Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Mustang / June 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

66' coupe I 6 to 348 V8 questions

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
D.L. Man - 25 May 2005 07:58 GMT
I am replacing the engine in my old girl and I thought that just like the
Mrs. when she put on some weight I would have more to deal with then looks.

I have the tranny for it all ready and the throttle rod but what should I do
with the rest of the car?
webmaster@rattlers.net - 25 May 2005 16:31 GMT
You will have to update your front suspension componets as well. Ball
Joints, springs, spring saddles, etc.. Those original parts are not
made for that much weight, if you look at the part numbers for the L6
front end parts versus the V8 parts you will see the difference. I was
going to install a "stroker" my old coup but the front end upgrades
were too much for my budget.

I have spoken with one of the original engineers on the early Mustang
and they did try putting big blocks engines in the orignal design but
with the added torque it twisted the front of the car so bad it would
crack or pop out the windshields of the car. So with in mind you would
also have to upgrade the sub frame to help with the "Torque Twist" of
the front end.

The differential, rear springs will have to revamped as well
considering the more muscle being put to the rear tires.

Don't get me wrong it can be done but you just can't drop it in and
expect to have no problems.
Mark C. - 25 May 2005 18:31 GMT
A '66 coupe unibody will do fine with that engine. The I-6 unibody itself is
exactly the same as the v-8 cars, shelbys (with subs), etc. Try to find a
donor V-8 car for the front spindles, brakes, and steering system. You'll
also need at least an 8" rearend from the same donor. You'll have to buy 5
lug wheels for the conversion. Always remember to upgrade your brakes to
match the power output and performance of your car. Do a Google search on
the swap. I'm sure you'll find a wealth of information on this subject.
Signature

Mark
--
"I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates who once said, "I drank
what?". " Val Kilmer in Real Genius.

> You will have to update your front suspension componets as well. Ball
> Joints, springs, spring saddles, etc.. Those original parts are not
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Don't get me wrong it can be done but you just can't drop it in and
> expect to have no problems.
D.L. Man - 26 May 2005 08:16 GMT
> You will have to update your front suspension componets as well. Ball
> Joints, springs, spring saddles, etc.. Those original parts are not
> made for that much weight, if you look at the part numbers for the L6
> front end parts versus the V8 parts you will see the difference. I was
> going to install a "stroker" my old coup but the front end upgrades
> were too much for my budget.

How much were you expecting to spend on yours? How much is a good system
cost? And what is involved in it?
webmaster@rattlers.net - 26 May 2005 15:52 GMT
This was back in the early 90's when I had mine. I have since sold the
car :( Just got to be too much and I was getting out of the service.
You can do most of the work yourself. Like Mark stated you might
consider buying a "Donor" car and take 2 to make one. There are enough
parts out there for Mustangs that you could build a one out of these
Parts magazines. I restored mine back to factory spec's had about 7k-8k
in it counting the purchase price and sold it for 6,500 which is great
considering it was just a plain Jane "T" code coupe.

What I would suggest is just purchase on pair of parts each month and
you will get there before you know it. If you do it like that then you
don't have that big expense all in one shot. Do some research for some
reason now that I am "back into the Pony frame of mind" I think the
1982 Ford Fairmont was pretty much the same front end, at least the
brake aspect. They did come with a 4.2 V8 so I would look into that.
Just remember if you put Disc brakes on the front of your Pony car make
sure you do not use the original purportioning valve!
D.L. Man - 04 Jun 2005 10:44 GMT
Ok I have the engine and its out of a wrecked lincoln. It has emmission
stuff on it and the tranny is AOD. I don't know what to throw away and what
to keep. I do have a donor thunderbird that I can use the parts off of for
the suppension but I don't know if it will work or not?

What can I do to the engine for performance? Trade the intake for a better
one change the cam shaft and lifters, holly double pumper or edelbrock 4
barrel and headers with dual exhuast. That should make it pretty fun to
drive right?

Thanks for your input in advance.

D.L. Man
66 6F HCS - 04 Jun 2005 11:20 GMT
> Ok I have the engine and its out of a wrecked lincoln. It has emmission
> stuff on it and the tranny is AOD.

What year lincoln? 348? For the AOD you'll need some special adapter plates,
mounts and TV cable adapter.

>I do have a donor thunderbird that I can use the parts off of for
> the suppension but I don't know if it will work or not?

None of it will work. Now if you had an old Falcon, then you might have had
some interchangeable parts. The T-bird and the Mustang were completely
different cars.

> What can I do to the engine for performance? Trade the intake for a better
> one change the cam shaft and lifters, holly double pumper or edelbrock 4
> barrel and headers with dual exhuast. That should make it pretty fun to
> drive right?

