Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Mustang / March 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Carbed Turn-Key 5.4 Romeo

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
CobraJet - 29 Mar 2005 20:54 GMT
  This is what a an engine *should* look like:

http://www.karkraft.com/engines.htm

Signature

  CobraJet

Chris Shea - 29 Mar 2005 21:52 GMT
beautiful

>    This is what a an engine *should* look like:
>
> http://www.karkraft.com/engines.htm
>
> --
>    CobraJet
Dana H. Myers - 29 Mar 2005 22:51 GMT
>    This is what a an engine *should* look like:
>
> http://www.karkraft.com/engines.htm

It's really pretty.  Too bad about those carbs,
though.

Dana
CobraJet - 30 Mar 2005 01:38 GMT
> >    This is what a an engine *should* look like:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Dana

  Well, yes and no. The whole idea behind this engine is to make for
an easy, visually aesthetic retrofit into an early car. Most of the
average guys that might do that themselves want an uncluttered
powerplant with a oldies style. I say this is tits for that
application, providing you can wedge it into the target vehicle, which
might be a whole 'nother story. I can see it in a '34 without the side
panels up front.

  BTW, this is the original Kar Kraft company that made the Boss 429
Mustangs for Ford in '69 and '70. I had no idea they were still around.
Credit to Johnny Johnson for scaring up the URL.

Signature

  CobraJet

Dana H. Myers - 30 Mar 2005 06:09 GMT
>>>   This is what a an engine *should* look like:
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> might be a whole 'nother story. I can see it in a '34 without the side
> panels up front.

Good point - if you're looking for a retro hot-rod look, yes.

>    BTW, this is the original Kar Kraft company that made the Boss 429
> Mustangs for Ford in '69 and '70. I had no idea they were still around.
> Credit to Johnny Johnson for scaring up the URL.

You gotta love the Ford GT engine built to order for only $40k :-)

Dana
Brent P - 30 Mar 2005 06:38 GMT
>    Well, yes and no. The whole idea behind this engine is to make for
> an easy, visually aesthetic retrofit into an early car. Most of the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> might be a whole 'nother story. I can see it in a '34 without the side
> panels up front.

For that kind of money we aren't talking 'average' guys. Also one can
make anything look pretty for that kind of cash. :)

The real promise is in the kit they mention for a regular production 4.6.
That would be nice. Because it would allow taking an engine without the
hassles of wire harnesses, sensors, etc from a recent production car and
puting it in an older car. Just buy that kit and all the sensor and
computer hassles go away. And for something 3 or more decades old, a carb
is just fine.

Think of it, just go to the salvage yard and buy a complete engine and
use it without worrying about hunting down a computer etc. No need to get
an entire donor car, etc.
CobraJet - 30 Mar 2005 20:46 GMT
> >    Well, yes and no. The whole idea behind this engine is to make for
> > an easy, visually aesthetic retrofit into an early car. Most of the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> For that kind of money we aren't talking 'average' guys. Also one can
> make anything look pretty for that kind of cash. :)

  7 grand? Take a look around at crate motor prices, and you'll find
that's about in the middle, and it's a complete engine. The new 5.0
Ford race engine is 15 thou.

> The real promise is in the kit they mention for a regular production 4.6.
> That would be nice. Because it would allow taking an engine without the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> use it without worrying about hunting down a computer etc. No need to get
> an entire donor car, etc.

  The big problem with that is the size of the 4.6. It's just too big
to fit in any classics except for full-frame Galaxies and trucks, and
then it's too small at 281 inches to move those things. I know several
people have hacked up shock towers to get one in, just to be
"different", but that sure offsets any savings from the engine. The
idea of accessing all those 4.6 's in junk yards is still going to be a
problem, even with a carb kit.

Signature

  CobraJet

Brent P - 30 Mar 2005 22:14 GMT
>> >    Well, yes and no. The whole idea behind this engine is to make for
>> > an easy, visually aesthetic retrofit into an early car. Most of the
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> that's about in the middle, and it's a complete engine. The new 5.0
> Ford race engine is 15 thou.

I didn't see the 7 grand price, just the complete motor at $39,500.00
My mistake, I scrolled down and thought it was all one and the same
thing. (no I didn't read it all, guess I should have) Just figured they
made one hell of an engine and carbed it.

>> The real promise is in the kit they mention for a regular production 4.6.
>> That would be nice. Because it would allow taking an engine without the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>> use it without worrying about hunting down a computer etc. No need to get
>> an entire donor car, etc.

>    The big problem with that is the size of the 4.6. It's just too big
> to fit in any classics except for full-frame Galaxies and trucks, and
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> idea of accessing all those 4.6 's in junk yards is still going to be a
> problem, even with a carb kit.

That's going to be true of any mod motor.


bluestang98@NOSPAMnetzero.net - 30 Mar 2005 02:32 GMT
>   This is what a an engine *should* look like:
>
>http://www.karkraft.com/engines.htm

Holy Crap!  What a beautiful piece of work!  Leave it to the folks at
KK to come up with this gem.  Kinda like the ultimate blend of the old
and the new from the Blue Oval...   I like it!

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Okie Tom - TS #62

1998 GT Coupe 5-spd.
2001 Ranger XLT  
www.bluestanggt.corral.net
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.