>> Has anyone notice engine knock at higher revs and strain on there 4.6L
>> engine at about 62,000 miles? Does this just mean that I need to change
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>Is the knock sound like a timing/low octane fuel knock? Do those cars still
>have distributors? If so check your timing. If not, try running a tank of 93
Not since the 96gt
>or 94 octane thorugh it (or whatever your highest octane pump gas is) and
why ? Higher octane doesn't clean an engine. It should run fine on 87.
>see if it makes a difference. These days auto makers often run timing right
>on the edge of knocking through the use of knock sensors. Could be something
Mustang GT doesn't have knock sensors.
>it out of whack, maybe the knock sensor isn't working right or something has
>changed messing up the computer's caculations. Running higher octane fuel
>could compensate enough to stop the knocking. Of course if the knock isn't a
It's just hiding (if even) a problem. Don't do it.
>timing or fuel octane type of knock you can disregard all this.
Remove NO-SPAM from email address when replying
Cory Dunkle - 29 Jan 2005 05:04 GMT
> >> Has anyone notice engine knock at higher revs and strain on there 4.6L
> >> engine at about 62,000 miles? Does this just mean that I need to change
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> why ? Higher octane doesn't clean an engine. It should run fine on 87.
I never said anything about cleaning an engine. I would assume at only
62,000 miles it's still pretty clean. Regardless, if you're gonna clean an
engine the only way to do it properly (and the onyl way worth doing) is to
take it apart. It sounds to me like there is a good chance the timing may be
too far advanced. Whatever the reason may be, running the highest octane
fuel available will help to rule that out. If it still makes the same noise
with no improvement on 94 octane, then it's most likely not a timing related
issue.
> >see if it makes a difference. These days auto makers often run timing right
> >on the edge of knocking through the use of knock sensors. Could be something
>
> Mustang GT doesn't have knock sensors.
I don't like computers in cars, and I don't know a whole lot about
particular models on new cars. They just plain don't interest me.
> >it out of whack, maybe the knock sensor isn't working right or something has
> >changed messing up the computer's caculations. Running higher octane fuel
> >could compensate enough to stop the knocking. Of course if the knock isn't a
>
> It's just hiding (if even) a problem. Don't do it.
I never said to continue to run higher octane fuel. By running a higher
octane fuel it can be determined if the noise is pinging. If it is, the
problem (most likely timing, but also possibly a lean mixture, or a handful
of other things) then you know that much mroe about it and it will point you
in the right direction for a solution. If pinging is not the problem,
running 94 octane (or wahtever the highest pump gas is in the OPs location)
is a cheap way to rule out pinging as the problem.
So buddy, I don't know what you've got shoved up your a.s, but it seems that
most Mustang groups with any of the late model stuff have a sizeable amount
of know-it-alls like you who are on a hair-trigger to bash anyone who comes
along. That's why I normally keep to FordMuscle... Great friendly
environment with a _LOT_ of knowledgeable people, who also happen to respect
eachother. I suppose it would be ludicrous to expect the same level of
respect on Usenet...