Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Mustang / January 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

What's your brake pad preference?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
wabbitslayer - 31 Jan 2006 01:26 GMT
Time for some new front pads...Raybestos or Hawk?
Never tried the Hawk pads, heard good things about them.
Probably going to try them, so the more pertinent question is:
Ceramic or semi-metallic?

Or should I starve the kids and get Steeda's 13" Cobra upgrade kit?
(not expecting spousal approval on that one, though)

Wabbitslayer
01 GT vert
Carl - 31 Jan 2006 01:32 GMT
Never heard of Hawk. I've always been satisfied with Raybestos PG Plus. They
are pretty dark so they have a higher metal content, seeem to wear well. I
also used Napa premium pads on an OT 4-wheel-disc car and they were the best
pads I have ever used. Put them on at 140,000 miles, and when the car was
stolen at 177,000 miles, the brakes were still great. I'm running Raybestos
on all 4 corners of my 99 'vert and when it's time to re-do, I'll probably
go with the Napa Premium.

If you do go with Hawk, please let everyone know what you think. Initial
quality, longevity and performance would be good to know.

HTH

Carl

> Time for some new front pads...Raybestos or Hawk?
> Never tried the Hawk pads, heard good things about them.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Wabbitslayer
> 01 GT vert
Ritz - 31 Jan 2006 01:39 GMT
Hawk/Raybestos/Porterfield are all the same company.

I've been very very happy with Hawk HPS pads for street applications and
HP+ for the track.  One step up is Porterfield, but you'll get a lot
more dust.

Cheers,

> Never heard of Hawk. I've always been satisfied with Raybestos PG Plus. They
> are pretty dark so they have a higher metal content, seeem to wear well. I
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>> Wabbitslayer
>> 01 GT vert
Carl - 31 Jan 2006 02:11 GMT
One thing I forgot to mention.. I tried Ceramic pads on an OT car, and they
were TERRIBLE. TONS of dust and NO stopping power.

Carl

> Hawk/Raybestos/Porterfield are all the same company.
>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>>> Wabbitslayer
>>> 01 GT vert
Joe - 31 Jan 2006 02:46 GMT
I've had PowerSlot rotors and Hawk pads on the LX for years and they're
still great.  dwight will probably tell you the same thing.

Joe
Calypso Green '93 5.0 LX AOD hatch with a few goodies
Black '03 Dakota 5.9 R/T CC

> One thing I forgot to mention.. I tried Ceramic pads on an OT car, and
> they were TERRIBLE. TONS of dust and NO stopping power.
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>>>> Wabbitslayer
>>>> 01 GT vert
.boB - 31 Jan 2006 03:46 GMT
> Time for some new front pads...Raybestos or Hawk?
> Never tried the Hawk pads, heard good things about them.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Wabbitslayer
> 01 GT vert

   I have Hawk pads on my Cobra.  Great on the street.  They work right away, don't
need a warm up to work well.  They do work better when warm, though.
   Also good on the track.  Used them kind of hard on a few long track days.  Not
racing, just driving fast for fun on a road course.  But hard on the brakes through
the corners.  Excellent feel all day long.

Signature

.boB
On Order:  2006 FXDI, Red.
1997 HD FXDWG - Turbocharged   Stolen 11/26/05 in Denver
    1HD1GEL10VY3200010    CO License J5822Z
2001 Dodge Dakota QC 5.9/4x4/3.92
1966 Mustang Coupe - Daily Driver
1965 FFR Cobra -  427W EFI, Damn Fast.

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.