Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Mustang / December 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Are enviro-nuts EVER satisfied??

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Rich - 07 Dec 2005 00:53 GMT
Catalytic converters: source of pollution?

Massachusetts scientists say toxic metals from automotive catalytic
converters have been detected for the first time in U.S. urban air.

The research was conducted by Swedish scientists working in
collaboration with researchers from the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology and the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution.

The scientists found high concentrations of platinum, palladium,
rhodium and osmium in air over the Boston metropolitan area. Although
the particles are not yet considered a serious health risk, evidence
suggests they potentially could pose a future danger as worldwide car
sales increase from an estimated 50 million in 2000 to more than 140
million in 2050.

Finding ways to "stabilize" those metal particles within the
converters "should be a priority to limit their potential impact,"
says lead researcher Sebastien Rauch of Chalmers University of
Technology in Goteborg, Sweden. Scientists have also detected elevated
concentrations of the elements in Europe, Japan, Australia, Ghana,
China and Greenland.

Catalytic converters reduce emissions of carbon monoxide,
hydrocarbons, nitrogen oxides and other pollutants.

The study is to appear in the Dec. 15 issue of the American Chemical
Society's journal, Environmental Science and Technology.

Copyright 2005 by United Press International
Spike - 07 Dec 2005 01:43 GMT
>Catalytic converters: source of pollution?
>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
>Copyright 2005 by United Press International

Old news. Not much different than the special low emissions fuel
developed for California, which turned out to damage engines and
release unexpected pollutants.

And no, the enviros are never satisfied. Just look at many of the
issues they support...

--

Spike
1965 Ford Mustang Fastback 2+2, Vintage Burgundy
w/Black Std Interior, A Code 289 C4 Trac-Lok;
Vintage 40 16" rims w/225/50ZR16 KDWS BF Goodrich
gForce Radial T/As, Cobra drop; surround sound
audio-video...
See my ride at....
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/003_May_21_3004.jpg
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/005_May_21_2004.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/davescar_7_11_05_002.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/Engine_rebuild_006.jpg
Jimmy - 07 Dec 2005 02:27 GMT
At some point I expect one of these groups to do a study on human output
of carbon dioxide and biological waste with a plan for population
reduction. But the avian influenz HN51, ebola, will take care of THAT
problem

But wait? Another reason not to worry about this study. Aren't we going
to run out of oil by 2050, and costal cities like Boston dissapear into
the ocean due to global warming, washing away all of the platinum,
palladium etc from the streets of Beantown?

Oh no! We're doomed!

> Catalytic converters: source of pollution?
>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> Copyright 2005 by United Press International
Spike - 07 Dec 2005 04:20 GMT
>At some point I expect one of these groups to do a study on human output
>of carbon dioxide and biological waste with a plan for population
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>>
>> Copyright 2005 by United Press International
While there is some need to be watchdogs on the environment, sooner or
later the enviros will figure out that the best way to fix things is
do away with humans... then they'll start killing themselves off "to
save the earth". After they are gone, it may be a much nicer place.

Given half a chance, the earth repairs itself... whether by war, or
disease, or natural catastrophe...
--

Spike
1965 Ford Mustang Fastback 2+2, Vintage Burgundy
w/Black Std Interior, A Code 289 C4 Trac-Lok;
Vintage 40 16" rims w/225/50ZR16 KDWS BF Goodrich
gForce Radial T/As, Cobra drop; surround sound
audio-video...
See my ride at....
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/003_May_21_3004.jpg
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/005_May_21_2004.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/davescar_7_11_05_002.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/Engine_rebuild_006.jpg
KJ.Kate - 07 Dec 2005 13:16 GMT
: While there is some need to be watchdogs on the environment, sooner or
: later the enviros will figure out that the best way to fix things is
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
: Given half a chance, the earth repairs itself... whether by war, or
: disease, or natural catastrophe...

Yep, she does.
and we may not like the way she does it.

KJK
Jim Warman - 07 Dec 2005 07:14 GMT
Heavy metals are pollutants.... you sound surprised. I didn't make it past
grade 8 and I knew that heavy metals were considered carcinogenic.

I'm not sure what qualifies someone as an "enviro-nut", though. 10 years or
more ago, I had made remarks that, even though we had found new methods and
materials, we shouldn't get lax in our attitudes... history has shown that
the excesses of consumers will ALWAYS overload ntures ability to deal with
common compounds.

We slopped R-12 around with abandon.... AC systems, hair spray and whipped
cream propellant and God knows what else. Now, many are guilty of slopping
R-134a around like it was water.... the same R-134a that was originally to
be a "stop gap" safer replacement for R-12. How long before someone
discovers the dangers that this particular excess will deliver upon us.

FWIW, I spent most of my childhood on Canadian army bases.... asbestos was
the insulation of the day. My job includes daily "ablutions" in carcinogenic
liquids, chock full of heavy metals and Lord only knows what chemical
changes..... Am I ill... well, I suffer from the ravages of aging and the
toll my daily tasks take on me...

However, our lifestyles have overtaken us. Fresh fruit and vegetables
weren't good enough. We first had to force this stuff out of the ground with
chemicals, bypassing that "je ne c'est quois" that nature gave it. Then we
had to process it and "enrich" it and add chenicals to it and add a label
that says "MAY CONTAIN..." I'm putting this sh.t in my belly... can we
please come up with something better than "MAY CONTAIN....".

It doesn't take a college degree to realize that everything we have grown
dependant upon has downsides.... electricity - hydro-electric can change the
way a river works, atomic power (what can I say).... wind and tidal
generators will also surely have an affect on our planet. The things we do,
the way we do them, the things we eat and the way we grow them.....

Just as we can be sure that Rich will find another alarming report to post
in it's entirety (palgiarism and originality notwithstanding), we can be
just as sure that tomorrows advancement can easily turn into next years
problem.

I don't think that it's the bad things by themselves that will do us in....
it is our excesses that will do that.
Spike - 07 Dec 2005 20:31 GMT
>Heavy metals are pollutants.... you sound surprised. I didn't make it past
>grade 8 and I knew that heavy metals were considered carcinogenic.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>the excesses of consumers will ALWAYS overload ntures ability to deal with
>common compounds.

An environut is someone who constantly runs around shouting 'the sky
is falling" and posting all manner of gloom and doom reports to
instill fear in others, as if the news has just been discovered, even
though it might be years old...... Oh, wait!  That's Rich.....

A large number of us who live under constant attack from
environmentalists consider there to be different degrees of
environmentalists.....

There are those who truly care about the environment, but realize that
there is no way to absolutely fix all the problems as long as humans
are involved, so they are willing to work together and compromise....
they drive classic cars which they keep tuned and in good repair.

There are those who are environmentalists because it's the in thing to
do... they work in Hollywood and drive exotic cars and replace it when
the tank goes dry.

There are those who are environmentalists because of the drugs they
took while residing on the communes raising pigs during the 60s...
they still drive their VWs.

There are those who are environmentalists for money... they still have
fine Corinthian leather seats in their cars.

There are those who are environmentalists who would just as soon turn
the earth into a nature preserve and kick all the people out. This is
a small elite group headed by Al Gore and go by the organizational
name EnviroNuts or EnviroNatzis and believe there can be no middle
ground where plants and animals are concerned.

>We slopped R-12 around with abandon.... AC systems, hair spray and whipped
>cream propellant and God knows what else. Now, many are guilty of slopping
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>I don't think that it's the bad things by themselves that will do us in....
>it is our excesses that will do that.

