Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Mustang / October 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Dissing the MavGrabber

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Backyard Mechanic - 23 Oct 2007 23:06 GMT
http://www.amazon.com/gp/blog/post/PLNK2XTEJMSFK0E10

"Car Lust--Ford Maverick Grabber
9:36 AM PDT, October 22, 2007
The Ford Maverick, a heavier and less sporting machine than the Ford
Pinto on which it was based (a difficult concept to wrap one's head
around), was a weak and flaccid family sedan, featuring the all-too-
familiar 1970s bugaboos of a strangled engine, flexible and weak chassis,
and garish styling."

Especially hard to wrap your head around since it was based on the
Falcon..

Heh...  considering I had 'retired' {young married} from street mod
machines for 5 years when the Mav Grabber was popular, { and considering
THE OTHER CHOICES in the Ford lines!!!}, I find anyone denigrating either
the MAV/Falcon or Pinto platform a little foolish!

Ford couldnt really help how they had to build those machines... but the
owner could do a lot to fix 'em.

Chris H prolly thinks the Mustang II is a lost cause.. heh!   I'd give my
left nut for one.  
Break out the cutters and radius those well-wells, then crawl under and
rebuild the chassis .. drop in some tasty late model EFI..  Yum - YUM!

But I'd settle for a Grabber II...

Signature

Yeh, I'm a Krusty old Geezer, putting up with my 'smartass' is the price
you pay..DEAL with it!

NoOption5L@aol.com - 24 Oct 2007 01:17 GMT
If you're taking a poll I wasn't a fan of the Mustang II, but I liked
the Maverick Grabbers.

Mustang II - No
Grabber - Yes

Patrick

> http://www.amazon.com/gp/blog/post/PLNK2XTEJMSFK0E10
>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> Yeh, I'm a Krusty old Geezer, putting up with my 'smartass' is the price
> you pay..DEAL with it!
John B. - 24 Oct 2007 18:11 GMT
> If you're taking a poll I wasn't a fan of the Mustang II, but I liked
> the Maverick Grabbers.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Patrick

Mustang II - No
Grabber - No
Pinto - HELL, no!
Torino - Yes!!!

John B.
elaich - 24 Oct 2007 03:51 GMT
> Ford couldnt really help how they had to build those machines... but
> the owner could do a lot to fix 'em.

My buddy had a Comet with the small block back in the day (same car) and
said that changing spark plugs was an all day job. He is probably
exaggerating.

> Chris H prolly thinks the Mustang II is a lost cause.. heh!   I'd give
> my left nut for one.  
> Break out the cutters and radius those well-wells, then crawl under
> and rebuild the chassis .. drop in some tasty late model EFI..  Yum -
> YUM!

A local wrecking yard had a sweet little '77 Ghia a year ago that had
been dumped in front of the place at night. It was in nice shape, and had
a blown up 302 in it. Looked like almost new dual exhausts. The interior
was nice (if cheap) and the paint was even good. Before I could get back
to get it, some ^%$&* mini-stock racer had bought it, knocked all the
windows out, and put a 2.3 in it. That's what happens to all the Pintos,
Mustangs, and Capris around here. Even the 1980s Fox body Mustangs are
rare. If you see a Pinto (other than on the track) it is just passing
through.

Signature

A: Because it disturbs the logical flow of the message.
Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.