Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Mustang / May 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Re: Want more MPG? Trying using your clutch pedal.

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Non scrivetemi - 13 May 2006 01:21 GMT
On Wed, May 10 2006 10:09 pm, Jim Warman wrote:

>  Coasting with the car in neutral can place you in jeopardy...
> should you be placed in a situation where you encounter the sudden
> need to increase speed, you will find yourself ill prepared for it
> - let us remember that we aren't the only ones on the roads and none
> of these other cars are labelled "IM STUPID"...

I don't get that whole argument, unless you're talking about heavy trucks with a lot of weight and the need to double-clutch.

In a car or light truck it only takes an instant to get back into gear unless your clutch or transmission is shot. In almost 30 years of driving I've never felt vulnerable while coasting to a stop on a fairly level road. I watch everything that's going on around me and the few times I've had to shift back into gear have been easy.

It only takes a second or less to shift into gear from neutral. When you're already in neutral you can more quickly choose whatever gear best suits the emergency situation (it may not be the gear you were using to slow down).

When coming to a stop on a relatively level road, I see no safety advantage to rowing through the gears. It just burns out the clutch prematurely and could cause you to stall in the more common scenario of needing to brake suddenly. If you're always wanting to accelerate your way out of situations, especially when you know there's a stop ahead, you're probably a reckless speediot.

I don't know how far you downshift, but taking it all the way to 2nd or 1st gear is ridiculous. I downshift to 3rd at most, unless there's a steep hill before a stop. Then, I coast the rest of the way so I'm in neutral, ready to get back into 1st. It's all a matter of balancing what the brakes can do vs. engine compression. Brakes are much cheaper to replace than a clutch.

There are obviously situations where you need to downshift, like long grades or when you clearly need to re-accelerate. But you can plan for all that. Downshifting routinely as the converse of up-shifting is a waste of time and drivetrain life.

People keep saying it's illegal to coast in neutral but I've yet to see such a law. It may have applied to older cars with clunkier clutches and transmissions. Large trucks definitely should avoid coasting for all but the briefest distances, but cars are much more controllable.

> After a while of doing this, you will experience the tendency to keep
> the clutch depressed and preselect the next gear you expect to
> need...ever see what happens to a clutch when someone selects 1st at
> 60 mph?

If you're lame enough to select 1st at 60 you're just a bad driver. I've been coasting for decades below ~40 MPH while coming to a stop and I've never had the need to hold down the clutch and wear out the pilot bearing. "Coasting in" is a much more relaxing way to drive than constantly working the gears. You can save thousands of shifts per year.

I think people who downshift all the time are trying to act like race car drivers. It's unnecessary in typical traffic when you _know_ you'll have to stop in 100 yards or so. The time it takes to shift into gear from neutral is very brief and well within safety limits when you're approaching a stop and slowing down anyway. If you can anticipate that the light is going to turn green soon, you plan accordingly and stay in gear.

F.W.
Jim Warman - 13 May 2006 09:14 GMT
> I don't get that whole argument, unless you're talking about heavy trucks
> with a lot of weight and the need to double-clutch.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> road. I watch everything that's going on around me and the few times I've
> had to shift back into gear have been easy.

In almost 30 years have driving, have you ever noticed how long it takes for
an accident to occur?

> It only takes a second or less to shift into gear from neutral. When
> you're already in neutral you can more quickly choose whatever gear best
> suits the emergency situation (it may not be the gear you were using to
> slow down).

It takes much less than a second for you to stop being smug and become a
statistic... Lord knows I've scraped enough of them up off the road when I
was active in the fire department.

> When coming to a stop on a relatively level road, I see no safety
> advantage to rowing through the gears. It just burns out the clutch
> prematurely and could cause you to stall in the more common scenario of
> needing to brake suddenly. If you're always wanting to accelerate your way
> out of situations, especially when you know there's a stop ahead, you're
> probably a reckless speediot.

Where did I mention "rowing through the gears"? And where did I mention
"always" accelerating out of a bind... Accelerating out of an impending
accident is but ONE possibility... If you are in neutral, you no longer have
this option.

> I don't know how far you downshift, but taking it all the way to 2nd or
> 1st gear is ridiculous. I downshift to 3rd at most, unless there's a steep
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> that. Downshifting routinely as the converse of up-shifting is a waste of
> time and drivetrain life.

I like that "when you clearly" part... If it were that easy, we wouldn't
have any accidents because everybody would be clearly aware of everything.

