Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Mustang / March 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Mustang versus Vette

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
RichA - 30 Jan 2005 00:55 GMT
Say I take a Vette, that costs $45,000 when new.
Then I take a Mustang GT, that costs $27,000.
Then I put $18,000 into the Mustang.  
Which is now the better car?
-Rich
Garth Almgren - 30 Jan 2005 01:45 GMT
> Say I take a Vette, that costs $45,000 when new.
> Then I take a Mustang GT, that costs $27,000.
> Then I put $18,000 into the Mustang.  
> Which is now the better car?
> -Rich

"Better" is such a subjective term...

How about you put the 18 grand into the bank instead, and enjoy both
cars on their own merits?

Signature

/     Garth - '83 GL V6stang Hatch <Former MW #7>     \

|      My V6stang: http://www.v6stang.com/v6stang     |
|  RAMFM Merchandise: http://www.cafeshops.com/ramfm  |
\  Mail pgp@v6stang.com for secure reply information  /
ZombyWoof - 30 Jan 2005 08:15 GMT
>Say I take a Vette, that costs $45,000 when new.
>Then I take a Mustang GT, that costs $27,000.
>Then I put $18,000 into the Mustang.  
>Which is now the better car?
>-Rich

The Vette, because you didn't have to stick 18k into it.  Personally I
would buy the Mustang and bank the 18K and then drive it like I stole
it.
Signature

"Either kill me or take me as I am,
because I'll be damned if I ever change..."

The Marquis de Sade

memset@recorddeal.com - 30 Jan 2005 09:10 GMT
Sorry, but you are trolling. You *know* there was a huge argument in a
different thread about this specifically. Bad Rich!! =(

-Mike

--
A happy kid behind the wheel of a 98 Mustang GT
Cold air intake
FRPP 3.73 gears
Steeda Tri-Ax Shifter
Flowmaster 40 Series mufflers (self-installed woohoo)
Hi-speed fan switch
255/60R-15 rear tires
Subframe connectors
Aluminum adjustable clutch quadrant

> Say I take a Vette, that costs $45,000 when new.
> Then I take a Mustang GT, that costs $27,000.
> Then I put $18,000 into the Mustang.
> Which is now the better car?
> -Rich
RichA - 30 Jan 2005 20:57 GMT
>Sorry, but you are trolling. You *know* there was a huge argument in a
>different thread about this specifically. Bad Rich!! =(
>
>-Mike

Not really.  I didn't follow the other thread.  But what I've seen
people do with Mustangs with relatively little money (compared to
the prices of cars that are "better" initially) impresses me.
The idea that "the Vette is a better car to begin with" is true,
but then where do you stop?  A 911 is a better car still...
Maybe I should have phrased it;  "Give me a $50,000 Vette and
a Mustang GT and only $10,000 ($8000 less than a Vette) and then
see which car is better."  I'd have $8000 to put "in the bank"
as two posters suggested and still a subjectively better car than
the Vette.
-Rich
SVTKate - 31 Jan 2005 01:21 GMT
Yea, but the new Vette is just SOOooooooo easy on the eyes.

| >Sorry, but you are trolling. You *know* there was a huge argument in a
| >different thread about this specifically. Bad Rich!! =(
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
| the Vette.
| -Rich
Nicodemus Telrenner - 15 Feb 2005 05:32 GMT
"SVTKate" <whoever@whatever.complaint.dept> wrote in news:FKfLd.3042
$S3.1580@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net:

> Yea, but the new Vette is just SOOooooooo easy on the eyes.

I don't like it myself.  I miss flip lights.  It looks too much like a
Viper
SVTKate - 30 Jan 2005 13:55 GMT
You're talking the new Vette vs the New Mustang.
If someone offered me the choice between the two modded as you wrote here...

damn... I'd have to take the Vette.

Kate

| Say I take a Vette, that costs $45,000 when new.
| Then I take a Mustang GT, that costs $27,000.
| Then I put $18,000 into the Mustang.
| Which is now the better car?
| -Rich
Joe - 30 Jan 2005 15:43 GMT
RichA <none@none.com> wrote in news:i1cov0ha8hmsfhr8gonsujfj5i8gakd6g4
@4ax.com:

> Say I take a Vette, that costs $45,000 when new.
> Then I take a Mustang GT, that costs $27,000.
> Then I put $18,000 into the Mustang.  
> Which is now the better car?
> -Rich

If you put the $18,000 cash into the Mustang's glove box, I'd have to
say the Mustang.

