Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ford / Ford Trucks / March 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Opinions on a 97 Explorer

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Pitman - 19 Mar 2005 21:14 GMT
I am looking at buying a 97 Explorer with 128 k. It has a 4.0 motor
and I haven?t ever driven a ford before. I really would like to hear
of any major problems with this vehicle.
Dana - 20 Mar 2005 04:21 GMT
We had one until we rolled it. It rolls at the drop of a hat. It
crumpled the uprights between the windows which meant it was a total
write-off. Firestone tires were very loud and noisy. Not very good on
gas. The aluminum rims got out of balance easily causing vibration.
Other than that nothing serious.

"Pitman" <UseLinkToEmail@AutoForumz.com> wrote in message > I am looking
at buying a 97 Explorer with 128 k. It has a 4.0 motor
> and I haven’t ever driven a ford before. I really would like to hear
> of any major problems with this vehicle.
>
> --
Geoff - 20 Mar 2005 04:46 GMT
> We had one until we rolled it. It rolls at the drop of a hat. It
> crumpled the uprights between the windows which meant it was a total
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>> --
>===
The later models have independent rear suspension....much better, '99 I
think.
If you keep your tires at the right pressure it will not roll any easier
than any other top heavy vehicle. Just remember its not a car. If I were you
I would try to get one with independent rear suspension. The explorer is a
great SUV. But it IS an SUV .
Geoff.
DR RASTIS FAF00FNIK - 20 Mar 2005 05:35 GMT
> > We had one until we rolled it. It rolls at the drop of a hat. It
> > crumpled the uprights between the windows which meant it was a total
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> great SUV. But it IS an SUV .
> Geoff.

If I remember correctly, the 2002 is the first year of independant
suspension in the rear. It makes a MAJOR differance.
Simon1952@canada.com - 20 Mar 2005 19:12 GMT
> > We had one until we rolled it. It rolls at the drop of a hat. It
> > crumpled the uprights between the windows which meant it was a total
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> great SUV. But it IS an SUV .
> Geoff.

That is a critical difference that a lot of people lose sight of.

The Explorer is an SUV, or even if you want, a truck.  It is NOT a
Ferrari.  To me, it never did look like a Ferrari. It will not handle
like a Ferrari, and if you try to make it, it may roll or respond in
some other dangerous fashion.

As long as you keep tires inflated properly - per Firestone specs - it
will be a very good vehicle.  (Less are makes for a more car-like ride,
but makes it more inclined to roll over - if you try some foolish
Ferrari-Type maneuver on the road.)

Dana may not have liked the vehicle, but many, many people own them and
they are not dying like flies every minute of every day.  For what it is
supposed to be, it is a very good vehicle.  (Unfortunately, it is
commercially very successful, which makes it a target to some...)

H.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.