> So, is this top posting or bottom posting????
At best, it's inconsiderate; at worst, it's stupid.
> FWIW - there is nothing so inane.... so timing consuming... so useless
> - as scratching ones way to the bottom of a pile only to find some gem
> of wisdom like "me too".
Except for having to go back through already-read posts to find out what
the current post containing refers to.
> Proudly top posting since circa 1993...
Thereby forcing the reader to read backwards. Simply brilliant.
elaich - 29 Jul 2007 23:35 GMT
Joe <drinks@noon.net> wrote in news:Xns997C912C4333Enospamforme@
216.77.188.18:
> Thereby forcing the reader to read backwards. Simply brilliant.
You, of course, noticed which newsreader he is using. Branded as "idiot"
before he even posted.

Signature
A: Because it disturbs the logical flow of the message.
Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
Joe - 30 Jul 2007 00:20 GMT
> Joe <drinks@noon.net> wrote in news:Xns997C912C4333Enospamforme@
> 216.77.188.18:
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> You, of course, noticed which newsreader he is using. Branded as "idiot"
> before he even posted.
Goes without saying. Nice sig, btw..
"Jim Warman" <mechanic@telusplanet.net> wrote in news:qW3ri.79153$xk5.24392
@edtnps82:
> Proudly top posting since circa 1993...
The problem is others just as ignorant as you who don't know how to snip. I
find both types to be in the same vein. Killfiled. They rarely have any
"gems of wisdom" to offer to begin with.

Signature
A: Because it disturbs the logical flow of the message.
Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
> So, is this top posting or bottom posting????
Since you didn't bother to quote anything, it is neither.