--

Spike
1965 Ford Mustang Fastback 2+2, Vintage Burgundy
w/Black Std Interior, A Code 289 C4 Trac-Lok;
Vintage 40 16" rims w/225/50ZR16 KDWS BF Goodrich
gForce Radial T/As, Cobra drop; surround sound
audio-video...
See my ride at....
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/003_May_21_3004.jpg
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/005_May_21_2004.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/davescar_7_11_05_002.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/Engine_rebuild_006.jpg
Rich - 08 Dec 2005 03:35 GMT
>Heavy metals are pollutants.... you sound surprised. I didn't make it past
>grade 8 and I knew that heavy metals were considered carcinogenic.
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
>I don't think that it's the bad things by themselves that will do us in....
>it is our excesses that will do that.

And yet we continue to live longer and longer. We must be living
right?
-Rich
Jim Warman - 08 Dec 2005 04:44 GMT
Of course the average age is longer now than years gone by..... diseases
that were once killers are now either treatable or otherwise beatable.
Polio, measles, rubella, scarlet fever... the mortaliy rate was extremely
high. We can attribute the greatest portion of our longevity to medical
advancements with a healthy dose of improvements in food storage.

Interestingly, one device that improved food storage - the every present
refrigerator - was part of the problem as we treated cfcs with a cavalier
attitude.

Getting back to carcinogenic..... in place of those old ads I remember as a
child.... the one's featuring a youngster striken with polio in an iron
lung. We now see ads fr those striken with diseases that people didn't live
long enough to get.

Years ago, we had neither air quality warnings nor people getting skin
cancer from lying in the sun. We didn't have a lot of things we take as
common-place today.

The notion of zero pollution is unattainable... but we should all do our
part to minimize the impact our daily lives have on our surroundings. We
don't have to be raging environmentalists to use our non-renewable resources
with a sensible mind and we aren't enviro-nuts if we realize that there are
correct ways to dispose of some of our modern refuse.

Imagine that the world was limited to your backyard..... you can only sh.t 
in your backyard for so long before it becomes a really unpleasant place to
be...

The world is a wide place... we can't look at it with narrow vision.
WindsorFox - 07 Dec 2005 07:44 GMT
   In a word, no.

Signature

"Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea -- massive,
difficult to redirect, awe-inspiring, entertaining, and a source of
mind-boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it."

                                          -- Gene Spafford

KJ.Kate - 07 Dec 2005 13:19 GMT
: "Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea -- massive,
: difficult to redirect, awe-inspiring, entertaining, and a source of
: mind-boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it."
:
:                                           -- Gene Spafford

Oh My God!
ROFLMFAO!!!!

KJK
Hawk - 16 Dec 2005 19:37 GMT
>    In a word, no.

The militant environmentalists are simply using environmentalism as a
vehicle (no pun intended) for their anti-capitalist beliefs.

A large number of the most active enviro nut groups are fronts for
communist/socialist organizations.  The plight of the environment is
really secondary to their desire to move towards a cradle to grave
entitlement society.  In their minds everyone should be equal...equally
miserable.

Now to pull this closer to being on-topic:

My Mustang has been tucked away in the garage for almost 2 months...god
how I wish I could roll her out and generate some healthy clouds of
pollution.  :P

(*>
Spike - 16 Dec 2005 20:06 GMT
>>    In a word, no.
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>entitlement society.  In their minds everyone should be equal...equally
>miserable.

I knew the ACLU were a bunch of Commie sympathizers, but had not
realized they were enviro nuts, too. Dang. They'll be after my car
next as soon as they get done destroying religion and Christmas, and
the rest of the American way of life... I wonder if they'll throw
their support behind some minority automaker, and fight to close down
the majority ones....

>Now to pull this closer to being on-topic:
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>(*>
--

Spike
1965 Ford Mustang Fastback 2+2, Vintage Burgundy
w/Black Std Interior, A Code 289 C4 Trac-Lok;
Vintage 40 16" rims w/225/50ZR16 KDWS BF Goodrich
gForce Radial T/As, Cobra drop; surround sound
audio-video...
See my ride at....
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/003_May_21_3004.jpg
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/005_May_21_2004.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/davescar_7_11_05_002.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/Engine_rebuild_006.jpg
KJ.Kate - 07 Dec 2005 13:13 GMT
Has it occured to you that we should keep trying until we get it right?
If not, then what legacy do we leave to future generations?

Kate

: Catalytic converters: source of pollution?
:
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
:
: Copyright 2005 by United Press International
Rich - 08 Dec 2005 03:38 GMT
>Has it occured to you that we should keep trying until we get it right?
>If not, then what legacy do we leave to future generations?
>
>Kate

The future generations will have far more advanced technology that
will allow them to better deal with any problem we might choose to
tackle.  Leave it for them.  
-Rich
Jim Warman - 08 Dec 2005 04:48 GMT
Now there's an attitude that really works......Everyone must love you as you
leave a trail of things for other people to take care of in your wake....

>>Has it occured to you that we should keep trying until we get it right?
>>If not, then what legacy do we leave to future generations?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> tackle.  Leave it for them.
> -Rich
Rich - 08 Dec 2005 22:42 GMT
>Now there's an attitude that really works......Everyone must love you as you
>leave a trail of things for other people to take care of in your wake....

Like what?   Or are you just speculating?  
Probably the thing I can't stand the most about all this are the
hypocrites who NEVER practice what they preach.  Give up your
car, give up heating your house or using electricity, because they ALL
pollute.  Ride the 30 miles you have to to go to a grocery store (and
only buy organic produce at 3x the price) on a bicycle during a -40
deg. Alberta cold snap!!!!!
-Rich

>>>Has it occured to you that we should keep trying until we get it right?
>>>If not, then what legacy do we leave to future generations?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>> tackle.  Leave it for them.
>> -Rich
Jim Warman - 09 Dec 2005 02:41 GMT
Interesting take, Rich.... I'm a hypocrite because of what???? Saying that
we all need to do what we can? Because I avail myself of the latest
technology? Because I recycle? What part makes me a hypocrite??

I think you should spend more money on drugs.... those cheap ones are
f*cking you up too much...

>>Now there's an attitude that really works......Everyone must love you as
>>you
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>>> tackle.  Leave it for them.
>>> -Rich
Spike - 09 Dec 2005 05:26 GMT
>Interesting take, Rich.... I'm a hypocrite because of what???? Saying that
>we all need to do what we can? Because I avail myself of the latest
>technology? Because I recycle? What part makes me a hypocrite??
>
>I think you should spend more money on drugs.... those cheap ones are
>f*cking you up too much...

ROFLMAO!!!!! Dang , and I swallowed my gum!!!!! ROFLMAO!!!!

>>>Now there's an attitude that really works......Everyone must love you as
>>>you
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>>>> tackle.  Leave it for them.
>>>> -Rich

--

Spike
1965 Ford Mustang Fastback 2+2, Vintage Burgundy
w/Black Std Interior, A Code 289 C4 Trac-Lok;
Vintage 40 16" rims w/225/50ZR16 KDWS BF Goodrich
gForce Radial T/As, Cobra drop; surround sound
audio-video...
See my ride at....
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/003_May_21_3004.jpg
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/005_May_21_2004.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/davescar_7_11_05_002.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/Engine_rebuild_006.jpg
KJ.Kate - 08 Dec 2005 21:56 GMT
: >Has it occured to you that we should keep trying until we get it right?
: >If not, then what legacy do we leave to future generations?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
: tackle.  Leave it for them.
: -Rich

Oh, you are out of your rabbid assed mind.

KJK
Rich - 08 Dec 2005 22:43 GMT
>: >Has it occured to you that we should keep trying until we get it right?
>: >If not, then what legacy do we leave to future generations?
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>KJK

And you are a typical, unthinking, knee-jerk LIBERAL.
Sell your cars NOW!
-Rich
KJ.Kate - 09 Dec 2005 03:55 GMT
"Rich" <none@none.com> barked out his a.s:

: >: >Has it occured to you that we should keep trying until we get it right?
: >: >If not, then what legacy do we leave to future generations?
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
: Sell your cars NOW!
: -Rich

Sadly, the only intelligent posts you EVER make, are the plagiarized copy
and paste articles that you toss out now and then.

