:> Hey all...
:> I am thinking about the upgrades I wanna make to my 86...
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
:off. That would make a very strong motor that will run forever on pump
:gas.
Having swapped a 351 into an '89...
Yes, the 351 uses the existing mounts, but that's about it. You'll need a new
intake manifold, new oil pan, new distributer, new exhaust manifolds along with
a new hood for starters.
This isn't an inexpensive swap. The cost of a 331 stroker can easily be
justified IMHO.
You can re-use all of your old parts and add upgrades as budget allows and reap
the benefits of better torque immediately.
bradtx
66 6F HCS - 08 Oct 2004 17:22 GMT
> Having swapped a 351 into an '89...
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> with
> a new hood for starters.
Why would he need a new oil pan. It's the same pan as a 302. I don't see why
the exhaust headers would have to be replaced either, the motor is only 1/2"
extra width/height added to both sides and uses the same head.
I'm not trying to be a wiseass, I just don't understand why those would have
to be replaced too. The rest I agree with. Does the hood on an '89 really
have such little clearance that a 351 won't fit without a cowl hood?

Signature
Scott W.
'66 Mustang HCS 289
'68 Ranchero 500 302
'69 Mustang Sportsroof 351W
'97 Cougar 30th Anniv SE 4.6L
ThunderSnake #57
http://home.comcast.net/~scott.williams.613/
TurboMike - 08 Oct 2004 17:31 GMT
>Why would he need a new oil pan. It's the same pan as a 302.
For the Mustang it'll have to be the double sump pan.
>Does the hood on an '89 really
>have such little clearance that a 351 won't fit without a cowl hood?
Every swap article I've ever read says it won't fit. Seems like i remember
reading where someone used a special motor mount that lowered the motor in the
bay just enough for it to fit.
///Mike
TS #63
1993 BMW 525i
http://community.webshots.com/user/mpompe2
Pics of all the old cars - Newly updated
66 6F HCS - 08 Oct 2004 17:38 GMT
> Every swap article I've ever read says it won't fit. Seems like i
> remember
> reading where someone used a special motor mount that lowered the motor in
> the
> bay just enough for it to fit.
Sheesh, what a PITA... and an expensive one at that.

Signature
Scott W.
'66 Mustang HCS 289
'68 Ranchero 500 302
'69 Mustang Sportsroof 351W
'97 Cougar 30th Anniv SE 4.6L
ThunderSnake #57
http://home.comcast.net/~scott.williams.613/
CobraJet - 08 Oct 2004 18:40 GMT
> > Having swapped a 351 into an '89...
> >
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Why would he need a new oil pan. It's the same pan as a 302.
Nope. The 351W block has a different rail pattern than the 302;
takes a different pan.
> I don't see why
> the exhaust headers would have to be replaced either, the motor is only 1/2"
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> to be replaced too. The rest I agree with. Does the hood on an '89 really
> have such little clearance that a 351 won't fit without a cowl hood?

Signature
CobraJet
Thunder Snake #1
B2723m - 09 Oct 2004 04:13 GMT
The 351 has larger main bearings (2.749") and the 302 pan won't fit front and
rear. Some of the 351 race blocks do have the 302's size main journal (
2.248".)
The 351 is 3 inches taller and 2 1/4" wider, but the same length per Ford. My
GT40 intake (w/1/2" spacer) has ~ 3/4" clearance with a 2" Harwood hood.
bradtx
> In The Year of Our Lord=-+->!! Wed, 06 Oct 2004 21:00:24
> ~Hey Bob..thanks for the RE...
> I don't have the $$ for a crate motor..but a rebuilt runs around 600
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Thanks again for the advice..
> Johnny
You get what you pay for - if you're lucky. $600 for a rebuilt
motor is pretty darn cheap. It's not going to last long under any kind
of performance use. And it won't make that much power, either. Low
compression, iron rings, cast pistons, stock rods, stock cast crank,
stock cam, stock heads. Cheap, cheap, cheap parts. No valve covers,
front cover, or oil pan. We're probably talking about 225-250 hp.
For that, it's not even worth it to do the swap. You'll be pretty
disappointed. Plus, you have to spend money on the new hood, headers,
etc, to make the swap.
OTOH, For around $2200'ish, PAW will sell you a long block kit that
will make about 375hp with the right cam (included), and last forever at
6500rpm's. Some assembly required. Unless you abuse the heck out of
it, it will be the last engine you ever buy.
I purchased a PAW 427W short block kit for my Cobra. Very well
done, quality parts, machine work spot on.

