Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Mustang / August 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Cooland Temperature Sensor location?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Cameron - 04 Aug 2006 18:47 GMT
Hey all!  My 88 mustang post was getting really log so I'm starting a new
one.

The mechanic said that both my o2 sensors are out and my coolant temperature
sensor.  He wants $388 to fix them (plus the $70 for the diagnostics he
did).  Obviously I can replace all three of those myself for about $100 from
autozone.

However, I am unsure where the "Cooland Temperature Sensor" is on a 88 5.0.
I see what they look like on the autozone site but not in my engine.  I have
a terrible Hayens manual and it wasnt listed in there either.  There was a
coolant temperature sending unit but thats probably not it.

Anyone have a picture or know where this thing is located?

Thanks!
Cameron - 04 Aug 2006 19:13 GMT
I should have mentioned that I found these two descriptions:

UNDER HOOD, CENTER, UPPER ENGINE AREA, PASSENGER SIDE   OF DISTRIBUTOR, REAR
OF WATER OUTLET, MOUNTED IN      INTAKE MANIFOLD

Remove the ECT sensor, on 5.0 engines it is located at the front passenger
side of the lower intake manifold

They didnt really help me locate anything, maybe I'm a dumdum :-)
Hopefully the guy at the shop will be willing to point it out to me.
Chumky - 04 Aug 2006 21:47 GMT
>I should have mentioned that I found these two descriptions:
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> They didnt really help me locate anything, maybe I'm a dumdum :-)
> Hopefully the guy at the shop will be willing to point it out to me.

Seems right above the thermostat on that pipe that goes back toward the
firewall ?? (93 5.0)

He could be shotgunning the O2 sensors, but they do get "weak" I have heard-
never seen it.
Cameron - 04 Aug 2006 21:50 GMT
I looked up pricing of $40 a o2 sensor at autozone and $24 for the coolant
sensor.  I went by the ford dealer and it was $94 for the o2 and $45 for the
coolant.  The ford guy recomended I buy their coolant one and the
acftermarket o2s so I did.  Letting the stang cool down before install that
junk.

I thought the sensor was exactly where you described it and the ford guy
confirmed that for me.  Autozone site is just way wrong.

Hopefully I pass tomorrow, otherwise I;ll have to pay another $70 diagnostic
to find out wtf else is wrong.

--C

>>I should have mentioned that I found these two descriptions:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> He could be shotgunning the O2 sensors, but they do get "weak" I have
> heard- never seen it.
Cameron - 04 Aug 2006 21:51 GMT
Oh I should have also noted that the previous owner of the car (for 15
years) had a H-pipe on their, but he had kept the o2 sensors and cats since
1991.  We put them back up under the vehicle so the cats are probably still
good but 10 years on a shelf of the o2s might have made them bad?

>I looked up pricing of $40 a o2 sensor at autozone and $24 for the coolant
>sensor.  I went by the ford dealer and it was $94 for the o2 and $45 for
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>> He could be shotgunning the O2 sensors, but they do get "weak" I have
>> heard- never seen it.
Chomlky - 04 Aug 2006 22:18 GMT
> Oh I should have also noted that the previous owner of the car (for 15
> years) had a H-pipe on their, but he had kept the o2 sensors and cats
> since 1991.  We put them back up under the vehicle so the cats are
> probably still good but 10 years on a shelf of the o2s might have made
> them bad?

There was a recall on the cats for 1989,  I got new cats put on by Ford in
the 1989 for free (in about 1995)
might check it out with ford, the inside would break loose and turn some,
get noisy and plug up a little.
not sure how the car would run without O2s in place, except rich, computer
may still be learning the O2 sensors, or they could have drifted off some or
both.
Michael Johnson, PE - 05 Aug 2006 00:03 GMT
Search the archives of this newsgroup regarding cleaning the MAF sensor
element.  I bet the element needs cleaned.  A dirty element will cause
the engine to run lean which can affect emissions readings.  Doing this
only costs the price of a can of brake cleaning fluid and a couple of
Q-Tips.