Joe
Calypso Green '93 5.0 LX AOD hatch with a few goodies
Black '03 Dakota 5.9 R/T CC
John C. - 30 Jan 2005 16:00 GMT
> If you put the $18,000 cash into the Mustang's glove box, I'd have to
> say the Mustang.

Dang, _that_ kind of incentive makes a GTO look good!  ;)
--
John C.
'03 Cobra Convt.
Michael Johnson, PE - 30 Jan 2005 18:39 GMT
> Say I take a Vette, that costs $45,000 when new.
> Then I take a Mustang GT, that costs $27,000.
> Then I put $18,000 into the Mustang.  
> Which is now the better car?
> -Rich

Try and get that $18k back out of the Mustang when you try and sell it.
 The Vette would be a better investment and a better performing car for
the money spent.

Now I just need to figure out whether you're a troll since you have also
authored a thread about GM going into bankruptcy.  Seems to be too loony
a post to take you very seriously.
RichA - 30 Jan 2005 20:59 GMT
>> Say I take a Vette, that costs $45,000 when new.
>> Then I take a Mustang GT, that costs $27,000.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>  The Vette would be a better investment and a better performing car for
>the money spent.

Investment?  A modern car?  That is a laugh.  If I want an investment
I'll spend the $50,000 on a Hemi Chrysler (1964-1971).

>Now I just need to figure out whether you're a troll since you have also
>authored a thread about GM going into bankruptcy.  Seems to be too loony
>a post to take you very seriously.

Rumours abound.  How else to determine authenticity unless you ask?
-Rich
Michael Johnson, PE - 31 Jan 2005 03:22 GMT
>>>Say I take a Vette, that costs $45,000 when new.
>>>Then I take a Mustang GT, that costs $27,000.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Investment?  A modern car?  That is a laugh.  If I want an investment
> I'll spend the $50,000 on a Hemi Chrysler (1964-1971).

Take a 2005 Mustang and add $18k worth of modifications, drive it for
two years and then try and sell it for more than $20k-$25k.  The Vette
will be worth much more than that from a resale value after two years.
Now do you get my point or do I need to draw you a picture?

>>Now I just need to figure out whether you're a troll since you have also
>>authored a thread about GM going into bankruptcy.  Seems to be too loony
>>a post to take you very seriously.
>
> Rumours abound.  How else to determine authenticity unless you ask?

I'll make up my own mind by observing your actions.

> -Rich
Nicodemus Telrenner - 15 Feb 2005 05:34 GMT
>>>>Say I take a Vette, that costs $45,000 when new.
>>>>Then I take a Mustang GT, that costs $27,000.
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> will be worth much more than that from a resale value after two years.
> Now do you get my point or do I need to draw you a picture?

Depends.  I never buy a car to sell.  I think that is a very moot point.  
If i put 18k into a car for performance upgrades, i amkeeping it till the
bloody thing falls apart, or i die
Michael Johnson, PE - 15 Feb 2005 06:05 GMT
>>>>>Say I take a Vette, that costs $45,000 when new.
>>>>>Then I take a Mustang GT, that costs $27,000.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> If i put 18k into a car for performance upgrades, i amkeeping it till the
> bloody thing falls apart, or i die

I have one of those parked in my garage. ;)
ZombyWoof - 15 Feb 2005 13:11 GMT
>>>>>>Say I take a Vette, that costs $45,000 when new.
>>>>>>Then I take a Mustang GT, that costs $27,000.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
>I have one of those parked in my garage. ;)

Me too, although I really wouldn't call it "Parked"
Signature

"Either kill me or take me as I am,
because I'll be damned if I ever change..."

The Marquis de Sade

Michael Johnson, PE - 15 Feb 2005 14:02 GMT
>>>>>>>Say I take a Vette, that costs $45,000 when new.
>>>>>>>Then I take a Mustang GT, that costs $27,000.
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> Me too, although I really wouldn't call it "Parked"

Unfortunately mine is parked.  It runs but is way down on power and I
haven't had the time or will power to diagnose the problem.  I plan to
retire the blower and install a 427W in it so that is one reason I don't
want to spend too much time on it.
ZombyWoof - 16 Feb 2005 05:08 GMT
>>>>>>>>Say I take a Vette, that costs $45,000 when new.
>>>>>>>>Then I take a Mustang GT, that costs $27,000.
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>retire the blower and install a 427W in it so that is one reason I don't
>want to spend too much time on it.