> People keep saying it's illegal to coast in neutral but I've yet to see
> such a law. It may have applied to older cars with clunkier clutches and
> transmissions. Large trucks definitely should avoid coasting for all but
> the briefest distances, but cars are much more controllable.

http://qcode.us/codes/milwaukie/view.php?topic=10-10_44-10_44_100
http://www.interlog.com/~css/manualprimer.htm
http://legis.state.sd.us/statutes/DisplayStatute.aspx?Type=Statute&Statute=32-24-2
http://www.doeuv.com/correct-way-to-drive-the-car-Gears-Clutch-445332.html
http://touchngo.com/lglcntr/akstats/AAC/Title13/Chapter002/Section515.htm
You haven't looked is why you haven't seen...

> If you're lame enough to select 1st at 60 you're just a bad driver. I've
> been coasting for decades below ~40 MPH while coming to a stop and I've
> never had the need to hold down the clutch and wear out the pilot bearing.
> "Coasting in" is a much more relaxing way to drive than constantly working
> the gears. You can save thousands of shifts per year.

Once again, looking at statistics, we can see there are thousands of "lame"
drivers (and ex-drivers... and ex-live drivers). Once again, a reference to
"working the gears"...I see no reason for you to try and put words in my
mouth.  If it is such a chore, buy an automatic...

> I think people who downshift all the time are trying to act like race car
> drivers. It's unnecessary in typical traffic when you _know_ you'll have
> to stop in 100 yards or so. The time it takes to shift into gear from
> neutral is very brief and well within safety limits when you're
> approaching a stop and slowing down anyway. If you can anticipate that the
> light is going to turn green soon, you plan accordingly and stay in gear.

The time it takes to place the car in gear and accelerate out of a situation
where braking would be an inappropriate choice could make all the difference
in the world. However, it is yopur car and your skin... feel free to do as
you choose... when push comes to shove, show some integrity and answer
truthfully when a LEO asks questions.

As for you driving for nearly 30 years... I am truly impressed.... That
means you were most likely still pissing in your drawers when I got my
licence in 1966...

Good judgement comes from experience... unfortunately, experience comes from
bad judgement...
Garth Almgren - 13 May 2006 18:44 GMT
> People keep saying it's illegal to coast in neutral but I've yet to see such a law.

Ask and ye shall receive:
http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=46.61.630

Plus, do a search on Google for "coasting prohibited" including the
quotes. The top 10 results are laws for WA, OK, NH, CA, MT, KY, AZ, AK,
and HI.

Signature

/     Garth - '83 GL V6stang Hatch <Former MW #7>     \

|      My V6stang: http://www.v6stang.com/v6stang     |
|  RAMFM Merchandise: http://www.cafeshops.com/ramfm  |
\         ~~ Ventis secundis, tene cursum ~~          /
My Names Nobody - 13 May 2006 22:09 GMT
>> People keep saying it's illegal to coast in neutral but I've yet to see
>> such a law.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> |  RAMFM Merchandise: http://www.cafeshops.com/ramfm  |
> \         ~~ Ventis secundis, tene cursum ~~          /

I had no dog in this fight, I did as you said and searched...

Seams the laws are in reference to costing down hills, only...

     RCW 46.61.630
     Coasting prohibited.

(1) The driver of any motor vehicle when traveling upon a down grade shall
not coast with the gears of such vehicle in neutral.

    (2) The driver of a commercial motor vehicle when traveling upon a down
grade shall not coast with the clutch disengaged.

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=46.61.630

  61-8-362. Coasting prohibited. The driver of a motor vehicle when
traveling upon a downgrade may not coast with the transmission of the
vehicle in neutral or with the clutch manually disengaged.

http://data.opi.state.mt.us/bills/mca/61/8/61-8-362.htm
Garth Almgren - 14 May 2006 04:26 GMT
>>> People keep saying it's illegal to coast in neutral but I've yet to see
>>> such a law.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Seams the laws are in reference to costing down hills, only...

Well, coasting *uphill* in neutral won't get you very far, will it? :)

Signature

/     Garth - '83 GL V6stang Hatch <Former MW #7>     \

|      My V6stang: http://www.v6stang.com/v6stang     |
|  RAMFM Merchandise: http://www.cafeshops.com/ramfm  |
\         ~~ Ventis secundis, tene cursum ~~          /
My Names Nobody - 14 May 2006 06:31 GMT
>>>> People keep saying it's illegal to coast in neutral but I've yet to see
>>>> such a law.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Well, coasting *uphill* in neutral won't get you very far, will it? :)

The original poster was not trying to go very far was he???

