>> hi all-
>>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> I have an 06 GT Conv... I put the shaker hood on mine... looks 1000x
> better than the fake scoop... imho
So if you got a 1970 Mach 1, would that be the first thing you did
to it too? Surely you realize that the number of Mustangs with working
cold air scoops can probably be counted on one hand. Thunderbirds, GTOs,
Torinos, 300s, Barracudas you name it, they ALL had fake hood scoops.

Signature
"Are you da poe-lice?" "No ma'am, we're musicians."
"So round, so firm, so fully packed, so easy on the draw" - Daffy Duck
Ahem. You're talking to someone who thinks that
popping a sail atop a 3,000 pound motor vehicle
is a viable alternative. - dwight
dwight - 20 Oct 2007 00:09 GMT
>>> hi all-
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> air scoops can probably be counted on one hand. Thunderbirds, GTOs,
> Torinos, 300s, Barracudas you name it, they ALL had fake hood scoops.
There is nothing in the GT appearance package that I would want on a car.
The cheesy, non-functional hood scoop simply detracts from the looks of a
nice, clean GT. The rolled exhaust tips...? No, thanks.
Now, that pony emblem engine cover, THAT I like.
dwight
www.tfrog.com
Tony - 22 Oct 2007 13:21 GMT
>>> hi all-
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> air scoops can probably be counted on one hand. Thunderbirds, GTOs,
> Torinos, 300s, Barracudas you name it, they ALL had fake hood scoops.
I had a 69 Mach and 2 70 Machs... the 69 and one of the 70s had the
fake scoop with the turn signals in the back.. One of the 70s had the
shaker.. definitely better...
> > hi all-
> >
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> I have an 06 GT Conv... I put the shaker hood on mine... looks 1000x
> better than the fake scoop... imho
The guy I bought my '05 GT from put an aftermarket phony scoop on it, which
looks pretty much like the ones they've got on the appearance package (minus
the matching grill piece). He also put on the phony side ducts - top and
bottom. Sure, they aren't functional, but look pretty cool to me. There's
something about looking out the front windshield at a hood scoop while
driving - working or not. (Yes, the REAL shaker would be nice, but...)
I'm thinking of getting the phony hood pins next - heh.
John B.
P.S. My '95 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP had phony hood "grilles" as well as
phony duel exhausts - ha!
Tony - 22 Oct 2007 19:59 GMT
>>> hi all-
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> John B.
NOTHING like having the 'scoop' move as you rev the engine... Once you
have the shaker, you simply cannot go back to non-functional plastic...
You just can't..
The current optional scoop.. Does it still look like it is pop-riveted
to the hood? That look 'worked' for the 65 Shelbys.. but on the current
Mustangs simply looks cheap and as if someone bought something from a JC
Whitney 'fiberglass crap' blow-out sale and riveted it to the hood after
a few beers with the boys.. (My opinion, if yours differs, that is
perfectly OK..)
The current Mustangs would have been better served by a Functional
Shaker (The hood is already stamped for it.. ) or a 69 / 70 Mach I type
scoop with the functional turn signals. or even the 67/68 hood with the
turn signals embedded near the leading edge of the hood.. The
Shelby-replica scoop just does not look 'right' on the car...
Of course, ymmv...