Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Mustang / December 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Does an off road h-pipe increase horsepower

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
BeverlyOmasta - 23 Nov 2004 21:53 GMT
Or not? I hear alot of different stories on this....Does it really boost HP'S a
bit or not at all? I just bought one to go along with my flowmaster exhaust,
and wanted a beat louder deeper sound and maybe some increase in HP'S... How do
you rate the MAC off road h-pipe comapred to others?
TurboMike - 23 Nov 2004 23:46 GMT
Oh Jesus, YOU again?  Are you never gonna learn?  Damn, it's time for the
infamous Dave Lyon's Village Idiot Application to come out of retirement.

....Needless bs snipped.

///Mike
TS #63
1993 BMW 525i
http://community.webshots.com/user/mpompe2
Pics of all the old cars - Newly updated
memset@recorddeal.com - 24 Nov 2004 01:10 GMT
I was waitin for SOMEONE to say something ;).

-Mike

--
A happy kid behind the wheel of a 98 Mustang GT
Cold air intake
FRPP 3.73 gears
Steeda Tri-Ax Shifter
Full Boar turbo mufflers
Hi-speed fan switch
255/60R-15 rear tires
Subframe connectors

> Oh Jesus, YOU again?  Are you never gonna learn?  Damn, it's time for the
> infamous Dave Lyon's Village Idiot Application to come out of retirement.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> http://community.webshots.com/user/mpompe2
> Pics of all the old cars - Newly updated
Claud Spinks - 24 Nov 2004 00:48 GMT
Although I have never personally seen the dyno results for before and
after, cars with off road h-pipes(friend put them on his drag car) have
"seemed" faster. They were also louder, if that is what you are after.
Most people around here buy hi-flow cats vs. the catless h-pipes. But
yours are just for racin', right?
Claud

> Or not? I hear alot of different stories on this....Does it really boost HP'S a
> bit or not at all? I just bought one to go along with my flowmaster exhaust,
> and wanted a beat louder deeper sound and maybe some increase in HP'S... How do
> you rate the MAC off road h-pipe comapred to others?
Larry Hepinstall - 24 Nov 2004 15:18 GMT
It seems faster because its louder.  The difference between a good set of
cats and no cats is only a few horsepower and only at the high end.. nothing
you're going to feel.  The downside is you're going to give up low end
torque that you CAN feel.
Certainly not worth fouling the air for.

LJH
95GT  (331 stroker, Bassani catted X-pipe)

> Although I have never personally seen the dyno results for before and
> after, cars with off road h-pipes(friend put them on his drag car) have
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> > and wanted a beat louder deeper sound and maybe some increase in HP'S... How do
> > you rate the MAC off road h-pipe comapred to others?
BeverlyOmasta - 24 Nov 2004 20:32 GMT
>It seems faster because its louder.  The difference between a good set of
>cats and no cats is only a few horsepower and only at the high end.. nothing
>you're going to feel.  The downside is you're going to give up low end
>torque that you CAN feel.

Damn, i thought the h-pipe would give a bit more low end since thre is no
cats....Oh well, i guess i learned my lesson.... Its just so many peopl i see
have the off road pipes, i figured there was some good coming out of them....
Jim Warman - 27 Nov 2004 04:59 GMT
No cats???? I hope we're not talking daily driver... This happens to be my
f*ckin air too.

> >It seems faster because its louder.  The difference between a good set of
>>cats and no cats is only a few horsepower and only at the high end..
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> have the off road pipes, i figured there was some good coming out of
> them....
351CJ - 27 Nov 2004 17:26 GMT
Removing Cats on your exhaust system is stupid, but I gotta know Jim, what
about all the pre '74/pre Catalectic converter cars on the road?  Do they
F*ckin bother you to?

> No cats???? I hope we're not talking daily driver... This happens to be my
> f*ckin air too.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> > have the off road pipes, i figured there was some good coming out of
> > them....
John - 27 Nov 2004 18:04 GMT
catalytic

Signature

John
ThunderSnake #59
If you Reply, be sure and remove the " (DELETE_THIS) " from the email
address.

> Removing Cats on your exhaust system is stupid, but I gotta know Jim, what
> about all the pre '74/pre Catalectic converter cars on the road?  Do they
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>> > have the off road pipes, i figured there was some good coming out of
>> > them....
memset@recorddeal.com - 27 Nov 2004 20:57 GMT
Thank you...