Otherwise, you have nothing of real value to offer, not even anything worthy
of entertainment value.

You are an idiot without an original thought in your empty head. Your idea
of "f.ck it up and let the future generations fix it" is completely absurd.
Go back to copy and paste Rich, it gives you some semblance of intelligence
by demonstrating your ability to right and left click on your mouse
buttons..

KJK
Michael Johnson, PE - 09 Dec 2005 05:36 GMT
> "Rich" <none@none.com> barked out his a.s:
>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> by demonstrating your ability to right and left click on your mouse
> buttons..

He does the exact same thing in the digital photography groups I
frequent.  He links to and plagiarizes boring, outdated web
articles/sites.  Complains about DSLR camera brands and HE DOESN'T EVEN
OWN A FRIGGIN' DSLR CAMERA!  They smack him around regularly in those
groups.  Personally I think he's a troll or starved for attention, even
if it is negative.
KJ.Kate - 09 Dec 2005 13:12 GMT
: > "Rich" <none@none.com> barked out his a.s:
: >
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
: groups.  Personally I think he's a troll or starved for attention, even
: if it is negative.

Until recently he's been relatively harmless, but here lately it's as if
someone gave him too high a jolt of electricity at the funny farm or like
Spike said cheap drugs.

KJK
Spike - 09 Dec 2005 21:19 GMT
>: He does the exact same thing in the digital photography groups I
>: frequent.  He links to and plagiarizes boring, outdated web
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>KJK

Or, while out picking through the dump recently, he came across a
stack of old Greenpeace magazines....
--

Spike
1965 Ford Mustang Fastback 2+2, Vintage Burgundy
w/Black Std Interior, A Code 289 C4 Trac-Lok;
Vintage 40 16" rims w/225/50ZR16 KDWS BF Goodrich
gForce Radial T/As, Cobra drop; surround sound
audio-video...
See my ride at....
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/003_May_21_3004.jpg
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/005_May_21_2004.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/davescar_7_11_05_002.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/Engine_rebuild_006.jpg
KJ.Kate - 09 Dec 2005 23:29 GMT
: >Until recently he's been relatively harmless, but here lately it's as if
: >someone gave him too high a jolt of electricity at the funny farm or like
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
: Or, while out picking through the dump recently, he came across a
: stack of old Greenpeace magazines....

Well, for some, bad attention is better than no attention at all.

KJK
WindsorFox - 10 Dec 2005 00:54 GMT
> : >Until recently he's been relatively harmless, but here lately it's as if
> : >someone gave him too high a jolt of electricity at the funny farm or like
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> KJK

    If you ever wondered, do a Google-groups search for free speech
store and/or sift through news.admin.net-abuse.email  and look at the
multiple posts under multiple names about the SPEWS list. One k00k, a
million OT messages and the wrong meds. Mix in a whole lotta time and
you have hurc ast to a 5th power.

Signature

Oh, you are out of your rabbid assed mind.- KJK

KJ.Kate - 10 Dec 2005 03:13 GMT
: > : >Until recently he's been relatively harmless, but here lately it's as if
: > : >someone gave him too high a jolt of electricity at the funny farm or like
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
: million OT messages and the wrong meds. Mix in a whole lotta time and
: you have hurc ast to a 5th power.

Can I just take your word for it? The k00ks are bad enough when they come
out on their own, you want me to go looking for them?

*grin*

I'm fairly certain that I can find something much more pleasant   to do with
my time.
Sounds like it would be enlightening in an off world sort of way.
Jim Warman - 10 Dec 2005 03:21 GMT
AAAAAAKKKKK!!!!!!! He uttered the <expletive deleted>......

"Beetlejuice - beetlejuice - beetlejuice....".

Fie on you, WF,  and a pox on your existance for uttering the
hu.....hu.....hu... him word.....
Spike - 10 Dec 2005 05:30 GMT
>AAAAAAKKKKK!!!!!!! He uttered the <expletive deleted>......
>
>"Beetlejuice - beetlejuice - beetlejuice....".
>
>Fie on you, WF,  and a pox on your existance for uttering the
>hu.....hu.....hu... him word.....

JIM! DON'T SAY IT!!!!!!!!!!
--

Spike
1965 Ford Mustang Fastback 2+2, Vintage Burgundy
w/Black Std Interior, A Code 289 C4 Trac-Lok;
Vintage 40 16" rims w/225/50ZR16 KDWS BF Goodrich
gForce Radial T/As, Cobra drop; surround sound
audio-video...
See my ride at....
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/003_May_21_3004.jpg
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/005_May_21_2004.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/davescar_7_11_05_002.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/Engine_rebuild_006.jpg
KJ.Kate - 10 Dec 2005 12:20 GMT
: AAAAAAKKKKK!!!!!!! He uttered the <expletive deleted>......
:
: "Beetlejuice - beetlejuice - beetlejuice....".
:
: Fie on you, WF,  and a pox on your existance for uttering the
: hu.....hu.....hu... him word.....

It had the same effect on me Jim...
I was hoping that if I ingored it, it would stay away.

ptooie ptooie ptooie

KJK
WindsorFox - 11 Dec 2005 00:23 GMT
> : AAAAAAKKKKK!!!!!!! He uttered the <expletive deleted>......
> :
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> KJK

    Deal with some of the people I see daily and you'll beg to have
beetle juice back....

Signature

Oh, you are out of your rabbid assed mind.- KJK

KJ.Kate - 11 Dec 2005 04:13 GMT
:     Deal with some of the people I see daily and you'll beg to have
: beetle juice back....

Umm... like who?
Here in my little corner of the world, the only people that can bother me
are the ones that are in town and I have to drive 15 miles to let them annoy
me.

KJK
WindsorFox - 11 Dec 2005 17:52 GMT
> :     Deal with some of the people I see daily and you'll beg to have
> : beetle juice back....
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> KJK

   Told you, GOogle Free speech store, freespeechstore and richard
scoville. Parouse what comes up. Look in the news group I mentioned.

Signature

Oh, you are out of your rabbid assed mind.- KJK

WindsorFox - 09 Dec 2005 23:05 GMT
> : And you are a typical, unthinking, knee-jerk LIBERAL.
> : Sell your cars NOW!
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> KJK

    I'd say I have to agree if he thinks you are a Liberal.

Signature

Oh, you are out of your rabbid assed mind.- KJK

KJ.Kate - 09 Dec 2005 23:30 GMT
: > : And you are a typical, unthinking, knee-jerk LIBERAL.
: > : Sell your cars NOW!
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
:
:     I'd say I have to agree if he thinks you are a Liberal.

Thank you sir... I am so pleased that you noticed.

KJK
Dan - 07 Dec 2005 18:39 GMT
Yeah, on the other hand, my car with no cats just passed emissions.
Locally (Alb, NM) they've adopted the OBD-II emissions testing without
any sniffer in the tail pipe. My car is completely healthy from the
perspective of the OBD-II systems so I passed the test. There is,
currently, no visual inspection, so the straight pipes, while raising
questions, did not cause my car to fail. And I can put a pair of empty
cat cans on for the visual and still pass since my car is healthy
according to the diagnostics.

The point is, cats may become superfluous on vehicles later than 1996.
Rich - 08 Dec 2005 03:41 GMT
>Yeah, on the other hand, my car with no cats just passed emissions.
>Locally (Alb, NM) they've adopted the OBD-II emissions testing without
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>The point is, cats may become superfluous on vehicles later than 1996.

