Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Mustang / November 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Just once, I figured

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Rich - 30 Oct 2005 05:50 GMT
I'm coming home, on the 401 in the Toronto area
and some clown in a XK8 comes roaring up behind me.
He must have done something with his engine because I
actually heard it.  I was innocently doing about 110kph
in the middle lane.  So, he jerks out from behind me
doing what I figure was about 160kph (based on how
fast he gained on me) and then juts in from of me, missing
me by around 2ft.
Trolling, I guess.  But it worked.
I figured, why should I let this yuppie pester me,
I wasn't in the left lane, I wasn't impeding him?
So, I accelerated onto his tail at 180kph.  No traffic to
speak of, it was after midnight.  He sped up to 200kph,
I kept up.  Finally, at 220kph, he gets out of the way.
I kept my foot down until the 6000rpm in 4th, 240kph
and kept it down until it showed 6600rpm, 100rpm short of the
redline. I figured I hit 260kph or around 158mph.
He faded back very fast.
It's not something I'd do again anytime soon, the most I'd
ever gone was 248kph in a 1988 LX 5.0.  This time it was my
2004 Mach-1.  Good thing the police are on a "work to rule" campaign
and are not issuing many tickets, at least not the Toronto police,
though the highway patrol (OPP) are still at it.
I'm sure the Jag could have passed me at some point, but he didn't.
-Rich
Jim Warman - 30 Oct 2005 06:43 GMT
Just when I thought you might have something... you turn into a supreme
a.s....

Notwithstanding that the 401 is the most accident prone stretch of highway
in Canada (here's another chance for your stats).... notwithstanding that
there is every chance that your tires aren't rated for that speed....
notwithstanding that there was even a slight chance of taking out an
innocent in your quest for balls.... you feel the need for braggadocio......

WTH were you thinking of? Did you get a boner?

Better start carrying a stick and a spoon in your car... that way the EMTs
can pick you up easier.

This message brought to you by a fat old guy on a Harley who never feels the
need to exceed the speed limit... now, if you want to compare timeslips....

> I'm coming home, on the 401
cprice@here.com - 30 Oct 2005 16:57 GMT
    Shut up warman.

> Just when I thought you might have something... you turn into a supreme
> a.s....
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
>>I'm coming home, on the 401
Jim Warman - 30 Oct 2005 18:28 GMT
Come, now... you KNOW that's impossible. But at least it isn't life
threatening.

> Shut up warman.
Jafo - 30 Oct 2005 06:48 GMT
> I'm coming home, on the 401 in the Toronto area
> and some clown in a XK8 comes roaring up behind me.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> I'm sure the Jag could have passed me at some point, but he didn't.
> -Rich

And this proved what? That your as big a jerk as the other guy?
Congratulations!!!!!
Hope that effort managed to put a hair on your balls....
Signature

Jafo
'02 GT Black
Not eggzackly stock

KJ.Kate - 30 Oct 2005 14:24 GMT
**snip**

I figured I hit 260kph or around 158mph.

*cough*
bullshit

KJK
dwight - 30 Oct 2005 14:29 GMT
> **snip**
>
> I figured I hit 260kph or around 158mph.
>
> *cough*
> bullshit

Never thought of it this way. I hit 177kph on my way home for lunch on
Friday. Cool.

:()
Michael Johnson, PE - 30 Oct 2005 15:29 GMT
> **snip**
>
>  I figured I hit 260kph or around 158mph.
>
> *cough*
> bullshit

I gotta call possible BS on an '88 LX 5.0L clocking in at 160 mph.  Back
when I was invincible and had a long, empty, slightly downhill stretch
of I-66 I managed to get my slightly modified '89 LX hatchback up to
135-140 mph and that was about all it could muster.  Getting another 20
mph out of it would have taken some serious horsepower.  Also, the
stability of the car was absolutely horrible at 135 and even if it could
have gone to 160 mph I'm not sure I would have had the guts to do it.
Also, the conversion factor from kph to mph is 0.621 so his 260 kph is
closer to 162 mph.
Ritz - 30 Oct 2005 16:37 GMT
>> **snip**
>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Also, the conversion factor from kph to mph is 0.621 so his 260 kph is
> closer to 162 mph.