-Mike

--
A happy kid behind the wheel of a 98 Mustang GT
Cold air intake
FRPP 3.73 gears
Steeda Tri-Ax Shifter
Full Boar turbo mufflers
Hi-speed fan switch
255/60R-15 rear tires
Subframe connectors

> catalytic
>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> >> > have the off road pipes, i figured there was some good coming out of
> >> > them....
Jim Warman - 28 Nov 2004 08:40 GMT
Depends on how they're used.... I have no problem with the collector/resto
ideology. These things are a part of our history. For our daily drivers, I
believe we should be a little more ecologically responsible.

History shows that the human race can find quick ways to screw stuff up...
now we have the technology to minimize our damage  (notice I didn't say
eliminate). All I've ever thought is that a vehicle should meet the emission
requirements for the year it was manufactured.

As a side note..... *most* of the people driving around in old iron have
*usually* spent every available penny on purchasing that old iron and can
ill afford to keep it in top notch condition.... and there goes yet another
piece of history.

I'm not a tree hugger..... but I'm not far away from the day I welcome
grandchildren into this world...... it'd be nice if they could still go
outdoors.

> Removing Cats on your exhaust system is stupid, but I gotta know Jim, what
> about all the pre '74/pre Catalectic converter cars on the road?  Do they
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>> > have the off road pipes, i figured there was some good coming out of
>> > them....
memset@recorddeal.com - 28 Nov 2004 09:54 GMT
I agree whole-heartedly about meeting emissions requirements.. reminded
several times earlier tonight how nasty the smell and TASTE of exhaust is. I
hate it when a biggo cloud of smoke just pours of of someone's exhaust & I
happen to be right behind 'em. That stuff ticks me off.

-Mike

--
A happy kid behind the wheel of a 98 Mustang GT
Cold air intake
FRPP 3.73 gears
Steeda Tri-Ax Shifter
Full Boar turbo mufflers
Hi-speed fan switch
255/60R-15 rear tires
Subframe connectors

> Depends on how they're used.... I have no problem with the collector/resto
> ideology. These things are a part of our history. For our daily drivers, I
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> >> > have the off road pipes, i figured there was some good coming out of
> >> > them....
Wound Up - 28 Nov 2004 17:09 GMT
I drive my 67 without a single solitary emissions control on it about
75% of the time from Mar - Nov.  The state doesn't emissions tests for
vehicles past 30 years old.  When I used to have to take it in, it was
within given limits.

The manufacture of one new vehicle creates more environmental pollution
than my 67 would in 100,000 miles.  Let's not forget all the new OEM
parts that have to be manufactured, the vastly increased complexity and
therefore increased number of (new) parts required for an average
repair, and the fact the vehicle's average lifespan is most likely less
than the lifespan of mine in terms of miles to begin with.

A gas-electric or diesel-electric hybrid is a freaking environmental
disaster, ironically enough.  Think of all that newly developed
expensive hardware, requiring new factory tooling, millions of hours of
training, new tools, new everything, and it's sold under the guise of
"environmentally responsible automobile".  It's not just the air that's
befouled by all of this.

Sure, there is a big curve of all of that at first, that -will- level
off in time.  But the world's automakers keep the innovations (a.k.a.
marketing ploys) coming, ensuring that one big curve just follows the next.

So what's the problem?  Like most, I think you're just failing to see
the big picture.

For the record, I'm not siding with "Beverly", either.

> No cats???? I hope we're not talking daily driver... This happens to be my
> f*ckin air too.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>>have the off road pipes, i figured there was some good coming out of
>>them....

Signature

Wound Up J

1967 Mustang coupe, restored & modified

Remove "put her" to reply in that bucket

Brad and Mia - 29 Nov 2004 02:10 GMT
Are you kidding us?

For the record, my Fox has no cats. Why? It's a summer weekend car and there
are no requirements for them where I live. and I don't have the money to buy
these great exhaust systems. Everything back from the exhaust manifold on my
car is used.

My daily driver is a 1980 Bronco and it is LOADED with emissions crap.  A
351M churns out a whopping 136 horse.  NO sh.t.  So be it.