Catalytic converters are like hydrogen fuel;  All the environuts want
them/it, but never stop to consider what is done to PROVIDE the
materials to make them.  In the case of platinum, an ingredient in
converters, it's the clearing of the plant life, the blasting,  the
digging, transporting, crushing, processing, refining
of one ounce of metal from at least 25 tons of rock.  How much energy
and pollution do you suppose that creates in whatever backward country
it's done in?
-Rich
KJ.Kate - 09 Dec 2005 03:57 GMT
: >Yeah, on the other hand, my car with no cats just passed emissions.
: >Locally (Alb, NM) they've adopted the OBD-II emissions testing without
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
: it's done in?
: -Rich

Is this the same asswipe that just called me a liberal? Which side of your
mouth are you whistling out of now dimwit?
Sheesh, choose a side and stick with it will you?
KJK
Michael Johnson, PE - 09 Dec 2005 05:49 GMT
>> Yeah, on the other hand, my car with no cats just passed emissions.
>> Locally (Alb, NM) they've adopted the OBD-II emissions testing without
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> and pollution do you suppose that creates in whatever backward country
> it's done in?

All we need are batteries that can run a car for 300 miles, can be
recharged in less than 5 minutes and can last 1,000 charge cycles.  Put
an efficient, 50-100hp electric motor in each wheel hub and just think
of the savings that could result.  No more antifreeze, oil, gasoline,
transmission fluid, grease, power steering fluid etc.  Then think of the
addition interior space and packaging possibilities from having no drive
train.  Also, the performance possibilities would be fantastic with
computers controlling each drive wheel with a finesse not remotely
possible on today's cars/trucks.  The car I described could be built
today if we, the consumers, demanded it.  BTW, do you own a car? ;)
Joe - 09 Dec 2005 11:31 GMT
>>> Yeah, on the other hand, my car with no cats just passed emissions.
>>> Locally (Alb, NM) they've adopted the OBD-II emissions testing
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> could be built today if we, the consumers, demanded it.  BTW, do you
> own a car? ;)

So Michael, if that Shelby you're considering had those 4 electric
motors you're talking about instead of what it will really come with,
would you still be considering it?  ;)
Michael Johnson, PE - 09 Dec 2005 15:33 GMT
>>>> Yeah, on the other hand, my car with no cats just passed emissions.
>>>> Locally (Alb, NM) they've adopted the OBD-II emissions testing
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> motors you're talking about instead of what it will really come with,
> would you still be considering it?  ;)

Sure.  Electric motors can be torque monsters.  I don't care what it
runs on just as long as it can do a burnout and go like a bat out of
hell.  I would miss the exhaust note but it would be one hell of a
sleeper. :)
Spike - 09 Dec 2005 21:28 GMT
>Jo
>>> All we need are batteries that can run a car for 300 miles, can be
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>hell.  I would miss the exhaust note but it would be one hell of a
>sleeper. :)
Problem... no drive train... ok.... no fluids.... ok.... but those
batteries have to go someplace.... and when they go bad... I think we
have some sort of pollution problem building....

On a happier note.... if they built it.... you could always get a CD
of BB engines, slip some speakers into the wheel wells, and crank it
up.... add some speakers on the dash pointed right at your face and
the sound waves should mash you into your seat, blow back your hair,
flatten out your face and press your eyeballs back in their sockets,
thus giving the illusion of going like a bat out of hell.... : 0 )

A running partner of mine did the stereo thing with his VW bug (along
with some phony pipes)... it really freaked some people out when the
light changed. He had 'em cold for about the first 30 feet or so...
--

Spike
1965 Ford Mustang Fastback 2+2, Vintage Burgundy
w/Black Std Interior, A Code 289 C4 Trac-Lok;
Vintage 40 16" rims w/225/50ZR16 KDWS BF Goodrich
gForce Radial T/As, Cobra drop; surround sound
audio-video...
See my ride at....
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/003_May_21_3004.jpg
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/005_May_21_2004.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/davescar_7_11_05_002.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/Engine_rebuild_006.jpg
Michael Johnson, PE - 09 Dec 2005 23:18 GMT
>> Jo
>>>> All we need are batteries that can run a car for 300 miles, can be
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> batteries have to go someplace.... and when they go bad... I think we
> have some sort of pollution problem building....

True but it would be a relatively infrequent event and comparing the
volume of fluids over a 300,000 mile life of a car disposing of a set of
batteries would be minor.  Also just think of all the manufacturing of
metal that would be unnecessary like engine blocks, heads, gears,
transmissions, etc.

> On a happier note.... if they built it.... you could always get a CD
> of BB engines, slip some speakers into the wheel wells, and crank it
> up.... add some speakers on the dash pointed right at your face and
> the sound waves should mash you into your seat, blow back your hair,
> flatten out your face and press your eyeballs back in their sockets,
> thus giving the illusion of going like a bat out of hell.... : 0 )

Who knows, maybe the whining of four strong electric motors might have
it own unique sound that would grow on me. :)

> A running partner of mine did the stereo thing with his VW bug (along
> with some phony pipes)... it really freaked some people out when the
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/davescar_7_11_05_002.jpg
> Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/Engine_rebuild_006.jpg
Spike - 10 Dec 2005 02:36 GMT
>>> Jo
>>>>> All we need are batteries that can run a car for 300 miles, can be
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>metal that would be unnecessary like engine blocks, heads, gears,
>transmissions, etc.
And all those unemployed auto workers....  but is that something not
entered into the equation... by the time such an auto is produced,
what would the world population be, how many would have such vehicles,
and thus how many more discarded batteries and fluids would there be?

>> On a happier note.... if they built it.... you could always get a CD
>> of BB engines, slip some speakers into the wheel wells, and crank it
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>Who knows, maybe the whining of four strong electric motors might have
>it own unique sound that would grow on me. :)
Hmmmmm.... whining.... a Jewish car....  probably not good on dates...
LOL

>> A running partner of mine did the stereo thing with his VW bug (along
>> with some phony pipes)... it really freaked some people out when the
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>> Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/davescar_7_11_05_002.jpg
>> Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/Engine_rebuild_006.jpg
--

Spike
1965 Ford Mustang Fastback 2+2, Vintage Burgundy
w/Black Std Interior, A Code 289 C4 Trac-Lok;
Vintage 40 16" rims w/225/50ZR16 KDWS BF Goodrich
gForce Radial T/As, Cobra drop; surround sound
audio-video...
See my ride at....
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/003_May_21_3004.jpg
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/005_May_21_2004.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/davescar_7_11_05_002.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/Engine_rebuild_006.jpg
KJ.Kate - 10 Dec 2005 03:16 GMT
: >True but it would be a relatively infrequent event and comparing the
: >volume of fluids over a 300,000 mile life of a car disposing of a set of
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
: what would the world population be, how many would have such vehicles,
: and thus how many more discarded batteries and fluids would there be?

But but but.... WE can just pile them up! Dump them anywhere, who cares!
The future generations will figure out a way to get rid of the toxins.
THEY will clean it up! Have you not been reading these posts? Have you not
learned anything here?? Sheesh.

KJK
KJ.Kate - 09 Dec 2005 23:36 GMT
: On a happier note.... if they built it.... you could always get a CD
: of BB engines, slip some speakers into the wheel wells, and crank it
: up.... add some speakers on the dash pointed right at your face and
: the sound waves should mash you into your seat, blow back your hair,
: flatten out your face and press your eyeballs back in their sockets,
: thus giving the illusion of going like a bat out of hell.... : 0 )

DAMNIT SPIKE!
What have I told you about filling the hot tub with Boones Farm??

: A running partner of mine did the stereo thing with his VW bug (along
: with some phony pipes)... it really freaked some people out when the
: light changed. He had 'em cold for about the first 30 feet or so...

Yea, a guy can only pedal so fast for so long, then his legs give out.

Is this one of the guys that lives up north of me?

