of the rear spoiler (extreme in most instances),
downforce might or might not be created.
Signature

Scott W.
'66 Mustang HCS 289
'68 Ranchero 500 302
'69 Mustang Sportsroof 351W
'97 Cougar 30th Anniv SE 4.6L
ThunderSnake #57

WraithCobra - 20 Jul 2004 00:50 GMT
Then you are using the term "spoiler" incorrectly. A "spoiler" spoils lift,
it does not create down force. If the apparatus on the rear of the body
creates down force, like an upside down wing, then it is called a "wing".
Signature

Mike
Silver 10th Anniversary Cobra Coupe
---

>> rear spoiler is there to 'spoil' the lift, or low pressure area
>> created by the airflow over the body, it does not create down force.
>
> You better tell all the top fuel guys and the vintage SR-2 racers
> then. Depending on the angle of the rear spoiler (extreme in most
> instances), downforce might or might not be created.
John - 20 Jul 2004 02:18 GMT
Mike,

Cool, so how did you come to know so much about aerodynamics?

Signature

John
ThunderSnake #59
If you Reply, be sure and remove the " (DELETE_THIS) " from the email
address.

> Then you are using the term "spoiler" incorrectly. A "spoiler" spoils lift,
> it does not create down force. If the apparatus on the rear of the body
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> > then. Depending on the angle of the rear spoiler (extreme in most
> > instances), downforce might or might not be created.
WraithCobra - 20 Jul 2004 02:33 GMT
My Father was a licensed pilot and had a Cessna Skyhawk when I was in my
teens. I also spent 10 years in the USAF, should have gotten my private
pilot license but found other uses for the $$. I've read things here and
there on the subject of aerodynamics and know the basics of how things work,
but I don't have an in depth knowlede on the subject.
Signature

Mike
Silver 10th Anniversary Cobra Coupe
---

> Mike,
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>>> then. Depending on the angle of the rear spoiler (extreme in most
>>> instances), downforce might or might not be created.
John - 20 Jul 2004 02:45 GMT
Coulda fooled me.  Excellent post.

Signature

John
ThunderSnake #59
If you Reply, be sure and remove the " (DELETE_THIS) " from the email
address.

> My Father was a licensed pilot and had a Cessna Skyhawk when I was in my
> teens. I also spent 10 years in the USAF, should have gotten my private
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> >>> then. Depending on the angle of the rear spoiler (extreme in most
> >>> instances), downforce might or might not be created.
Jack Napier - 20 Jul 2004 15:23 GMT
So, sounds like having both front and rear "spoilers" would help.
Except for the guy that said a stock mach 1 spoiler would not work on
a coupe.

Thanks,

> Coulda fooled me.  Excellent post.
>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> > >>> then. Depending on the angle of the rear spoiler (extreme in most
> > >>> instances), downforce might or might not be created.
66 6F HCS - 20 Jul 2004 20:16 GMT
> Except for the guy that said a stock mach 1 spoiler would not work on
> a coupe.

Why wouldn't it? You just make a few small holes in the decklid and bolt it on. You just have to be REALLY careful.
http://tinyurl.com/6lrtd
Here's a pic from Mustang and Fords showing what le mans stripes and a front spoiler look like on a '69 coupe.
Signature

Scott W.
'66 Mustang HCS 289
'68 Ranchero 500 302
'69 Mustang Sportsroof 351W
'97 Cougar 30th Anniv SE 4.6L
ThunderSnake #57

Stuart&Janet - 21 Jul 2004 02:43 GMT
When you say spoiler are you talking about the FRONT or the back (wing)? The wing will
work at about 100 mph. Again, the front spoiler will stop the lift you get on the old
Mustangs at around 80/90.
 My '71 Cyclone Spoiler use to hunker down closer to the road at speed. At 115 mph I
actually started scraping my mufflers on the road. StuK

> So, sounds like having both front and rear "spoilers" would help.
> Except for the guy that said a stock mach 1 spoiler would not work on
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> > > >>> then. Depending on the angle of the rear spoiler (extreme in most
> > > >>> instances), downforce might or might not be created.
Jack Napier - 21 Jul 2004 15:25 GMT
with the decklid spoiler i was worried about getting stuck with one
that doesnt let you adjust the angle. do the repros adjust?
also with the front spoiler ive seen them listed as, "the bolt on
type" what other types are there? whats the best to get and do they
require modifications to the body or valance to install??

> When you say spoiler are you talking about the FRONT or the back (wing)? The wing will

> Mustangs at around 80/90.
>   My '71 Cyclone Spoiler use to hunker down closer to the road at speed. At 115 mph I
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
> > > > >>> then. Depending on the angle of the rear spoiler (extreme in most
> > > > >>> instances), downforce might or might not be created.
66 6F HCS - 21 Jul 2004 17:59 GMT
> also with the front spoiler ive seen them listed as, "the bolt on
> type" what other types are there?

I was thinking the same thing. Do they have Velcro?? I can see the Ricer's
pulling off their spoilers to stash them in the trunk when they go into the
mall. Velcro! LMAO!!!
Signature

Scott W.
'66 Mustang HCS 289
'68 Ranchero 500 302
'69 Mustang Sportsroof 351W
'97 Cougar 30th Anniv SE 4.6L
ThunderSnake #57

Stuart&Janet - 21 Jul 2004 22:08 GMT
The proper decklid spoilers used on '69/'70 Mustangs are adjustable.
The '69 BOSS's had plastic ones and they tended to droop in the middle on hot days so Ford
made the '70's out of fibreglass. They were actually quite heavy and required a small prop
rod to stop the trunk from closing.
The same one was used on the '70/'71 Cyclone Spoilers and the Cougar Eliminators. (
Mercury painted them body colour) The '71 to '73 Mustangs used the same wing part but had
shorter legs to account for the larger ( higher) fastback. As for the stock front spoilers
they screw or bolt on to the valance and are molded to the shape of the valance. I added
some small metal brackets near the middle on my '70 mach 1 as I have seen them fold under
at high speed ( they are ABS plastic) HTH StuK

> with the decklid spoiler i was worried about getting stuck with one
> that doesnt let you adjust the angle. do the repros adjust?
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
> > > > > >>> then. Depending on the angle of the rear spoiler (extreme in most
> > > > > >>> instances), downforce might or might not be created.
Jack Napier - 22 Jul 2004 16:50 GMT
for example, the ones sold by www.paddockparts.com are ABS plastic,
the rear has a steel rod through it to keep it straight and they sell
all the mounting hardware. the front one is bolt on type and dont know
if they have mounting hardware and it plastic. they also carry all the
shelby scoops. and a mach 1 hood scoop which im also thinking about.

i think im gonna go for it with the side scoops, i plan on keeping
this car quite a long time and why not go all the way and do something
special with it.

> The proper decklid spoilers used on '69/'70 Mustangs are adjustable.
> The '69 BOSS's had plastic ones and they tended to droop in the middle on hot days so Ford
[quoted text clipped - 56 lines]
> > > > > > >>> then. Depending on the angle of the rear spoiler (extreme in most
> > > > > > >>> instances), downforce might or might not be created.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.