Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Mustang / July 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

More on the demon cellphone

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
RichA - 08 Jul 2005 02:52 GMT
RURAL DRIVERS USING CELL PHONES ARE LIKELY TO CAUSE ACCIDENTS, June 24
Rural drivers using cell phones while driving are nearly four times
more likely to cause automobile accidents than rural drivers not using
cell phones, according to a new study by the Western Transportation
Institute based at Montana State University.
As one of the first studies conducted in rural areas, the findings
corroborate data showing that rural drivers should hang up and drive.
Full story at http://www.physorg.com/news4743.html
Jafo - 08 Jul 2005 04:31 GMT
> RURAL DRIVERS USING CELL PHONES ARE LIKELY TO CAUSE ACCIDENTS, June 24
> Rural drivers using cell phones while driving are nearly four times
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> corroborate data showing that rural drivers should hang up and drive.
> Full story at http://www.physorg.com/news4743.html

Geeez they spared no expense or effort... a whole 36 people tested.

I like the quotes,
"Based on the fact that drivers are 3.8 times more likely to get in a car
accident when using a cell phone, it is best to dial before driving," said
WTI researcher Laura Stanley. "It is preferable that drivers don't use cell
phones while driving, whether on urban or rural roads, because most research
shows a higher risk of being involved in an accident. It's a driver
distraction."

Where did that fact "3.8 times more likely... " come from?
and "because most research shows a higher risk..."

So typical... never any references to actual published studies.. just "well
I know this".... its all crap.
Signature

Jafo
'02 GT Black
Not eggzackly stock.

Jim Warman - 08 Jul 2005 06:20 GMT
Why on earth would they target "rural" drivers? Are cell phones a
distraction? Ask your friendly, local motorcyclist.... Worse yet, I'm inches
away from changing my laundry schedule (or worse) and the talkee thinks
their screw up was hunourous....

If driving was an activity that required less than our full attention, there
wouldn't be much in the way of accident reports...

> RURAL DRIVERS USING CELL PHONES ARE LIKELY TO CAUSE ACCIDENTS, June 24
> Rural drivers using cell phones while driving are nearly four times
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> corroborate data showing that rural drivers should hang up and drive.
> Full story at http://www.physorg.com/news4743.html
Armon Tanzerian - 08 Jul 2005 06:30 GMT
Once again, it is NOT the cellphone that is the problem, it is the DRIVER!!!

Putting on makeup, brushing your teeth, eathing an egg-mc-heartattack, or
even yelling at your screaming kids ALL lead to "increased accidents".  but
nobody has an agenda to push against any of them!

What I find funny is that, while people will try to (and successfully in
some cases) OUTLAW the use of a device that you can use while keeping your
eyes on the road, NOBODY has any problems with NAVIGATION systems!

Glancing down, and poking away at a glaring screen while in an unfamilar
area... Yeah, THAT'S safe !

But nobody will jump on THIS bandwagon until there are 50 bazillion of them
in circulation. THEN someone will say "gee whiz... these things should be
outlawed"

How about not outlawing ANYTHING, and just make the @$#@% penalties stiff
for having an accident when not paying attention.... WHATEVER the reason is
! !
> Why on earth would they target "rural" drivers? Are cell phones a
> distraction? Ask your friendly, local motorcyclist.... Worse yet, I'm
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>> corroborate data showing that rural drivers should hang up and drive.
>> Full story at http://www.physorg.com/news4743.html
RichA - 08 Jul 2005 21:43 GMT
>Once again, it is NOT the cellphone that is the problem, it is the DRIVER!!!

I know we all like to think we can drive and talk at the same time,
but study after study shows we can't do it very well.  Obviously (like
with anything else) people differ, but there is no doubt
"multi-tasking" while driving is not a good idea.
-Rich

>Putting on makeup, brushing your teeth, eathing an egg-mc-heartattack, or
>even yelling at your screaming kids ALL lead to "increased accidents".  but
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>>> corroborate data showing that rural drivers should hang up and drive.
>>> Full story at http://www.physorg.com/news4743.html
SVTKate - 09 Jul 2005 01:13 GMT
: >Once again, it is NOT the cellphone that is the problem, it is the DRIVER!!!
:
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
: "multi-tasking" while driving is not a good idea.
: -Rich

Hey, I know I can't, so I don't unless it's a no other choice kind of thing.
I cannot shift, stter and pay attention to everything all at once. Scares
the sh.t out of me
RichA - 08 Jul 2005 21:41 GMT
>Why on earth would they target "rural" drivers? Are cell phones a
>distraction? Ask your friendly, local motorcyclist.... Worse yet, I'm inches
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>If driving was an activity that required less than our full attention, there
>wouldn't be much in the way of accident reports...

I think one reason is that although rural accidents are probably less
frequent than urban ones, they are more serious when they happen,
owing to things like 50mph intersections that only have stop signs.
T-bone!

>> RURAL DRIVERS USING CELL PHONES ARE LIKELY TO CAUSE ACCIDENTS, June 24
>> Rural drivers using cell phones while driving are nearly four times
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>> corroborate data showing that rural drivers should hang up and drive.
>> Full story at http://www.physorg.com/news4743.html
Spike - 08 Jul 2005 06:33 GMT
And on the news channel today they said they was almost no difference
in the rate of accident between people using them and people not using
them. That both were increased risks of nearly identical levels.

>RURAL DRIVERS USING CELL PHONES ARE LIKELY TO CAUSE ACCIDENTS, June 24
>Rural drivers using cell phones while driving are nearly four times
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>corroborate data showing that rural drivers should hang up and drive.
>Full story at http://www.physorg.com/news4743.html

Spike
1965 Ford Mustang fastback 2+2 A Code 289 C4 Trac-Lok
Vintage Burgundy w/Black Standard Interior; Vintage 40
16" rims w/BF Goodrich Comp T/A gForce Radial
225/50ZR16 KDWS skins; surround sound audio-video.

"When the time comes to lay down my life for my country,
I do not cower from this responsibility. I welcome it."
                                -JFK Inaugural Address
dwight - 09 Jul 2005 13:43 GMT
I can never hear the damn cellphone ring, when I'm in the car. Too many
missed calls.

Princess suggested that I keep the cellphone tucked into my crotch and on
vibrate.

Now, when I get a phone call, it's the most fun I've had all week.

dwight
cprice@here.com - 12 Jul 2005 04:55 GMT
    And in other news;

    Common sense found to be uncommon...

    50% of people are below average intelligence.

    'Water is wet'.

    .
    .
    .

> RURAL DRIVERS USING CELL PHONES ARE LIKELY TO CAUSE ACCIDENTS, June 24
> Rural drivers using cell phones while driving are nearly four times
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> corroborate data showing that rural drivers should hang up and drive.
> Full story at http://www.physorg.com/news4743.html
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.