"Wow, it's amazing how far a modern car can roll and not lose much speed.
On the rest of my stops,"

???

> |      My V6stang: http://www.v6stang.com/v6stang     |
> |  RAMFM Merchandise: http://www.cafeshops.com/ramfm  |
> \         ~~ Ventis secundis, tene cursum ~~          /
WindsorFox - 14 May 2006 18:39 GMT
>>>> People keep saying it's illegal to coast in neutral but I've yet to see
>>>> such a law.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Well, coasting *uphill* in neutral won't get you very far, will it? :)

    Depends on which way you're headed....

Signature

"Be sure you keep your fur free of grit,
or you will have the same trouble all over again." - Kate

Jim Warman - 14 May 2006 07:59 GMT
I don't recall seeing "downhill" mentioned here...
http://qcode.us/codes/milwaukie/view.php?topic=10-10_44-10_44_100 . I
imagine a good, downhome paper chase would reveal some startling finds....
The internet is not the "be all, end all" that many seem to think.... yet.

There are many ways to be stupid and few to be smart...

>>> People keep saying it's illegal to coast in neutral but I've yet to see
>>> such a law.
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
> http://data.opi.state.mt.us/bills/mca/61/8/61-8-362.htm
NoOption5L@aol.com - 16 May 2006 02:59 GMT
> On Wed, May 10 2006 10:09 pm, Jim Warman wrote:

> >  Coasting with the car in neutral can place you in jeopardy...
> > should you be placed in a situation where you encounter the sudden
> > need to increase speed, you will find yourself ill prepared for it
> > - let us remember that we aren't the only ones on the roads and none
> > of these other cars are labelled "IM STUPID"...

This is the most ridiculous law, rule, argument... whatever, that I
have ever read.  Ranks right in there with the tag on a mattress that
reads do not remove under penalty of law.  What sense does it make and
who would ever know?  They might as well go further and outlaw lazy,
slow shifts.  You're allowing your car to be out of gear too long.
Or go even a step further and just ban manual transmissions all
together.  How dare we risk lives with a transmission that requires the
car to be out of gear in order to shift?  And this brings me to who is
ever going to know you're coasting.  Is a cop really going know or
better yet care enough to ticket you for coasting?  I'd love to see
that one in court!  My final point: I can slap my car back in gear and
accelerate faster than many lesser powered vehicles can accelerate
being in gear and punching it.  Should we not ban these underpowered
cars too?

Patrick
Bob Willard - 16 May 2006 13:10 GMT
>>On Wed, May 10 2006 10:09 pm, Jim Warman wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Patrick

The cops can only tell during the post mortem; then they attach the ticket
to the corpse.
Signature

Cheers, Bob

WindsorFox - 16 May 2006 23:31 GMT
>>> On Wed, May 10 2006 10:09 pm, Jim Warman wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> The cops can only tell during the post mortem; then they attach the ticket
> to the corpse.

   Please explain

Signature

"Be sure you keep your fur free of grit,
or you will have the same trouble all over again." - Kate

NoOption5L@aol.com - 17 May 2006 02:14 GMT
> >>> Coasting with the car in neutral can place you in jeopardy...
> >>>should you be placed in a situation where you encounter the sudden
> >>>need to increase speed, you will find yourself ill prepared for it
> >>>- let us remember that we aren't the only ones on the roads and none
> >>>of these other cars are labelled "IM STUPID"...

> > This is the most ridiculous law, rule, argument... whatever, that I
> > have ever read.  Ranks right in there with the tag on a mattress that
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> > being in gear and punching it.  Should we not ban these underpowered
> > cars too?

> The cops can only tell during the post mortem; then they attach the ticket
> to the corpse.

Bob,

How is coasting going to increase your risk of an accident?  Because
you can't pop the clutch back out quick enough to be able to jump on
the throttle to avoid an accident?  Give me a break!!  If this is the
case then all cars with a maunal transmission must be death traps in
city traffic.  Because who in the hell down shifts/chugs their car all
the way down to zero mph at every stop?  Is anyone/everyone raising
their hand?  I didn't think so.  

Patrick
Richard - 17 May 2006 03:12 GMT
> > >>> Coasting with the car in neutral can place you in jeopardy...
> > >>>should you be placed in a situation where you encounter the sudden
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> the way down to zero mph at every stop?  Is anyone/everyone raising
> their hand?  I didn't think so.