Well mine will; run too.  I actually got a wild air up my a.s and
fired it up on the engine stand.  One of these days it will get back
in the frame, when I finish it that is.  
Signature

"Either kill me or take me as I am,
because I'll be damned if I ever change..."

The Marquis de Sade

Scott en Aztl?n - 27 Feb 2005 00:50 GMT
>> Take a 2005 Mustang and add $18k worth of modifications, drive it for
>> two years and then try and sell it for more than $20k-$25k.  The Vette
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>If i put 18k into a car for performance upgrades, i amkeeping it till the
>bloody thing falls apart, or i die

Here's hoping you never lose your job, have your car stolen, or suffer
any number of other unexpected events which will leave you with a car
where you spent/owe more on it than you could sell it for/recover in
an insurance settlement.

Signature

Friends don't let friends shop at Best Buy (except to buy loss leaders for resale on eBay).
(See http://tinyurl.com/6efhd)

ZombyWoof - 27 Feb 2005 01:47 GMT
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 16:50:42 -0800, Scott en Aztlán
<slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com> wrote something wonderfully witty:

>>> Take a 2005 Mustang and add $18k worth of modifications, drive it for
>>> two years and then try and sell it for more than $20k-$25k.  The Vette
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>where you spent/owe more on it than you could sell it for/recover in
>an insurance settlement.

That is why there is this wonderful thing nowadays called gap
insurance.  Back in the day people used to put enough down on a car
and only finance it for 36-months so they were rarely if ever upside
in a vehicle.  Nowadays almost everyone who finances is upside-down on
the day they drive off the lot.  Hence, step in good old gap
insurance.
Signature


"Maybe worshiping the cross and the painful death rather
than the well lived life really has distorted our sense
of who we are and what life is about." -- Author unkown

Scott en Aztl?n - 06 Mar 2005 03:47 GMT
>>>> Take a 2005 Mustang and add $18k worth of modifications, drive it for
>>>> two years and then try and sell it for more than $20k-$25k.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>That is why there is this wonderful thing nowadays called gap
>insurance.

Gap insurance only covers the difference between what you owe on your
car and what your insurance company gives you on your claim. It will
NOT cover the $18,000 in performance upgrades (for which you paid
cash).

Signature

Friends don't let friends shop at Best Buy (except to buy loss leaders for resale on eBay).
(See http://tinyurl.com/6efhd)

ZombyWoof - 06 Mar 2005 07:33 GMT
On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 19:47:53 -0800, Scott en Aztlán
<slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com> wrote something wonderfully witty:

>>>>> Take a 2005 Mustang and add $18k worth of modifications, drive it for
>>>>> two years and then try and sell it for more than $20k-$25k.
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>NOT cover the $18,000 in performance upgrades (for which you paid
>cash).

I was speaking to the "owe" portion of the equation.  Dumping 18k in
performance parts is nothing different to the thousands of dollars
worth of stereo equipment some people dumb into their cars when it
comes to theft or other complete loss scenarios.  Anyone who dumps 18k
CASH into his/her car isn't going to have to worry about making the
payments now are they?
Signature


"Maybe worshiping the cross and the painful death rather
than the well lived life really has distorted our sense
of who we are and what life is about." -- Author unkown

Scott en Aztl?n - 23 Mar 2005 15:54 GMT
>>>>>Depends.  I never buy a car to sell.  I think that is a very moot point.  
>>>>>If i put 18k into a car for performance upgrades, i amkeeping it till the
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>>
>I was speaking to the "owe" portion of the equation.

That's fine, but you'll still be faced with an $18,000 loss.

>Dumping 18k in
>performance parts is nothing different to the thousands of dollars
>worth of stereo equipment some people dumb into their cars

Freudian slip?

>when it
>comes to theft or other complete loss scenarios.  Anyone who dumps 18k
>CASH into his/her car isn't going to have to worry about making the
>payments now are they?

Actually, that $18,000 worth of upgrades was undoubtedly financed
using high-interest credit cards.

Signature

When are you people going to wake up to the fact that rebates are a SCAM?

Rein - 07 Mar 2005 02:55 GMT
>>>>>Say I take a Vette, that costs $45,000 when new.
>>>>>Then I take a Mustang GT, that costs $27,000.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>If i put 18k into a car for performance upgrades, i amkeeping it till the
>bloody thing falls apart, or i die

True, buying a car as an investment is foolish. The onyl ones that it
would be somewhat interesting for is limited production cars like the
Ford GT, plus you can't drive them. Park and look at it. What fun is
that ?