Signature
.boB
1997 HD FXDWG - Turbocharged!
2001 Dodge Dakota QC 5.9/4x4/3.92
1983 GMC Jimmy - Mountain Beater
1966 Mustang Coupe - Daily Driver
1966 FFR Cobra - Ongoing project
Guess who? - 10 Oct 2004 14:25 GMT
In The Year of Our Lord=-+->!! Fri, 08 Oct 2004 23:19:34
-0600,<-+-=Our highly esteemed and respected member=-+-> boB
<bobcowan@access4less.net> <-+-=Put forth this notion for all to
ponder...
:> In The Year of Our Lord=-+->!! Wed, 06 Oct 2004 21:00:24
:
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
: I purchased a PAW 427W short block kit for my Cobra. Very well
:done, quality parts, machine work spot on.
~Ok..I read all the replies here..and I wanna address a few points..
I know the old parts (oil pan etc) won't swap over from my stock 302
to a 351...
I know there are lower profile engine mounts available...and I was
thinking of going that route..
I know the engine will be taller and wider..thus the cowl hood..
However..a re-built 351 does not have to be a bad investment..they are
cheap because they are plentiful..all the old parts have been replaced
with stock parts..so basically I'll be better off because I'll have a
rebuilt 351 instead of an old 302 with 200K kms on it...
I am not planning to race the car..so stroking it and changing to a
more radical cam and such is not something I am considering at this
point...
I have alot of options..but my point was this..why modify a 302 to
produce a few extra horses when I can replace it with an engine that
will already produce more horses without modifications for less than a
few mods to the 302 would cost me?
This engine I am considering already has an oil pan..intake
manifold..etc..so it's not an issue to consider with the old parts
crossing over...
boB - 10 Oct 2004 22:35 GMT
> In The Year of Our Lord=-+->!! Fri, 08 Oct 2004 23:19:34
> -0600,<-+-=Our highly esteemed and respected member=-+-> boB
[quoted text clipped - 49 lines]
> manifold..etc..so it's not an issue to consider with the old parts
> crossing over...
That's not the issue in my mind. It makes perfect sense to go
bigger. There's no replacement for displacement. An extra 50 cubes is
extremly valuable. It weighs a little more, but that's usually not an
issue.
The swap is also not that difficult. A hood scoop and a set of
headers and you're there. You can use a lower profile motor mount and
trans mount set. But then pinion angle and ground clearance can become
an issue.
The point is (as I see it), that you don't get much for $600. The
parts used often don't yield any power increase over a quality 302,
negating the point of the swap. Plus, there's durability to consider.

Signature
.boB
1997 HD FXDWG - Turbocharged!
2001 Dodge Dakota QC 5.9/4x4/3.92
1983 GMC Jimmy - Mountain Beater
1966 Mustang Coupe - Daily Driver
1966 FFR Cobra - Ongoing project
B2723m - 11 Oct 2004 15:14 GMT
From an economic standpoint...the 351 swap is expensive from all of the
ancillary items required.
So far:
engine/trans mounts, intake/exhaust, oil pan, distributer, hood.
If you buy the rebuilt 351, be advized that your stock heads will require
having the holes for the head bolts drilled to 1/2". A stock upper intake
won't fit a GT40, or any other 351 lower that I'm aware of.
If you search this NG you may find all of the items required from my
swap...couple of years ago.
Should you decide to go ahead with the 351, we'll gladly help. You may've read
some of my sporadic posts of the 351 we're putting into a '65 coupe, so yes I'm
a fan of the swap, it's just not economical.
bradtx