KJK
Spike - 10 Dec 2005 02:37 GMT
>: On a happier note.... if they built it.... you could always get a CD
>: of BB engines, slip some speakers into the wheel wells, and crank it
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
>KJK

Nope... he was one lonnnnngggggg before that bunch....
--

Spike
1965 Ford Mustang Fastback 2+2, Vintage Burgundy
w/Black Std Interior, A Code 289 C4 Trac-Lok;
Vintage 40 16" rims w/225/50ZR16 KDWS BF Goodrich
gForce Radial T/As, Cobra drop; surround sound
audio-video...
See my ride at....
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/003_May_21_3004.jpg
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/005_May_21_2004.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/davescar_7_11_05_002.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/Engine_rebuild_006.jpg
Hawk - 17 Dec 2005 16:42 GMT
>>Jo
>>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> batteries have to go someplace.... and when they go bad... I think we
> have some sort of pollution problem building....

I hate to think what it costs to get a set of batteries replaced in a
hybrid.  The "recycling" fee itself must be pretty hefty.

Pure electric cars at this point are a complete pipe dream.  Not only do
you have the battery disposal problem, but consider the following...

If everyone converted to electric cars, where would all of the required
electrical power come from to charge all of those batteries?  Are we
going to increase the amount of coal we burn by several orders of
magnitude?  The enviro nuts will never allow more nuke power plants to
be built either...so whats the alternative?

The U.S power grid is near the breaking point now.  There have not been
any major improvements or additions to existing electrical
infrastructure for decades.

Remember the rolling blackouts in California?  How on earth are they
going to be able to provide enough power for everyones electric cars
when they can hardly keep up with electrical demand now.

(*>
Michael Johnson, PE - 17 Dec 2005 17:41 GMT
>>> Jo
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> I hate to think what it costs to get a set of batteries replaced in a
> hybrid.  The "recycling" fee itself must be pretty hefty.

Probably not much more than an engine rebuild.

> Pure electric cars at this point are a complete pipe dream.  Not only do
> you have the battery disposal problem, but consider the following...

Pure electrical cars are far from a pipe dream.  They are possible right
now.  The only thing keeping them from replacing petrol driven cars is
having batteries that give an equivalent driving range (i.e. 300+ miles
on a charge) and a quick recharge time of, say, less than 5 minutes.  We
have the technology (sans the batteries) in computers, electric motors,
build materials etc. to make one hell of an electric vehicle, IMO, and
to make it quite affordable.

> If everyone converted to electric cars, where would all of the required
> electrical power come from to charge all of those batteries?  Are we
> going to increase the amount of coal we burn by several orders of
> magnitude?  The enviro nuts will never allow more nuke power plants to
> be built either...so whats the alternative?

Making electrical power can be done in a variety of ways.  The good
thing is that nearly all power plants have emissions controls and by
centralizing the burning of the fuel (i.e. coal, oil etc.) it is easier
to do it in an efficient, clean manor.  It is an economy of scale thing.
 Once the electricity is generated the end user generates zero
emissions.  Just think of all the waste that is avoided by an electric
car with a set of 1,000 recharge cycle batteries verses a typical car of
today.  Plus a combustion engine is notoriously inefficient for
converting the energy of petroleum to mechanical energy to drive a car.
 Way less efficient than an electric car.  Also, having the electric
grid and vehicles in place makes shifting to newer, more efficient
technologies for generating electricity seamless and painless.

> The U.S power grid is near the breaking point now.  There have not been
> any major improvements or additions to existing electrical
> infrastructure for decades.

The money saved from not having to manufacture, transport, store and
distribute liquid fuel could more than cover the costs of improving the
power grid.  The fact is there isn't a more efficient way to distribute
power to the masses than the electrical grid.  Plus a person could slow
charge their vehicle overnight in their home and reduce the peak demands
on the grid since the electrical load is low when people are sleeping.

> Remember the rolling blackouts in California?  How on earth are they
> going to be able to provide enough power for everyones electric cars
> when they can hardly keep up with electrical demand now.

The way they always do, improve the capacity of the system.  It isn't
that difficult and really not that expensive.  The money saved from the
reduction in manufacturing, storing, transporting and distributing
petroleum for use in current vehicles would more than pay for it.  Heck,
in California just the money saved from the elimination of their Nazi
smog inspection process would pay for it. ;)
Hawk - 17 Dec 2005 18:51 GMT
>>>> Jo
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> Probably not much more than an engine rebuild.

A standard gasoline engine is going to outlast a set of batteries 5
times over minimum.  In extreme climates the difference will become even
more apparent.  Batteries are like people...they don't tend to hold up
well in extreme cold or heat, they do best at median temps.

>> Pure electric cars at this point are a complete pipe dream.  Not only
>> do you have the battery disposal problem, but consider the following...
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> grid and vehicles in place makes shifting to newer, more efficient
> technologies for generating electricity seamless and painless.

We are not talking about the need for one or two new powerplants...you'd
need dozens.  Who's gonna pay to build them?  Who is going to allow them
in their back yards? etc. etc.

>> The U.S power grid is near the breaking point now.  There have not
>> been any major improvements or additions to existing electrical
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> charge their vehicle overnight in their home and reduce the peak demands
> on the grid since the electrical load is low when people are sleeping.

Even though fuel prices are high, the refining industry is one of the
most well tuned industries on earth.  The cost of manufacture and
transport is a tiny fraction of the cost of a gallon of gas as it's done
on such a massive scale and the processes involved have been perfected
over decades.

>> Remember the rolling blackouts in California?  How on earth are they
>> going to be able to provide enough power for everyones electric cars
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> in California just the money saved from the elimination of their Nazi
> smog inspection process would pay for it. ;)

I only have two questions...who's going to pay for the upgrades, and who
is going to be able to get it rammed through the political process and
make it possible (even if someone will cough up the cash to do it)?

I think I have a better chance of winning the lottery than seeing an
major increase in the capacity of the electrical grid in the next 20 years.

(*>
Michael Johnson, PE - 18 Dec 2005 06:00 GMT
><snip>
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> more apparent.  Batteries are like people...they don't tend to hold up
> well in extreme cold or heat, they do best at median temps.

If a set of batteries has a 300 mile range and can be recharged 1,000
times then that equates to 300,000 miles.  How many gas engines last
300,000 miles?  OTOH, IMO, electric motors are quite durable and could
be engineered to last that long.  Especially, if one is used at each
wheel to reduce the load and power requirement of each one.

>>> Pure electric cars at this point are a complete pipe dream.  Not only
>>> do you have the battery disposal problem, but consider the following...
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> need dozens.  Who's gonna pay to build them?  Who is going to allow them
> in their back yards? etc. etc.

And we are also talking about far fewer refineries, gas stations, tanker
ships, transport trucks, offshore oil platforms etc. too.  There are
plenty of places to build power plants.  Fly over the continental US and
see all the unused space we have. ;)

>>> The U.S power grid is near the breaking point now.  There have not
>>> been any major improvements or additions to existing electrical
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> on such a massive scale and the processes involved have been perfected
> over decades.

And why can't this same thing happen with electricity?

>>> Remember the rolling blackouts in California?  How on earth are they
>>> going to be able to provide enough power for everyones electric cars
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> is going to be able to get it rammed through the political process and
> make it possible (even if someone will cough up the cash to do it)?

If the consumer wants it then it will happen.  That is the great thing
about capitalism.  How do you think the oil industry came into
existence?  Who paid for it?

> I think I have a better chance of winning the lottery than seeing an
> major increase in the capacity of the electrical grid in the next 20 years.

Someone said the same thing 30-40 years ago about the majority of homes
having a personal computer.  Now many homes have one for each person in
the house.  They are more common than toasters. ;)

Also, over the next 20 years there will have to be a major increase in
the capacity of the electric grid whether we have electric cars or not.
Hawk - 19 Dec 2005 14:17 GMT
>> <snip>
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> be engineered to last that long.  Especially, if one is used at each
> wheel to reduce the load and power requirement of each one.

