Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Mustang / January 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Modless Wonder FOX Challenge!

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jimmy - 07 Jan 2007 05:00 GMT
Do I win?

1990...Mustang GT

Owned since new...

Mods!

Removed Air Silencer...

Exhaust...Dynomax Turbo Catback 2.5 (stocks rusted out!)

End of mods!

Was a BEAUTIFUL day today here in the NYC metro area....washed the car
finally (looked like crap)...my Z-28 needs an inspection and I took out
ye old '69 pontiac (aka my former Mustang supercharger funds) last
weekend..

Here she is from this afternoon after a washing...if this IS global
warming, how come we only hear about the BAD aspects...what about 70
degrees in NYC? :-)

http://picasaweb.google.com/jimsfastls1/MustangJan62007

Jimmy..
nospam - 07 Jan 2007 12:39 GMT
It's not global warming.
Just a weird jet stream.
The winter was like this in 1890 (among a few other years that have been
recorded).

> Do I win?
>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> Jimmy..
BradandBrooks - 07 Jan 2007 13:50 GMT
> It's not global warming.
> Just a weird jet stream.
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>>
>> Jimmy..

Love the Stang! Lose the Z-28. ;)  Nice car. Love the 100% stock look.

Brad
Jimmy - 10 Jan 2007 02:04 GMT
> Love the Stang! Lose the Z-28. ;)  Nice car. Love the 100% stock look.
>
> Brad

Thanks.
NoOption5L@aol.com - 07 Jan 2007 21:52 GMT
> It's not global warming.

Let hope so.  But with rapidly increasing CO2 levels, loss of
glacier/polar ice caps and the growing concensus among experts, things
are looking ominous.

> Just a weird jet stream.

Caused by El Nino or La Nina, but we're not sure it their
intensity/frequency have been changed by man's activities.

> The winter was like this in 1890 (among a few other years that have been
> recorded).

And the average gobal temperature continues to rise.

I know this doesn't account for much, but I do know SE Michigan's
winters have been awfully wacky and warmer the last 20+ years.  They
don't get the cold/snow up there anymore like when I was a kid -- tons
of snow, huge snow drifts, 30+ days of continuous below freezing
temperatures, snow mobiles running all over the place, etc.-- that
stuff doesn't happen anymore.        

Patrick
Nicholas Anthony - 08 Jan 2007 01:59 GMT
>> It's not global warming.
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Patrick

At one time they said the Earth's axis was rotating which would cause change
as well. What I dont get is that even if it were true what is to say the
Earth wont take care of itself? I mean it gets hotter the water evaporates
and turns into clouds, the clouds protect us from harmful sun rays and the
temperature.
greg - 08 Jan 2007 02:25 GMT
>>> It's not global warming.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> evaporates and turns into clouds, the clouds protect us from harmful sun
> rays and the temperature.

maybee but my mustang 5.0 will still be running.......
NoOption5L@aol.com - 08 Jan 2007 04:05 GMT
> >> It's not global warming.

> > Let hope so.  But with rapidly increasing CO2 levels, loss of
> > glacier/polar ice caps and the growing concensus among experts, things
> > are looking ominous.

> >> Just a weird jet stream.

> > Caused by El Nino or La Nina, but we're not sure it their
> > intensity/frequency have been changed by man's activities.

> >> The winter was like this in 1890 (among a few other years that have been
> >> recorded).

> > And the average gobal temperature continues to rise.

> > I know this doesn't account for much, but I do know SE Michigan's
> > winters have been awfully wacky and warmer the last 20+ years.  They
> > don't get the cold/snow up there anymore like when I was a kid -- tons
> > of snow, huge snow drifts, 30+ days of continuous below freezing
> > temperatures, snow mobiles running all over the place, etc.-- that
> > stuff doesn't happen anymore.

> At one time they said the Earth's axis was rotating which would cause change
> as well. What I dont get is that even if it were true what is to say the
> Earth wont take care of itself? I mean it gets hotter the water evaporates
> and turns into clouds, the clouds protect us from harmful sun rays and the
> temperature.

Like I said, let's hope.  But the signs seem to be indicating we're
overloading the Earth's balancing system.  (Can the Earth's system
handle the huge escape of stored energy/oil and the massive clear
cutting of forests in such a short [only 100+ years] period of time?)
Add in human nature's tendancy to act only after things begin to
directly affect our lives and you can see the potential for an
unprecedented disaster.  Especially when you factor in the difficulty
of coordinating a global effort to turn things around, AND starting the
effort before it's too late.    

Patrick
Joe - 08 Jan 2007 12:23 GMT
>> >> It's not global warming.
>
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>
> Patrick

Saw a documentary on PBS not too long ago on how the earth's magnetic
structure is "reversing".  Apparently this is something that goes on
every few hundred or thousand years (forgot the time frame), but it's
all part of the cycle.

Personally, I don't think we (mankind) have the power to destroy the
earth.  We're just not that strong compared to Mother Nature.  We can
certainly screw it up, but I believe it will prevail in the end.  It'll
be here long after we annihilate ourselves.
NoOption5L@aol.com - 09 Jan 2007 03:35 GMT
> >> >> It's not global warming.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
> > of coordinating a global effort to turn things around, AND starting
> > the effort before it's too late.