There's no way a stock or even moderately modified '88LX is going that
fast.  The aerodynamics of the Fox body are about as brick-like as they
come.  As speed increases, the power requirements just to overcome the
air resistance are enormous.

All that aside, I agree with Warman (oh my).  Only a complete tool would
do something like that on a public roadway.  Wanna go fast?  Go to the
track.  That way, there are plenty of bystanders at a safe distance to
scrape your entrails off the walls when you screw up.
Michael Johnson, PE - 30 Oct 2005 17:05 GMT
>>> **snip**
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> come.  As speed increases, the power requirements just to overcome the
> air resistance are enormous.

I have a factory sunroof in my LX and at 135 mph it sounded like it was
on the verge of being sucked off the car.  Combine that with the feeling
the car was going airborne at any second and it was a performance I have
not cared to repeat since then.

> All that aside, I agree with Warman (oh my).  Only a complete tool would
> do something like that on a public roadway.  Wanna go fast?  Go to the
> track.  That way, there are plenty of bystanders at a safe distance to
> scrape your entrails off the walls when you screw up.

There's a time and place for everything.  I the USA there are places,
and times, when a driver can open up their vehicle and be of no danger
to anyone but themselves.  If someone is on an interstate highway in a
remote area with no one in sight then I really don't care if they want
to dance with the Devil.  Doing top speed runs in a metropolitan area or
on highways that are not restricted access isn't very wise and endangers
innocent people and property.  The top speed run I referenced was on a
deserted stretch of I-66 and there was not a car visible for as far as I
could see either in front or behind me.  If I had wrecked then the worst
I could have done was to take out a road sign or two.  I would likely be
dead from the crash too.
KJ.Kate - 30 Oct 2005 17:45 GMT
Well, all ya'll are calling bullshit on the LX, I'm still calling it on the
Mach.
Ritz - 31 Oct 2005 00:03 GMT
> Well, all ya'll are calling bullshit on the LX, I'm still calling it on the
> Mach.

Neither one of them can go that fast unless someone had done more than
the usual low hanging fruit types of mods.  Judging from the rather
immature nature of a lot of his other posts, I suspect this entire
episode is the result of random neuron firings while he slept.
66 6F HCS - 30 Oct 2005 22:30 GMT
>> I gotta call possible BS on an '88 LX 5.0L clocking in at 160 mph.
> There's no way a stock or even moderately modified '88LX is going that
> fast.

He said it was in an '04 Mach1
Signature

Scott W.
'66 HCS Mustang 289
'68 Ranchero 500 302
'69 Mustang Sportsroof 351W
ThunderSnake #57
http://home.comcast.net/~vanguard92/

trotzo - 30 Oct 2005 22:58 GMT
Having driven a Tractor Trailer for the better part of my life I'll
give you a few tips....

The surest way to get the guy in front of you to speed up is to pull
out and try and pass him. To get him to slow down, just set your cruise
control. Works every time.

The most aggravating thing to me is 3 cars abreast on a 3 lane highway
all going EXACTLY the same speed. I call this a log jam.

Try not to piss off truckers, most of them don't stop everytime they
gotta pee so the vast majority drive around with a "portable pee
bottle" (no, not me....I STOP!)
which means they have a readily available bottle of urine to dump all
over your car should you anger them in any way.
Oh, and see that big space in the lane in front of most trucks? We need
that to SLOW DOWN should someone brake unexpectedly in front of us. So
try not to take that away, especially at highway speeds.

You think hauling 80,000 pounds around is easy work?  I've heard
stories that would make yer hair curl, involving truckers and
motorists. Truck drivers radioing ahead to the other guys to box in a
particular car, and then throwing handfuls of pennies out the windows
or worse at the offending vehicle. Scary stuff....
I know sometimes it's not possible to have that space in front of us,
when my stopping distance is cut down I back off until I have the
appropriate space but of course that just invites someone else to move
in front. Unfortunately, most people don't realize how heavy a loaded
truck can be. 80,000 lbs....think about that.... 40 TONS. Even empty,
trucks weigh in at over 20,000 lbs....!
Bottom line is this, if I rear end a vehicle may be my fault, but I
will always walk away from the accident. The guy I hit will have my
bumper in his front seat....
Has never happened yet (knock wood) and I hope it never does.
Drive safe!
Mike Patterson - 31 Oct 2005 03:56 GMT
>Having driven a Tractor Trailer for the better part of my life I'll
>give you a few tips....