Remove NO-SPAM from email address when replying
Chief_Wiggum - 31 Jan 2005 01:22 GMT
Well, if , by "better" you mean "faster" then why not just put 18k into a 72
Nova or something ??

"Better car" encompasses a LOT more than horsepower, or speed.

If you like the lines, stance, interior, etc of a Corvett then no amount of
money will likely make you think a Mustang is "better"

OTOH there are many folks that think it's ALREADY a better car than a Vette.

Personally, I LOVE my Mustang, and it's been a great car.   I'd like to have
an '05 too, and likely will some day.

OTOH, I love Vettes too!   I've owned a few in the past, and had lots of fun
with them.  I think the C6 is a BEAUTIFUL car, and, although I hate to admit
it HERE, if you offered me an 05 Vette STOCK, and an 05 Mustang with a
supercharger, and handling mods,   I'd snatch that little bowtie beauty up
in a HEARTBEAT ! ! !

> Say I take a Vette, that costs $45,000 when new.
> Then I take a Mustang GT, that costs $27,000.
> Then I put $18,000 into the Mustang.
> Which is now the better car?
> -Rich
SVTKate - 31 Jan 2005 12:14 GMT
| Well, if , by "better" you mean "faster" then why not just put 18k into a 72
| Nova or something ??
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
| supercharger, and handling mods,   I'd snatch that little bowtie beauty up
| in a HEARTBEAT ! ! !

I agree with you 100%.
First time I saw one I nearly broke my neck looking at it as it went by on
the transport truck.

Damn! Why couldn't I have been born rich.

Kate
JohnH - 31 Jan 2005 13:38 GMT
>Well, if , by "better" you mean "faster" then why not just put 18k into a 72
>Nova or something ??
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>supercharger, and handling mods,   I'd snatch that little bowtie beauty up
>in a HEARTBEAT ! ! !

*Which* little beauty would you snatch up?

I'm 60 years old. I could have bought a 'Vette. I bought a yellow '05
GT. Why? 'Cause the GT turned something in my gut that the 'vette
didn't.

In the first three weeks I had the GT more than a dozen people have
high signed or commented on my beautiful car out on the road. I've
never thought of doing that to a 'vette driver. Maybe 'vette owners
get a lot of thumbs-up also, but I'll bet it's from other 'vette
owners. Have to do a study on that some day.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes
ZombyWoof - 31 Jan 2005 14:07 GMT
>>Well, if , by "better" you mean "faster" then why not just put 18k into a 72
>>Nova or something ??
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
>John H

Hmmm, money not an issue and offered either with my choices of
options?  Guess I would have to go with the `05 Vette.  Gotta do it.
Although my `95 Vette is competition yellow and I love my sporting
cars in yellow, I might just have to go with that new Daytona Sunset
Orange Metallic on the `05 Vette.  And of course I can get it as a
drop-top with HUD and all the other goodies if money wasn't an issue,
but alas it is. So no new Vette in my immediate future, but when that
last youngin get's out of college in four years who knows.  Might end
up with a garage full of choices every morning.  Got any idea what
four years of tuition will buy you in the car market nowadays?  Now
multiply that times two and you'll know why a GT is my only option at
this time.
Signature

"Either kill me or take me as I am,
because I'll be damned if I ever change..."

The Marquis de Sade

Scott en Aztl?n - 05 Feb 2005 18:03 GMT
>I'm 60 years old. I could have bought a 'Vette. I bought a yellow '05
>GT. Why? 'Cause the GT turned something in my gut that the 'vette
>didn't.

Hmm... Not quite the phrasing I would use, but to each his own. ;)

>In the first three weeks I had the GT more than a dozen people have
>high signed or commented on my beautiful car out on the road. I've
>never thought of doing that to a 'vette driver. Maybe 'vette owners
>get a lot of thumbs-up also, but I'll bet it's from other 'vette
>owners. Have to do a study on that some day.

Let's see... On the day I drove my C6 home from the dealership, some
guy in an S2000 zoomed up next to me, then slowed down to drool. The
next day, the car was parked in a strip mall parking lot, and some guy
was hovering around it, peering inside and slobbering on the glass.

Does that answer your question? :)

Signature

Friends don't let friends shop at Best Buy (except to buy loss leaders for resale on eBay).
(See http://tinyurl.com/6efhd)

memset@recorddeal.com - 05 Feb 2005 20:44 GMT
Sorry, but you won't see me do that. I like Corvettes & all... but I won't
even go that far. Maybe for an 03/04 SVT Cobra I'll stop to see it & BS with
the owner & compliment the car... but I"ll never "zoom up" & "drool" haha.
But I bet a lot of ppl would for a C6! Or an 03/04 Cobra! Nobody zooms up to
see my poor car haha.