> Saw a documentary on PBS not too long ago on how the earth's magnetic
> structure is "reversing".  Apparently this is something that goes on
> every few hundred or thousand years (forgot the time frame), but it's
> all part of the cycle.

Certainly the Earth has variations but they develop over 1,000s of
years, but the global warming theory is based on recent variations that
have happened extremely fast (less than a 100).  And in the case of
CO2, have risen to unprecedented levels.

> Personally, I don't think we (mankind) have the power to destroy the
> earth.  We're just not that strong compared to Mother Nature.  We can
> certainly screw it up, but I believe it will prevail in the end.  It'll
> be here long after we annihilate ourselves.

Do you realize the power of our nukes?  If enough of them go off, the
rotation of the planet could be upset.

Patrick
Jimmy - 10 Jan 2007 02:17 GMT
> Certainly the Earth has variations but they develop over 1,000s of
> years, but the global warming theory is based on recent variations that
> have happened extremely fast (less than a 100).  And in the case of
> CO2, have risen to unprecedented levels.
>
> Patrick

Also, don't forget the medias tendency to blow things out of proportion
and scare the living crap out of people. Like yesterday in NYC and "the
gaseous smell" that was all over the news. I must have gotten 15-20
IM's from people around the country sitting in my office literally
across the street from the WTC site. "Are you ok?" "What's going on
there?" etc etc....look out the window and....NADA..ZILCH...normal
traffic, rainy day...**nothing** out of the ordinary. But people from
California, Florida sending IM's e-mails etc...the missus calls...what
a joke. The media should be hung sometimes the way it plays up stories.
Global warming is the filler scare story when they don't have a maniac
being chased in California, an Avalanche in Colorado or a stinky subway
in NYC (I mean it smells ANYWAY...now we NY're are connoisseurs of BAD
smells? Gimme a break!) We may have a free media but MAN does it
suck.....runaway brides...Brittny's got no panties...who gives a crap?
Nevermind. Apparently millions do cause that's what sells. Fear and
sex....
Joe - 10 Jan 2007 02:53 GMT
NoOption5L@aol.com wrote in news:1168313735.175913.105990
@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com:

>> >> >> It's not global warming.
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
> have happened extremely fast (less than a 100).  And in the case of
> CO2, have risen to unprecedented levels.

Didn't mean to trivialize global warming; just thought of the magnetic
thing.  As long as we're on the topic however, I think mankind is at the
point where we all need something as powerful as a threat to the planet
(i.e., global warming) so we all get our act together as a race.  Only
in that sense would global warming be good.  The longer we wait, the
more screwed up the planet will become until mankind itself becomes
affected.  2 cents, of course.

>> Personally, I don't think we (mankind) have the power to destroy the
>> earth.  We're just not that strong compared to Mother Nature.  We can
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Patrick

Yeah, all the nukes are pretty powerful.  But they're nothing compared
to nature IMO.  Not to get into religion and all, but I think it's
presumptuous to assume that mankind can destroy the planet.  We will
destroy ourselves long before we come close to destroying the planet.
lab~rat  >:-) - 10 Jan 2007 18:47 GMT
>> >> It's not global warming.
>
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>of coordinating a global effort to turn things around, AND starting the
>effort before it's too late.    

Sounds to me like a lost cause.  Let's open up the pipes and rock and
roll...
--
lab~rat  >:-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?
Jimmy - 10 Jan 2007 02:02 GMT
> It's not global warming.
> Just a weird jet stream.
> The winter was like this in 1890 (among a few other years that have been
> recorded).

Probably right...going down to a not so balmy 28 degrees tonight! Oh
well. At least saturday was a great day though. I'll take what I can
get. Especially in January!
NoOption5L@aol.com - 07 Jan 2007 17:50 GMT
> Do I win?

> 1990...Mustang GT

> Owned since new...

> Mods!

> Removed Air Silencer...

> Exhaust...Dynomax Turbo Catback 2.5 (stocks rusted out!)

> End of mods!

Am I a close second?

'93 Cobra/120K miles (owned since '98)

removed air silencer
3.55s gears
shortie headers
C&L 73mm mass-air meter
'91 GT A6L processor

> Was a BEAUTIFUL day today here in the NYC metro area....washed the car
> finally (looked like crap)...my Z-28 needs an inspection and I took out
> ye old '69 pontiac (aka my former Mustang supercharger funds) last
> weekend..

It's crappy here in LA (lower AL).  Lot's a rain this weekend.

> http://picasaweb.google.com/jimsfastls1/MustangJan62007

Patrick
Jimmy - 10 Jan 2007 02:08 GMT
> > Do I win?
>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> Patrick

Looks pretty close to me!

*Just* got a call from my nephew. He's been wanting my mustang
since..well...when I got it and he was a little kid! He's 19 now. I
said no way (for various reasons posted to this newsgroup over the past
about teenagers and these cars etc). He just got his OWN mustang. 1992
green and silver? (his description) Bone stock. No details as he wanted
to tell me and get off the phone with me ASAP. I said "congratulations"
and "PLEASE listen. Be very careful".....ugh
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.