There are a couple of serious flaws in your analysis.

The first problem is that even if you assume the vehicle can make it 300
miles on a charge when new (which is not possible as of today), it will
not be able to deliver that range over its entire service life.  As the
number of cycles pile up, its effective capacity is going to erode and
you will not get anywhere near 300 miles when the battery is going end
of life.

Second, the number of cycles that you will get out of the battery is
tied to the average depth of discharge that it is subjected to.  In your
example you quote 1000 cycles.  You may only get 1000 cycles if you are
averaging a 50% depth of discharge per cycle.

Third, the extreme temperatures that most vehicles are subjected to will
significantly impact battery performance and you will rarely attain that
300 mile per charge mark even when new.  Extreme temperatures will also
seriously shorten its effective life.  Look at the lead acid battery in
your car today.  In most cases you are lucky to get 5 years out of it,
and it's usage duty cycle is extremely small.

These factors significantly alter your 300,000 mile theory.  Of course
the specific battery chemistry used is going to alter the equation, but
I believe that 50k miles is a more realistic number with a pure electric
vehicle using todays battery technology.

On the subject of gasoline engines, it really depends on how they are
driven.  300,000 in town short trip miles would be pretty tough.  I know
plenty of people that put on 25-50k a year on the freeway, and they have
no trouble putting on 200k+ without any major issues.  In my original
quote, I was assuming a 50k life from vehicle batteries, and a 250k
service life from the gasoline engine to get the 5x number.

Of course we don't have any good data to go from as there are no mass
produced purely electric vehicles in use by the public at this time, but
in my earlier life I spent years designing numerous types of charging
systems for lead acid, ni-cd, ni-mh, and lithium ion battery types so I
became intimately familiar with all of their differing characteristics.

(*>
Michael Johnson, PE - 19 Dec 2005 21:53 GMT
>>> <snip>
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> There are a couple of serious flaws in your analysis.

Only a couple?  I'm getting better. ;)

> The first problem is that even if you assume the vehicle can make it 300
> miles on a charge when new (which is not possible as of today), it will
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> example you quote 1000 cycles.  You may only get 1000 cycles if you are
> averaging a 50% depth of discharge per cycle.

You're assuming these batteries use current technology.  I imagine they
will be lithium or maybe something better.  As I stated, the batteries
that I believe will be in a viable electric car does not exist today.

> Third, the extreme temperatures that most vehicles are subjected to will
> significantly impact battery performance and you will rarely attain that
> 300 mile per charge mark even when new.  Extreme temperatures will also
> seriously shorten its effective life.  Look at the lead acid battery in
> your car today.  In most cases you are lucky to get 5 years out of it,
> and it's usage duty cycle is extremely small.

I expect mileage to vary based on driving conditions just like it does
today for internal combustion engines.  It may take more time before
battery technology allows electric snowcats but for the overwhelming
majority of us it won't be a problem 99.9% of the time.  Actually
lithium batteries we can buy today are fairly cold resistant.

> These factors significantly alter your 300,000 mile theory.  Of course
> the specific battery chemistry used is going to alter the equation, but
> I believe that 50k miles is a more realistic number with a pure electric
> vehicle using todays battery technology.

Depending on replacement costs 50k miles on a set may be quite feasible.

> On the subject of gasoline engines, it really depends on how they are
> driven.  300,000 in town short trip miles would be pretty tough.  I know
> plenty of people that put on 25-50k a year on the freeway, and they have
> no trouble putting on 200k+ without any major issues.  In my original
> quote, I was assuming a 50k life from vehicle batteries, and a 250k
> service life from the gasoline engine to get the 5x number.

It is rare for most cars to see 300,000 miles.  I don't see why an
electric car can't be just as durable as a gasoline powered car.  In
some ways they may be more durable since there will likely be far fewer
moving parts.  Also, electric motors can last a very long time if
designed and built properly using today's technology.

> Of course we don't have any good data to go from as there are no mass
> produced purely electric vehicles in use by the public at this time, but
> in my earlier life I spent years designing numerous types of charging
> systems for lead acid, ni-cd, ni-mh, and lithium ion battery types so I
> became intimately familiar with all of their differing characteristics.

I'm far from an expert on any of this.  It just seems to me that
electric cars solve too many problems to not be the ultimate successor
to the gasoline powered car.  It also makes sense to me because society
is gravitating toward most things consuming electrical power and
alternative energy sources like geothermal, wind, tides, photoelectric
cells, nuclear etc. result in the production of electricity.
Electronics, most household items etc. require it to function.  It would
unify the power distribution system and greatly reduce the need for our
current huge oil infrastructure.  It centralizes power generation so
these facilities can be run cleaner and take advantage of new
technologies to everyones benefit.  It will require huge improvements in
the power generation and delivery systems but then in 1900 would anyone
have thought there would be a quadrillion gas stations spread around the
globe?  I expect if this happens it will be a decades long process
unless some unforeseen factor kicks in to accelerate it.
Spike - 20 Dec 2005 02:31 GMT
>I'm far from an expert on any of this.  It just seems to me that
>electric cars solve too many problems to not be the ultimate successor
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>globe?  I expect if this happens it will be a decades long process
>unless some unforeseen factor kicks in to accelerate it.
Ahhh, now the ultimate might be some way of harnessing gravity
(attract/repel something like maglev), or tapping into the aurora
borealis...

Actually, cars which operate on the same general principle as the
electric trolley using some kind of ground installed cable or track,
with computer controls coupled to GPS... plug in the co-ordinates for
the local grocery and the car takes you there by the quickest/safest
means.  Get onto an interstate and the car picks up on a power grid
and goes to where you program it, with any stops along the way.
Make them toll routes to pay for the power used and system upkeep.

Personally, I don't think we'll be around to need such systems. Some
catastrophe will come along to greatly reduce the need.  
--

Spike
1965 Ford Mustang Fastback 2+2, Vintage Burgundy
w/Black Std Interior, A Code 289 C4 Trac-Lok;
Vintage 40 16" rims w/225/50ZR16 KDWS BF Goodrich
gForce Radial T/As, Cobra drop; surround sound
audio-video...
See my ride at....
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/003_May_21_3004.jpg
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/005_May_21_2004.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/davescar_7_11_05_002.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/Engine_rebuild_006.jpg
Michael Johnson, PE - 20 Dec 2005 02:53 GMT
>> I'm far from an expert on any of this.  It just seems to me that
>> electric cars solve too many problems to not be the ultimate successor
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> and goes to where you program it, with any stops along the way.
> Make them toll routes to pay for the power used and system upkeep.

I would rather breath smog as thick as gravy before living with this. ;)

> Personally, I don't think we'll be around to need such systems. Some
> catastrophe will come along to greatly reduce the need.  

Everyone is too concerned with global warming to worry about any massive
asteroids streaking towards us. ;)
Spike - 20 Dec 2005 06:15 GMT
>> Actually, cars which operate on the same general principle as the
>> electric trolley using some kind of ground installed cable or track,
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>Everyone is too concerned with global warming to worry about any massive
>asteroids streaking towards us. ;)
I wasn't considering asteroids, comets, etc. I'm thinking disease, war
(which I consider to be a natural phenomenon of sorts), natural
catastrophes (major tsunamis on the NW US Coast and the Eastern
Seaboard caused by tectonic uplifts),more major volcanic activity,
reversal of the magnetic poles (which is approximately 10% already in
the southern Atlantic regions if the present models are correct).
Earth protects itself from time to time. It's not a gloom and doom
prediction, it's just the way it is in the natural order of things.
--

Spike
1965 Ford Mustang Fastback 2+2, Vintage Burgundy
w/Black Std Interior, A Code 289 C4 Trac-Lok;
Vintage 40 16" rims w/225/50ZR16 KDWS BF Goodrich
gForce Radial T/As, Cobra drop; surround sound
audio-video...
See my ride at....
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/003_May_21_3004.jpg
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/005_May_21_2004.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/davescar_7_11_05_002.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/Engine_rebuild_006.jpg
Michael Johnson, PE - 20 Dec 2005 14:32 GMT
>>> Actually, cars which operate on the same general principle as the
>>> electric trolley using some kind of ground installed cable or track,
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> Earth protects itself from time to time. It's not a gloom and doom
> prediction, it's just the way it is in the natural order of things.

