Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Mustang / January 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Fact or fiction?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
John - 05 Jan 2006 11:01 GMT
The wifey gave me a new Mustang book for Christmas.  "Mustang - 40 Years" by
Randy Leffingwell and David Newhardt.

In Chapter 6 (1967 - 1968.5), the authors do not directly say some early '68
Mustangs had the W-code engine, but they do not deny it either.  Their words
are somewhat unclear and could be interpreted a couple of ways, so the urban
legend lives on.

HOWEVER, in Chapter 7 (Shelby Mustang's 1967 - 1968), they say this about
the 1967 GT500, "Shelby was able to offer the 427-ci side oiler engine as an
option later, but they produced fewer than 50 examples."  For the 1968
GT500, they say, "In addition to the 302-powered GT350s, Ford continued to
offer the rare 427-ci side oiler engine as an option for the GT500.  They
subdued it's noise quotient by using hydraulic lifters and fitted the intake
with the Holley 600-cfm carburetor.  They rated the package at 400
horsepower at 5,600 rpm.  However, dealers did their best to talk buyers out
of it, and Shelby once again delivered fewer than 50."

Is the W-code GT500 fact or fiction?  Has anyone seen one?

Signature

John - ThunderSnake #59
'69 Mach 1 w/ 390 4V
Wide Ratio Toploader
3.50 Traction-Lok
Acapulco Blue

walt peifer - 06 Jan 2006 19:11 GMT
> The wifey gave me a new Mustang book for Christmas.  "Mustang - 40 Years"
> by
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> Is the W-code GT500 fact or fiction?  Has anyone seen one?
John - 07 Jan 2006 14:46 GMT
>>i was at a SAAC convention back in the early 80's and Ol' Shel was the
>>guest of honor. His speech at the dinner included a comment about there
>>being more 427's at the meet than he made....i always heard that it was
>>between 6 and 10 mustang bodies that received the side oiler. the rest
>>were earmarked for cobra's

Sounds interesting Walt.  I'm taking the familt to Tampa for Spring Break
this March/April.  Care to talk Mustangs over a beer or four?

Signature

John - ThunderSnake #59
'69 Mach 1 w/ 390 4V
Wide Ratio Toploader
3.50 Traction-Lok
Acapulco Blue

Bill - 07 Jan 2006 00:47 GMT
There were a few GT-500 produced with the 427 in 1968. As I remember it,
they were rated at 390 H.P. This engine very different from the 1967 427. I
think the 68 engine was a center oilier, as the side oilier engine was never
drilled for hydraulic lifters. The 68 engine did not have the same cylinder
heads. Is far as I know, Ford never built a 68 Mustang with the 427. There
were a number of them produced with the 428 Cobra Jets. The 427 was intended
as a race engine and extremely expensive to produce.
I had a 1967 "W" code 427 Fairlane, one of 7 built. I bought it in 1969 at
the height of the Super Car era. That car was clearly faster than almost all
of the super cars of the time. The only cars really in it's class was the
426 Hemi Mopars, the 454 Vettes.

> The wifey gave me a new Mustang book for Christmas.  "Mustang - 40 Years"
> by
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> Is the W-code GT500 fact or fiction?  Has anyone seen one?
66 6F HCS - 07 Jan 2006 03:39 GMT
There were no W code Shelby Mustang's, per Shelby's own shop records.
Signature

Scott W.
'66 HCS Mustang 289
'68 Ranchero 500 302
'69 Mustang Sportsroof 351W
ThunderSnake #57
http://home.comcast.net/~vanguard92/

John - 07 Jan 2006 14:39 GMT
> There were no W code Shelby Mustang's, per Shelby's own shop records.

Where did you learn this?

Kevin Marti and I swapped e-mails a few years back about there being no
W-code Mustangs.  We never discussed Shelbys.  Does his data include the
Shelbys?

Signature

John - ThunderSnake #59
'69 Mach 1 w/ 390 4V
Wide Ratio Toploader
3.50 Traction-Lok
Acapulco Blue

66 6F HCS - 07 Jan 2006 19:50 GMT
>> There were no W code Shelby Mustang's, per Shelby's own shop records.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> W-code Mustangs.  We never discussed Shelbys.  Does his data include the
> Shelbys?

I learned it from Bill S. I knew about the Marti angle too, but Bill S.
claims to have seen at least ONE W code mustang whether Marti says it exists
or not. I reserve judgment.
Signature

Scott W.
'66 HCS Mustang 289
'68 Ranchero 500 302
'69 Mustang Sportsroof 351W
ThunderSnake #57
http://home.comcast.net/~vanguard92/

John - 11 Jan 2006 03:29 GMT
<fewedge@pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:1136835508.344589.62780@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> John wrote:
>> > There were no W code Shelby Mustang's, per Shelby's own shop records.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> http://www.nvsaac.com/gallery/1967_shelby_gt500_18.htm
> There was talk of building 50, never happened. Only 1 built.

Looks like the real deal to me!

Signature

John - ThunderSnake #59
'69 Mach 1 w/ 390 4V
Wide Ratio Toploader
3.50 Traction-Lok
Acapulco Blue

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.