> I looked up pricing of $40 a o2 sensor at autozone and $24 for the coolant
> sensor.  I went by the ford dealer and it was $94 for the o2 and $45 for the
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>> He could be shotgunning the O2 sensors, but they do get "weak" I have
>> heard- never seen it.
JohnV@nn - 05 Aug 2006 00:44 GMT
> Search the archives of this newsgroup regarding cleaning the MAF sensor
> element.  I bet the element needs cleaned.  A dirty element will cause
> the engine to run lean which can affect emissions readings.  Doing this
> only costs the price of a can of brake cleaning fluid and a couple of
> Q-Tips.

That's a definite "must do".  If you haven't already, do all of the
following (this is from Tim aka Musttanguy):

A) Clean the throttle body w/sensor/TB safe cleaner
B) Remove IAC and clean it along with the ports on the TB
C) Remove the EGR valve and clean it along with the ports on the TB/EGR
spacer.
D) Pull apart both main engine harness connectors at back of intake and
spray
with electrical contact cleaner, alow to dry and snap back together.
E) If MAF equiped spray the sensor with the same electrical contact
cleaner.

FYI I wound up replacing the IAC and EGR on my 93.  I cleaned them a
few times but they were just shot.  I also replaced my O2 sensors.  All
of the above are very easy to do.
Yelmuhc - 05 Aug 2006 04:09 GMT
>> Search the archives of this newsgroup regarding cleaning the MAF sensor
>> element.  I bet the element needs cleaned.  A dirty element will cause
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> few times but they were just shot.  I also replaced my O2 sensors.  All
> of the above are very easy to do.

what and where the IAC ?  -Thanks
JohnV@nn - 06 Aug 2006 00:29 GMT
> what and where the IAC ?  -Thanks

"idle air control".  Also goes by the name IAB for "idle air bypass."
Thing attached to the side of the throttle body.  It gets filled up
with crap over time.

http://www.moddedmustangs.com/cleaning-your-iac.html
Yelmuhc - 05 Aug 2006 04:07 GMT
> Search the archives of this newsgroup regarding cleaning the MAF sensor
> element.  I bet the element needs cleaned.  A dirty element will cause the
> engine to run lean which can affect emissions readings.  Doing this only
> costs the price of a can of brake cleaning fluid and a couple of Q-Tips.

MAF
Is that the wire inside the unit ?
never heard of cleaning that part,
I thought it would throw the cal off.
But my car runs lean, 93 5.0
Michael Johnson, PE - 05 Aug 2006 04:59 GMT
>> Search the archives of this newsgroup regarding cleaning the MAF sensor
>> element.  I bet the element needs cleaned.  A dirty element will cause the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> I thought it would throw the cal off.
> But my car runs lean, 93 5.0

The aluminum housing right after the air filter box is the MAF sensor.
Inside it is a tiny pair of wires with a resistor looking element
located on them that are heated by applying a current through them.  The
resistance of these two segments change depending on their temperature.
 The more air that passes through the housing the less the resistance
because the wires are cooler.  Think of it as wind chill.  When the two
segments develop a dirty "crust" it insulates them from the air flow.
This, in turn, raises the resistance which makes the computer think
there is less air flowing through the housing than actually is.  The
computer then lowers the fuel injected into the cylinders which leans
out the mixture.

The two segments aren't extremely delicate.  They can be rubbed with a
Q-Tip soaked in brake cleaner.  The first time I cleaned mine a piece of
dirty crust popped off one of the elements.  Anyone using an oiled air
filter like a K&N should do regular MAF cleanings because the oil from
the filter will accelerate dirt collection.  While cleaning the MAF also
disconnect the battery for 30 minutes to clear the computer.
Cameron - 05 Aug 2006 06:08 GMT
I took my MAF out and checked it and it was clean enough to eat off of as
far as I could tell.