<<SNIP>>
>Drive safe!

An old family friend was a trucker until one night he was carrying
rolls of steel and had to jam on the brakes. Apparently a couple of
the rolls weren't tied down and just came right through the cab.

I always leave trucks a lot of room.

Mike

Mike Patterson
Please remove the spamtrap to email me.
"I always wanted to be somebody...I should have been more specific..." - Lily Tomlin
KJ.Kate - 31 Oct 2005 13:42 GMT
: >Having driven a Tractor Trailer for the better part of my life I'll
: >give you a few tips....
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
:
: Mike

My little brother is a trucker. I have ridden with him some, and learned
several years ago how stupid I was sometimes.
Since, I give them plenty of room and try to let them in when I can.

KJK
Ritz - 31 Oct 2005 00:07 GMT
>>>I gotta call possible BS on an '88 LX 5.0L clocking in at 160 mph.
>>
>>There's no way a stock or even moderately modified '88LX is going that
>>fast.
>
> He said it was in an '04 Mach1

That car won't do it either.
Garth Almgren - 31 Oct 2005 03:51 GMT
>>> **snip**
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> fast.  The aerodynamics of the Fox body are about as brick-like as they
> come.

I thought I remembered reading that the aero-headlight Fox-bodied
Mustangs were pretty aerodynamic. IIRC, they had a lower CD than the
SN95s that replaced 'em.

Signature

/     Garth - '83 GL V6stang Hatch <Former MW #7>     \

|      My V6stang: http://www.v6stang.com/v6stang     |
|  RAMFM Merchandise: http://www.cafeshops.com/ramfm  |
\  Mail pgp@v6stang.com for secure reply information  /
cprice@here.com - 30 Oct 2005 17:03 GMT
>> **snip**
>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Also, the conversion factor from kph to mph is 0.621 so his 260 kph is
> closer to 162 mph.

    Can you read? Its his 2004 Mach-1 he's talking about. Also, at those
speeds, factory speedometers are (historically anyways) notoriously
inaccurate.

Given a factory gear ratio and the high revving DOHC in his car I
wouldnt necessarily say bullshit. I'd be more interested in knowing what
his tach said. Ever better would be if he had a quality aftermarket tach
as you should be able to closely calculate speed based on an accurate
tach reading.
Michael Johnson, PE - 30 Oct 2005 17:52 GMT
>>> **snip**
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> speeds, factory speedometers are (historically anyways) notoriously
> inaccurate.

Ummmm... yes I can.  Can you?  At the bottom of his post he states the
following:

"It's not something I'd do again anytime soon, the most I'd
ever gone was 248kph in a 1988 LX 5.0."

My factory speedometer wasn't off 20+ mph and I seriously doubt his is,
or was, either.

> Given a factory gear ratio and the high revving DOHC in his car I
> wouldnt necessarily say bullshit. I'd be more interested in knowing what
> his tach said. Ever better would be if he had a quality aftermarket tach
> as you should be able to closely calculate speed based on an accurate
> tach reading.

The Mustang isn't a very aerodynamic vehicle and the Mach I engine is
around 280 rwhp stock so 160 mph runs are somewhat a stretch unless he
was going down a relatively steep incline or had a very stiff tail wind.
 Besides, I was commenting on an '88 LX going 160 mph not a 2004 Mach I.
ZombyWoof - 30 Oct 2005 18:03 GMT
>>> **snip**
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>as you should be able to closely calculate speed based on an accurate
>tach reading.

Well if you read his original message he claimed 6600rpm in 4th.
Signature

Zombywoof

Si vis Pacem, Para bellum

KJ.Kate - 31 Oct 2005 00:12 GMT
Would he have not hit the rev limeter at 6600 RPM ???????