I was just telling someone the other day that we all may look back and
say "Remember when all we had to worry about was thermonuclear war?"
when some wacked-out terrorist or environmentalist genetically engineers
a super bug or virus that wipes out 99% of mankind.

I don't see Mother Nature as protecting herself as much as her saying to
all life on earth just before every mass extinction "Who's tough enough
to make it to the next level?"  I don't think humans will fair as well
as cockroaches during the next one.
Spike - 20 Dec 2005 17:43 GMT
>I was just telling someone the other day that we all may look back and
>say "Remember when all we had to worry about was thermonuclear war?"
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>to make it to the next level?"  I don't think humans will fair as well
>as cockroaches during the next one.
Sea critters had their day. reptiles had their day, mammals are having
their day. Virii and microbes have always had their day. What's left?
Bugs. Consider how close sci fi writers have always been. Now consider
all those hokey scifi movies about ants and roaches and bees, and....
: 0 )
--

Spike
1965 Ford Mustang Fastback 2+2, Vintage Burgundy
w/Black Std Interior, A Code 289 C4 Trac-Lok;
Vintage 40 16" rims w/225/50ZR16 KDWS BF Goodrich
gForce Radial T/As, Cobra drop; surround sound
audio-video...
See my ride at....
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/003_May_21_3004.jpg
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/005_May_21_2004.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/davescar_7_11_05_002.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/Engine_rebuild_006.jpg
Spike - 17 Dec 2005 20:17 GMT
>>>> Jo
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 79 lines]
>in California just the money saved from the elimination of their Nazi
>smog inspection process would pay for it. ;)

My father, who has been working with electrical and electronic systems
since the early days of radar during WW2, and headed a division of a
major corporation's government projects division when 5 of his bosses
got the axe, was over and we were discussing such issues. When he
began quoting equations, and explaining their impact regarding what it
takes in juice to power a 1 horse motor, and how long it would take to
charge up a system with a 1 horse motor at each wheel, I was amazed.
It's going to take a heck of a lot more than added power plants to go
to a so called non emission electric car system unless there is some
huge techno breakthrough.
--

Spike
1965 Ford Mustang Fastback 2+2, Vintage Burgundy
w/Black Std Interior, A Code 289 C4 Trac-Lok;
Vintage 40 16" rims w/225/50ZR16 KDWS BF Goodrich
gForce Radial T/As, Cobra drop; surround sound
audio-video...
See my ride at....
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/003_May_21_3004.jpg
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/005_May_21_2004.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/davescar_7_11_05_002.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/Engine_rebuild_006.jpg
66 6F HCS - 17 Dec 2005 21:15 GMT
"Spike" <jma@snowcrest.net> wrote
I was amazed.
> It's going to take a heck of a lot more than added power plants to go
> to a so called non emission electric car system unless there is some
> huge techno breakthrough.

The other fact that seems to have been forgotten is that it takes MORE fuel
to create the electricity to run the electric car, than it does just to run
the car on fuel and skip the whole electric thing.
Signature

Scott W.
'66 HCS Mustang 289
'68 Ranchero 500 302
'69 Mustang Sportsroof 351W
ThunderSnake #57
http://home.comcast.net/~vanguard92/

Wound Up - 17 Dec 2005 21:24 GMT
> "Spike" <jma@snowcrest.net> wrote
> I was amazed.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> to create the electricity to run the electric car, than it does just to run
> the car on fuel and skip the whole electric thing.

And, coal-fired powerplants are not exactly environmentally friendly.
In theory, fine, but in practice, not at all.  It's counterproductive.
It's all fed by half-truths and BS.

Hybrids are a similar disaster.  Isn't breakeven on a hybrid like 12-15
years, compared to its gas counterpart?  This guy at work is so proud he
coaxed 50.7 mpg out of his Civic hybrid, but what did it cost?  And how
much are those powertrain parts?  I would bet more marginal pollution is
created in the manufacture of a hybrid vs. an equivalent gas model than
it will EVER save in emissions.

The only sensible thing that's being done is increasing methanol use.  I
wonder about timing, gaskets, hoses, and other stuff... but it should
have been phased in years ago

Signature

Wound Up
ThunderSnake #65

AHPBBFM posting rules: http://tinyurl.com/ak694
AHPBBFM links page: http://tinyurl.com/a9qsx

Big Block is an Attitude

Michael Johnson, PE - 18 Dec 2005 07:11 GMT
> "Spike" <jma@snowcrest.net> wrote
> I was amazed.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> to create the electricity to run the electric car, than it does just to run
> the car on fuel and skip the whole electric thing.

It depends on how the electricity is generated.  The internal combustion
engine is typically only 25% efficient and the average efficiency of
power plants in the US is 33%.  The more modern power plants can reach
efficiency levels of 50%-60%.  I would say in today's world there isn't
a huge difference in overall efficiency between gas and electric cars.
In fact, without advances in battery technology electric cars just
aren't viable.

However, as electric power plants become more efficient and alternative
energy sources are developed such as wind, geothermal, tidal etc. the
potential for electric cars are great.  Add to this the reduction in
pollution, discarded fluids etc. and to me it seems they are the logical
choice to succeed the internal combustion engine sometime in the future.
Michael Johnson, PE - 18 Dec 2005 05:42 GMT
>>>>> Jo
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 81 lines]
> to a so called non emission electric car system unless there is some
> huge techno breakthrough.

I respect what you are saying but building capacity into the system for
supplying vehicles won't happen over night and delivering electricity on
a large scale happens today at thousands upon thousands of factories all
over the country.  If we can deliver a gallon of gas from half way
around the world to damn near every neighborhood in the USA for
$2/gallon then delivering electricity to supply electric cars is more
than feasible and affordable.  I don't see where a huge techno
breakthrough is required to deliver electricity.  There will hopefully
be breakthroughs in generating electricity as technology advances.
Sooner or later electric cars will come to the market in a meaningful
way.  If I could buy one at a competitive price that recharges quickly,
has good range, etc. I would do it.  I think the public is ready to
accept them today if they were available.  Even with their potential
problems with maintenance, hybrids are selling quite well.
Spike - 18 Dec 2005 05:52 GMT
>> My father, who has been working with electrical and electronic systems
>> since the early days of radar during WW2, and headed a division of a
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>accept them today if they were available.  Even with their potential
>problems with maintenance, hybrids are selling quite well.
I think there is a segment of the populace which is ready to accept,
but I think you'd find the vast majority are not, and for a wide range
of reasons.
--

Spike
1965 Ford Mustang Fastback 2+2, Vintage Burgundy
w/Black Std Interior, A Code 289 C4 Trac-Lok;
Vintage 40 16" rims w/225/50ZR16 KDWS BF Goodrich
gForce Radial T/As, Cobra drop; surround sound
audio-video...
See my ride at....
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/003_May_21_3004.jpg
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/005_May_21_2004.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/davescar_7_11_05_002.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/Engine_rebuild_006.jpg
Michael Johnson, PE - 18 Dec 2005 07:15 GMT
>>> My father, who has been working with electrical and electronic systems
>>> since the early days of radar during WW2, and headed a division of a
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> but I think you'd find the vast majority are not, and for a wide range
> of reasons.

