Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Mustang / December 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

91 LX engine swap to a Ranger Diesel

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Upstate Cip - 24 Nov 2005 16:15 GMT
Hey All,

My 91 LX 4cyl engine is on its last legs. I am tired of putting money
into the engine but the body and top are in great shape so getting rid
of the whole car does not seem like an option.  I was thinking of
swapping out the factory engine to the old Ford Ranger diesel.  From
research it looks like it should fit. I am not a transmission guy so
that is the only thing I still need to research in detail.

Has anyone tried to do this with success or looked into it?

I am only getting around 20 mpg now and figured with the diesel (even a
refurb) I should get upwards of 27-28.

Thanks, Pete
Backyard Mechanic - 24 Nov 2005 17:04 GMT
> Hey All,
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> I am only getting around 20 mpg now and figured with the diesel (even a
> refurb) I should get upwards of 27-28.

Most original swap on here, in at least a year..  but a lot of work for 1
or 2 mpg of what might be higher priced fuel.

My wife's 88 vert got 27-28 before I 'turboed' it.

Signature

Yeh, I'm a Krusty old Geezer, putting up with my 'smartass' is the price
you pay..DEAL with it!

351CJ - 29 Nov 2005 20:52 GMT
>> Hey All,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Most original swap on here, in at least a year..  but a lot of work for 1
> or 2 mpg of what might be higher priced fuel.

Hey I am considering taking the 460 out and putting a 6.0L (2003-newer)
Powerstroke turbo diesel engine and automatic transmission into my 1971 Ford
Torino sportsroof...
In my 10,000 pound F-450 the engine is very impressive, in a 3,500 pound
Torino it would be really really fun.
For the novelty, not the mileage, can you imagine all the commotion at the
Ford car shows, :-),  Just need the right donor truck.

> My wife's 88 vert got 27-28 before I 'turboed' it.
Backyard Mechanic - 30 Nov 2005 00:51 GMT
> Hey I am considering taking the 460 out and putting a 6.0L
> (2003-newer) Powerstroke turbo diesel engine and automatic
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> For the novelty, not the mileage, can you imagine all the commotion at
> the Ford car shows, :-),  Just need the right donor truck.

Now THAT would be cool!

Signature

Yeh, I'm a Krusty old Geezer, putting up with my 'smartass' is the price
you pay..DEAL with it!

.boB - 01 Dec 2005 04:24 GMT
> Hey I am considering taking the 460 out and putting a 6.0L (2003-newer)
> Powerstroke turbo diesel engine and automatic transmission into my 1971 Ford
> Torino sportsroof...

   Wow, that would be cool.  You'de really have to beef up the entire front frame
and suspension to handle all that weight.

Signature

.boB
1997 HD FXDWG - Turbocharged   Stolen 11/26/05 in Denver
    1HD1GEL10VY3200010    CO License J5822Z
2001 Dodge Dakota QC 5.9/4x4/3.92
1966 Mustang Coupe - Daily Driver
1965 FFR Cobra -  427W EFI, Damn Fast.

.boB - 24 Nov 2005 17:47 GMT
> Hey All,
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Thanks, Pete

    Don't see why it wouldn't fit.  I would use the trans that comes from a ranger
to make everything easier.
    The biggest problem will be the weight.  Diesels are very heavy.  Pobably close
to a 5.0 V8.  Suspension is not a problem, just swap in the V8 parts.  But You'll
probably have to beef up the motor mount area.
    It would be an expensive project.  You'll have to do the math to see if it's
worth it to you.  In our area, diesel costs more than mid grade gasoline.
    Have you considered a turbocharged 4 from a Merkur?

Signature

.boB
1997 HD FXDWG - Turbocharged!
2001 Dodge Dakota QC 5.9/4x4/3.92
1966 Mustang Coupe - Daily Driver
1965 FFR Cobra - Finally on the Road!

alfredB18@prodigy.net - 25 Nov 2005 20:33 GMT
> Hey All,
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Thanks, Pete

Have you ever tried to find Mitsu (2.3L TDI) or Perkins (2.2L) diesel
parts for those Rangers?

Can you live with a vehicle that is umpteen times more of a dog, just
for a few mpgs more?

The idea is thoughtful, but being that I own a Ranger and see the
difficuties those with the diesels face when they do break (and they
will), I would recommend dropping in a better cam and porting/polishing
the head on the 2.3L gasser.

The 2.3L Lima flows HORRENDOUSLY, especially if you have the 8 spark
plug head.  Despite that, my Ranger gets mileage close to what a diesel
Ranger gets, if not better, for cheaper cost and better parts
availability.  Do what I suggest and you get better power and fuel
mileage.  Only if that could have been done at the factory, right?
Upstate Cip - 29 Nov 2005 14:35 GMT
Parts have been one of my main concerns.  It looks like for the desiel
or Merkur I would be living in the pick & pull yards on Saturday.  I
guess I still have to sleep on it more and see what I want to do.
Maybe just refurbing the engine I have is the way to go.

I am just glad the car started this morning so I could leave the RAM in
the garage. (Somtimes the starter does not catch and just spins. I need
to inspect the teeth)

Thanks for all the suggestions.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.