: >>> **snip**
: >>>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
: >
: Well if you read his original message he claimed 6600rpm in 4th.
cprice@here.com - 31 Oct 2005 03:35 GMT
    In a DOHC? You had a cobra, didnt you ever wind it past 6600?
KJ.Kate - 31 Oct 2005 13:43 GMT
Mine used to hit the rev limiter (guv-ner whatever)  and fall on it's knees
right around  there, that's why I was asking.

: In a DOHC? You had a cobra, didnt you ever wind it past 6600?
Rich - 01 Nov 2005 02:24 GMT
>Mine used to hit the rev limiter (guv-ner whatever)  and fall on it's knees
>right around  there, that's why I was asking.
>
>: In a DOHC? You had a cobra, didnt you ever wind it past 6600?

The Mach-1 will hit 7000 without valve float.  It's a better engine
(more refined) than the older Cobras.  But then again, my
1988 LX 5.0 could hit 148mph and pretty fast, considering it was
supposedly rated at 225hp.
-Rich
ZombyWoof - 31 Oct 2005 14:12 GMT
>Would he have not hit the rev limeter at 6600 RPM ???????

His story, not mine :)

>: >>> **snip**
>: >>>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>: >
>: Well if you read his original message he claimed 6600rpm in 4th.

Signature

Zombywoof

Si vis Pacem, Para bellum

RT - 30 Oct 2005 19:55 GMT
>>> **snip**
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>speeds, factory speedometers are (historically anyways) notoriously
>inaccurate.

Well, I've compared my 03 cobra with a gps to see how accurate the
speedo is and I must tell you that up to 100 mph it is right on. I am
not sure what happens above that but it probably is still pretty
close.
I doubt the mach-1 does 160mph though but that's another issue.

>Given a factory gear ratio and the high revving DOHC in his car I
>wouldnt necessarily say bullshit. I'd be more interested in knowing what
>his tach said. Ever better would be if he had a quality aftermarket tach
>as you should be able to closely calculate speed based on an accurate
>tach reading.

well, who knows. I'm not saying I never speed, but doing 160mph on
public roads is not a good idea in my opinion.
Take it to the track I say.
Scott Van Nest - 31 Oct 2005 03:38 GMT
Kate,
 I am not trying ot stir the pot, but wasn't our Cobra's rated to do 155
mph in stock form?  and isn't that basically the same motor the new Mach's
have?

Scott

> **snip**
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> KJK
KJ.Kate - 31 Oct 2005 13:47 GMT
Hey Scott! How ya doin kid!
Hell, you aren't stirring a thing :)

The speedo said 160.
Highest I ever had it was just over 130

Yes, I do believe that the Mach has the same engine, and that's why I called
bullshit

Do you really think he had the speedo that close to pegged?
By that speed the Mach's tounge should have been hanging out.

If YOU were going that fast wouldn't you LOOK and KNOW how fast you were
going?
I sure as hell would have known. Braggin rights and all that.

KJK

: Kate,
:  I am not trying ot stir the pot, but wasn't our Cobra's rated to do 155
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
: >
: > KJK
Scott Van Nest - 31 Oct 2005 15:19 GMT
Katie -
 I am still around.  I have the motor out of the '71 and about to order a
331 kit.  good times.  The BIL mechanic is thinking I should be putting out
around 300ish HP with my conservative combination.  Something tells me that
my stock C4 doesn't have the gears to hit 150 MPH.  added to my 3.90 rear
end I might be lucky to hit 120.  I might have to find me an AOD as soon as
my C4 goes south.

 I have no regrets selling the Cobra.  This old car is much more fun.

 Have you ran your daughter off yet?

Scott
> Hey Scott! How ya doin kid!
> Hell, you aren't stirring a thing :)
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> : >
> : > KJK
KJ.Kate - 31 Oct 2005 22:59 GMT
Nope, Kristen is still here, the little guy is keeping me up to my eyeballs
while she is at work.
That little guy runs my a.s off!
She went to work at *sigh* the chevy dealer, also the place where I bought
my Jeep.

Go figure, she is a grease monkey. aka lube tech. My little girl, a grease
monkey, where will it all end!!??
I ran across, of all things, today a Bronco II. an 87 that I can pick up for
$800. I am seriously considering picking it up and making it a play toy.
Brop a 302 into it maybe and jack it up, make a mud monster out of it or
something. Yea.. it might be fun. It's already a 4x4 with a standard
tranny... it's a great start. Then I could go playin the brush and not worry
about scratching the hide off my Libby for a little while.