-Mike

--
A happy kid behind the wheel of a 98 Mustang GT
Cold air intake
FRPP 3.73 gears
Steeda Tri-Ax Shifter
Flowmaster 40 Series mufflers (self-installed woohoo)
Hi-speed fan switch
255/60R-15 rear tires
Subframe connectors
Aluminum adjustable clutch quadrant

> >I'm 60 years old. I could have bought a 'Vette. I bought a yellow '05
> >GT. Why? 'Cause the GT turned something in my gut that the 'vette
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> Friends don't let friends shop at Best Buy (except to buy loss leaders for resale on eBay).
> (See http://tinyurl.com/6efhd)
John H - 05 Feb 2005 21:05 GMT
On Sat, 05 Feb 2005 10:03:29 -0800, Scott en Aztlán <slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com>
wrote:

>>I'm 60 years old. I could have bought a 'Vette. I bought a yellow '05
>>GT. Why? 'Cause the GT turned something in my gut that the 'vette
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
>Does that answer your question? :)

I'll add your input to my study!

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes
Brad and Mia - 06 Feb 2005 09:54 GMT
>>I'm 60 years old. I could have bought a 'Vette. I bought a yellow '05
>>GT. Why? 'Cause the GT turned something in my gut that the 'vette
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Does that answer your question? :)

"Guys" "drool" over cars?  You all gotta get a life. And maybe a woman too.

Brad
memset@recorddeal.com - 06 Feb 2005 20:49 GMT
I need a woman..... and a life! f.ck I am working 24/7 =(. *Slobbers on
Brad* take that!

-Mike

--
A happy kid behind the wheel of a 98 Mustang GT
Cold air intake
FRPP 3.73 gears
Steeda Tri-Ax Shifter
Flowmaster 40 Series mufflers (self-installed woohoo)
Hi-speed fan switch
255/60R-15 rear tires
Subframe connectors
Aluminum adjustable clutch quadrant

> >>I'm 60 years old. I could have bought a 'Vette. I bought a yellow '05
> >>GT. Why? 'Cause the GT turned something in my gut that the 'vette
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Brad
Rein - 07 Mar 2005 03:02 GMT
On Sat, 05 Feb 2005 10:03:29 -0800, Scott en Aztlán
<slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com> wrote:

>>I'm 60 years old. I could have bought a 'Vette. I bought a yellow '05
>>GT. Why? 'Cause the GT turned something in my gut that the 'vette
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>next day, the car was parked in a strip mall parking lot, and some guy
>was hovering around it, peering inside and slobbering on the glass.

I'd say any new car will get that. The new Mustang gets that too.
Hell, my 03 Cobra STILL gets that. People drive by sticking their
thumbs up. People asking questions at gas-stations.
Tell you the truth, I have to point out to friends that that is the
new vette, it isn't  THAT different from the C5. The new Mustang
however...

>Does that answer your question? :)

Remove NO-SPAM from email address when replying
Scott en Aztl?n - 23 Mar 2005 15:56 GMT
>>Let's see... On the day I drove my C6 home from the dealership, some
>>guy in an S2000 zoomed up next to me, then slowed down to drool. The
>>next day, the car was parked in a strip mall parking lot, and some guy
>>was hovering around it, peering inside and slobbering on the glass.
>
>I'd say any new car will get that.

That never happened with either of the new Cobras I owned, including
my Yo! Officer!! Yellow '03 Cobra convertible.

>Tell you the truth, I have to point out to friends that that is the
>new vette, it isn't  THAT different from the C5.

You obviously haven't driven one, or even sat inside one. ;)

Signature

When are you people going to wake up to the fact that rebates are a SCAM?

Rein - 23 Mar 2005 19:23 GMT
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 06:56:26 -0800, Scott en Aztlán
<slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com> wrote:

>>>Let's see... On the day I drove my C6 home from the dealership, some
>>>guy in an S2000 zoomed up next to me, then slowed down to drool. The
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>That never happened with either of the new Cobras I owned, including
>my Yo! Officer!! Yellow '03 Cobra convertible.

hehe, Same here. Yesterday a 94-ish thunderbird passed me and I looked
inside. The guy stuck his thumb up. I DO love my 03 Cobra !

