http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/News/articleId=108697
Bill - 05 Jan 2006 23:12 GMT
Next thing you know, Ford will be marketing the 1932 coupe.
(I wish)
> http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/News/articleId=108697
cprice@here.com - 06 Jan 2006 03:18 GMT
> Next thing you know, Ford will be marketing the 1932 coupe.
> (I wish)
>
>>http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/News/articleId=108697
You would be able to buy/build a very high quality 32 roadster for what
ford would want for a retro-look 32 coupe.
> Unlike the previous incarnations we've seen, or the current Dodge
> Charger
>
> http://money.cnn.com/2006/01/04/Autos/funonwheels/dodge_challenger/index.htm
Amazing how much better their cars look when they drop that fugly truck
front end.
michaelanderson4@sympatico.ca - 06 Jan 2006 23:50 GMT
> Unlike the previous incarnations we've seen, or the current Dodge
> Charger
http://money.cnn.com/2006/01/04/Autos/funonwheels/dodge_challenger/index.htm
If the bean counters don't muck it up, I'd _love_ to have one. Saw a pic
on the cover of one of the current auto rags, NICE lookin' car.
But...
The new Charger looked pretty good on the show circuit, too. I hope the
Challenger doesn't morph into something hideous.

Signature
John C.
'03 Cobra Convt.
Zombywoof - 07 Jan 2006 18:16 GMT
>> Unlike the previous incarnations we've seen, or the current Dodge
>> Charger
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> The new Charger looked pretty good on the show circuit, too. I hope the
>Challenger doesn't morph into something hideous.
Well given http://money.cnn.com/2006/01/06/Autos/cafe_fines/index.htm
there might not be much under the hood on any future products.

Signature
"Everything in excess! To enjoy the flavor of life, take big bites.
Moderation is for monks."
ZombyWoof
(take the dogs when replying via e-mail)