Only 300 hp huh? It won't be enough, you know that. Shug was always weaker
than I wanted and she was a smidge more than that.
Think hard, I would suggest putting as much in it as you can since you're
doing it anyway. Do you have any photos of the older one up anywhere?

: Katie -
:  I am still around.  I have the motor out of the '71 and about to order a
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
: > : >
: > : > KJK
Scott Van Nest - 01 Nov 2005 01:15 GMT
Oh, how proud I would be to raise a daughter that was a gear-head.  how
cool.   my child is constantly telling me to speed up while driving down the
road.  I look forward to taking her for a ride in the Mustang.

I have two projects going.  Since child #2 is due in March, I am building a
room over my garage to move my office to.  I need more room.  And since this
room addition is taking all my resources, I will be lucky to order my parts
before XMas.  We will see.

Aren't children the best!  Even the unborn.   GRRRR

Scott
> Nope, Kristen is still here, the little guy is keeping me up to my eyeballs
> while she is at work.
[quoted text clipped - 69 lines]
> : > : >
> : > : > KJK
KJ.Kate - 01 Nov 2005 06:09 GMT
Oh yea.. kinda like warts or boils... LOL

Poor Scott.

: Oh, how proud I would be to raise a daughter that was a gear-head.  how
: cool.   my child is constantly telling me to speed up while driving down the
[quoted text clipped - 86 lines]
: > : > : >
: > : > : > KJK
Scott Van Nest - 01 Nov 2005 13:46 GMT
Actually, I am not complaining about the situation.  For once, I am able to
build something (the room).  All of my bread and butter work is boring a.s
computer work. Nothing real tangible.  If i could make $100k and be a
carpenter or something along those lines, I would do it in a heartbeat.

But I can see the light at the end of the tunnel now.  I am at sheetrock
stage.  and the stroker kit will be on order by week end.  No pics yet.

Scott

> Oh yea.. kinda like warts or boils... LOL
>
[quoted text clipped - 104 lines]
> : > : > : >
> : > : > : > KJK
66 6F HCS - 01 Nov 2005 00:59 GMT
> If YOU were going that fast wouldn't you LOOK and KNOW how fast you were
> going?

I'd be too afraid to look down for fear of missing something I oughta be
keeping my eyes on, like the road and anything that might end up
centerpunching my front end.
Signature

Scott W.
'66 HCS Mustang 289
'68 Ranchero 500 302
'69 Mustang Sportsroof 351W
ThunderSnake #57
http://home.comcast.net/~vanguard92/

Backyard Mechanic - 30 Oct 2005 15:52 GMT
We've all probably succumbed at least once to that temptation.  
And Rich's body of posts points out that he writes the incident, not in
boastfulness but as a stream of conciousness report.

But I'm reminded  of something I learned through observation, as a kid.

I had occasion to stay with my aunt and uncle and she was driving me
somewhere .. I forget where.. and I noticed that she steered her car much
like you see done on TV comedic skits... constantly moving the steering
wheel, left and right.  Now it was a NEW car, they never kept a car more
than 3 years, so it couldnt be play in the steering.. which I knew of
because I was a farm kid and DID have experience in driving, if only off-
road.

But I was smart enough not to ask her why she did that... instead I
reasoned it out.  And the answer I came up with was that she was
LITERALLY DRIVING the car, instead of looking down the road and guiding
the car toward a point, she was actually ACTIVELY KEEPING the car in the
proper lane.

I think we've all ridden with someone who does that.  And therein lies
the danger of speeding to excess.

Many people NEVER look further down the road than a quarter mile... some
not even that far.  So instead of driving defensively, they bank on the
fact that almost all drivers drive within the law and statutes.  

Another good example of this are those who assume that, because the light
has just turned green, they're in the clear to proceed through the
intersection.. and they dont bother looking left and right to see if
someone's going to try to beat the light and/or run a red.
I'm also guilty of sometimes assuming that..

Statistically this is supported by UN accident and death figures for some
countries in which we KNOW there are 'crazy' drivers but relatively low
collision rates.