>>Tell you the truth, I have to point out to friends that that is the
>>new vette, it isn't  THAT different from the C5.
>
>You obviously haven't driven one, or even sat inside one. ;)

Nope. none of the dealers have them in stock. I Was told they sell
them as soon as they get them in.
But, I got some invitation for a cheby day at the local racetrack
where they CLAIM I can drive the new vette. We'll see.

Remove NO-SPAM from email address when replying
RichA - 24 Mar 2005 00:01 GMT
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 06:56:26 -0800, Scott en Aztlán
<slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com> wrote:

>>>Let's see... On the day I drove my C6 home from the dealership, some
>>>guy in an S2000 zoomed up next to me, then slowed down to drool. The
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>That never happened with either of the new Cobras I owned, including
>my Yo! Officer!! Yellow '03 Cobra convertible.

A guy engaged me in conversation at a video store (much to the chagrin
of his wife) drooling over how amazing looking my dark blue 2001 GT
was.  Just to bug his wife, I told him he could get one for a decent
monthly price 'cause Ford had them on special!
-Rich
RichA - 01 Feb 2005 02:06 GMT
>Well, if , by "better" you mean "faster" then why not just put 18k into a 72
>Nova or something ??
>
>"Better car" encompasses a LOT more than horsepower, or speed.

Did I say that it didn't?
-Rich
Scotter - 09 Feb 2005 16:24 GMT
Yeah, even though I'm a "Mustang guy," I have to make the argument that
higher dollar items tend to be higher quality and throwing money at a lower
quality item may not be the best idea DEPENDING on what you want in the end.
If you are going for pure horsepower then yeah, sure, put $18K into an 05
Mustang GT and wow! Fast & fun.
Not much different comparison than if you buy a Civic and put tons of money
into it vs. buying something that comes stock prepared to go fast (Mustang
GT).

But would I take the Vette? No. I'm not a "Vette guy," hehe :) If I had that
kind of money to spend on a car I might buy the highest end convertible Audi
I could get.

But alll that aside, this "Mustang guy" is drooling over the 05 GT
convertible and scheming as to how I can get one this Summer!

Scott
96 GT Convertible
3.73 gears

> Say I take a Vette, that costs $45,000 when new.
> Then I take a Mustang GT, that costs $27,000.
> Then I put $18,000 into the Mustang.
> Which is now the better car?
> -Rich
Rein - 07 Mar 2005 03:05 GMT
>Yeah, even though I'm a "Mustang guy," I have to make the argument that
>higher dollar items tend to be higher quality and throwing money at a lower
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>kind of money to spend on a car I might buy the highest end convertible Audi
>I could get.

Tell you the truth, the quality of a vette isn't all that great. I've
driven the C5 extensively and the quality really isn't that much
better than a mustang.

>But alll that aside, this "Mustang guy" is drooling over the 05 GT
>convertible and scheming as to how I can get one this Summer!
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>> Which is now the better car?
>> -Rich

Remove NO-SPAM from email address when replying
Joe - 07 Mar 2005 04:21 GMT
>>Yeah, even though I'm a "Mustang guy," I have to make the argument
>>that higher dollar items tend to be higher quality and throwing
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> I've driven the C5 extensively and the quality really isn't that
> much better than a mustang.

So you're saying that the Corvette's build quality isn't all that
great, but it's better than the Mustang's?  IOW, the Mustang's build
quality is worse than the so-so Corvette's?

Joe
Calypso Green '93 5.0 LX AOD hatch with a few goodies
Black '03 Dakota 5.9 R/T CC
Rein - 07 Mar 2005 23:07 GMT
>>>Yeah, even though I'm a "Mustang guy," I have to make the argument
>>>that higher dollar items tend to be higher quality and throwing
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>great, but it's better than the Mustang's?  IOW, the Mustang's build
>quality is worse than the so-so Corvette's?

No, It's carefully saying that it doesn't look like a 50K sportscar. I
see quality issues in a corvette that shouldn't. I don't have any long
term experience with a corvette, but from what I have seen it's not
all that great. The leather seats for example, There's not way in hell
the will last long, and the seats in my 03 cobra will outlast them for
sure.
There are leaky window issues on this model.. The center console
opening is weird and feels like it could break off anytime, The
door/roof rubbers look like it won't hold up,etc etc. I can go on for
a while. This is an 03 vette, with the same amount of miles as my 03
Cobra.

Remove NO-SPAM from email address when replying
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.