Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Mustang / October 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Small cars are death machines

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Rich - 02 Oct 2005 21:06 GMT
Or, why they'll bury you WITH your smart car.

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1009&message=15257209
Spike - 02 Oct 2005 22:32 GMT
So are the BIG cars that hit you when you're in the cross walk.....

The nice thing about the newer small cars is that you have all those
pillows to cushion your lifeless bod during the viewing, before they
drop it in the hole....

So, what are ya gonna do? Outlaw all big cars? outlaw all small cars?
And what about those big trucks that carry everything you need from
food to toilet paper? Want to shrink those? If you do, watch you
prices rise because it takes more to move the stuff.

As I recall, San Francisco already requires the loads in those BIG
trucks to be repacked into smaller trucks before they enter the
city/county limits.  So transfer terminals had to be built further
out. Now there is a shipping fee, and a transfer fee to be added to
the delivery fees.

>Or, why they'll bury you WITH your smart car.
>
>http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1009&message=15257209

Spike
1965 Ford Mustang fastback 2+2 A Code 289 C4 Trac-Lok
Vintage Burgundy w/Black Standard Interior; Vintage 40
16" rims w/BF Goodrich Comp T/A gForce Radial
225/50ZR16 KDWS skins; surround sound audio-video.

Gad what fools these morons be....
Children are obscene but should not be heard
Give me a peperoni pizza... or give me a calzone!
Cory Dunkle - 08 Oct 2005 16:07 GMT
> So are the BIG cars that hit you when you're in the cross walk.....
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> So, what are ya gonna do? Outlaw all big cars? outlaw all small cars?

I think the point was that accidents in small cars are generally worse than
accidents in big cars. Having been recently involved in an accident in a
compact car ('63 Falcon) I have decided I'm done with small cars, for now at
least. I'm back to driving my '68 Galaxie. No question about safety in that
car. If I were driving the Galaxie and got into the same accident I would
have walked away from it with no damage. I actually almost drove the Galaxie
that day, but since it was threatening to rain I drove the Falcon.
Ironically it turned out to be a nice sunny day. So instead my two front
teeth are snapped in half and one was nearly knocked out, still not sure if
I'm gonna keep it. All the other teeth on my upper jaw were loose. My kneed
impacted the dash pretty damned hard, so only now after a few weeks am I
able to get around alright. Also had to have a bunch of staples in my head
as I had a good sized gash there. Well at least I didn't go through the
windshield... Thankfully the steering wheel broke my momentum. LOL

If you wanna see pics and such check it out in one of the Falcon forums at:
http://fordsix.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=27862

Well, with the money I got as compensation for the damage to my car I'll
probably be buying a ~1980 F-150 4x4 stepside shortbox, with a 302 and
toploader. :) Should be a fun daily driver and parts hauler. Gonna go check
it out more closely and take it for a test drive tomorrow and if I like it
I'll take it home with me.

   Cory
Mort Guffman - 08 Oct 2005 17:14 GMT
>> So are the BIG cars that hit you when you're in the cross walk.....
>>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
>    Cory

I got creamed in my 61 Galaxie by a Tercel. The bonehead who was
looking at herself in the mirror instead of watching the road hit me
from behind at about 50. She had airbags and walked away. I had no
seat belts and low bench seats. I got whiplash and chest injuries from
the steering wheel. The Galaxie was almost intact, the Tercel was
crushed flat almost to the windshield.
Jim Warman - 09 Oct 2005 01:10 GMT
Good observation.... the Tercel absorbs the impact in an attempt to isolate
the passengers from the trauma.... Early 60s Detroit iron is hardly a
shining star of impact absorbtion and will transfer the full impact of the
event to the passengers. While I would prefer to be seen cruising top down
in a 64 Sunliner, I would feel much safer in a smaller, more modern car.

It's not about "solid"... it is all about survivability.
Spike - 09 Oct 2005 02:52 GMT
>Good observation.... the Tercel absorbs the impact in an attempt to isolate
>the passengers from the trauma.... Early 60s Detroit iron is hardly a
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>It's not about "solid"... it is all about survivability.