And that is why, in North America....

Rich <none@none.com> wrote in news:bqj8m1d6ogk7lm128gvu14tpp3enhfqfla@
4ax.com:

> I'm coming home, on the 401 in the Toronto area
> and some clown in a XK8 comes roaring up behind me.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> I'm sure the Jag could have passed me at some point, but he didn't.
> -Rich
ZombyWoof - 30 Oct 2005 18:10 GMT
>We've all probably succumbed at least once to that temptation.  
>And Rich's body of posts points out that he writes the incident, not in
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>I think we've all ridden with someone who does that.  And therein lies
>the danger of speeding to excess.

A long time ago 60 Minutes did a segment on driving where they
attached a measuring device to see how many times a minute the average
driver corrected their glide path.  Supposedly the less number of
changes made on a straight lane the better the driver.  I can't
remember all of the details since it was such a long time ago (Mike
Wallace was young).

Signature

Zombywoof

Si vis Pacem, Para bellum

Backyard Mechanic - 30 Oct 2005 18:15 GMT
>>We've all probably succumbed at least once to that temptation.  
>>And Rich's body of posts points out that he writes the incident, not
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> remember all of the details since it was such a long time ago (Mike
> Wallace was young).

What was interesting upshot of that... is that while I was in Navy, I was
a very ordinary guy in both boot camp and schools.  Until tests that
looked on how you actually  DID something.

I had to test for an on base driver's license, and during the 'school',
the instructor pointed out how I drove as the way to do it, he was
watching for signs of 'looking down-road'.
RT - 30 Oct 2005 20:02 GMT
>>We've all probably succumbed at least once to that temptation.  
>>And Rich's body of posts points out that he writes the incident, not in
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>remember all of the details since it was such a long time ago (Mike
>Wallace was young).

Well, I think the steering system has a lot to do with it too. Some
systems are so overpowered that you need to correct it constantly.
Then things like tire wear, alignment and the road itself also add up
to that.
KJ.Kate - 31 Oct 2005 00:15 GMT
Pair of who ?
Spike - 31 Oct 2005 04:07 GMT
>Pair of who ?

parabellum... as in 9mm : 0 )
Signature

Spike
1965 Ford Mustang Fastback 2+2, Vintage Burgundy
w/Black Std Interior, A Code 289 C4 Trac-Lok;
Vintage 40 16" rims w/225/50ZR16 KDWS BF Goodrich
gForce Radial T/As, Cobra drop; surround sound
audio-video...
See my ride at....
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/003_May_21_3004.jpg
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/005_May_21_2004.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/davescar_7_11_05_002.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/Engine_rebuild_006.jpg

KJ.Kate - 31 Oct 2005 13:48 GMT
Silly, I KNEW that part, I was wondering what the heck the rest was LOL

: >Pair of who ?
: >
: parabellum... as in 9mm : 0 )
Spike - 30 Oct 2005 21:03 GMT
>We've all probably succumbed at least once to that temptation.  
>And Rich's body of posts points out that he writes the incident, not in
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>the car toward a point, she was actually ACTIVELY KEEPING the car in the
>proper lane.

Of course, it might also be reasoned that someone might have needed to
see an optometrist : 0 )

Defensive driving is the key, and it's not just how far down the road
one looks, but all around. I've had to chase people with reds and
siren for several miles before they realize there is someone behind
them. And seen accidents in the middle of nowhere with essentially
unlimited visibility, where someone pulls out directly into the path
of another vehicle (or train). Among some of the reasons for the
constant correction could be attributed to a) steering system b)
vision problem c) insecure/timid/nervous diver d) weather (gusting
cross winds).

There are many drivers who, no matter how long they have been driving,
never become comfortable behind the wheel and it's often a case of
fighting to be in control, even when there is no need. And I've found
the cause to vary. For example, someone who is used to driving in the
country becomes this way in city traffic, and vice versa. In some you
can see it increase as the traffic around them increases.