I changed out my o2 sensors ($40 each) with Bosch ones from Autozone and I
changed out my Coolant Temp Sensor with the real one from Ford ($45).

Fired the bad boy up, added a bit of coolant, some bubbled out from the air
in the lines.  Wierd thing now is I saw some exhaust coming out the back.
Wasnt any color really and it smelled like...exhaust.  I havn't seen any
exhaust at all until this time.  However, it just rained and it was REALLY
humid, could that make a difference (real foggy outside, etc)?

I had left off the battery cable to reset the computer and then took it for
a 20 minute drive on the interstate and some back roads.  Came home and no
exhaust visible anymore.

Anyone placing bets on if I will pass emissions tomorrow?  So far I've
changed the t-stat, o2s, coolant sensor, and ran a tank of "Guaranteed not
to pass" through it.

--C
Josh Thelmack - 06 Aug 2006 03:45 GMT
>I took my MAF out and checked it and it was clean enough to eat off of as
>far as I could tell.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> any exhaust at all until this time.  However, it just rained and it was
> REALLY humid, could that make a difference (real foggy outside, etc)?

Mine always dumps water out the exhaust from rain.

> I had left off the battery cable to reset the computer and then took it
> for a 20 minute drive on the interstate and some back roads.  Came home
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> --C

It will pass for sure.  If not, go to another county
Michael Johnson, PE - 06 Aug 2006 21:13 GMT
> I took my MAF out and checked it and it was clean enough to eat off of as
> far as I could tell.

If you didn't clean the elements you should have.
WindsorFox[SS] - 05 Aug 2006 06:42 GMT
> Search the archives of this newsgroup regarding cleaning the MAF sensor
> element.  I bet the element needs cleaned.  A dirty element will cause
> the engine to run lean which can affect emissions readings.  Doing this
> only costs the price of a can of brake cleaning fluid and a couple of
> Q-Tips.

   LOL and be sure to read the recent entry when Dwight decided to
clean his MAF sensor  :-p

Signature

I used to have abs. Now, I've just got ab.
One big ol' Ab. - BigSkiff www.titanspot.com

Pyongyang sounds more like the sound effect an ACME catapult makes
as it goes off at precisely the wrong moment for Wile E. Coyote. -
Cadbury Moose

Michael Johnson, PE - 05 Aug 2006 07:09 GMT
>> Search the archives of this newsgroup regarding cleaning the MAF
>> sensor element.  I bet the element needs cleaned.  A dirty element
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>    LOL and be sure to read the recent entry when Dwight decided to clean
> his MAF sensor  :-p

Whatever happened with that?  Did he need a new one or was there
something else causing the problem?
Cameron - 05 Aug 2006 15:49 GMT
OMG is all I have to say.  Took the car down to get it tested again:
HC 239 allowed 220 FAIL
CO 0.09 allowed 1.20

What a rip.  However I have found some interesting information on the
Tennessee DMV site:
The owner of any motor vehicle which did not successfully complete an
emissions test administered prior to the date fixed for issuance or renewal
and, after attempting the repairs necessary to successfully complete the
emissions test fails the emissions testing again, shall be eligible to apply
for a waiver from further emissions testing for that year; provided, that
the owner has attempted repairs to the vehicle in an amount of two hundred
dollars ($200) or more, if the vehicle is a model year 1981 or more recent,
or seventy-five dollars ($75.00) or more, if the vehicle is of a model year
1980 or older, or has attempted repairs in such amount as established by the
environmental protection agency to make the owner of a motor vehicle
eligible for a waiver, whichever is less. The waiver shall be granted
according to guidelines and procedures established by the air pollution
control board.