You have the context of the law wrong. If you lived in an area where
highways crest at 6-7000 feet, where down hill grades are 10 to 15 miles
long, where truck runaway lanes exist 1/2 to 1 mile, where road grades are
often in excessive of 8% you would understand why coasting is a dangerous
activity. To be sure these laws were written in an earlier time when it
wasn't always possible to put the car back into gear. Same as occurs today
with the 18+ wheelers. If one could always downshift there wouldn't be a
need for runaway lanes. Throughout this thread no one even suggested that
cars with manual transmissions don't coast to a stop or shouldn't coast to a
stop in an urban or non urban environment. The coasting laws refer to taking
the vehicle out of gear and coasting on a downhill grade.  Will they ever
know, probably not unless there is an accident.  If you think that coasting
on a long downhill grade will be a hoot try it sometime, I only hope that
I'm not any ways near. I'd like to see you put it back into gear when you're
at 100+mph.

Richard

> Patrick
NoOption5L@aol.com - 18 May 2006 03:04 GMT
> > > >>> Coasting with the car in neutral can place you in jeopardy...
> > > >>>should you be placed in a situation where you encounter the sudden
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> > the way down to zero mph at every stop?  Is anyone/everyone raising
> > their hand?  I didn't think so.

> You have the context of the law wrong. If you lived in an area where
> highways crest at 6-7000 feet, where down hill grades are 10 to 15 miles
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> cars with manual transmissions don't coast to a stop or shouldn't coast to a
> stop in an urban or non urban environment.

Richard,

I told them I was coasting up to stoplights.  There aren't too many
traffic lights in the middle of steep mountainous downgrades.   And
while I was said, "hills", again, I never mentioned coming down
mountainous passes.  Dispite this their counter was coasting is
dangerous because you wouldn't be able to get it back into gear quickly
enough to avoid a possible collision.  I find their counter silly,
don't you?

> The coasting laws refer to taking
> the vehicle out of gear and coasting on a downhill grade.  Will they ever
> know, probably not unless there is an accident.  If you think that coasting
> on a long downhill grade will be a hoot try it sometime, I only hope that
> I'm not any ways near.

I have.  Many times.  The car was well maintained, the road ahead was
clear and the weather was good.  What's the problem?

> I'd like to see you put it back into gear when you're at 100+mph.

Why do you find it hard to get it back into gear at 100+ mph?  I've
done it hundreds of times without incident.    

Patrick
Richard - 18 May 2006 05:59 GMT
> I told them I was coasting up to stoplights.  There aren't too many
> traffic lights in the middle of steep mountainous downgrades.   And
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> enough to avoid a possible collision.  I find their counter silly,
> don't you?

Yes, of course.

> > The coasting laws refer to taking
> > the vehicle out of gear and coasting on a downhill grade.  Will they ever
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> I have.  Many times.  The car was well maintained, the road ahead was
> clear and the weather was good.  What's the problem?

And straight or without sharp turns.

> > I'd like to see you put it back into gear when you're at 100+mph.
>
> Why do you find it hard to get it back into gear at 100+ mph?

I didn't mean to infer that one couldn't put put it back into gear. I was
thinking about coasting with the transmission in neutral vs the clutch being
disengaged.

>I've done it hundreds of times without incident.

I'll bet that wasn't done with the engine at idle speed. Sure you can match
the revs to speed and it's harmless. However, I am inclined to think that
the guy that tried doing this for the first time didn't think about that.

Richard
My Names Nobody - 18 May 2006 07:29 GMT
>> Why do you find it hard to get it back into gear at 100+ mph?
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Richard

I think it has more to do with the drivers ability to use his clutch, (this
is a great illustration of what a clutch is for) rather than "matching"
engine speed...
NoOption5L@aol.com - 19 May 2006 03:01 GMT
> > > The coasting laws refer to taking
> > > the vehicle out of gear and coasting on a downhill grade.  Will they
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> that
> > > I'm not any ways near.

> > I have.  Many times.  The car was well maintained, the road ahead was
> > clear and the weather was good.  What's the problem?

> And straight or without sharp turns.

Yes.  Now if I was driving a Vette or Viper...

> > > I'd like to see you put it back into gear when you're at 100+mph.

> > Why do you find it hard to get it back into gear at 100+ mph?

> I didn't mean to infer that one couldn't put put it back into gear. I was
> thinking about coasting with the transmission in neutral vs the clutch being
> disengaged.

> >I've done it hundreds of times without incident.

> I'll bet that wasn't done with the engine at idle speed. Sure you can match
> the revs to speed and it's harmless. However, I am inclined to think that
> the guy that tried doing this for the first time didn't think about that.