You gotta figure out what you're starting with before you know where you can
go.
Signature

Scott W.
'66 HCS Mustang 289
'68 Ranchero 500 302
'69 Mustang Sportsroof 351W
ThunderSnake #57
http://home.comcast.net/~vanguard92/

D.L. Man - 04 Jun 2005 22:19 GMT
> Ok I have the engine and its out of a wrecked mid 80's lincoln. The engine
was rebuilt and bored from
305 -> 348 the lincoln was wrecked after 30,000 miles and the engine pulled
and put in storage.
It has emmission
> stuff on it and the tranny is AOD. I don't know what to throw away and what
> to keep. I do have a donor 83 thunderbird that I can use the parts off of
for
> the suppension but I don't know if it will work or not?
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> D.L. Man
66 6F HCS - 05 Jun 2005 02:23 GMT
>> Ok I have the engine and its out of a wrecked mid 80's lincoln. The
>> engine
> was rebuilt and bored from
> 305 -> 348 the lincoln was wrecked after 30,000 miles and the engine
> pulled

Well AFAIK, Ford never built a 305, Chevy did and it was a POS, and there's
no way in hell you can bore a block that far out and have anything left but
a chinese lantern if you put a lightbulb down a cylinder.

Now if it's a stroker motor, then you have something to start with. Again,
the actual year of the motor is important, as then you will know if you have
a carb engine, a Speed Density EFI, or EEC-IV Mass Air EFI. The last being
the most desirable for streetability.
Signature

Scott W.
'66 HCS Mustang 289
'68 Ranchero 500 302
'69 Mustang Sportsroof 351W
ThunderSnake #57
http://home.comcast.net/~vanguard92/

D.L. Man - 05 Jun 2005 10:33 GMT
> >> Ok I have the engine and its out of a wrecked mid 80's lincoln. The
> >> engine
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> no way in hell you can bore a block that far out and have anything left but
> a chinese lantern if you put a lightbulb down a cylinder.

Ok I checked and I have some more information. It was a 302 out of a 78
lincoln. It was bored 30 over and it had a throttle body. The carb with 2
fuel injectors in there.

I want to go low tech since it is going in a '66 mustang. I think it would
be nice to have a engine that can handle top speeds but I like tinkering
with it so I will have to pull out the intake and exhaust and the start
over.
66 6F HCS - 05 Jun 2005 21:27 GMT
> Ok I checked and I have some more information. It was a 302 out of a 78
> lincoln. It was bored 30 over and it had a throttle body. The carb with 2
> fuel injectors in there.

It would have had a carb in '78. You could use any of the aftermarket stuff
for the 5.0 and have a nice motor.

> I want to go low tech since it is going in a '66 mustang. I think it would
> be nice to have a engine that can handle top speeds but I like tinkering
> with it so I will have to pull out the intake and exhaust and the start
> over.

Stick with basics, heads, intake carb, maybe a hotter cam. You need to
decide if you want a stump puller or a high revver, or somewhere in between.
Signature

Scott W.
'66 HCS Mustang 289
'68 Ranchero 500 302
'69 Mustang Sportsroof 351W
ThunderSnake #57
http://home.comcast.net/~vanguard92/

elaich - 05 Jun 2005 21:27 GMT
"D.L. Man" <bravedave96@yahoo.net> wrote in news:kdqdnbZsOftrWz_fRVn-
3g@comcast.com:

> Ok I checked and I have some more information. It was a 302 out of a 78
> lincoln. It was bored 30 over and it had a throttle body. The carb with 2
> fuel injectors in there.

A '78 302 is a smogged down gutless wonder. Like 120 HP or thereabouts. To
get anything out of it you'll need better heads, more compression, and a
better cam.
D.L. Man - 06 Jun 2005 06:38 GMT
> > >> Ok I have the engine and its out of a wrecked mid 80's lincoln. The
> > >> engine
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> with it so I will have to pull out the intake and exhaust and the start
> over.

I have an update. I brought the engine home today and like a dumbass my
friend dropped the engine and broke off the pulley on the water pump. I have
look at it some more but in the morning but I think that it will be fine. I
have to pull the pump if I want to get a new cam in there. And I have to
pull a bunch of junk that ford bolted on there.

I have to pull the ignition stuff from the harmonic balancer. But I should
be able to put a nice distributor in there. And ideas that don't use points.
66 6F HCS - 07 Jun 2005 01:26 GMT
>And ideas that don't use points.

Simplest and least expensive- Pertronix Ignitor or Crane XR-1 points to
electronic conversion.
Next simplest but better- MSD Ready to Run Billet Distributor. No brain box
necessary.
Expensive but the best- MSD Billet Distributor, 6AL brain
More Expensive but better than the MSD- MSD Billet Distributor but use
Jacob's Electronics Pro Street Kit for the brain and coil.
Signature

Scott W.
'66 HCS Mustang 289
'68 Ranchero 500 302
'69 Mustang Sportsroof 351W
ThunderSnake #57
http://home.comcast.net/~vanguard92/

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.