I've spent about $230 so far on this stuff, so maybe I can callthe County
Clerk monday and be done with the whole thing for a year!  Probably all I
need to get the readings down is just a regular tune up, but I dont really
want to keep going back and paying $10 for the test :-)

--C
Michael Johnson, PE - 05 Aug 2006 16:12 GMT
> OMG is all I have to say.  Took the car down to get it tested again:
> HC 239 allowed 220 FAIL
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> need to get the readings down is just a regular tune up, but I dont really
> want to keep going back and paying $10 for the test :-)

What all this is telling you is the car needs some regular maintenance
since the items you have replaced lowered you emissions readings.  I
agree that a tune up with new plugs & wires, throttle body cleaning,
fuel injector cleaning, IAB valve cleaning/replacement will allow it to
pass next year.
Cameron - 07 Aug 2006 14:57 GMT
Called the county clerk and they said the $200 rule applied to all emissions
counties in Tennessee except Davidson.

Guess that tune up comes sooner than laterm since I cant get a tag until I
do.

>> OMG is all I have to say.  Took the car down to get it tested again:
>> HC 239 allowed 220 FAIL
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> injector cleaning, IAB valve cleaning/replacement will allow it to pass
> next year.
Cameron - 07 Aug 2006 14:57 GMT
Called the county clerk and they said the $200 rule applied to all emissions
counties in Tennessee except Davidson.

Guess that tune up comes sooner than laterm since I cant get a tag until I
do.

>> OMG is all I have to say.  Took the car down to get it tested again:
>> HC 239 allowed 220 FAIL
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> injector cleaning, IAB valve cleaning/replacement will allow it to pass
> next year.
JohnV@nn - 05 Aug 2006 20:51 GMT
> OMG is all I have to say.  Took the car down to get it tested again:
> HC 239 allowed 220 FAIL
> CO 0.09 allowed 1.20

Wow so you "practically" passed.  I bet it was the O2 sensors that
brought you down to near-passing.

JV
WindsorFox[SS] - 06 Aug 2006 19:23 GMT
>>> Search the archives of this newsgroup regarding cleaning the MAF
>>> sensor element.  I bet the element needs cleaned.  A dirty element
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Whatever happened with that?  Did he need a new one or was there
> something else causing the problem?

   I think he decided it was a coincidence. Just, bad karma I guess  :p

Signature

I used to have abs. Now, I've just got ab.
One big ol' Ab. - BigSkiff www.titanspot.com

Pyongyang sounds more like the sound effect an ACME catapult makes
as it goes off at precisely the wrong moment for Wile E. Coyote. -
Cadbury Moose

Michael Johnson, PE - 07 Aug 2006 01:30 GMT
>>>> Search the archives of this newsgroup regarding cleaning the MAF
>>>> sensor element.  I bet the element needs cleaned.  A dirty element
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>    I think he decided it was a coincidence. Just, bad karma I guess  :p

What was the problem and the fix?
Backyard Mechanic - 06 Aug 2006 04:56 GMT
> Hey all!  My 88 mustang post was getting really log so I'm starting a
> new one.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Thanks!

The car is running RICH.  
High CO, high HC is unburned fuel.
OR oil.  Does it use much oil? What do the plug isolators look like?

Does the car idle smoothly? I'd bet not.  And I bet it's hard-start, hot.

Since you've changed the CTS, make sure the MAP sensor tubing is
coonected to manifold.  And I suggest changing the Fuel Pressure
Regulator.. a common fail item in mid eighties.

THEN change oil before you take it back... that's first on everyone's
tips to pass a marginal engine.

Signature

Yeh, I'm a Krusty old Geezer, putting up with my 'smartass' is the price
you pay..DEAL with it!

Cameron - 07 Aug 2006 14:55 GMT
Where exatcly is the MAP sensor tubing?

>> Hey all!  My 88 mustang post was getting really log so I'm starting a
>> new one.
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> THEN change oil before you take it back... that's first on everyone's
> tips to pass a marginal engine.
Backyard Mechanic - 09 Aug 2006 02:16 GMT
> Where exatcly is the MAP sensor tubing?

You've already said you have a california car... it has a MAF, therefor the
sensor is a BAP and measures atmosphere press, not manifold.

Signature

Yeh, I'm a Krusty old Geezer, putting up with my 'smartass' is the price
you pay..DEAL with it!

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.