Normally, I try to match revs, but if I was trying to scrub off some
speed I'd use a slow clutch release.

Patrick
Bob Willard - 17 May 2006 12:36 GMT
>>>>>Coasting with the car in neutral can place you in jeopardy...
>>>>>should you be placed in a situation where you encounter the sudden
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> Patrick

The anti-coasting law is really old, I won't defend it, and I certainly
do what I want in my 5-speed Mustang.

ISTR my father (who drove teams of horses and teams of mules before he
first drove a car) explaining that the danger with coasting downhill
in early cars/trucks was that the increased speed could overwhelm the
capability of mechanical brakes.  And he listed an accident or two on
a nearby hill that was blamed on free-wheeling.

{OT, but that same hill was long enough that Dad said some cars could
 only get up it in reverse -- gas got to the carb courtesy of gravity,
 and steep hills caused starvation.}
Signature

Cheers, Bob

Garth Almgren - 18 May 2006 03:30 GMT
>> How is coasting going to increase your risk of an accident?  Because
>> you can't pop the clutch back out quick enough to be able to jump on
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> The anti-coasting law is really old, I won't defend it, and I certainly
> do what I want in my 5-speed Mustang.

Likewise, I wasn't defending the law (there are a *lot* of silly old
laws still on the books...), but simply responding with an example for
the guy who had never seen a law against coasting in neutral.

Sure, the "downhill" part was probably a little more specific than he
was looking for, but it was still *a* law against coasting in neutral.

[shrugs]

In the Jeep I usually will just let it coast in gear until about 1000
RPMs before pulling it out of gear. In the Mustang and the van, I don't
get to worry about it, since the torque converter does it for me. :)

Signature

/     Garth - '83 GL V6stang Hatch <Former MW #7>     \

|      My V6stang: http://www.v6stang.com/v6stang     |
|  RAMFM Merchandise: http://www.cafeshops.com/ramfm  |
\         ~~ Ventis secundis, tene cursum ~~          /
lab~rat  >:-) - 18 May 2006 13:07 GMT
>>>>>>Coasting with the car in neutral can place you in jeopardy...
>>>>>>should you be placed in a situation where you encounter the sudden
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
>  only get up it in reverse -- gas got to the carb courtesy of gravity,
>  and steep hills caused starvation.}

Son of a gun:

316.2024  Coasting prohibited.--The driver of any motor vehicle, when
traveling upon a downgrade, shall not coast with the gears or
transmission of such vehicle in neutral or the clutch disengaged. A
violation of this section is a noncriminal traffic infraction,
punishable as a moving violation as provided in chapter 318.

http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=Ch031
6/ch0316.htm


Fortunately there aren't any hills in S. Florida.  What a dumbass
unenforceable law...
--
lab~rat  >:-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?
Joe - 19 May 2006 13:03 GMT
>>>>>>>Coasting with the car in neutral can place you in jeopardy...
>>>>>>>should you be placed in a situation where you encounter the
[quoted text clipped - 62 lines]
> lab~rat  >:-)
> Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

Actually, there are plenty of hills in FL.  Just not in SoFla.
lab~rat  >:-) - 19 May 2006 15:19 GMT
>>>>>>>>Coasting with the car in neutral can place you in jeopardy...
>>>>>>>>should you be placed in a situation where you encounter the
[quoted text clipped - 65 lines]
>
>Actually, there are plenty of hills in FL.  Just not in SoFla.

Point being, how can they enforce that law?
--
lab~rat  >:-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?
Joe - 19 May 2006 21:05 GMT
>>>>>>>>>Coasting with the car in neutral can place you in jeopardy...
>>>>>>>>>should you be placed in a situation where you encounter the
[quoted text clipped - 70 lines]
> lab~rat  >:-)
> Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

Don't think it matters, as you can't get going more than 40mph on any of
those hills anyway...
Paul - 21 May 2006 16:50 GMT
> Actually, there are plenty of hills in FL.  Just not in SoFla.

*laughing* I doubt any of those would get you anywhere near 100mph if yu
coast down them. Now in PA I can see this as a very sensible law. Which
is why I stay well away from trucks on downgrades there.

The biggest downgrade in my area would be the Skyway bridge ;)

Signature

_                       1995 Mustang V6 Coupe (Bright Blue)

|_|                      Member Modern Mustangs of North America (MMNA)
|__|ofh@tampabay.rr.com  http://mustang.fdns.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.