Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Trucks / August 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

2001 F-250 V-10 peformance options?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Dracuss - 21 Aug 2004 00:35 GMT
Guys,
   I have a 2001 F-250 Super-Duty with the V-10.  What would be the biggest
bang for the buck to upgrade my performance?  Was thinking Performance Comp.
chip, K & N Exhaust, and platinum plugs.  Also what is the consensus on
switching to synthetic oil?  And if I did, is there anything special I need
to do to convert, or just drain and flush?

V/R
Al
351CJ - 21 Aug 2004 02:01 GMT
Al

From my experience, the synthetic oil is highly over rated.  I have tried it
on three different engines a Ford 460 & 302, and a Toyota 3 liter.  I track
my mileage on every tank full of fuel, by calculating the miles gone and
gallons of fuel used, not with a trip computer.

I have not been able to see any fuel mileage improvement, engine temperature
drop, or changes in oil pressure.

For the many times increase in cost, I say it is not worth it.  I do use
synthetic in my differentials and manual transmissions, I do not use
synthetic oil in any engines anymore.

I believe the performance chips are a good idea, But question the
prepackaged exhaust systems versus a new custom exhaust system fitted
locally...

> Guys,
>     I have a 2001 F-250 Super-Duty with the V-10.  What would be the biggest
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> V/R
> Al
Jeepers - 21 Aug 2004 03:06 GMT
> I believe the performance chips are a good idea, But question the
> prepackaged exhaust systems versus a new custom exhaust system fitted
> locally...

I had a chip in my guzzler, but I ditched it. I actually preferred the
shifting pattern of stock. I have a lift with 35's without the proper
ring and pinion so the chip wasn't helping, it was a bit harsh. I love
my bigger exhaust tho, sounds great and breathes better. YMMV,
literally. I concur, a custom dual exhaust would be loads better than
the single big tube I have, but "it's all goood".

Signature

Member AAAAAAAA
American Association Against Acronym Abuse And Also Ambiguity.

2lgsgd4lgsbttr - 21 Aug 2004 08:44 GMT
> Al
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> synthetic in my differentials and manual transmissions, I do not use
> synthetic oil in any engines anymore.

I use synthetic exclusively in my Shelby, HOWEVER, that car has a turbo.

Otherwise, with the advancements in technology as applied to the lubrication
industry, any regular oil should do the job with no complaints. I do note
that newly made oil doesn't come out after use looking "dirty" like it did
back in the 80's, but that may just be my own faulty perceptions.

Plasyd
Signature

"I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing, and as
necessary in the political world as storms in the physical. Unsuccessful
rebellions, indeed, generally establish the encroachments on the rights of
the people which have produced them. An observation of this truth should
render honest republican governors so mild in their punishment of rebellions
as not to discourage them too much. It is a medicine necessary for the sound
health of the government."

Thomas Jefferson

Ihatespam - 21 Aug 2004 13:44 GMT
Most chips are a waste of time.  The lean you out as much as possible to try
to make that extra horsepower.

> Al
>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>> V/R
>> Al
Kevin Bottorff - 25 Aug 2004 16:53 GMT
> Most chips are a waste of time.  The lean you out as much as possible
> to try to make that extra horsepower.

 what are you smoking man?????  lean for power???   KB

>> Al
>>
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>>> V/R
>>> Al

Signature

ThunderSnake #9  Warn once, shoot twice
460 in the pkup, 460 on the stand for another pkup
and one in the shed for a fun project to yet be decided on

Chris - 22 Aug 2004 00:00 GMT
what weight oil were you using? i bet it was over oem specs using 5-20 or
5-30 synthetic will improve mileage slightly. heavier weighted oils help
consume more fuel!

Chris
> Al
>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> > V/R
> > Al
351CJ - 22 Aug 2004 19:45 GMT
In the Fords 5-30, sometimes straight 30 weight, in the Toyota, 5-30, the
weight Toyota calls for.

In my 460 I can run any weight oil and it doesn't change the fuel mileage at
all.  It makes a much bigger difference in the newer smaller, lighter,
closer tolerance engines than it does in the older larger, greater tolerance
pushrod v-8's...

> what weight oil were you using? i bet it was over oem specs using 5-20 or
> 5-30 synthetic will improve mileage slightly. heavier weighted oils help
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
> > > V/R
> > > Al
The OTHER Kevin in San Diego - 21 Aug 2004 06:34 GMT
>Guys,
>    I have a 2001 F-250 Super-Duty with the V-10.  What would be the biggest
>bang for the buck to upgrade my performance?  Was thinking Performance Comp.
>chip, K & N Exhaust, and platinum plugs.  Also what is the consensus on
>switching to synthetic oil?  And if I did, is there anything special I need
>to do to convert, or just drain and flush?

Depends on how many bangs you want per buck.  (or more importantly,
how many bucks you've got to provide said bang)

I have an '02 F350 with 35s (soon to be 37s) and 4.30 gears.  I bought
a Superchips tuner and loaded up their ECM code.  BIG difference in
tranny shifting.  Much firmer and just feels better all the time.  I
did tweak some of the shift points to keep the engine in it's torque
band a little better but other that that, didn't mess with it.

Gas mileage went down and gas costs went up.  I've got to run premium
(91 octane MINIMUM) gas now and I'm sure the big tires and my heavy
right foot contributed to the loss of mileage.  I keep a log for the
truck and I went from about 10.7/gal to right around 9.9/gal.  Not
quite a 1MPG loss. Power is definitely up tho and the rev limiter is
either off or way higher than it used to be.  About $400.

Buddy of mine got the Banks Power Pack for his V10 with the OttoMind
"chip".  says he picked up a decent bit of HP and torque and a small
increase in mileage.  Cost installed was around $3,000.

Two other guys I know with V10 powered Super Duties went the forced
induction route.  One with a Vortech centrifugal supercharger and the
other with a Kenne Bell twin screw unit.  Both got serious HP/torque
increases and associated decreases in gas mileage.  Both units
installed with headers, intake etc were well into the 5 figure range
when it was all said and done.

I do run synthetic oil in the truck, but not sure if it's worth it for
economy's sake.  Mileage doesn't seem much different (if at all)
compared to the couple fills of Ford's synthetic blend..  I just sold
a 4Runner with 205k on it that only ran Castrol dino oil and it didn't
burn more than a 1/2 quart between changes.  Frequent changes are
going to be your best bet for longevity.  I run synthetic because I
flog the hell out of this truck with work and it's often hauling heavy
loads and earning it's keep.
Mellowed - 21 Aug 2004 16:40 GMT
I thought that the V-10 already had platinum plugs from the factory.

> Guys,
>     I have a 2001 F-250 Super-Duty with the V-10.  What would be the biggest
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> V/R
> Al
Chris - 22 Aug 2004 00:02 GMT
yep sure does

Chris
Yoeri Gemeen - 29 Aug 2004 14:45 GMT
Maybe a big operation but put a twin turbo in it ^^
Have done it with a 4-cilinder but not on a V10
That should blast you from one point to another.

Joe
---
Alfa Romeo 164 3.0 V6

> Guys,
>     I have a 2001 F-250 Super-Duty with the V-10.  What would be the biggest
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> V/R
> Al
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.