Brad

>I drive my 67 without a single solitary emissions control on it about 75%
>of the time from Mar - Nov.  The state doesn't emissions tests for vehicles
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
>>>have the off road pipes, i figured there was some good coming out of
>>>them....
Nocares - 03 Dec 2004 06:15 GMT
My 87 Saleen has been stripped of the cats in favor of a 2.5"  & true
headers.  Though it is a summer driver it has finally hit the 11k miles mark
and I still pass the emissions with no problem.  A car properly tuned and
maintained will create less 'smog' than most lawnmowers.  Oh, and as far as
evil bad air-poluters how about a cudos to Mt St helens which in this past
week has speewed out more carbon dioxide than all of WA industries have the
entire year (or liekly more).  And how about that blow in 1980... The amount
of CO into the air on that big blow in one day was greater than all the
factories in the US producing at maximum capacity did throughout the
1970s..yes, the entire decade.  Amazing or not, the world has managed to
survive and clean itself.  End note: Greenhouse gases are overrated, ozone
is overrated and unsubstantiated, and frankly the world could use a few
extra degrees to increase the growing season to help feed all the 'extra'
people.  What would a good evil regime dictator do without the mases to
enslave and decapitate or starve.

Oh, as far as the cats, not sure what part of the power band is affected but
I am certain that the better breathing can only be better for power and
efficiency.  I have plenty of power but now I just need to replace my clutch
that finally burned off.

> Are you kidding us?
>
[quoted text clipped - 53 lines]
>>>>have the off road pipes, i figured there was some good coming out of
>>>>them....
Nocares - 03 Dec 2004 06:21 GMT
Thats 100k miles not 11k.  sorry.
> My 87 Saleen has been stripped of the cats in favor of a 2.5"  & true
> headers.  Though it is a summer driver it has finally hit the 11k miles
[quoted text clipped - 74 lines]
>>>>>have the off road pipes, i figured there was some good coming out of
>>>>>them....
351CJ - 03 Dec 2004 20:34 GMT
You better specify which lawnmowers you are talking about...   I still have
a 5 horse two-stroke oil-mix gas, Craftsman lawnmower for trimming, it makes
many times more pollutants then my vehicles...

You lost your clutch because gutting your exhaust system robbed your LOW RPM
Torque, Hence you have had to slip the clutch more since your exhaust system
"modification"...

> My 87 Saleen has been stripped of the cats in favor of a 2.5"  & true
> headers.  Though it is a summer driver it has finally hit the 11k miles mark
[quoted text clipped - 81 lines]
> >>
> >> Remove "put her" to reply in that bucket
BeverlyOmasta - 24 Nov 2004 18:59 GMT
>Although I have never personally seen the dyno results for before and
>after, cars with off road h-pipes(friend put them on his drag car) have
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>How do
>> you rate the MAC off road h-pipe comapred to others?

No, but i guess im going to have some trouble with emissions... Most guys just
put back on the cats for emissions testing.... I was just trying to find out if
its worth all the changing over of cats each year....
Deputy Dog - 24 Nov 2004 01:24 GMT
I ran with one for a while, but went back to stock. I lost torque in the low
end and lost quite a bit of mileage. I could feel it in the  seat of my
pants.
Signature

Dave
96 Rio Red GTS with a few goodies

> Or not? I hear alot of different stories on this....Does it really boost
> HP'S a
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> How do
> you rate the MAC off road h-pipe comapred to others?
BeverlyOmasta - 24 Nov 2004 19:01 GMT
>I ran with one for a while, but went back to stock. I lost torque in the low
>end and lost quite a bit of mileage. I could feel it in the  seat of my

I thought you would gain torque with an H-pipe....? tom
James - 24 Nov 2004 19:41 GMT
Best to go with a set of Hi-Flo cats.  You have no real differance in HP AND
you are emissions legal AND you don't have to annually reinstall the cats.
I had a custom H-pipe created and installed by a local muffler shop with
hiflo cats for between $300 to $400.  I can't remember the exact price, but
it is comparable to a purchased premade setup.