My grandfather, who, in his much younger days, drove cargo trucks
through the Grapevine when it was 2 lanes was this way. Later in life,
he'd take his old Buick Roadmaster and bust 100mph on country roads
around the town where he lived. Yet, when it came time to sign up for
social security, it was an extreme effort for him to drive the 9 miles
to the next town where the Social Security Office was located.
Signature

Spike
1965 Ford Mustang Fastback 2+2, Vintage Burgundy
w/Black Std Interior, A Code 289 C4 Trac-Lok;
Vintage 40 16" rims w/225/50ZR16 KDWS BF Goodrich
gForce Radial T/As, Cobra drop; surround sound
audio-video...
See my ride at....
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/003_May_21_3004.jpg
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/005_May_21_2004.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/davescar_7_11_05_002.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/Engine_rebuild_006.jpg

ZombyWoof - 31 Oct 2005 00:04 GMT
>>We've all probably succumbed at least once to that temptation.  
>>And Rich's body of posts points out that he writes the incident, not in
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
>social security, it was an extreme effort for him to drive the 9 miles
>to the next town where the Social Security Office was located.

I learned how to drive in Germany and the process is quite involved.
One of the thing that the driving instructors drilled into me was to
pay attention to the car in front of the car in front of me.  If I was
reacting to what he did I would be doing it at as least as fast as the
driver in front of me if not faster.  I really wish we could adopt a
lot of the aspects of German driving here in the states, but I would
suspect 70% of our population would never be able to get licensed or
keep it.
Signature

Zombywoof

Si vis Pacem, Para bellum

Jim Warman - 31 Oct 2005 00:46 GMT
All I know is, that when I was more involved with our fire department, I
picked up far too many people with a stick and a spoon. It's bad enough
putting someone in a body bag.... having to use a scoop shovel to do it is
worse.... much, much worse. I realize that what I have in mind will be
ignored by some, treated with disdain by others....

If you want to go real fast... there are places to do that... If you want to
screw your brains out... there are places to do that.... If you want to
drink your face off... there are places for that.... If yopu want to watch a
movie... there are places for that.... None of them are publicly used roads.
Every last one of us leaves home expecting that every last one of us is
going to respect the rules of the road. If we keep dropping loose cannons
into the middle of the equation....

Common sense is still on holiday...
cprice@here.com - 31 Oct 2005 03:41 GMT
> All I know is, that when I was more involved with our fire department, I
> picked up far too many people with a stick and a spoon. It's bad enough
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Common sense is still on holiday...

    Shut up warman.
Jim Warman - 31 Oct 2005 05:11 GMT
What... is everyone from Calgary an a.shole? Do something... offer an
opinion... offer an alternative... but don't sound like a parrot....

> > All I know is, that when I was more involved with our fire department, I
> > picked up far too many people with a stick and a spoon. It's bad enough
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Shut up warman.
Spike - 31 Oct 2005 04:06 GMT
>Every last one of us leaves home expecting that every last one of us is
>going to respect the rules of the road.
This is one of the main reasons we see so many who don't.  

If more people would drive as if nobody else is going to obey the
rules, they'd be more defensive in the way they drive.... and more
would make it home.
Signature

Spike
1965 Ford Mustang Fastback 2+2, Vintage Burgundy
w/Black Std Interior, A Code 289 C4 Trac-Lok;
Vintage 40 16" rims w/225/50ZR16 KDWS BF Goodrich
gForce Radial T/As, Cobra drop; surround sound
audio-video...
See my ride at....
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/003_May_21_3004.jpg
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/005_May_21_2004.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/davescar_7_11_05_002.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/Engine_rebuild_006.jpg

Jim Warman - 31 Oct 2005 05:04 GMT
That's a unique view, Spike... crazy part is that it might work in some
areas...
Spike - 31 Oct 2005 07:25 GMT
>That's a unique view, Spike... crazy part is that it might work in some
>areas...

LOL Thanks for the.... say was that a positive? negative? or a
positive negative???? : 0 )

All it says is to expect the worst from other drivers and if you're
smart, you'll be a lot more cautious...

This is the way a lot of patrolmen are taught... Always expect the
other guy NOT to drive properly in order to be prepared for the
unexpected.

This is why, during a flat out response on a 2 lane road and
approaching a 4 way stop, slowing,  I pulled out to pass the cars
lined up and as I reached the stop line, the lead vehicle hung a left
right in front of me. Then stopped dead. A tap of the brake and hit
the gas and slipped between the rear of that vehicle and the nose of
the next in line.

