Standing mile. The Mustang GT had a higher trap speed than the GT. However,
the GT had a quicker ET. The Mustang wasn't exactly stock though. Just a
little boost via SC ;) Out of the many cars tested, the C6 Corvette was DEAD
LAST in ALL categories!!!!!! LMAO!!!!

Signature
Scott W.
'66 HCS Mustang 289
'68 Ranchero 500 302
'69 Mustang Sportsroof 351W
ThunderSnake #57
http://home.comcast.net/~vanguard92/
Bob Willard - 04 Aug 2005 03:47 GMT
> Standing mile. The Mustang GT had a higher trap speed than the GT. However,
> the GT had a quicker ET. The Mustang wasn't exactly stock though. Just a
> little boost via SC ;) Out of the many cars tested, the C6 Corvette was DEAD
> LAST in ALL categories!!!!!! LMAO!!!!
A little boost? The Vortech in the 3-valve Mustang GT pumped 16 psi
through the water-cooled intercooler! And one suspects that the innards
of that 4.6L V8 were beefier than stock, to handle the 575 HP.

Signature
Cheers, Bob
66 6F HCS - 04 Aug 2005 07:09 GMT
> A little boost?
Just a smidge.

Signature
Scott W.
'66 HCS Mustang 289
'68 Ranchero 500 302
'69 Mustang Sportsroof 351W
ThunderSnake #57
http://home.comcast.net/~vanguard92/
one80out@hotmail.com - 04 Aug 2005 17:24 GMT
What's R&T doing testing hot rods? 16 psi, that's almost 2 x
atmospheric pressure, effectively turning a 4.6 into a ten liter.
What psi does the Ford GT run?
180 Out
Michael Johnson, PE - 04 Aug 2005 17:27 GMT
> Standing mile. The Mustang GT had a higher trap speed than the GT. However,
> the GT had a quicker ET. The Mustang wasn't exactly stock though. Just a
> little boost via SC ;) Out of the many cars tested, the C6 Corvette was DEAD
> LAST in ALL categories!!!!!! LMAO!!!!
Just wait until they test a Cobra GT500. Its 5.4L with a twin screw
blower is going to deliver unbelievable performance for the money.