> >I ran with one for a while, but went back to stock. I lost torque in the
> >low
>>end and lost quite a bit of mileage. I could feel it in the  seat of my
>
> I thought you would gain torque with an H-pipe....? tom
BeverlyOmasta - 24 Nov 2004 20:31 GMT
>est to go with a set of Hi-Flo cats.  You have no real differance in HP AND
>you are emissions legal AND you don't have to annually reinstall the cats.
>I had a custom H-pipe created and installed by a local muffler shop with
>hiflo cats for between $300 to $

I guess i screwed up then... There already on the way, so im may just pay the
shipping and send the off road h-pipe back.... I wonder if MACPERFORMANCE will
give me a hard time refunding me? do you have any experience with them?..
thanks
memset@recorddeal.com - 24 Nov 2004 22:22 GMT
You have an H-pipe already on the way? Has hi-flow cats? Use it!

-Mike

--
A happy kid behind the wheel of a 98 Mustang GT
Cold air intake
FRPP 3.73 gears
Steeda Tri-Ax Shifter
Full Boar turbo mufflers
Hi-speed fan switch
255/60R-15 rear tires
Subframe connectors

> >est to go with a set of Hi-Flo cats.  You have no real differance in HP AND
> >you are emissions legal AND you don't have to annually reinstall the cats.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> give me a hard time refunding me? do you have any experience with them?..
> thanks
Erik D. - 24 Nov 2004 04:57 GMT
http://www.kalecoauto.com/perf.htm

The last thing on the list.  Its whats best for your mustang.  All of
those parts work very well though, you should try them.

Erik D.
'94 white lightning
'01 white GT
memset@recorddeal.com - 24 Nov 2004 05:24 GMT
Air filter bypass kit........ riiiiiiiiight..

-Mike

--
A happy kid behind the wheel of a 98 Mustang GT
Cold air intake
FRPP 3.73 gears
Steeda Tri-Ax Shifter
Full Boar turbo mufflers
Hi-speed fan switch
255/60R-15 rear tires
Subframe connectors

> http://www.kalecoauto.com/perf.htm
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> '94 white lightning
> '01 white GT
Gill - 24 Nov 2004 05:38 GMT
Yeah, that's the one I got. If you want LOUD that's it!

Tropic Green Y2K 5 Speed Mustang GT
       P-1SC & Some MM Stuff
http://tinyurl.com/5d6dy

> http://www.kalecoauto.com/perf.htm
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> '94 white lightning
> '01 white GT
Chip Stein - 25 Nov 2004 02:52 GMT
H crossovers should be tuned for each engine if you really want
anything out of it. paint the exhaust pipes from the manifold or
header back about 3 feet. then dive it a while, where the paint
stopped burning off is where the crossover should go.
              Chip
JS - 28 Nov 2004 01:06 GMT
Get the 2-cat H-pipe.  You'll pass the PA smog test much better too.  I
believe they can also fail your state inspection for not having cats even if
you're not in an emissions county.

The 2-cat will give you power over the stocker, keep you legal, and keep the
tone down some.  I must admit, I threw a non-cat H-pipe on an e-legal cammed
(not E303) '88 5.0 with 2-chamber flowmasters and it sounded great.  Not my
car, not my emissions or inspection hassles either.

The headers will help a bit more I think.  But, with no other engine mods,
the exhaust upgrade won't be that noticable.

JS

> Or not? I hear alot of different stories on this....Does it really boost
> HP'S a
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> How do
> you rate the MAC off road h-pipe comapred to others?
Deputy Dog - 28 Nov 2004 01:41 GMT
 I
> believe they can also fail your state inspection for not having cats even
> if you're not in an emissions county.

You are right, the visual inspection of the cats is now part of the safety
inspection. They no longer fall under emissions in Pa.

Dave
BeverlyOmasta - 28 Nov 2004 17:02 GMT
>You are right, the visual inspection of the cats is now part of the safety
>inspection. They no longer fall under emissions in Pa.

I didnt know they had a visual now...IMm sending the H-pipe back and getting
the catted h-pipe
CigManXFls - 30 Nov 2004 00:35 GMT
cats suck
WindsorFox[SS] - 30 Nov 2004 02:21 GMT
> cats suck

    Dogs bite.

Signature

YOU are the real piece of work in this post. I think you are
a couple of drumsticks short of a picnic there bud. - SVTKate

Nocares - 03 Dec 2004 06:18 GMT
Just weld or solder the hollow cat bodies over the straight pipe.

> >You are right, the visual inspection of the cats is now part of the
> >safety
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> getting
> the catted h-pipe
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.