Injection Perfection
By Karl Brauer
The last 30 years have produced a complete turnover in vehicle technology.
Today's automotive components have little in common with their primitive
ancestors: drum brakes have been replaced by disc brakes, solid-axle rear
suspensions have given way to independent designs, and ignition systems are
now electronic rather than mechanical. Yet of all these advances, none are
as compelling as the shift from carburetion to fuel injection.
Certainly the use of fuel injection has been around for more than thirty
years, but only since the mid-1980s has it became a widespread feature on
almost every vehicle sold in America. Driven by a need for cleaner
emissions, American car manufacturers were forced to give up the
less-expensive carburetor for the more-sophisticated computer-controlled
electronic fuel injection, or EFI. As a bonus, they also got better
performance and improved fuel economy.
So what is it about EFI that makes it so much better than the simpler,
less-expensive and easier-to-work-on carburetor? In a word: precision.
Through the use of sensors, injectors and computer control, EFI provides a
far more precise air and fuel mixture under a much broader range of
operating conditions.
Why EFI is Better
It's obvious that EFI makes for a great technical discussion, but is it that
much better than a carburetor? You bet. Remember that while driving your car
your engine is in a constant state of change. In addition to the
accelerating, braking, coasting or idling that comes with stop-and-go
traffic, there's plenty of variation going on when rolling down the
interstate with the cruise control set. You may be going up a mountain or
descending into a valley. Maybe you're on a flat plane, but the sun has just
set and the temperature is dropping.
The point is that only EFI, with its computer-based control module, can
effectively keep up with the many changes our vehicles experience on a
typical drive. Carburetors are mechanical devices that depend on springs,
rods and engine vacuum to modulate fuel delivery. They can't accommodate for
variations between individual cylinders, inconsistent octane, or altitude
changes. More experienced readers will remember the days when moving between
Denver and Los Angeles required a trip to an automotive shop for "rejetting"
to keep a car from running too rich or too lean. Today, with the power of
fuel injection, engine tuning is a no-brainer when traveling from the
Rockies to the beaches. And isn't that the kind of driving experience we
want?
http://www.edmunds.com/ownership/techcenter/articles/43843/article.html
Backyard Mechanic - 14 Mar 2006 00:19 GMT
I'll give a big 10-4 for that!!
Not only that... it's easier to troubleshoot. Even the old EECIV
However, I refuse to get into pissing contests over superiority regarding
street/strip applications. If you can find someone who knows how to tune
carbs and mech/vacuum advance, fine.
"Take your F#$34g 'power-valve' and...."
;)

Signature
Yeh, I'm a Krusty old Geezer, working on his own cars since 1958.
one80out@hotmail.com - 14 Mar 2006 00:32 GMT
Feel better? What is the point of this copy and paste?
But since you brought it up, suppose you're piecing together a typical
restomod '65-'70 289 or 302 Mustang. You're only going to drive it
about 5K miles per year, 10K max, for about five years. You're going
to keep your stock tranny, i.e., you'll be running a 1:1 top gear, with
a 3.25 to 3.55:1 rear gear. You're going to run a hydraulic cam in the
range of 220/220 @ .050, 112 LSA, and .500". Your car is emissions
exempt.
What induction system is "better," and why?
180 Out
Carl - 14 Mar 2006 00:39 GMT
It all comes down to which one gives you that special feeling when you drive
you car.
Carl
> Feel better? What is the point of this copy and paste?
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> 180 Out
Brent P - 14 Mar 2006 05:47 GMT
> Injection Perfection
<...>
> Why EFI is Better
<...>
But only one will work after an EMP.
351CJ - 14 Mar 2006 07:10 GMT
>> Injection Perfection
> <...>
>> Why EFI is Better
> <...>
>
> But only one will work after an EMP.
hum, how so? All cars with electronic ignition systems or ignition chips
are vulnerable to ElectroMagnetic Pulses, not just EFI cars...
Brent P - 14 Mar 2006 08:51 GMT
>>> Injection Perfection
>> <...>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> hum, how so? All cars with electronic ignition systems or ignition chips
> are vulnerable to ElectroMagnetic Pulses, not just EFI cars...
The only fuel system... we were discussing fuel systems. Now points are
an ignition system that isn't vunerable.
351CJ - 14 Mar 2006 09:49 GMT
>>>> Injection Perfection
>>> <...>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> The only fuel system... we were discussing fuel systems. Now points are
> an ignition system that isn't vunerable.
There are a lot of cars with carburetors and electronic ignitions, what the
hell was your point?
Brent P - 14 Mar 2006 14:09 GMT
>>>>> Injection Perfection
>>>> <...>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> There are a lot of cars with carburetors and electronic ignitions, what the
> hell was your point?
not my fault you people have no sense of humor.
Backyard Mechanic - 14 Mar 2006 16:37 GMT
>> Injection Perfection
> <...>
>> Why EFI is Better
> <...>
>
> But only one will work after an EMP.
After which, we'll have more things to worry about than HOW we'll get to
work. Like WTF do we do when we get there...
And all the farmers will get very 'well' hauling around grocery shoppers on
wagons.

Signature
Yeh, I'm a Krusty old Geezer, putting up with my 'smartass' is the price
you pay..DEAL with it!
lab~rat >:-) - 14 Mar 2006 21:26 GMT
>>> Injection Perfection
>> <...>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>After which, we'll have more things to worry about than HOW we'll get to
>work. Like WTF do we do when we get there...
And how do we get gas out of the station tanks?
--
lab~rat >:-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?
Lynn McGuire - 14 Mar 2006 21:39 GMT
>>> But only one will work after an EMP.
>>
>>After which, we'll have more things to worry about than HOW we'll get to
>>work. Like WTF do we do when we get there...
>
> And how do we get gas out of the station tanks?
1. get garden hose
2. get idiot
3. insert one end of garden hose into idiot's mouth
4. insert other end of garden hose into hole in ground (the one
presumably containing gasoline)
5. tell idiot to suck on hose
6. when idiot starts sucking gasoline instead of air, kink the hose
near the idiot's mouth
7. pull hose end out of ground, kinking end quickly
8. put hose end into appropriate container
9. release kinks in hose
10. let kink in hose open
11. repeat previous steps 1 through 10 as often as needed
12. make idiot go wash mouth out after he throws up
Lynn
lab~rat >:-) - 14 Mar 2006 21:44 GMT
>>>> But only one will work after an EMP.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
>Lynn
So I take it the EMP won't affect the idiot?
--
lab~rat >:-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?
one80out@hotmail.com - 15 Mar 2006 05:15 GMT
> >>> But only one will work after an EMP.
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> 11. repeat previous steps 1 through 10 as often as needed
> 12. make idiot go wash mouth out after he throws up
13. hope idiot doesn't know that a siphon only works if outlet is at
lower elevation than inlet, because if he does he's likely to think the
other guy's a bigger idiot than he is
180 Out
Jim Warman - 15 Mar 2006 05:33 GMT
SH*T.... You mean to tell me that gravity works????
Lynn - 15 Mar 2006 06:19 GMT
>> 1. get garden hose
>> 2. get idiot
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> lower elevation than inlet, because if he does he's likely to think the
> other guy's a bigger idiot than he is
What siphon ? Do you know how much gasoline a garden hose can
hold ? The idiot just provides the suction. The real problem is in
getting the garden hose out of the ground and into the container before
the idiot lets his end drop and spills all the gasoline on the ground.
Lynn