Had I not expected someone to do something stupid, I might not have
reduced speed, and a TA could very likely not have been avoided.

NOTE: After arriving and handling the situation, both I and my partner
kicked back to have a smoke and relapse, when the shaking set in so
bad neither of us could hold a lighter steady to light up. Damn near
splashed all the coffee out of my thermos, too.
Signature

Spike
1965 Ford Mustang Fastback 2+2, Vintage Burgundy
w/Black Std Interior, A Code 289 C4 Trac-Lok;
Vintage 40 16" rims w/225/50ZR16 KDWS BF Goodrich
gForce Radial T/As, Cobra drop; surround sound
audio-video...
See my ride at....
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/003_May_21_3004.jpg
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/005_May_21_2004.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/davescar_7_11_05_002.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/Engine_rebuild_006.jpg

KJ.Kate - 31 Oct 2005 13:52 GMT
"Spike" <jma@snowcrest.net> wrote
*snip*

: NOTE: After arriving and handling the situation, both I and my partner
: kicked back to have a smoke and relapse, when the shaking set in so
: bad neither of us could hold a lighter steady to light up. Damn near
: splashed all the coffee out of my thermos, too.

Please say you didn't dump your donuts........

*snikker giggle*

Kate
Spike - 31 Oct 2005 23:17 GMT
>"Spike" <jma@snowcrest.net> wrote
>*snip*
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>Kate

I was going to avoid any discussion of a return to station : 0 )
Signature

Spike
1965 Ford Mustang Fastback 2+2, Vintage Burgundy
w/Black Std Interior, A Code 289 C4 Trac-Lok;
Vintage 40 16" rims w/225/50ZR16 KDWS BF Goodrich
gForce Radial T/As, Cobra drop; surround sound
audio-video...
See my ride at....
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/003_May_21_3004.jpg
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/005_May_21_2004.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/davescar_7_11_05_002.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/Engine_rebuild_006.jpg

KJ.Kate - 01 Nov 2005 01:06 GMT
: >"Spike" <jma@snowcrest.net> wrote
: >*snip*
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
: >
: I was going to avoid any discussion of a return to station : 0 )

Couldn't let ya slide sweetie.... just couldn't letcha.
Oh, you have a little glaze there on your moustache.....

KJK
Spike - 01 Nov 2005 01:16 GMT
>: >"Spike" <jma@snowcrest.net> wrote
>: >*snip*
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
>KJK

Uhhhhh, Geeeeee.... Thanks for pointing that out : 0 ) LOL
Should I ask how the Hubster hurt his back? hehehehehehe
Signature

Spike
1965 Ford Mustang Fastback 2+2, Vintage Burgundy
w/Black Std Interior, A Code 289 C4 Trac-Lok;
Vintage 40 16" rims w/225/50ZR16 KDWS BF Goodrich
gForce Radial T/As, Cobra drop; surround sound
audio-video...
See my ride at....
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/003_May_21_3004.jpg
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/005_May_21_2004.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/davescar_7_11_05_002.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/Engine_rebuild_006.jpg

KJ.Kate - 01 Nov 2005 06:10 GMT
: >Oh, you have a little glaze there on your moustache.....
: >
: >KJK
: >
: Uhhhhh, Geeeeee.... Thanks for pointing that out : 0 ) LOL
: Should I ask how the Hubster hurt his back? hehehehehehe

Not in any way that *I* got to enjoy!
damnit.

KJK
Spike - 01 Nov 2005 07:20 GMT
>: >Oh, you have a little glaze there on your moustache.....
>: >
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>KJK

Sounds like it's rock hoppin' time to me.... LOL
Signature

Spike
1965 Ford Mustang Fastback 2+2, Vintage Burgundy
w/Black Std Interior, A Code 289 C4 Trac-Lok;
Vintage 40 16" rims w/225/50ZR16 KDWS BF Goodrich
gForce Radial T/As, Cobra drop; surround sound
audio-video...
See my ride at....
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/003_May_21_3004.jpg
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/005_May_21_2004.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/davescar_7_11_05_002.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/Engine_rebuild_006.jpg

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.