I think so too.  Electric cars will have to prove themselves before
being accepted by the masses.
Hank - 20 Dec 2005 23:23 GMT
> Making electrical power can be done in a variety of ways.  The good
> thing is that nearly all power plants have emissions controls and by
> centralizing the burning of the fuel (i.e. coal, oil etc.) it is easier
> to do it in an efficient, clean manor.

 From:

 http://www.motherjones.com/news/qa/2004/10/09_402.html

 RFK: One of the worst examples is the rewriting of New Source
Review. I have three sons with asthma; one out of every four black
kids in New York City now has asthma. Asthma attacks are triggered
primarily by ozone and particulates, and the major sources of those
materials in our atmosphere are 1,100 coal-burning power plants that
are burning coal illegally. The Clinton administration had initiated
investigations and prosecutions against 70 of the worst of those. But
this is an industry that donated $48 million to President Bush and the
Republican Party in the 2000 cycle and has given $58 million since.
One of the first things that Bush did when he came into office was to
order the Justice Department to drop those lawsuits. The Justice
Department lawyer said that this had never happened before in American
history, where a president accepts money from industries targeted for
investigation and prosecution, and then orders the Justice Department
to drop those investigations once he gets into office. There were 70
utilities involved here and, according to EPA, just the criminal
exceedences from those 70 plants killed 5,500 Americans every year.
Then the administration went and rewrote the Clean Air Act, gutting
the New Source rule, which means those plants will be able to
discharge ozone and particulates forever.

 http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200504/042205a.html

 Independent Library Of Congress Study
Confirms That Bush Mercury Rules Let Industry Off The Hook

(FRIDAY, April 22) -- A new Congressional Research Service (Library of
Congress) report requested by Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) confirms that
most power plants will have to do nothing to reduce toxic mercury
pollution from power plants for at least ten years under the Bush
Administration's new mercury rules.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized a set of two rules
on March 15.  The first rule reversed a 2000 EPA decision that it is
"necessary" and "appropriate" to regulate mercury from coal-fired
power plants.  The second rule established a "cap and trade" system
under which utilities can either control mercury pollution or buy
allowances from other plants.  The new independent report released by
Leahy validates many of the concerns about the Bush Administration’s
mercury rule that were raised by states, public health officials and
sportsmen at a Democratic Policy Committee hearing chaired by Senator
Leahy on April 19 on Capitol Hill.

“This adds to the mountain of evidence that confirms the Bush
Administration’s mercury rule is fatally flawed and steeped with
favoritism to the big polluters,” said Leahy.

-

 Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed
to raging infernos for hours on end.

 http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html

 On 9-11-01, WTC7, a 47 story steel framed building, which
had only small, random fires, dropped in perfect symmetry
at near free fall speed as in a perfectly executed controlled
demolition.

 http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html
 http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html
 http://wtc7.net/articles/FEMA/WTC_ch5.htm

 "You're doin' a heckuva job, Brownie!" - bu$h, a few days
 before his FEMA chief, Micheal Brown was forced to resign
 because of his gross incompetence.

 "The tools that enable Cuba to save lives and preserve
 human dignity during hurricanes are socialist values
 and organization." - Dr. W.T. Whitney Jr

 Ever wonder who benefits from the 150 MILLION
 U.S. taxpayer dollars spent each DAY in Iraq?
 http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0223-08.htm
 http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?list=type&type=21

  "They are waging a campaign of murder and destruction. And
 there is no limit to the innocent lives they are willing to
 take... men with blind hatred and armed with lethal weapons
 who are capable of any atrocity... they respect no laws of
 warfare or morality."
 -bu$h describing his own illegal invasion of Iraq.
  http://www.robert-fisk.com/iraqwarvictims_mar2003.htm

 http://www.commondreams.org/
 http://www.truthout.org/
Spike - 21 Dec 2005 02:15 GMT
>> Making electrical power can be done in a variety of ways.  The good
>> thing is that nearly all power plants have emissions controls and by
[quoted text clipped - 91 lines]
>  http://www.commondreams.org/
>  http://www.truthout.org/

I suppose you have solid evidence of all this, and it's not just what
you heard via anti-Bush/Republican media. And if you don't personally
have such evidence, then you should not be the one airing it. Leave it
to those who claim they do.

Even if true, it's not as if people like the Clintons have not had
their fair share of getting away with doing bad things. All this back
stabbing revenge stuff is so over used that a major share of the
public doesn't trust either side for the truth. It's all rhetoric, and
those who spread it are like children on a playground calling each
other names.
--

Spike
1965 Ford Mustang Fastback 2+2, Vintage Burgundy
w/Black Std Interior, A Code 289 C4 Trac-Lok;
Vintage 40 16" rims w/225/50ZR16 KDWS BF Goodrich
gForce Radial T/As, Cobra drop; surround sound
audio-video...
See my ride at....
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/003_May_21_3004.jpg
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/005_May_21_2004.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/davescar_7_11_05_002.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/Engine_rebuild_006.jpg
Hank - 21 Dec 2005 23:08 GMT
>>>Making electrical power can be done in a variety of ways.  The good
>>>thing is that nearly all power plants have emissions controls and by
>>>centralizing the burning of the fuel (i.e. coal, oil etc.) it is easier
>>>to do it in an efficient, clean manor.

>> From:
>> http://www.motherjones.com/news/qa/2004/10/09_402.html
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
>>Administration’s mercury rule is fatally flawed and steeped with
>>favoritism to the big polluters,” said Leahy.

> Even if true,

If you would learn to read and think for yourself, you
wouldn't be totally dependent on government propaganda
for your "information", and you wouldn't have to guess
what's true and what isn't - you'd know.

-

 Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed
to raging infernos for hours on end.

 http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html

 On 9-11-01, WTC7, a 47 story steel framed building, which
had only small, random fires, dropped in perfect symmetry
at near free fall speed as in a perfectly executed controlled
demolition.

 http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html
 http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html
 http://wtc7.net/articles/FEMA/WTC_ch5.htm

 "You're doin' a heckuva job, Brownie!" - bu$h, a few days
 before his FEMA chief, Micheal Brown was forced to resign
 because of his gross incompetence.

 "The tools that enable Cuba to save lives and preserve
 human dignity during hurricanes are socialist values
 and organization." - Dr. W.T. Whitney Jr

 Ever wonder who benefits from the 150 MILLION
 U.S. taxpayer dollars spent each DAY in Iraq?
 http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0223-08.htm
 http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?list=type&type=21

  "They are waging a campaign of murder and destruction. And
 there is no limit to the innocent lives they are willing to
 take... men with blind hatred and armed with lethal weapons
 who are capable of any atrocity... they respect no laws of
 warfare or morality."
 -bu$h describing his own illegal invasion of Iraq.
  http://www.robert-fisk.com/iraqwarvictims_mar2003.htm
Spike - 22 Dec 2005 01:15 GMT
>>>>Making electrical power can be done in a variety of ways.  The good
>>>>thing is that nearly all power plants have emissions controls and by
[quoted text clipped - 94 lines]
>  -bu$h describing his own illegal invasion of Iraq.
>   http://www.robert-fisk.com/iraqwarvictims_mar2003.htm

And if YOU would learn to think for yourself instead of aping all the
propaganda you see, hear, and/or read you would not be wasting
everyone's' time with repeated postings of wasted rhetoric which few
care to hear in this forum.
--

Spike
1965 Ford Mustang Fastback 2+2, Vintage Burgundy
w/Black Std Interior, A Code 289 C4 Trac-Lok;
Vintage 40 16" rims w/225/50ZR16 KDWS BF Goodrich
gForce Radial T/As, Cobra drop; surround sound
audio-video...
See my ride at....
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/003_May_21_3004.jpg
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/005_May_21_2004.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/davescar_7_11_05_002.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/Engine_rebuild_006.jpg
Michael Johnson, PE - 21 Dec 2005 04:18 GMT
Did somebody fart or is Hanky back?