That's why mine is getting mods.... 3 pt seatbelts, high back buckets,
padded steering wheel, and working on a collapsible column. Not too
much I can do about the bumpers, etc. Probably the best thing I can do
is only drive when totally drunk. (just kidding) because I've
investigated so many accidents where the drunk walks away no matter
what kind of car. Oh, and for good measure, it's probably a good idea
to put it in my will that I be buried in the Mustang.
Spike
1965 Ford Mustang fastback 2+2 A Code 289 C4 Trac-Lok
Vintage Burgundy w/Black Standard Interior; Vintage 40
16" rims w/BF Goodrich Comp T/A gForce Radial
225/50ZR16 KDWS skins; surround sound audio-video.
BradandBrooks - 10 Oct 2005 12:17 GMT
> Good observation.... the Tercel absorbs the impact in an attempt to
> isolate
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> It's not about "solid"... it is all about survivability.

BINGO.

Brad
Rich - 10 Oct 2005 16:50 GMT
>> Good observation.... the Tercel absorbs the impact in an attempt to
>> isolate
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>Brad

Impact energy and heat energy are very similar.  The larger object
will absorb both better, and be less likely to "radiate" that energy
into whatever is in or near them.  So small cars are inherently less
safe than large cars, you can violate the laws of physics.
However, if a small car has things to protect to occupants that a
large car doesn't have, it can be safer.  So, a new small car "may" be
safer than a 1970s LTD, but I'm not conceding that it is.  All things
equal, you are much more likely to live though or not sustain injuries
in a larger car.
-Rich
Brent P - 10 Oct 2005 22:00 GMT
> It's not about "solid"... it is all about survivability.

Good passenger restraints can give the benefit of preventing passenger
compartment intrusion and not impacting things inside the car. Plus maybe
the car will survive too.

Yes, I understand crumple zones and such, but sometimes (sides) there
isn't much distance to crumple.
Spike - 10 Oct 2005 23:11 GMT
>> It's not about "solid"... it is all about survivability.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>Yes, I understand crumple zones and such, but sometimes (sides) there
>isn't much distance to crumple.

Especially when an 18 wheeler rolls over ya....
Spike
1965 Ford Mustang fastback 2+2 A Code 289 C4 Trac-Lok
Vintage Burgundy w/Black Standard Interior; Vintage 40
16" rims w/BF Goodrich Comp T/A gForce Radial
225/50ZR16 KDWS skins; surround sound audio-video.
http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/davescar_7_11_05_002.jpg
Richard - 11 Oct 2005 01:11 GMT
> >> It's not about "solid"... it is all about survivability.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> >
> Especially when an 18 wheeler rolls over ya....

AND therein lies the answer.  It really comes down to the mass differential
between the colliding objects.
Signature

Richard

'94 GT 'vert
Under Drive Pulleys
Transgo HD2  Reprogramming Kit
High Stall Torque Converter
4:10 Gears
Gripp Sub Frame Connectors (welded)
FRPP Aluminum Drive shaft
FRPP M5400-A Suspension
Laser Red

Spike - 11 Oct 2005 03:29 GMT
>> >> It's not about "solid"... it is all about survivability.
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>AND therein lies the answer.  It really comes down to the mass differential
>between the colliding objects.
"mass differential"... kinda sounds like someone gettin' ready for
church.... But you're right in many ways.... it's like
..........where the rubber meets the toad.....
Spike
1965 Ford Mustang fastback 2+2 A Code 289 C4 Trac-Lok
Vintage Burgundy w/Black Standard Interior; Vintage 40
16" rims w/BF Goodrich Comp T/A gForce Radial
225/50ZR16 KDWS skins; surround sound audio-video.
http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/davescar_7_11_05_002.jpg
Brent P - 11 Oct 2005 03:15 GMT
>>> It's not about "solid"... it is all about survivability.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>>
> Especially when an 18 wheeler rolls over ya....

Funny you mention that. My '75 maverick was hit in the door by a semi.
That's where real steel structure matters. It held. Those cars had huge
door beams by modern standards. Like a frame rail. The door skin was
formed around the beam. The side was pressed in only about an inch.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.