Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Mustang / October 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

does GT appearance pkg prevent upgrade?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
leeb@home.com - 19 Oct 2007 19:25 GMT
hi all-

i'm a former 'stang owner (90 GT convertible) thinking of returning to
the fold.    i'm looking at 08 GT's, and i sorta like that GT pkg with
the phony hood scoop.  

here's my concern....someone told me that if you go for that, it's part
of the "GT appearance package", which also includes some sort of Logo
engine cover, and that if you wind up with that, the cover prevents you
from being able to make certain types of engine upgrades down the road.

any truth to that?

thanks for your help,

Lee
Tony - 19 Oct 2007 19:30 GMT
> hi all-
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Lee

For me, the first upgrade would be to remove that cheesy looking
non-functional scoop...

:-)

I have an 06 GT Conv... I put the shaker hood on mine... looks 1000x
better than the fake scoop... imho
WindsorFox - 19 Oct 2007 23:24 GMT
>> hi all-
>>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> I have an 06 GT Conv... I put the shaker hood on mine... looks 1000x
> better than the fake scoop... imho

   So if you got a 1970 Mach 1, would that be the first thing you did
to it too? Surely you realize that the number of Mustangs with working
cold air scoops can probably be counted on one hand. Thunderbirds, GTOs,
Torinos, 300s, Barracudas you name it, they ALL had fake hood scoops.

Signature

"Are you da poe-lice?"  "No ma'am, we're musicians."

"So round, so firm, so fully packed, so easy on the draw" - Daffy Duck

Ahem. You're talking to someone who thinks that
popping a sail atop a 3,000  pound motor vehicle
is a viable alternative. - dwight

dwight - 20 Oct 2007 00:09 GMT
>>> hi all-
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> air scoops can probably be counted on one hand. Thunderbirds, GTOs,
> Torinos, 300s, Barracudas you name it, they ALL had fake hood scoops.

There is nothing in the GT appearance package that I would want on a car.
The cheesy, non-functional hood scoop simply detracts from the looks of a
nice, clean GT. The rolled exhaust tips...? No, thanks.

Now, that pony emblem engine cover, THAT I like.

dwight
www.tfrog.com
Tony - 22 Oct 2007 13:21 GMT
>>> hi all-
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> air scoops can probably be counted on one hand. Thunderbirds, GTOs,
> Torinos, 300s, Barracudas you name it, they ALL had fake hood scoops.

I had a 69 Mach and 2 70 Machs...  the 69 and one of the 70s had the
fake scoop with the turn signals in the back..  One of the 70s had the
shaker.. definitely better...
John B. - 22 Oct 2007 16:14 GMT
> > hi all-
> >
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> I have an 06 GT Conv... I put the shaker hood on mine... looks 1000x
> better than the fake scoop... imho

The guy I bought my '05 GT from put an aftermarket phony scoop on it, which
looks pretty much like the ones they've got on the appearance package (minus
the matching grill piece).  He also put on the phony side ducts - top and
bottom.  Sure, they aren't functional, but look pretty cool to me.  There's
something about looking out the front windshield at a hood scoop while
driving - working or not.  (Yes, the REAL shaker would be nice, but...)

I'm thinking of getting the phony hood pins next - heh.

John B.

P.S.  My '95 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP had phony hood "grilles" as well as
phony duel exhausts - ha!
Tony - 22 Oct 2007 19:59 GMT
>>> hi all-
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> John B.

NOTHING like having the 'scoop' move as you rev the engine... Once you
have the shaker, you simply cannot go back to non-functional plastic...
You just can't..

The current optional scoop.. Does it still look like it is pop-riveted
to the hood?  That look 'worked' for the 65 Shelbys.. but on the current
Mustangs simply looks cheap and as if someone bought something from a JC
Whitney 'fiberglass crap' blow-out sale and riveted it to the hood after
a few beers with the boys..  (My opinion, if yours differs, that is
perfectly OK..)

The current Mustangs would have been better served by a Functional
Shaker (The hood is already stamped for it.. ) or a 69 / 70 Mach I type
scoop with the functional turn signals.  or even the 67/68 hood with the
turn signals embedded near the leading edge of the hood..  The
Shelby-replica scoop just does not look 'right' on the car...

Of course, ymmv...
Frank ess - 20 Oct 2007 00:41 GMT
> hi all-
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> thanks for your help,

Perhaps you'll find something here that will help answer your
question:

http://preview.tinyurl.com/27m8jn

The program seems to add and delete supporting/conflicting options at
appropriate times.

Signature

Frank ess

.... - 20 Oct 2007 01:24 GMT
There was nothing I liked about the GT appearance package.  I hated the
hood scoop. I had to order the car to get one without the hood scoop.  I
also went with the spoiler delete.  I think it makes for a nice clean look.

But, ya pays ya money and ya takes your choice.

Norm

> hi all-
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Lee
Scott - 20 Oct 2007 16:14 GMT
The cover is easily removed, it is only held on by a few nuts. It is purely
cosmetic and removing it and leaving it off would cause no problems.

> hi all-
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Lee
leeb@home.com - 21 Oct 2007 03:15 GMT
> The cover is easily removed, it is only held on by a few nuts. It is purely
> cosmetic and removing it and leaving it off would cause no problems.

thanks very much for that.   exactly what i was looking for-

and to all the others who posted too, thanks.

-Lee
Tony - 22 Oct 2007 14:00 GMT
> The cover is easily removed, it is only held on by a few nuts. It is purely
> cosmetic and removing it and leaving it off would cause no problems.

Which leads me to believe that there may be a nicer and less expensive
option from a third-party vendor...

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.